Blog Features Podcasts Video Forums Follow Us
Twitter Facebook Tumblr
•Submit

FBI raids TX-based server hosting business in "Operation Payback" probe

Xeni Jardin at 10:00 am Thu, Dec 30, 2010

ADVERTISE AT BOING BOING!

SHARE TWEET STUMBLE COMMENTS
aonyfrontimag.jpg

From The Smoking Gun: "As part of an international criminal probe into computer attacks launched this month against perceived corporate enemies of WikiLeaks, the FBI has raided a Texas business and seized a computer server that investigators believe was used to launch a massive electronic attack on PayPal." More details on the firm in question, and another hosting facility in California the FBI is investigating, at the bottom of the piece.

Discuss

15 Responses to “FBI raids TX-based server hosting business in "Operation Payback" probe”

  1. Restless says:
    December 30, 2010 at 12:53 pm

    Probably somebody set up the IRC channel on their already-existing server (or that of their employer). The FBI is probably interested in the IRC server logs to find out who was connected and perhaps the logs of the chat if the server keeps them.

    Reply
  2. Restless says:
    December 30, 2010 at 12:55 pm

    Actually… given the article on this here, perhaps the IRC channel was being used as a control conduit for the LOIC installs.

    Kiddies, in future, host that stuff outside the US.

    Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    December 30, 2010 at 1:05 pm

    #8 so what? I was connected on anonops irc at that time but I didn’t attack paypal, am I a “criminal”? :P

    Reply
    • BB says:
      December 30, 2010 at 2:50 pm

      Anon

      “#8 so what? I was connected on anonops irc at that time but I didn’t attack paypal, am I a “criminal”? :P”

      I sincerely don’t understand. I give up. I didn’t understand if they were charging the company with a crime, or if they were looking to find others on the server.

      Reply
  4. Burningsol says:
    December 31, 2010 at 11:57 am

    This will do nothing, stop no one. The sysadmin’s of the world are in control. operation “payback” its a joke. A puff piece. Calming the nerves of the public that doesn’t understand how the internet really works. You think the person running the bot net on that server was actually there? HA!

    Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    December 30, 2010 at 10:18 am

    What, did they raid Steve Jackson Games again?

    Reply
  6. Church says:
    December 30, 2010 at 10:25 am

    This won’t end well.

    Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    December 30, 2010 at 10:50 am

    Another good reason to filter UDP at the edge of your network.

    Reply
    • Loraan says:
      December 30, 2010 at 6:25 pm

      Filter UDP? I take it you don’t use DNS? Am I missing something?

      Reply
  8. wrwetzel says:
    December 30, 2010 at 10:52 am

    The asymmetry here is painfully glaring. The FBI goes after the people who attacked PayPal but not those who earlier attacked WikiLeaks.

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      December 30, 2010 at 10:59 am

      It may be difficult to do if the attack wasn’t domestic.

      Reply
  9. BB says:
    December 30, 2010 at 10:59 am

    So, (warning: dumb question here), is there a way that they can distinguish that the attacks actually originated from that server?
    Or could it be that some other ISP location turned the server into a zombie or bot computer? Is there a way to know if someone hacked the computer, or sent a trojan in order to do the attacks?

    Reply
  10. teflon says:
    December 30, 2010 at 6:51 pm

    Makes you feel good about hosting your data in a ‘secure’ data center. Imagine you’re hosting your (completely unrelated yet private) data in this Texas datacenter the day it gets raided by the FBI.

    Reply
  11. Restless says:
    December 30, 2010 at 11:35 am

    It appears that it wasn’t the server itself that was performing the DDoS, it was just hosting the IRC channel for coordination of the attacks.

    Reply
    • BB says:
      December 30, 2010 at 11:43 am

      Thanks for that answer. Does “hosting” imply that they were complicit somehow? Or is it that they simply have a business that makes money by “hosting” whatever activity or traffic someone pays them to put through their servers? I’m sorry if I should already know this.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Read more at Boing Boing

Surprise presentation by Openleaks' Daniel Domscheit-Berg at 27c3

Vice Guide to the Business of War

Terre Thaemlitz on MAD's Dave Berg, Roger Kaputnik, and Post-Modernity

ADVERTISEMENT
About Us Contact Advertise Privacy TOS • Facebook Twitter RSS Email