<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pundit calls for development of magical anti-Wikileaks computer&#160;virus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 12:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWittSF</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-961034</link>
		<dc:creator>DWittSF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-961034</guid>
		<description>Julian, I beg you, DO NOT CLICK ON THE FREE IPAD AD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julian, I beg you, DO NOT CLICK ON THE FREE IPAD AD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960780</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960780</guid>
		<description>Jeff Goldblum&#039;s skull.exe can ruin any computer, just like those aliens that were using OSX. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff Goldblum&#8217;s skull.exe can ruin any computer, just like those aliens that were using OSX. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendon J. Wilson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960781</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendon J. Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960781</guid>
		<description>Alright, so maybe he&#039;s mildly confused about the exact mechanism this might be achieved, but the vitriol loaded on him here is uncalled for.

There are a variety of completely realistic and feasible ways you could achieve the goal he outlines, or at least come sufficiently close to make a lot of government people very happy. A drive-by-download was identified above as one way, but that would require compromising WikiLeak&#039;s own servers - not impossible, especially if you consider that the complexity of Stuxnet indicates it was likely a state-sanctioned attack (4 zero-day exploits used in that attack).

One only has to look at the challenges the banking industry faces with attacks on their online customer portals for an idea of other ways an attack might be perpetrated. Spear-phishing, man-in-the-browser attacks, poisoned local DNS settings, and even good ol&#039; social engineering attacks would all be good ways to either render users unable to visit WikiLeaks or even install software capable of monitoring and severely punishing those who attempt to download WikiLeaks docs.

I&#039;m not suggesting this would be an all-encompassing way to achieve the goal. However, when you consider that millions of people&#039;s machines are parts of illicit botnets without their knowledge, you can&#039;t completely disregard the possibility that there exist some means to achieve a large part of his stated goal by infecting a large number of users&#039; machines in a fashion that rendered them incapable of browsing, downloading, or storing Wikileaks documents.

He may be somewhat ill-informed for not knowing exactly how it might be achieved, but I expect BoingBoing readers to at least show some of their usual imagination and recognize he&#039;s not completely off target.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, so maybe he&#8217;s mildly confused about the exact mechanism this might be achieved, but the vitriol loaded on him here is uncalled for.</p>
<p>There are a variety of completely realistic and feasible ways you could achieve the goal he outlines, or at least come sufficiently close to make a lot of government people very happy. A drive-by-download was identified above as one way, but that would require compromising WikiLeak&#8217;s own servers &#8211; not impossible, especially if you consider that the complexity of Stuxnet indicates it was likely a state-sanctioned attack (4 zero-day exploits used in that attack).</p>
<p>One only has to look at the challenges the banking industry faces with attacks on their online customer portals for an idea of other ways an attack might be perpetrated. Spear-phishing, man-in-the-browser attacks, poisoned local DNS settings, and even good ol&#8217; social engineering attacks would all be good ways to either render users unable to visit WikiLeaks or even install software capable of monitoring and severely punishing those who attempt to download WikiLeaks docs.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not suggesting this would be an all-encompassing way to achieve the goal. However, when you consider that millions of people&#8217;s machines are parts of illicit botnets without their knowledge, you can&#8217;t completely disregard the possibility that there exist some means to achieve a large part of his stated goal by infecting a large number of users&#8217; machines in a fashion that rendered them incapable of browsing, downloading, or storing Wikileaks documents.</p>
<p>He may be somewhat ill-informed for not knowing exactly how it might be achieved, but I expect BoingBoing readers to at least show some of their usual imagination and recognize he&#8217;s not completely off target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960790</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960790</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s gonna hack the Gibson so he can back trace you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s gonna hack the Gibson so he can back trace you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Anderson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960795</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960795</guid>
		<description>Surely the voice of the computer would be Majel Roddenberry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely the voice of the computer would be Majel Roddenberry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrJM</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960796</link>
		<dc:creator>MrJM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960796</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you people understand?  

The Internet is not something that you just dump something on. 

