<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikileaks volunteer detained and searched yet again at&#160;airport</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1000193</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1000193</guid>
		<description>For flights from Canada to the US, there are US-CBP agents in each Canadian airport that serves the US. These folks are employees of the US Government and Canada has nothing to do with who/how/why they screen people. If Canadian manners have rubbed off on them, great, but the Canadian Government had nothing to do with it.

As far as I know, Canadians get the same screening as anyone else entering the US, it just happens before we get on the plane, instead of once we get off it, and perhaps with more respect, judging from what&#039;s described above. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For flights from Canada to the US, there are US-CBP agents in each Canadian airport that serves the US. These folks are employees of the US Government and Canada has nothing to do with who/how/why they screen people. If Canadian manners have rubbed off on them, great, but the Canadian Government had nothing to do with it.</p>
<p>As far as I know, Canadians get the same screening as anyone else entering the US, it just happens before we get on the plane, instead of once we get off it, and perhaps with more respect, judging from what&#8217;s described above. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj77</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1000207</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1000207</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure everyone is an associate of a felon if you apply such loose standards. I know I would be; I&#039;m even related to some. Mostly don&#039;t like them or the things they do/did (if they were violent or assholes, anyway). Don&#039;t think I should be subject to enhanced state surveillance wherever I go because of it.

Any time I wonder how East Germany survived so long, someone turns up and inadvertently reminds me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure everyone is an associate of a felon if you apply such loose standards. I know I would be; I&#8217;m even related to some. Mostly don&#8217;t like them or the things they do/did (if they were violent or assholes, anyway). Don&#8217;t think I should be subject to enhanced state surveillance wherever I go because of it.</p>
<p>Any time I wonder how East Germany survived so long, someone turns up and inadvertently reminds me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1003536</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1003536</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;However since he is part of Assange&#039;s company then it is indeed right for the government to think he is a person of interest given the statements and actions of his employer.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So, please explain to me what will the harassment and intimidation achieve?  What&#039;s the goal here?

And, do you support said goal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>However since he is part of Assange&#8217;s company then it is indeed right for the government to think he is a person of interest given the statements and actions of his employer.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, please explain to me what will the harassment and intimidation achieve?  What&#8217;s the goal here?</p>
<p>And, do you support said goal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonam</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-999982</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-999982</guid>
		<description>First time I travelled to the US for work reasons (pre 9/11), I was surprised to get a public interrogation by a (supposedly) American airline staff member just before the check-in counters at Arlanda airport in Stockholm. Got asked all sorts of questions in a loud voice about where I was going in the US, who was my manager, why I needed to go for x weeks and what project I was working on. Not everyone got the same treatment but there were quite a few who did. Unfortunately, the same thing got repeated to me (and only me) just before boarding at the gate. Same routine would get repeated on me at any stop in the US during my stay. Quite intimidating for my first trip there.

I had to travel three more times to the US over the next couple of years and I&#039;d always get pulled up somewhere for some extra checking. The worst was having to spend 20 minutes explaining to a low-IQ, TSA person (with poor English skills ) at the gate on a flight to Dallas (from Chicago again) that the single screw supposedly missing from the bottom of my work laptop was actually the point where the docking station attached to the machine and that I hadn&#039;t secretly opened the machine myself and hidden something inside. For offering such a logical explanation, I got the &quot;take off shoes, belt and empty your carry-on bag&quot; punishment and was then asked if I had any tools that could open the laptop so he could look inside even though it had gone through the X-ray. I was the last to board the plane.

