Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Linotype: The Film

Rob Beschizza at 7:51 am Mon, Nov 8, 2010

— FEATURED —

Science

Making sense of the confusing Supreme Court DNA patent ruling

Book Review

The 'Geisters: spooky, scary novel

Science

Ants and Stars: Bruce Sterling and Jasmina Tesanovic visit the Sardinia Radio Telescope in Italy

Feature

The Snowden Principle

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle
The characteristics of a production process often become desirable when the process becomes obsolete; "flaws" become symbolic of the good taste and expense that old ways acquire when freed from commercial significance. But it's not just a cult of the hand-made. Even the heaviest and most unwieldy machinery can attain the same same cachet. Whatever the word for this technological nostalgia is, Linotype is surely the most extreme example. [Linotype: The Film] (Previously)

⟿ Follow Rob Beschizza on Twitter.

MORE:  Technology

More at Boing Boing

Ants and Stars: Bruce Sterling and Jasmina Tesanovic visit the Sardinia Radio Telescope in Italy

The Snowden Principle

  • daddy_fizz

    My dad used to work at a newspaper years ago, and when it closed down he got to take a very large one of these home, where he set it up in our garage. Took up most of the room and he still used it for years to do print jobs for local companies. I remember more than once being told to stay away from the molten lead on the side of it…

  • Anonymous

    I fell in love with the Linotype. I never quite mastered setting “straight matter” quickly, but I did set type for ads. The machine was a marvel and I miss its clanks and clatters. I even forgave it for the “squirt” that sent molten lead into my shoe. The newspaper business was never the same after the Linotypes were sent to the scrap heat.

  • Thorzdad

    Back in college (around 1978) my design class took a trip to Chicago. One of our stops was RyderType. They had a large room full of Linotype machines going almost 24/7. The noise in that room was crazy but oh so cool. Sort of a metallic symphony of intricate, well-oiled machines happily going about their business. I still cherish the large slug of headline type an operator ran off for me that says “Design”.

  • Anonymous

    I have to say that’s very interesting espically since I love older things.I liked seeing my brother Bud in the video too.Shirley (the old sister)

  • Anonymous

    The Baltimore Museum of Industry also has a typewriter with a linotype keyboard that was for the use of printers, since for the most party they didn’t know from qwerty. Perhaps for filling out their timecards. And I have to point out that in many shops the practice was to add thin space to the spacebar after the period so that even in variable fonts with justified type, there was extra space between sentances. Not quite a double space, but wider nonetheless.

  • pjcamp

    My Dad would have stayed in the Navy if he hadn’t gotten the apprenticeship he wanted as a Linotype operator.

    He got squirted by molten lead once and was laid up for a week with heavy metal poisoning. Then he decided proofreading was a better career.

    He died earlier this year, 83 and married for 50 years.

    I miss my dad.

  • Anonymous

    And just a note to point out that just like the qwerty keyboard, the linotype keyboard is designed around the mechanism, not for easy typing. Qwerty was designed so that keys that were typed in frequent succession weren’t next to each other, and the linotype was designed so that the most frequently used characters were dropped back into the magazine first, thus the left most keys are the lower-case etaon shrdlu.

  • inyourdeathbed

    talk about precission :), this is beautiful.

  • Anonymous

    I had a chance to see one operating up close and personal when I was maybe 10 or 12, and it made a HUGE impression. A ginormous machine, with all sorts of exposed, moving parts whose principles of operation are pretty easily comprehended. It was AWSOME.

  • tsdguy

    I feel privileged as I was lucky enough to play with one in my junior high school print shop. It had a very satisfying operation from what I can remember – very kerchunky and lots of noise.

    We learned composition, type setting and we had intaglio, offset, and other types of printers. Guess that’s nostalgia these days but I think many disciplines could be enhanced by some time with the devices and techniques that were the historical backbone of modern ones.

  • nixiebunny

    This machine is one of the most complex, Rube Goldberg-like machines ever to achieve production status. Other than semiconductor fabs, of course.

  • Anonymous

    I submit the term “anachrophilia” or maybe “techno-anachrophilia” for technological nostalgia.

  • taj1f

    “It doesn’t.” Viva analog!

  • freshacconci

    I’ve had the pleasure to play with one of these in art school. Fifteen years later I wish I’d spent more time with it and done something interesting with it. But on a purely experiential level, it was very cool.

  • Church

    The Baltimore Museum of Industry has one of these. If you hit them on the right day, you can get your name cast in lead.

  • frankieboy

    I used to have one of these. My friend was closing his shop, maybe 20 years ago, and I had the mad idea to use it for a particular application. My friends said, “what the hell are you doing buying this giant contraption, it’s obsolete”. I’m sorry to say they were right.
    It sure was it fun while I had it. But you’re basically sitting over a pot of molten lead the whole time you’re using it. Can’t be good for you; printing is full of stuff not good for you.
    Talk about ‘moving parts’, this machine is full of them. Brilliantly cast pieces of iron, keyed brass molds for every character, ingenious devices to create variable spaces between words. But I always felt I could fix whatever might go wrong. Very satisfying when working properly. Quite unlike the thing I’m using now. The sound was like some mad modern music. I could have kept it, but it takes up a lot of room. I’m sorry to say I wound up junking it, and selling the lead and brass for scrap.

  • phooky

    There’s a fantastic film from 1960 on archive.org describing how every cog, cam, and rail of a linotype machine operates.

    http://www.archive.org/details/Typesett1960
    http://www.archive.org/details/Typesett1960_2

    • frankieboy

      phooky that is awesome. Thanks for the post.

  • Anonymous

    The Monotype machine, however, was superior for high-quality typesetting due to its ability to set kerned pairs and scientific notation, and the ability to correct one letter instead of an entire line.

    See:
    http://typophile.com/node/62329

    However, I have a fondness for a particular Linotype Janson that was used for many, many trade paperbacks for many years which featured a strange bump in “T”, and which was never digitized in that way.

  • sickkid1972

    I used to work in small museum dedicated to printing and got to use one of these on a semi-regular basis for several years. It’s deeply satisfying to see the cast slugs gradually forming a page of type as the whole thing rattles and shakes and gives the impression it may well explode any second… probably my best work-related memories to date… 8-)

  • victorvodka

    Linotype is to page layout what the Mellotron is to music.

  • Vanwall

    ETAOIN SHRDLU

    • technogeek

      Vanwall: Absolutely. Both the keyboard, and the short story.

      Hot lead is dead, alas… except for a few folks who have the dedication to historical technology to keep it alive. I’m not surprised at all that the latter still exist — I know folks who are keeping a hand-set print shop in operation just because It’s The Right Thing To Do, and really it’s no different than the folks who lovingly preserve classic cars or old woodworking tools.

      Or old musical instruments, for that matter.

      And yes, printing of the time was “full of things that can hurt you”, as were (and are) most industrial processes. Like fire, you learn to treat it with respect, and you _continue_ to treat it with respect, and it will serve you well; get careless and you’re likely to get hurt.

      As far as the lead goes… Hm. Judging from the folks I have known from that generation, painters may have been getting a heavier dose of lead than printers.

  • Vanwall

    Actually, 1952′s “Park Row”, Sam Fuller’s low, low budget, two-fisted tribute to the early typeset days of NYC papers, is a great mechanical fest – with an early version of a Linotype apperaing to upset the apple cart – and a great movie. Wait’ll you see typesetter savant – who can’t read!