It&#039;s not a big truck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you people understand?  </p>
<p>The Internet is not something that you just dump something on. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a big truck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brielle</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960806</link>
		<dc:creator>brielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960806</guid>
		<description>I see someone&#039;s been watching reruns of 24 and CSI...

I stopped watching 24 after getting tired of hearing such classic phrases like &quot;He&#039;s using static NAT mapping in the global Internet routing tables to hack the Internet!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see someone&#8217;s been watching reruns of 24 and CSI&#8230;</p>
<p>I stopped watching 24 after getting tired of hearing such classic phrases like &#8220;He&#8217;s using static NAT mapping in the global Internet routing tables to hack the Internet!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-961338</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-961338</guid>
		<description>A virus would get detected by all of the infallible anti-virus programs everyone is running.  We should detonate nuclear devices above every major city in the world so the EMP would destroy any Wikileaks viewing device!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A virus would get detected by all of the infallible anti-virus programs everyone is running.  We should detonate nuclear devices above every major city in the world so the EMP would destroy any Wikileaks viewing device!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: igpajo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960828</link>
		<dc:creator>igpajo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960828</guid>
		<description>I was thinking today that there&#039;s no way to stop or delete the stuff that&#039;s already out there, but how hard would it be for someone to create something that corrupts that encrypted &quot;nuclear option&quot; file that has been downloaded thousands of times.  You know the Gov&#039;ment&#039;s got people trying to crack that thing.  Could they fake a release of keycode in an effort to trick the folks who want to open that thing into running it instead.  But instead of opening the file, it destroys it.  
I have no idea what if what I&#039;m talking about is possible or not, am on the fence as to whether it would be a moral thing or not to release some fake key, just curious to know if something like that might be possible.
Probably wouldn&#039;t be worth the effort because the first person to try it would spread the word and it would become ineffective almost immediately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking today that there&#8217;s no way to stop or delete the stuff that&#8217;s already out there, but how hard would it be for someone to create something that corrupts that encrypted &#8220;nuclear option&#8221; file that has been downloaded thousands of times.  You know the Gov&#8217;ment&#8217;s got people trying to crack that thing.  Could they fake a release of keycode in an effort to trick the folks who want to open that thing into running it instead.  But instead of opening the file, it destroys it.<br />
I have no idea what if what I&#8217;m talking about is possible or not, am on the fence as to whether it would be a moral thing or not to release some fake key, just curious to know if something like that might be possible.<br />
Probably wouldn&#8217;t be worth the effort because the first person to try it would spread the word and it would become ineffective almost immediately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960831</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960831</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that won&#039;t make the situation worse with Anonymous....

http://boingboing.net/submit/2010/12/4chan-rushes-to-wikileaks-defense-forces-swiss-banking-site-offline.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that won&#8217;t make the situation worse with Anonymous&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://boingboing.net/submit/2010/12/4chan-rushes-to-wikileaks-defense-forces-swiss-banking-site-offline.html" rel="nofollow">http://boingboing.net/submit/2010/12/4chan-rushes-to-wikileaks-defense-forces-swiss-banking-site-offline.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boba Fett Diop</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960840</link>
		<dc:creator>Boba Fett Diop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960840</guid>
		<description>...and when you least expect it, Jeff Goldblum!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and when you least expect it, Jeff Goldblum!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjacques</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-961359</link>
		<dc:creator>bjacques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-961359</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s it! Throw vitriol at Julian&#039;s monitor! I saw Superman take out a PC by putting his fist through the monitor.

Alternatively, take Wikileaks to Internet Court and file a writ of cybernetic estoppel. Damn, I wish I could remember the rest of that quote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s it! Throw vitriol at Julian&#8217;s monitor! I saw Superman take out a PC by putting his fist through the monitor.</p>
<p>Alternatively, take Wikileaks to Internet Court and file a writ of cybernetic estoppel. Damn, I wish I could remember the rest of that quote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgs</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-961361</link>
		<dc:creator>jgs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-961361</guid>
		<description>This rubbish was being propagated by NPR this morning, quoting some guy said to be at the National Academy of Sciences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This rubbish was being propagated by NPR this morning, quoting some guy said to be at the National Academy of Sciences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amandaraqs</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-961620</link>
		<dc:creator>Amandaraqs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-961620</guid>
		<description>Question one: Who on the planet hasn&#039;t ALREADY gotten the insurance file? (And for the more paranoid among us, who hasn&#039;t already copied it to a half dozen flash drives?)  

