<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cambridge university refuses to censor student&#039;s thesis on chip-and-PIN&#160;vulnerabilities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: karl_jones</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-979202</link>
		<dc:creator>karl_jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-979202</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Darwin censored himself for fear of offending the Church, and only published The Origin of Species when Wallace scooped him. Perhaps the University should censure him retroactively.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, the University should out him retroactively.  Have the Advanced Physics department send back the time machine they&#039;re going to invent next year.

On a serious note: I cheered and applauded upon reading the University&#039;s manifesto.  Give &#039;em hell!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Darwin censored himself for fear of offending the Church, and only published The Origin of Species when Wallace scooped him. Perhaps the University should censure him retroactively.
</p></blockquote>
<p>No, the University should out him retroactively.  Have the Advanced Physics department send back the time machine they&#8217;re going to invent next year.</p>
<p>On a serious note: I cheered and applauded upon reading the University&#8217;s manifesto.  Give &#8216;em hell!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bardfinn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-978955</link>
		<dc:creator>bardfinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-978955</guid>
		<description>&quot;Quite why the banks did not hire someone competent to design the protocol is a mystery to me.&quot;

They did not actually hire someone to design the protocol.

A chip design firm chose to implement a protocol, the details of which were considered &quot;top secret&quot; to &quot;protect the interests of our customers&quot;, (read: security through obscurity), the chip and support systems were marketed to various institutions and industries for various uses, and some know-nothing MBA-degree-holding bank executive, sitting on (or chairing) an industry discussion panel, concerned solely with his annual bonus for making every quarter better than the last, brought up several possible &quot;solutions&quot; to their &quot;leap forward initiative&quot; on securing transactions, and (quite possibly with a variety of kickbacks and bribes) this particular system was shown as the most secure and least expensive (or equivalently secure and least expensive) solution, and the planning group (which contained absolutely no-one who possessed an EE, CS, or IT education) worked with the CIO&#039;s (none of whom have any CS, EE, or IT educations -- CIO&#039;s of financial firms are MBAs / accountants / efficiency experts to a man) to set this system as an industry-wide standard in the country and to ensure that all legislation lobbying supported it and none opposed it.

In short, the protocol was chosen -- not because it was secure -- but because it was a &quot;win-win for our bottom line&quot;. And as no-one involved in the decision to use it understood it, including the people designing it and marketing it, they could not know that it was, in fact, a gigantic life-ruining turd -- and even if they /could/ know it, it wasn&#039;t going to be /their/ lives ruined, since they have never and will never have to wonder where they will live and what they will eat tomorrow. They make in one year enough for any reasonable person to live for twenty years on. Their decisions are not based on their skills, but on whether someone somewhere will take their candy away over something anyone /can/ understand: the profit margin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Quite why the banks did not hire someone competent to design the protocol is a mystery to me.&#8221;</p>
<p>They did not actually hire someone to design the protocol.</p>
<p>A chip design firm chose to implement a protocol, the details of which were considered &#8220;top secret&#8221; to &#8220;protect the interests of our customers&#8221;, (read: security through obscurity), the chip and support systems were marketed to various institutions and industries for various uses, and some know-nothing MBA-degree-holding bank executive, sitting on (or chairing) an industry discussion panel, concerned solely with his annual bonus for making every quarter better than the last, brought up several possible &#8220;solutions&#8221; to their &#8220;leap forward initiative&#8221; on securing transactions, and (quite possibly with a variety of kickbacks and bribes) this particular system was shown as the most secure and least expensive (or equivalently secure and least expensive) solution, and the planning group (which contained absolutely no-one who possessed an EE, CS, or IT education) worked with the CIO&#8217;s (none of whom have any CS, EE, or IT educations &#8212; CIO&#8217;s of financial firms are MBAs / accountants / efficiency experts to a man) to set this system as an industry-wide standard in the country and to ensure that all legislation lobbying supported it and none opposed it.</p>
<p>In short, the protocol was chosen &#8212; not because it was secure &#8212; but because it was a &#8220;win-win for our bottom line&#8221;. And as no-one involved in the decision to use it understood it, including the people designing it and marketing it, they could not know that it was, in fact, a gigantic life-ruining turd &#8212; and even if they /could/ know it, it wasn&#8217;t going to be /their/ lives ruined, since they have never and will never have to wonder where they will live and what they will eat tomorrow. They make in one year enough for any reasonable person to live for twenty years on. Their decisions are not based on their skills, but on whether someone somewhere will take their candy away over something anyone /can/ understand: the profit margin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-979214</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-979214</guid>
		<description>Just to remind the grammarians out there, the treatment of collective plurals is one of the faultlines between AE and BE.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to remind the grammarians out there, the treatment of collective plurals is one of the faultlines between AE and BE.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-978968</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-978968</guid>
		<description>Bravo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-979238</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-979238</guid>
		<description>At no time was there any intent to commit fraud; the journalist&#039;s account was debited in due course in accordance with his mandate and the merchant was paid. It is perfectly clear that no transaction was falsified in any material sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At no time was there any intent to commit fraud; the journalist&#8217;s account was debited in due course in accordance with his mandate and the merchant was paid. It is perfectly clear that no transaction was falsified in any material sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madfin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-979240</link>
		<dc:creator>madfin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-979240</guid>
		<description>To those still fighting the revolutionary war, may I suggest mota?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those still fighting the revolutionary war, may I suggest mota?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-979244</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-979244</guid>
		<description>Guys you all got manipulated by Cambridge&#039;s PR. Can I read any argument that backs the bank&#039;s point of view? Can I read the exact wordings of the letter the bank sent? Did they really ask the exploit to be &quot;censored&quot; or to just undisclose it until patched. Oh but I got to read again about that exploit and the people the great people who found it and yeah Newton and Darwin went to Cam so it must be a great school! Well done. 

