<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cell-phone using time traveler spotted in 1928 Charlie Chaplin&#160;movie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: quitterjunior</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923392</link>
		<dc:creator>quitterjunior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923392</guid>
		<description>I have always wondered if there was some layman&#039;s proof (or disproof) of earth-human time travel that might actually hold water - some kinda techno-archeology.  Forget Stark Trek communicators - many of OUR technologies leave a footprint.  We can date dinosaur bones.  We probably won&#039;t ever be able to &#039;date&#039; radio communications, for instance, but if we could - the existence of a humanly recognizable radio &#039;message&#039; that predated radio would be harder to scoff at.  

Non-want-to-belivers: let&#039;s try to think in those terms - if there was a way to &#039;date&#039; earlier techs, we could more convincingly disprove OUR potential for backwards time travel, without having to disprove time travel itself.  Just disprove that HUMANS visited us from the future, and I think you will have effectively won this argument (speculating about aliens is like speculating about God).  New tech doesn&#039;t starve the herd - just because RADAR is NEWER than SONAR, it doesn&#039;t mean that we have stopped using SONAR altogether.  It should stand to reason that future humans would employ the same economies. That is to say:  there is no reason to believe that our alleged future visitor - now matter how sophisticated they may be - should be &#039;above&#039; employing technology CUMULATIVELY. 

The benchmark-tech in question doesn&#039;t need to be as primordial as radio for this to work either - nukes, for example,  should leave a signature - on rocks, dinosaur bones, what have you.  If we could establish a disparity (either by discovering a caveman that -  according to radioactive dating - is only 1 year old, or by discovering a radius of site radioactivity, outside of which, dinosaur bones abruptly spike in age) we might be on to something.  

These are just the first two examples that popped into my head.  But very many of our technologies impact the environment in subtle (radio waves) and catastrophic (nuke) ways.  The future is in many ways inconceivable, but come on, even Ripley used radio waves.  It is not unthinkable that someone could affirmatively disprove the capacity for HUMANS from our instance of the universe to travel in time and have an effect on the past of humans from our instance of the universe  (whether by impossibility or the future extinction of humans).  But until you have personally accomplished this laudable task - STOP TROLLING.  There is a difference between skepticism and pessimism.   This is hella fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always wondered if there was some layman&#8217;s proof (or disproof) of earth-human time travel that might actually hold water &#8211; some kinda techno-archeology.  Forget Stark Trek communicators &#8211; many of OUR technologies leave a footprint.  We can date dinosaur bones.  We probably won&#8217;t ever be able to &#8216;date&#8217; radio communications, for instance, but if we could &#8211; the existence of a humanly recognizable radio &#8216;message&#8217; that predated radio would be harder to scoff at.  </p>
<p>Non-want-to-belivers: let&#8217;s try to think in those terms &#8211; if there was a way to &#8216;date&#8217; earlier techs, we could more convincingly disprove OUR potential for backwards time travel, without having to disprove time travel itself.  Just disprove that HUMANS visited us from the future, and I think you will have effectively won this argument (speculating about aliens is like speculating about God).  New tech doesn&#8217;t starve the herd &#8211; just because RADAR is NEWER than SONAR, it doesn&#8217;t mean that we have stopped using SONAR altogether.  It should stand to reason that future humans would employ the same economies. That is to say:  there is no reason to believe that our alleged future visitor &#8211; now matter how sophisticated they may be &#8211; should be &#8216;above&#8217; employing technology CUMULATIVELY. </p>
<p>The benchmark-tech in question doesn&#8217;t need to be as primordial as radio for this to work either &#8211; nukes, for example,  should leave a signature &#8211; on rocks, dinosaur bones, what have you.  If we could establish a disparity (either by discovering a caveman that &#8211;  according to radioactive dating &#8211; is only 1 year old, or by discovering a radius of site radioactivity, outside of which, dinosaur bones abruptly spike in age) we might be on to something.  </p>
<p>These are just the first two examples that popped into my head.  But very many of our technologies impact the environment in subtle (radio waves) and catastrophic (nuke) ways.  The future is in many ways inconceivable, but come on, even Ripley used radio waves.  It is not unthinkable that someone could affirmatively disprove the capacity for HUMANS from our instance of the universe to travel in time and have an effect on the past of humans from our instance of the universe  (whether by impossibility or the future extinction of humans).  But until you have personally accomplished this laudable task &#8211; STOP TROLLING.  There is a difference between skepticism and pessimism.   This is hella fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: farmfoodie</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923649</link>
		<dc:creator>farmfoodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923649</guid>
		<description>Why a guy in drag?  I mean, that&#039;s a pretty impressive era-appropriate outfit, whether it&#039;s a man or a woman.  How&#039;d the time traveler manage that, huh?  Are there time traveler safe houses for arrival?  Fully stocked with hats, coats, shoes, and clothing for all sizes?  If so, how likely is it that said safe house is going to have women&#039;s shoes that just happen to fit man feet?  I mean, I&#039;ll buy the whole mobile phone and stealth relay towers and all that.  But a group with sufficient organization/motivation to kit a guy out in 1920s drag?  Now that&#039;s going a bit far, imho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why a guy in drag?  I mean, that&#8217;s a pretty impressive era-appropriate outfit, whether it&#8217;s a man or a woman.  How&#8217;d the time traveler manage that, huh?  Are there time traveler safe houses for arrival?  Fully stocked with hats, coats, shoes, and clothing for all sizes?  If so, how likely is it that said safe house is going to have women&#8217;s shoes that just happen to fit man feet?  I mean, I&#8217;ll buy the whole mobile phone and stealth relay towers and all that.  But a group with sufficient organization/motivation to kit a guy out in 1920s drag?  Now that&#8217;s going a bit far, imho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sis B</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923652</link>
		<dc:creator>Sis B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923652</guid>
		<description>Best. Update. Ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best. Update. Ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923412</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923412</guid>
		<description>BRILLIANT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRILLIANT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: littlebrother</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923157</link>
		<dc:creator>littlebrother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923157</guid>
		<description>Its a small hand held ear trumpet.

