<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lieberman: New York Times may be investigated for&#160;espionage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: IronEdithKidd</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960001</link>
		<dc:creator>IronEdithKidd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960001</guid>
		<description>Senator Lieberman, if you do not understand the document you swore an oath to protect, then you have no business being a Senator.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Lieberman, if you do not understand the document you swore an oath to protect, then you have no business being a Senator.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Frauenfelder</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960004</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Frauenfelder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960004</guid>
		<description>&quot;The only thing we learn from history is that we don&#039;t learn from history.&quot;

And Joe Lieberman is a sleazy embarrassment to every DNA-based entity on the planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The only thing we learn from history is that we don&#8217;t learn from history.&#8221;</p>
<p>And Joe Lieberman is a sleazy embarrassment to every DNA-based entity on the planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ericmartinex1</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960005</link>
		<dc:creator>ericmartinex1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960005</guid>
		<description>Is Joe Lieberman the new Joe Mccartney?  

Anyways, I just want to congratulate Julian for his first soon to be killed person due to the leaks:

&quot;Liaoning Party Secretary Li Keqiang, identified as a potential â€œfifth generationâ€ leader and possible successor to President Hu Jintao, joined the Ambassador for dinner at his residence on March 12...Describing some of the challenges he faces as Party Secretary, Li related that despite brisk economic growth of SIPDIS 12.8 percent in 2006, Liaoningâ€™s income gaps remain severe...[These] GDP figures are â€œman-madeâ€ and therefore unreliable, Li said.&quot;

http://46.59.1.2/cable/2007/03/07BEIJING1760.html

Recursive conspiracy: What has Wikileaks redacted?
http://www.privetbank.com.ua/cablegate/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Joe Lieberman the new Joe Mccartney?  </p>
<p>Anyways, I just want to congratulate Julian for his first soon to be killed person due to the leaks:</p>
<p>&#8220;Liaoning Party Secretary Li Keqiang, identified as a potential â€œfifth generationâ€ leader and possible successor to President Hu Jintao, joined the Ambassador for dinner at his residence on March 12&#8230;Describing some of the challenges he faces as Party Secretary, Li related that despite brisk economic growth of SIPDIS 12.8 percent in 2006, Liaoningâ€™s income gaps remain severe&#8230;[These] GDP figures are â€œman-madeâ€ and therefore unreliable, Li said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://46.59.1.2/cable/2007/03/07BEIJING1760.html" rel="nofollow">http://46.59.1.2/cable/2007/03/07BEIJING1760.html</a></p>
<p>Recursive conspiracy: What has Wikileaks redacted?<br />
<a href="http://www.privetbank.com.ua/cablegate/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.privetbank.com.ua/cablegate/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hassenpfeffer</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960264</link>
		<dc:creator>hassenpfeffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960264</guid>
		<description>Sith Lord Lieberman in his private Senate office: &quot;Master Assange! You survived.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sith Lord Lieberman in his private Senate office: &#8220;Master Assange! You survived.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960520</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960520</guid>
		<description>Is it just me, or does this guy both look AND act like Senator Palpatine?  amirite?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me, or does this guy both look AND act like Senator Palpatine?  amirite?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Beschizza</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960011</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Beschizza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960011</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the only decent fresh photo of him on the wire! He must look like that quite regularly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the only decent fresh photo of him on the wire! He must look like that quite regularly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millionpoems</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960038</link>
		<dc:creator>millionpoems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960038</guid>
		<description>Man, the Times just cannot cut a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, the Times just cannot cut a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allfornot</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960809</link>
		<dc:creator>allfornot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960809</guid>
		<description>Ay, fight and you may die, run and you&#039;ll live. At least a while. And dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they&#039;ll never take our freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ay, fight and you may die, run and you&#8217;ll live. At least a while. And dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they&#8217;ll never take our freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960043</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960043</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And Joe Lieberman is a sleazy embarrassment to every DNA-based entity on the planet.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Watch your tongue; maybe the sleazy embarrassment will turn his attention towards you &quot;radicals&quot; at boingboing?