Alex, PhD at Cambridge Uni</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys you all got manipulated by Cambridge&#8217;s PR. Can I read any argument that backs the bank&#8217;s point of view? Can I read the exact wordings of the letter the bank sent? Did they really ask the exploit to be &#8220;censored&#8221; or to just undisclose it until patched. Oh but I got to read again about that exploit and the people the great people who found it and yeah Newton and Darwin went to Cam so it must be a great school! Well done. </p>
<p>Alex, PhD at Cambridge Uni</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: princeminski</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-979502</link>
		<dc:creator>princeminski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-979502</guid>
		<description>Were you joking when you used the term &quot;anyways&quot; in your &quot;grammar fail&quot; post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were you joking when you used the term &#8220;anyways&#8221; in your &#8220;grammar fail&#8221; post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-978993</link>
		<dc:creator>mdh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-978993</guid>
		<description>--applause--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8211;applause&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tzctboin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-981042</link>
		<dc:creator>Tzctboin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-981042</guid>
		<description>That you think that delaying disclosure is not a form of censorship is such an exercise of double-think and double-speak that it should be included in the next edition of that famous book ITzctboin hope you may have read during your prestigious education.

Tzctboin
Computer Technician
Technological College of Netzahualcoyotl City.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That you think that delaying disclosure is not a form of censorship is such an exercise of double-think and double-speak that it should be included in the next edition of that famous book ITzctboin hope you may have read during your prestigious education.</p>
<p>Tzctboin<br />
Computer Technician<br />
Technological College of Netzahualcoyotl City.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-981554</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-981554</guid>
		<description>This is awesome. Cambridge, way to go!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awesome. Cambridge, way to go!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: princeminski</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-979508</link>
		<dc:creator>princeminski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-979508</guid>
		<description>You may look in vain for any argument which supports the bank&#039;s point of view because most people who come to this site are well aware that virtually any American institution of higher learning would break both kneecaps in its haste to fellate any bank or other corporate interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may look in vain for any argument which supports the bank&#8217;s point of view because most people who come to this site are well aware that virtually any American institution of higher learning would break both kneecaps in its haste to fellate any bank or other corporate interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-979267</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-979267</guid>
		<description>You actually can read the letter the bank sent, but you have to want to do it enough to click through &lt;i&gt;two&lt;/i&gt; links from this page. Hiding it so deeply is a cunning PR trick indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You actually can read the letter the bank sent, but you have to want to do it enough to click through <i>two</i> links from this page. Hiding it so deeply is a cunning PR trick indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tylerkaraszewski</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-978762</link>
		<dc:creator>tylerkaraszewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-978762</guid>
		<description>That is awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryze</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-981324</link>
		<dc:creator>bryze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-981324</guid>
		<description>Wow, Amazon.com should adopt the same policy towards meddling senators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Amazon.com should adopt the same policy towards meddling senators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-979277</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-979277</guid>
		<description>@astrochimp
&quot;This is, of course, good, though keep in mind that Anderson is a tenured professor.&quot;

Since  Thatcher&#039;s magnificent reforms, there is no such thing as tenure in the UK.
All contracts are renewed every few years, the only difference between junior and senior faculty is the salary, and the renewal period gradually getting a bit longer - but saturates at 3-4 years.
But no worries, he won&#039;t be sacked ;-).