So even if a worm were released, how would it affect those who already have the file encased in carbonite and hidden in a safe deposit box? 

Question two: What he&#039;s advocating is illegal. The Post accepts Mastercard &amp; Visa for subscriptions. Why have the credit card companies not yanked the Post&#039;s ability to process credit card transactions for subscriptions?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question one: Who on the planet hasn&#8217;t ALREADY gotten the insurance file? (And for the more paranoid among us, who hasn&#8217;t already copied it to a half dozen flash drives?)  </p>
<p>So even if a worm were released, how would it affect those who already have the file encased in carbonite and hidden in a safe deposit box? </p>
<p>Question two: What he&#8217;s advocating is illegal. The Post accepts Mastercard &#038; Visa for subscriptions. Why have the credit card companies not yanked the Post&#8217;s ability to process credit card transactions for subscriptions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llamatron</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960617</link>
		<dc:creator>llamatron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960617</guid>
		<description>Jeff Goldblum has the necessary skills.  I&#039;ve seen him do it... he&#039;s awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff Goldblum has the necessary skills.  I&#8217;ve seen him do it&#8230; he&#8217;s awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960622</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960622</guid>
		<description>This guy is full of enough $h*t to clog the tubes that have been leaking the Wikis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This guy is full of enough $h*t to clog the tubes that have been leaking the Wikis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake0748</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960623</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake0748</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960623</guid>
		<description>People who don&#039;t know what they are talking about should just STFU.

Sorry... I don&#039;t know what I&#039;m even talking about. So let me amend it to &quot;People who don&#039;t even TRY to understand what they are talking about should REALLY STFU.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who don&#8217;t know what they are talking about should just STFU.</p>
<p>Sorry&#8230; I don&#8217;t know what I&#8217;m even talking about. So let me amend it to &#8220;People who don&#8217;t even TRY to understand what they are talking about should REALLY STFU.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: user23</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960625</link>
		<dc:creator>user23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960625</guid>
		<description>Thiessen should employ the most powerful virus of all, Delete System32...just typing it gives me chills. He should start by testing it on his own PC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thiessen should employ the most powerful virus of all, Delete System32&#8230;just typing it gives me chills. He should start by testing it on his own PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake0748</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960626</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake0748</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960626</guid>
		<description>IOW... Wikileaks seems to be the latest scapegoat/ whipping-boy.  If we can somehow remove them everything will be ok.