[&lt;i&gt;I&#039;m only half-kidding - and I do think boingboing would kick his ass in federal court&lt;/i&gt;]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And Joe Lieberman is a sleazy embarrassment to every DNA-based entity on the planet.</p></blockquote>
<p>Watch your tongue; maybe the sleazy embarrassment will turn his attention towards you &#8220;radicals&#8221; at boingboing?</p>
<p>[<i>I'm only half-kidding - and I do think boingboing would kick his ass in federal court</i>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960044</link>
		<dc:creator>Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960044</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I like how you guys chose the photo in which he looks most like Senator Palpatine&lt;/em&gt;

Do you have a recent one where he doesn&#039;t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I like how you guys chose the photo in which he looks most like Senator Palpatine</em></p>
<p>Do you have a recent one where he doesn&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evilpyrate</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960045</link>
		<dc:creator>evilpyrate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960045</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still not entirely sure how I feel about the recent leaks.

But this?  It has bad idea written all over it.

Then again, the Department of Homeland Security has enlisted WalMart in the &quot;See Something, Say Something&quot; campaign...

The Orwellian state is developing quite well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still not entirely sure how I feel about the recent leaks.</p>
<p>But this?  It has bad idea written all over it.</p>
<p>Then again, the Department of Homeland Security has enlisted WalMart in the &#8220;See Something, Say Something&#8221; campaign&#8230;</p>
<p>The Orwellian state is developing quite well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveNZ</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960557</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveNZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960557</guid>
		<description>During the George W. years Joe Lieberman was almost my sole consolation -- &quot;Well, at least that creepy little turd Lieberman isn&#039;t Vice President&quot;, I&#039;d say to myself. Yes, no doubt Cheney was actually worse than Lieberman would have been in the same circumstances but I&#039;m sure there would have been plenty of Joe moments had Al Gore done more than merely win the popular vote. 

My other consolation was that Tipper Gore wasn&#039;t First Lady in Charge of Censorship and Repression. But other than those two things 2000-2008 was an unmitigated disaster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the George W. years Joe Lieberman was almost my sole consolation &#8212; &#8220;Well, at least that creepy little turd Lieberman isn&#8217;t Vice President&#8221;, I&#8217;d say to myself. Yes, no doubt Cheney was actually worse than Lieberman would have been in the same circumstances but I&#8217;m sure there would have been plenty of Joe moments had Al Gore done more than merely win the popular vote. </p>
<p>My other consolation was that Tipper Gore wasn&#8217;t First Lady in Charge of Censorship and Repression. But other than those two things 2000-2008 was an unmitigated disaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BookGuy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960049</link>
		<dc:creator>BookGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960049</guid>
		<description>The only thing that concerns me here, versus The Pentagon Papers, is that they didn&#039;t have the Patriot Act to contend with back then.  I fear that they&#039;ll find some un-Constitutional nonsense there to actually back this up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing that concerns me here, versus The Pentagon Papers, is that they didn&#8217;t have the Patriot Act to contend with back then.  I fear that they&#8217;ll find some un-Constitutional nonsense there to actually back this up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960057</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960057</guid>
		<description>Liebrman said he wants to change Assange with treason.

He&#039;s not a US citizen! How can you charge him with treason?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liebrman said he wants to change Assange with treason.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s not a US citizen! How can you charge him with treason?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irene Delse</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960063</link>
		<dc:creator>Irene Delse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960063</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, a State Dept press release blithely announces: &quot;U.S. to Host World Press Freedom Day in 2011&quot;:

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2010/12/152465.htm


Priceless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, a State Dept press release blithely announces: &#8220;U.S. to Host World Press Freedom Day in 2011&#8243;:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2010/12/152465.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2010/12/152465.htm</a></p>
<p>Priceless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrs</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960576</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960576</guid>
		<description>It looks so physically painful for him to attempt to make expressions!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks so physically painful for him to attempt to make expressions!  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960067</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960067</guid>
		<description>Lieberman told Fox News: &quot;To me the New York Times has committed at least an act of bad citizenship, but whether they have committed a crime is a matter of discussion for the justice department.&quot;

Now he remembers the justice department exists!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lieberman told Fox News: &#8220;To me the New York Times has committed at least an act of bad citizenship, but whether they have committed a crime is a matter of discussion for the justice department.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now he remembers the justice department exists!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sagodjur</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960068</link>
		<dc:creator>Sagodjur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960068</guid>
		<description>I think Senator Lieberman needs to be investigated and possibly censured for potentially violating his oath of office to uphold the Constitution, specifically the 1st Amendment. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Senator Lieberman needs to be investigated and possibly censured for potentially violating his oath of office to uphold the Constitution, specifically the 1st Amendment. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake0748</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960584</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake0748</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960584</guid>
		<description>&quot;Dumb bimbo on Fox:
&quot;What do you think of the Justice Department&#039;s action so far not to charge Julian Assange with treason?&quot;

Lieberman:
&quot;I don&#039;t understand why that hasn&#039;t happened yet.&quot;

US constitution:
&quot;Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.&quot;

Not mentioning the obvious fact that you can&#039;t commit treason against a country you aren&#039;t a citizen of.