&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.phisick.com/images/ent/silver-ear-trumpet-small-102.jpg&quot;&gt;
http://www.phisick.com/images/ent/silver-ear-trumpet-small-102.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a small hand held ear trumpet.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.phisick.com/images/ent/silver-ear-trumpet-small-102.jpg"/><br />
<a href="http://www.phisick.com/images/ent/silver-ear-trumpet-small-102.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.phisick.com/images/ent/silver-ear-trumpet-small-102.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redesigned</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923416</link>
		<dc:creator>redesigned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923416</guid>
		<description>If they were really from the future they&#039;d be in color! ;-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they were really from the future they&#8217;d be in color! ;-P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-931864</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-931864</guid>
		<description>Its my father. He is a big Charlie Chaplin fan and has been experimenting in time travel.  I didn&#039;t believe him at first.  He told me he was going to do it and showed me the movie without the woman years ago.  He told me he would appear in the scene once he gets his machine working.  

Kudos on finding it.  He has been trying to keep it secret.  He called from the past on Feb 17, 2008.  Apparently the time machine somehow provided a path for the mobile phone signals.  Amazing.  Just trying to figure out what to do with the capability.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its my father. He is a big Charlie Chaplin fan and has been experimenting in time travel.  I didn&#8217;t believe him at first.  He told me he was going to do it and showed me the movie without the woman years ago.  He told me he would appear in the scene once he gets his machine working.  </p>
<p>Kudos on finding it.  He has been trying to keep it secret.  He called from the past on Feb 17, 2008.  Apparently the time machine somehow provided a path for the mobile phone signals.  Amazing.  Just trying to figure out what to do with the capability.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrJM</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923162</link>
		<dc:creator>MrJM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923162</guid>
		<description>ZOMG!!1!