PUKE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IOW&#8230; Wikileaks seems to be the latest scapegoat/ whipping-boy.  If we can somehow remove them everything will be ok.</p>
<p>PUKE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960627</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960627</guid>
		<description>I think you missed the part where the screen becomes a pixellated image of a skull and crossbones, and then the skull starts laughing.  That part is important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you missed the part where the screen becomes a pixellated image of a skull and crossbones, and then the skull starts laughing.  That part is important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lolbrandon</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960629</link>
		<dc:creator>lolbrandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960629</guid>
		<description>That movie sounds awesome. What&#039;s it called?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That movie sounds awesome. What&#8217;s it called?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xenu</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960631</link>
		<dc:creator>Xenu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960631</guid>
		<description>So many problems with this idea -- different operating systems, browsers, etc.  Stuxnet just dealt with one platform and targeted one piece of software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many problems with this idea &#8212; different operating systems, browsers, etc.  Stuxnet just dealt with one platform and targeted one piece of software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ColHapablap</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-961400</link>
		<dc:creator>ColHapablap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-961400</guid>
		<description>True, while this is a stupid idea, it is at least technically possible.  The same thing happened recently with the popular ProFTPD source code, which was replaced with a compromised version including a backdoor.  If they could hack the Wikileaks servers (wherever they may be...), they could replace the cables with infected files that exploit vulnerabilities in Adobe Reader, Windows, Linux, etc. to just brick a person&#039;s system.  Again, this idea is neither good nor practical, but it&#039;s at least feasible, (probably) unbeknownst to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, while this is a stupid idea, it is at least technically possible.  The same thing happened recently with the popular ProFTPD source code, which was replaced with a compromised version including a backdoor.  If they could hack the Wikileaks servers (wherever they may be&#8230;), they could replace the cables with infected files that exploit vulnerabilities in Adobe Reader, Windows, Linux, etc. to just brick a person&#8217;s system.  Again, this idea is neither good nor practical, but it&#8217;s at least feasible, (probably) unbeknownst to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CLAVDIVS</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960637</link>
		<dc:creator>CLAVDIVS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960637</guid>
		<description>That screenplay needs to be written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That screenplay needs to be written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turn_self_off</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-963711</link>
		<dc:creator>turn_self_off</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-963711</guid>
		<description>Type cookie, you idiot...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Type cookie, you idiot&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960642</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960642</guid>
		<description>All this talk is so silly.  They say kill Assange, as if hes the only guy involved.  They say &quot;shut down the site&quot; as if its not already copied on dozens of mirrors and P2P networks.  They don&#039;t understand the internet.  They are from such a linear-authoritarian-frequentist perspective they can&#039;t understand that this cannot be stopped.  They don&#039;t understand that there already freely available and easy to use tools like TOR and Freenet which make it impossible to censor information from people who seriously seek it.  

Its also sad that we have an age where the olds in the MSM don&#039;t understand the internet at all.  Its such a ludicrous kind of ignorance today.  Its the equivalent of not knowing how a telephone works or how the post office works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this talk is so silly.  They say kill Assange, as if hes the only guy involved.  They say &#8220;shut down the site&#8221; as if its not already copied on dozens of mirrors and P2P networks.  They don&#8217;t understand the internet.  They are from such a linear-authoritarian-frequentist perspective they can&#8217;t understand that this cannot be stopped.  They don&#8217;t understand that there already freely available and easy to use tools like TOR and Freenet which make it impossible to censor information from people who seriously seek it.  </p>
<p>Its also sad that we have an age where the olds in the MSM don&#8217;t understand the internet at all.  Its such a ludicrous kind of ignorance today.  Its the equivalent of not knowing how a telephone works or how the post office works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960643</link>
		<dc:creator>jimh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960643</guid>
		<description>George, I saw a very interesting movie the other night. It was called &quot;The Net&quot;. It starred that girl from &quot;The Bus&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George, I saw a very interesting movie the other night. It was called &#8220;The Net&#8221;. It starred that girl from &#8220;The Bus&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960644</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960644</guid>
		<description>Hey, let&#039;s just ignore the fact that producing software designed to do what he describes is illegal and incredibly unethical [if anyone other than a government makes it].

I don&#039;t feel like I should be able to say this seriously, but: FUCKING FASCISTS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, let&#8217;s just ignore the fact that producing software designed to do what he describes is illegal and incredibly unethical [if anyone other than a government makes it].</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel like I should be able to say this seriously, but: FUCKING FASCISTS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Smith</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-961157</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-961157</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So many problems with this idea -- different operating systems, browsers, etc. Stuxnet just dealt with one platform and targeted one piece of software.&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The other problem is called Julian. He may be lacking in people skills but he knows how to keep information secure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So many problems with this idea &#8212; different operating systems, browsers, etc. Stuxnet just dealt with one platform and targeted one piece of software.</i></p>
<p>The other problem is called Julian. He may be lacking in people skills but he knows how to keep information secure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/07/pundit-calls-for-dev.html#comment-960652</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-960652</guid>
		<description>Poor Julian Sands. He was great in Warlock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Julian Sands. He was great in Warlock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