I wish I could say I expected people who have taken a solemn oath to defend the US constitution to have read the document in question, but I guess that&#039;s too much to ask for in this post 9/11 era we live in.&quot;

Sorry... didn&#039;t want to steal, just wanted it repeated. 

  Thanks Space Monkey
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dumb bimbo on Fox:<br />
&#8220;What do you think of the Justice Department&#8217;s action so far not to charge Julian Assange with treason?&#8221;</p>
<p>Lieberman:<br />
&#8220;I don&#8217;t understand why that hasn&#8217;t happened yet.&#8221;</p>
<p>US constitution:<br />
&#8220;Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not mentioning the obvious fact that you can&#8217;t commit treason against a country you aren&#8217;t a citizen of.</p>
<p>I wish I could say I expected people who have taken a solemn oath to defend the US constitution to have read the document in question, but I guess that&#8217;s too much to ask for in this post 9/11 era we live in.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry&#8230; didn&#8217;t want to steal, just wanted it repeated. </p>
<p>  Thanks Space Monkey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960077</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960077</guid>
		<description>Anybody got a spare copy of the Constitution they want to send to Sen. Lieberman to read.  Perhaps you could get out a yellow highlighter and emphasize the First Amendment.  Especially the part where it talks about the government not infringing upon the freedom of the press.

It might make for some interesting reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody got a spare copy of the Constitution they want to send to Sen. Lieberman to read.  Perhaps you could get out a yellow highlighter and emphasize the First Amendment.  Especially the part where it talks about the government not infringing upon the freedom of the press.</p>
<p>It might make for some interesting reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960095</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960095</guid>
		<description>Has America gone insane?!  Is there any part of the Bill of Rights that isn&#039;t under constant attack by the lunatics in charge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has America gone insane?!  Is there any part of the Bill of Rights that isn&#8217;t under constant attack by the lunatics in charge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polama</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960098</link>
		<dc:creator>polama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960098</guid>
		<description>It gets Lieberman media play, but as far as actually moving towards accomplishing the goal of stopping these sorts of leaks in the future, it&#039;s a terrible move.

You&#039;ve got a controversial organization that&#039;s presented some leaks of unprecedented size, in a somewhat novel way (the internet). This becomes a lever to, for example, outlaw wikileaks, give the government the ability to censor websites, whatever.

But instead you lump the New York Times into the same category as them. NYT, based out of physical presses, meets about the strictest possible definition of &quot;the presses&quot; as you can come up with. I don&#039;t doubt lots of people could be convinced Wikileaks did/should have committed a crime, but disagree with the assessment the NYT could have.

By linking the actions of Wikileaks and the Times, Lieberman is just watering down the government&#039;s ability to abuse this to their own ends, rather than turning it into a lever against the Times as I imagine he had hoped to do. Sometimes it&#039;s only ineptitude that keeps our rights alive :)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It gets Lieberman media play, but as far as actually moving towards accomplishing the goal of stopping these sorts of leaks in the future, it&#8217;s a terrible move.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got a controversial organization that&#8217;s presented some leaks of unprecedented size, in a somewhat novel way (the internet). This becomes a lever to, for example, outlaw wikileaks, give the government the ability to censor websites, whatever.</p>
<p>But instead you lump the New York Times into the same category as them. NYT, based out of physical presses, meets about the strictest possible definition of &#8220;the presses&#8221; as you can come up with. I don&#8217;t doubt lots of people could be convinced Wikileaks did/should have committed a crime, but disagree with the assessment the NYT could have.</p>
<p>By linking the actions of Wikileaks and the Times, Lieberman is just watering down the government&#8217;s ability to abuse this to their own ends, rather than turning it into a lever against the Times as I imagine he had hoped to do. Sometimes it&#8217;s only ineptitude that keeps our rights alive :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awjtawjt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960099</link>
		<dc:creator>awjtawjt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960099</guid>
		<description>&quot;BoingBoing is investigated for espionage for reporting on the New York Times being investigated for espionage for reporting on Wikileaks.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;BoingBoing is investigated for espionage for reporting on the New York Times being investigated for espionage for reporting on Wikileaks.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrsBug</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960101</link>
		<dc:creator>MrsBug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960101</guid>
		<description>Awesome. Except THAT senator actually had some power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. Except THAT senator actually had some power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teapot</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960613</link>
		<dc:creator>teapot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960613</guid>
		<description>NEWS FLASH: Politicians are upset that newspapers report the news.