@ Anon @ 8:32/26.12

I had a brief look at the thesis - all relevant information in it seems already published, so there is no real question of delayed publication.
In 2008/2009 Ross Anderson &amp; co. sent the information to banks, and after waiting for the industry to react for several months to a year for different parts, published it in 2009.
They didn&#039;t just go ahead and immediately publish material potentially problematic for payment systems - the banking association really has not much to complain about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@astrochimp<br />
&#8220;This is, of course, good, though keep in mind that Anderson is a tenured professor.&#8221;</p>
<p>Since  Thatcher&#8217;s magnificent reforms, there is no such thing as tenure in the UK.<br />
All contracts are renewed every few years, the only difference between junior and senior faculty is the salary, and the renewal period gradually getting a bit longer &#8211; but saturates at 3-4 years.<br />
But no worries, he won&#8217;t be sacked ;-).</p>
<p>@ Anon @ 8:32/26.12</p>
<p>I had a brief look at the thesis &#8211; all relevant information in it seems already published, so there is no real question of delayed publication.<br />
In 2008/2009 Ross Anderson &#038; co. sent the information to banks, and after waiting for the industry to react for several months to a year for different parts, published it in 2009.<br />
They didn&#8217;t just go ahead and immediately publish material potentially problematic for payment systems &#8211; the banking association really has not much to complain about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cameronh1403</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-978767</link>
		<dc:creator>cameronh1403</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-978767</guid>
		<description>Nice...very nice.  Glad to see some schools back their students no matter what.  Here in the US, the school would cave and let the bank do whatever they wanted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice&#8230;very nice.  Glad to see some schools back their students no matter what.  Here in the US, the school would cave and let the bank do whatever they wanted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-978770</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-978770</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hoping you enjoyed having your ass kicked as much as I enjoyed kicking it.  Happy Holidays!

Sincerely,

Ross Anderson&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hoping you enjoyed having your ass kicked as much as I enjoyed kicking it.  Happy Holidays!</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Ross Anderson&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baby Lamont</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-978772</link>
		<dc:creator>Baby Lamont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-978772</guid>
		<description>BOOSH!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOOSH!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernunnos</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-978776</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernunnos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-978776</guid>
		<description>Boom! Headshot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boom! Headshot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-978784</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-978784</guid>
		<description>&quot;Cambridge is the University of ... Darwin; censoring writings that offend the powerful is offensive to our deepest values.&quot;

Darwin censored himself for fear of offending the Church, and only published The Origin of Species when Wallace scooped him. Perhaps the University should censure him retroactively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Cambridge is the University of &#8230; Darwin; censoring writings that offend the powerful is offensive to our deepest values.&#8221;</p>
<p>Darwin censored himself for fear of offending the Church, and only published The Origin of Species when Wallace scooped him. Perhaps the University should censure him retroactively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-979297</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-979297</guid>
		<description>&quot;What will support public confidence in the payments system is evidence that the banks are frank and honest in admitting its weaknesses when they are exposed, and diligent in effecting the necessary remedies. &quot;

&quot;its&quot; refers to &quot;the payments system&quot; - singular; &quot;their&quot; refers to &quot;weaknesses&quot; - plural. No error.

ETA Sorry, I didn&#039;t realise at first that you had already noted that yourself. Just my inner pedant demanding an airing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What will support public confidence in the payments system is evidence that the banks are frank and honest in admitting its weaknesses when they are exposed, and diligent in effecting the necessary remedies. &#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;its&#8221; refers to &#8220;the payments system&#8221; &#8211; singular; &#8220;their&#8221; refers to &#8220;weaknesses&#8221; &#8211; plural. No error.</p>
<p>ETA Sorry, I didn&#8217;t realise at first that you had already noted that yourself. Just my inner pedant demanding an airing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daev</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-979042</link>
		<dc:creator>daev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-979042</guid>
		<description>tsk, tsk... grammar fail in the last displayed paragraph (I&#039;d expect better from Cambridge, of all places). 