Everyone know that no one held their hand to the side of her head until the advent of cellular telephony!  It&#039;s a proven fact!!1!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ZOMG!!1!</p>
<p>Everyone know that no one held their hand to the side of her head until the advent of cellular telephony!  It&#8217;s a proven fact!!1!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-926746</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-926746</guid>
		<description>Blame it on Telsa for the transmitting towers, I guess... :) I cannot think of other person designing things like that. On other thoughts, it might be she was adressing somebody up ahead from her and had to speak out aloud, and because she is half deaf she had the custom to cover. Anyway, I find the idea of a cellphone exciting. Have to include this idea in the next movie of X-files... :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blame it on Telsa for the transmitting towers, I guess&#8230; :) I cannot think of other person designing things like that. On other thoughts, it might be she was adressing somebody up ahead from her and had to speak out aloud, and because she is half deaf she had the custom to cover. Anyway, I find the idea of a cellphone exciting. Have to include this idea in the next movie of X-files&#8230; :))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meatball Brown</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923424</link>
		<dc:creator>Meatball Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923424</guid>
		<description>Do you have any idea how expensive roaming rates are back to the 1920s? The signals for voice calls on the chrono-network are so spotty when you go back that far, and you can&#039;t go back any further than 1954 if you want to activate the 25G chrono-data network. THAT&#039;S how you know it&#039;s a fake. She&#039;s not furiously pounding her phone, yelling, &quot;can you hear me now?!&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have any idea how expensive roaming rates are back to the 1920s? The signals for voice calls on the chrono-network are so spotty when you go back that far, and you can&#8217;t go back any further than 1954 if you want to activate the 25G chrono-data network. THAT&#8217;S how you know it&#8217;s a fake. She&#8217;s not furiously pounding her phone, yelling, &#8220;can you hear me now?!&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaylonWillie</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923428</link>
		<dc:creator>WaylonWillie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923428</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad I slogged through to Actionverb&#039;s comment. We can all stop now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad I slogged through to Actionverb&#8217;s comment. We can all stop now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheRealist</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-928804</link>
		<dc:creator>TheRealist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-928804</guid>
		<description>Mark, 

VERY interesting video. Besides most of the &#039;ridiculous&#039; answers of &quot;it&#039;s an iPhone, or etc..&quot;, I think there is a possibility that the device he/she is holding could possibly be a primitive (to our standards) hearing aid. It does appear that he/she is holding some sort of device.

I think there may also be some merit to an above comment concerning the adjustment of an earing. 

Additionally, added as a joke comment, but maybe getting someone who can actually read lips may at least assist in what this person might be saying. If we knew what he/she was saying, perhaps that may clarify things a bit. Speculation says perhaps she is speaking to the person in front of her, commenting on the fake zebra with a saddle, etc. There&#039;s a wide array of possible variables that we do not know. 

Not sure of the crossdresser portion though, as unfortunately it seems that she might be wearing what was in-style at the time, however masculine it may appear. Style was horrible in those times anyhow!

Have you tried taking some frames of this video and perhaps doing some reverse coloring or enhancement in Photoshop?

Have you perhaps tried to contact a Chaplin expert? (Not sure if those exist anymore.) Perhaps maybe someone who might be a historian of this film company, or of Chaplin&#039;s works could also be an additional option. Oddly enough since this is so strange, you might also try to directly contact the film company, or whatever company may have bought out the filming company that Chaplin worked for. Chaplin was a bit of a prankster at times, so it really would not surprise me if we found out that there was way more to this story than we know!

Obviously, as you probably can tell, I do not assume that this is a time traveler. However, it does somewhat appear so if you take into account her body language compared to what you see daily in any decent sized city. I find this sort of oddity absolutely fascinating, and definitely presents more of a curiosity than the other &#039;time traveler&#039; videos posted on BB.

Additionally, I think it would be very cool to discuss this with you in further detail. I&#039;d also like to know your additional thoughts on this, or if you have uncovered any more detail about this video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, </p>
<p>VERY interesting video. Besides most of the &#8216;ridiculous&#8217; answers of &#8220;it&#8217;s an iPhone, or etc..&#8221;, I think there is a possibility that the device he/she is holding could possibly be a primitive (to our standards) hearing aid. It does appear that he/she is holding some sort of device.</p>
<p>I think there may also be some merit to an above comment concerning the adjustment of an earing. </p>
<p>Additionally, added as a joke comment, but maybe getting someone who can actually read lips may at least assist in what this person might be saying. If we knew what he/she was saying, perhaps that may clarify things a bit. Speculation says perhaps she is speaking to the person in front of her, commenting on the fake zebra with a saddle, etc. There&#8217;s a wide array of possible variables that we do not know. </p>
<p>Not sure of the crossdresser portion though, as unfortunately it seems that she might be wearing what was in-style at the time, however masculine it may appear. Style was horrible in those times anyhow!</p>
<p>Have you tried taking some frames of this video and perhaps doing some reverse coloring or enhancement in Photoshop?</p>
<p>Have you perhaps tried to contact a Chaplin expert? (Not sure if those exist anymore.) Perhaps maybe someone who might be a historian of this film company, or of Chaplin&#8217;s works could also be an additional option. Oddly enough since this is so strange, you might also try to directly contact the film company, or whatever company may have bought out the filming company that Chaplin worked for. Chaplin was a bit of a prankster at times, so it really would not surprise me if we found out that there was way more to this story than we know!</p>
<p>Obviously, as you probably can tell, I do not assume that this is a time traveler. However, it does somewhat appear so if you take into account her body language compared to what you see daily in any decent sized city. I find this sort of oddity absolutely fascinating, and definitely presents more of a curiosity than the other &#8216;time traveler&#8217; videos posted on BB.</p>
<p>Additionally, I think it would be very cool to discuss this with you in further detail. I&#8217;d also like to know your additional thoughts on this, or if you have uncovered any more detail about this video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923173</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923173</guid>
		<description>Probably, I mean realistically, she&#039;s probably trying to hide her face. Not everyone want&#039;s to be filmed.