Check out this awesome Lieberman impersonation:
http://tinyurl.com/y9o68dy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEWS FLASH: Politicians are upset that newspapers report the news.</p>
<p>Check out this awesome Lieberman impersonation:<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/y9o68dy" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/y9o68dy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scifijazznik</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960103</link>
		<dc:creator>scifijazznik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960103</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Is Joe Lieberman the new Joe Mccartney? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nah, he&#039;s not even in a Beatles cover band..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Is Joe Lieberman the new Joe Mccartney? </p></blockquote>
<p>Nah, he&#8217;s not even in a Beatles cover band..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjcamp</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960882</link>
		<dc:creator>pjcamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960882</guid>
		<description>Lieberman is a sanctimonious moron.

The less attention you give to him the better.

That&#039;s all he wants so take his oxygen away.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lieberman is a sanctimonious moron.</p>
<p>The less attention you give to him the better.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all he wants so take his oxygen away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Monkey</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960376</link>
		<dc:creator>Space Monkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960376</guid>
		<description>Dumb bimbo on Fox:
&quot;What do you think of the Justice Department&#039;s action so far not to charge Julian Assange with treason?&quot;

Lieberman:
&quot;I don&#039;t understand why that hasn&#039;t happened yet.&quot;

US constitution:
&quot;Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.&quot;

Not mentioning the obvious fact that you can&#039;t commit treason against a country you aren&#039;t a citizen of.   

I wish I could say I expected people who have taken a solemn oath to defend the US constitution to have read the document in question, but I guess that&#039;s too much to ask for in this post 9/11 era we live in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dumb bimbo on Fox:<br />
&#8220;What do you think of the Justice Department&#8217;s action so far not to charge Julian Assange with treason?&#8221;</p>
<p>Lieberman:<br />
&#8220;I don&#8217;t understand why that hasn&#8217;t happened yet.&#8221;</p>
<p>US constitution:<br />
&#8220;Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not mentioning the obvious fact that you can&#8217;t commit treason against a country you aren&#8217;t a citizen of.   </p>
<p>I wish I could say I expected people who have taken a solemn oath to defend the US constitution to have read the document in question, but I guess that&#8217;s too much to ask for in this post 9/11 era we live in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960122</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960122</guid>
		<description>&quot;What do you think of the justice department&#039;s action so far, not to charge Julian Assange with treason?&quot;  That&#039;s the kind of blind-to-reality question that I&#039;ve come to expect from Fox News.  Lieberman of course does what every good politician does: ignore the question and reply with the message.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What do you think of the justice department&#8217;s action so far, not to charge Julian Assange with treason?&#8221;  That&#8217;s the kind of blind-to-reality question that I&#8217;ve come to expect from Fox News.  Lieberman of course does what every good politician does: ignore the question and reply with the message.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html#comment-960126</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960126</guid>
		<description>Lieberman is on his way out.  He has too much history calling himself a Democrat for the Republicans to back him, he has too much history backing the Republicans for the Democrats to back him, and he wouldn&#039;t get enough support as an independent.

I&#039;d like to apologize on behalf of my state and ask the rest of you Boingers to please be patient.  We&#039;re already taking bids for the contract to clean his ass prints off the door.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lieberman is on his way out.  He has too much history calling himself a Democrat for the Republicans to back him, he has too much history backing the Republicans for the Democrats to back him, and he wouldn&#8217;t get enough support as an independent.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to apologize on behalf of my state and ask the rest of you Boingers to please be patient.  We&#8217;re already taking bids for the contract to clean his ass prints off the door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