Good for them, anyways, for sticking to principle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tsk, tsk&#8230; grammar fail in the last displayed paragraph (I&#8217;d expect better from Cambridge, of all places). </p>
<p>Good for them, anyways, for sticking to principle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-981604</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-981604</guid>
		<description>Thats because the US is run by corporations and the UK is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats because the US is run by corporations and the UK is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-978790</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-978790</guid>
		<description>Great response, but missed opportunity.

They could have had the letter read:
&quot;Attached is a letter we received on December 1st.  I think you should be aware that some asshole is signing your name to very stupid letters.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great response, but missed opportunity.</p>
<p>They could have had the letter read:<br />
&#8220;Attached is a letter we received on December 1st.  I think you should be aware that some asshole is signing your name to very stupid letters.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nescio</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-979055</link>
		<dc:creator>Nescio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-979055</guid>
		<description>Daev - there is no &quot;grammar fail&quot; in the last displayed paragraph. The use of &quot;is&quot; and &quot;are&quot;, referring to the banking system and its weaknesses respectively, is correct. So is the use of &quot;effecting&quot;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daev &#8211; there is no &#8220;grammar fail&#8221; in the last displayed paragraph. The use of &#8220;is&#8221; and &#8220;are&#8221;, referring to the banking system and its weaknesses respectively, is correct. So is the use of &#8220;effecting&#8221;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexG55</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-979057</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexG55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-979057</guid>
		<description>Neither the LSE nor SOAS is a university- they&#039;re both part of the University of London. The term &quot;school&quot; is sometimes used in the UK for a part of a university which specialises in a particular subject (such as LSE, SOAS, and some medical schools) but never for the university as a whole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither the LSE nor SOAS is a university- they&#8217;re both part of the University of London. The term &#8220;school&#8221; is sometimes used in the UK for a part of a university which specialises in a particular subject (such as LSE, SOAS, and some medical schools) but never for the university as a whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john s. erickson, ph.d.</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-979316</link>
		<dc:creator>john s. erickson, ph.d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-979316</guid>
		<description>This is a story that has been repeated in one form or another for almost two decades (and in the abstract, forever). The specifics vary --- DRM, voting, ATM, energy, food production --- but the theme is the same: Mr. Big in the Executive Suite compromises hard-core solutions in order to save costs and make their product easier for users, usually ignoring the advice of true experts, then whines when their &quot;solutions&quot; are cracked. Boo-Hoo.

This is simply further evidence that corporate executives and politicians believe that &quot;physics&quot; (I&#039;m broadly applying the term, to include the &quot;physics&quot; of cryptography, etc) is an optional annoyance, that the Marketing mantra &quot;perception is ALL there is&quot; applies in all scenarios, and that by shear will they can change reality. Boo-Hoo. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a story that has been repeated in one form or another for almost two decades (and in the abstract, forever). The specifics vary &#8212; DRM, voting, ATM, energy, food production &#8212; but the theme is the same: Mr. Big in the Executive Suite compromises hard-core solutions in order to save costs and make their product easier for users, usually ignoring the advice of true experts, then whines when their &#8220;solutions&#8221; are cracked. Boo-Hoo.</p>
<p>This is simply further evidence that corporate executives and politicians believe that &#8220;physics&#8221; (I&#8217;m broadly applying the term, to include the &#8220;physics&#8221; of cryptography, etc) is an optional annoyance, that the Marketing mantra &#8220;perception is ALL there is&#8221; applies in all scenarios, and that by shear will they can change reality. Boo-Hoo. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-979322</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-979322</guid>
		<description>When the Bridgestone Tire Company, of Japan, tried to block an American student&#039;s Ph.D. thesis that Bridgestone objected to, at the University of Akron, in Ohio, the University of Akron backed the Ph.D. student.

That is a rare instance of a University in America not caving into corporate pressures.

George H. Morgan
Professional Engineer
Registered Patent Agent &lt;!-- www.evansville.net/biz/patagent --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Bridgestone Tire Company, of Japan, tried to block an American student&#8217;s Ph.D. thesis that Bridgestone objected to, at the University of Akron, in Ohio, the University of Akron backed the Ph.D. student.</p>
<p>That is a rare instance of a University in America not caving into corporate pressures.</p>
<p>George H. Morgan<br />
Professional Engineer<br />
Registered Patent Agent <!-- www.evansville.net/biz/patagent --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boondocker</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/12/25/cambridge-university-1.html#comment-978812</link>
		<dc:creator>Boondocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-978812</guid>
		<description>Absolutely wonderful to read this on Christmas. Finally, a spine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely wonderful to read this on Christmas. Finally, a spine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