Or maybe... she&#039;s using her phone. To talk to another time traveller. On a network they specially brought with them for such instances. Or maybe it connects via a beacon on their ship. But then that would be spotted easily and is absurd. Instead, it work by magic.

Anyway, good to see some Nordies on Boingboing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably, I mean realistically, she&#8217;s probably trying to hide her face. Not everyone want&#8217;s to be filmed.</p>
<p>Or maybe&#8230; she&#8217;s using her phone. To talk to another time traveller. On a network they specially brought with them for such instances. Or maybe it connects via a beacon on their ship. But then that would be spotted easily and is absurd. Instead, it work by magic.</p>
<p>Anyway, good to see some Nordies on Boingboing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nck wntrhltr</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923429</link>
		<dc:creator>nck wntrhltr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923429</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s giving dictation to her miniature Edison cylinder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s giving dictation to her miniature Edison cylinder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coal</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923430</link>
		<dc:creator>Coal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923430</guid>
		<description>Clearly the only logical conclusion we can draw is that at some point in the future, there&#039;s a kind of Y2K type disaster waiting to happen and the only way they can avert it is to use a specific kind of technology only used in the original 1924 Siemens carbon amplifier. So the time traveller went back to 1928 (a few years after release so she could be sure there&#039;d be sufficient availability), bought a carbon amplifier, and wanted to test it to make sure it was working before bringing it back to the future. And that&#039;s when she was caught on film! 

In your face, time traveller!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly the only logical conclusion we can draw is that at some point in the future, there&#8217;s a kind of Y2K type disaster waiting to happen and the only way they can avert it is to use a specific kind of technology only used in the original 1924 Siemens carbon amplifier. So the time traveller went back to 1928 (a few years after release so she could be sure there&#8217;d be sufficient availability), bought a carbon amplifier, and wanted to test it to make sure it was working before bringing it back to the future. And that&#8217;s when she was caught on film! </p>
<p>In your face, time traveller!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923431</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923431</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a time traveller, that was my regular time. I just havent been able to die yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a time traveller, that was my regular time. I just havent been able to die yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: delzey</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923688</link>
		<dc:creator>delzey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923688</guid>
		<description>how the hell did this non-story get so much traction?  for days now people have been forwarding me links to the video going &quot;have you seen this?&quot; 

can i blame the political season?  people are just so inundated with stupidity that they are grasping at the most far-fetched diversion they can find to help them cope?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how the hell did this non-story get so much traction?  for days now people have been forwarding me links to the video going &#8220;have you seen this?&#8221; </p>
<p>can i blame the political season?  people are just so inundated with stupidity that they are grasping at the most far-fetched diversion they can find to help them cope?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AvengingRocker</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923944</link>
		<dc:creator>AvengingRocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923944</guid>
		<description>Could be this
http://hearing.siemens.com/ca/10-about-us/01-our-history/milestones.jsp?year=1924</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could be this<br />
<a href="http://hearing.siemens.com/ca/10-about-us/01-our-history/milestones.jsp?year=1924" rel="nofollow">http://hearing.siemens.com/ca/10-about-us/01-our-history/milestones.jsp?year=1924</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hughelectronic</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923179</link>
		<dc:creator>hughelectronic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923179</guid>
		<description>Finally! We finally have evidence that time travel is possible! Of course, it comes in the form of blurry footage in the DVD extras of an obscure comedy, and there are hundreds of alternative explanations that are more likely than time travel. But still, seeing is believing â€” and I want to believe!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally! We finally have evidence that time travel is possible! Of course, it comes in the form of blurry footage in the DVD extras of an obscure comedy, and there are hundreds of alternative explanations that are more likely than time travel. But still, seeing is believing â€” and I want to believe!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BDiamond</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923435</link>
		<dc:creator>BDiamond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923435</guid>
		<description>Enhance 224 to 176. Enhance, stop. Move in, stop. Pull out, track right, stop. Center in, pull back. Stop. Track 45 right. Stop. Center and stop. Enhance 34 to 36. Pan right and pull back. Stop. Enhance 34 to 46. Pull back. Wait a minute, go right, stop. Enhance 57 to 19. Track 45 left. Stop. Enhance 15 to 23. Give me a hard copy right there.

Migawd, it&#039;s a pack of Five Gum! What an amazing use of time travel technology for ingenious product placement!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enhance 224 to 176. Enhance, stop. Move in, stop. Pull out, track right, stop. Center in, pull back. Stop. Track 45 right. Stop. Center and stop. Enhance 34 to 36. Pan right and pull back. Stop. Enhance 34 to 46. Pull back. Wait a minute, go right, stop. Enhance 57 to 19. Track 45 left. Stop. Enhance 15 to 23. Give me a hard copy right there.</p>
<p>Migawd, it&#8217;s a pack of Five Gum! What an amazing use of time travel technology for ingenious product placement!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-924461</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-924461</guid>
		<description>its 1928 - she&#039;s obviously calling her broker ordering a sell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its 1928 &#8211; she&#8217;s obviously calling her broker ordering a sell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Frauenfelder</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923182</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Frauenfelder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923182</guid>
		<description>MrJM - We all know it isn&#039;t a phone. But we are trying to figure out why she is holding her hand to her ear. You can either speculate on what it might be, refrain from commenting, or post something that&#039;s amusing. Your post wasn&#039;t any of these. It was useless post. Try harder next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MrJM &#8211; We all know it isn&#8217;t a phone. But we are trying to figure out why she is holding her hand to her ear. You can either speculate on what it might be, refrain from commenting, or post something that&#8217;s amusing. Your post wasn&#8217;t any of these. It was useless post. Try harder next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drhaggis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923183</link>
		<dc:creator>Drhaggis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923183</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been a dream of mine to go back in time and set up a wifi network for other time travelers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a dream of mine to go back in time and set up a wifi network for other time travelers. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obeyken</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923184</link>
		<dc:creator>obeyken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923184</guid>
		<description>I imagine some cell phone towers would have to get sent back in time as well, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine some cell phone towers would have to get sent back in time as well, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923186</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923186</guid>
		<description>yes. they were disguised as trees</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes. they were disguised as trees</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923187</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923187</guid>
		<description>So did anybody ask the guy if he thought it was on a CDMA tower or a GSM?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So did anybody ask the guy if he thought it was on a CDMA tower or a GSM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923444</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923444</guid>
		<description>... do you think the future inherits all the knowledge from the past? Do you think Boigboing will be archived FOR EVER?

It&#039;s logic the creature uses a Quantum Phone: no need for mobile antennas!

(And btw: the being is an androgyne Spaghettimonster)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; do you think the future inherits all the knowledge from the past? Do you think Boigboing will be archived FOR EVER?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s logic the creature uses a Quantum Phone: no need for mobile antennas!</p>
<p>(And btw: the being is an androgyne Spaghettimonster)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923445</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923445</guid>
		<description>We should definitely, collectively sue Apple for the iPhone 5 causing Arthritis!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should definitely, collectively sue Apple for the iPhone 5 causing Arthritis!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freshacconci</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923701</link>
		<dc:creator>freshacconci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923701</guid>
		<description>Because it&#039;s a bit of fun? It&#039;s also a bit of a mystery. Not that &quot;is it a cellphone?&quot; is much of a mystery but rather that it looks like she could be talking on a cellphone, which is impossible, so what is it.

That&#039;s all. Maybe you should perhaps &lt;i&gt;lighten up&lt;/i&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it&#8217;s a bit of fun? It&#8217;s also a bit of a mystery. Not that &#8220;is it a cellphone?&#8221; is much of a mystery but rather that it looks like she could be talking on a cellphone, which is impossible, so what is it.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all. Maybe you should perhaps <i>lighten up</i>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hagrid</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/10/28/cell-phone-using-tim.html#comment-923446</link>
		<dc:creator>Hagrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-923446</guid>
		<description>I really wish BB had a &quot;like&quot; function, similar to facebook. 
That way, I wouldn&#039;t have to log in and type &quot;Blade Runner reference FTW!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wish BB had a &#8220;like&#8221; function, similar to facebook.<br />
That way, I wouldn&#8217;t have to log in and type &#8220;Blade Runner reference FTW!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