I consider myself to be a fairly ordinary, well travelled person and therefore don&#039;t have any idea why I got all this attention whenever I went to the US. I eventually stopped travelling to the US altogether many years ago and decided I would never travel there again until things changed. Unfortunately, it looks like it&#039;s just getting worse.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First time I travelled to the US for work reasons (pre 9/11), I was surprised to get a public interrogation by a (supposedly) American airline staff member just before the check-in counters at Arlanda airport in Stockholm. Got asked all sorts of questions in a loud voice about where I was going in the US, who was my manager, why I needed to go for x weeks and what project I was working on. Not everyone got the same treatment but there were quite a few who did. Unfortunately, the same thing got repeated to me (and only me) just before boarding at the gate. Same routine would get repeated on me at any stop in the US during my stay. Quite intimidating for my first trip there.</p>
<p>I had to travel three more times to the US over the next couple of years and I&#8217;d always get pulled up somewhere for some extra checking. The worst was having to spend 20 minutes explaining to a low-IQ, TSA person (with poor English skills ) at the gate on a flight to Dallas (from Chicago again) that the single screw supposedly missing from the bottom of my work laptop was actually the point where the docking station attached to the machine and that I hadn&#8217;t secretly opened the machine myself and hidden something inside. For offering such a logical explanation, I got the &#8220;take off shoes, belt and empty your carry-on bag&#8221; punishment and was then asked if I had any tools that could open the laptop so he could look inside even though it had gone through the X-ray. I was the last to board the plane.</p>
<p>I consider myself to be a fairly ordinary, well travelled person and therefore don&#8217;t have any idea why I got all this attention whenever I went to the US. I eventually stopped travelling to the US altogether many years ago and decided I would never travel there again until things changed. Unfortunately, it looks like it&#8217;s just getting worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1001272</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1001272</guid>
		<description>You missed the point, but that&#039;s OK.  You&#039;ll bob and weave it no matter how much I try to explain it to you, I&#039;m sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed the point, but that&#8217;s OK.  You&#8217;ll bob and weave it no matter how much I try to explain it to you, I&#8217;m sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1000263</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1000263</guid>
		<description>@blendergasket

I grew up in the Midwest and left for Canada in the late 60&#039;s. Your summary of USA the tribe vs. USA the myth made my hair stand on end for its breathtaking accuracy. 

Is the allegorical battle imagery you describe totally your own, or does it come from other sources I could check out?

Thanks.

KC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@blendergasket</p>
<p>I grew up in the Midwest and left for Canada in the late 60&#8242;s. Your summary of USA the tribe vs. USA the myth made my hair stand on end for its breathtaking accuracy. </p>
<p>Is the allegorical battle imagery you describe totally your own, or does it come from other sources I could check out?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>KC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Damage</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1000029</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Damage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1000029</guid>
		<description>FYI, I flew to the States from my home of Toronto this week and was surprised to see a whole row of those gargantuan nudie scanners after the US preclearance area.  I was told that I had been selected for an additional search and could choose between the scanner or a patdown.  

Another security-clad individual stopped the lady speaking to me for a moment, asking why she had selected 3 people in a row.  &quot;This line is 100% selection today.&quot;  &quot;Oh.&quot;

My dad&#039;s friend, a radiologist, advised him to avoid the nudie scanners due to radiation, so I that&#039;s what I did.  The guy who patted me down was expressionless but polite and respectful.  It was a minimal inconvenience that was no worse than the inspection I used to get before entering nightclubs.  No, he didn&#039;t touch my package.  Everything but.

The whole thing was maybe 2 minutes.  No biggie.  Not that I didn&#039;t resent it, but I felt I&#039;d earned a bit of smugness by refusing them the privilege of using their expensive machines.

Sadly, nobody else chose the patdown.  Presumably they had better things to do with their 90 seconds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, I flew to the States from my home of Toronto this week and was surprised to see a whole row of those gargantuan nudie scanners after the US preclearance area.  I was told that I had been selected for an additional search and could choose between the scanner or a patdown.  </p>
<p>Another security-clad individual stopped the lady speaking to me for a moment, asking why she had selected 3 people in a row.  &#8220;This line is 100% selection today.&#8221;  &#8220;Oh.&#8221;</p>
<p>My dad&#8217;s friend, a radiologist, advised him to avoid the nudie scanners due to radiation, so I that&#8217;s what I did.  The guy who patted me down was expressionless but polite and respectful.  It was a minimal inconvenience that was no worse than the inspection I used to get before entering nightclubs.  No, he didn&#8217;t touch my package.  Everything but.</p>
<p>The whole thing was maybe 2 minutes.  No biggie.  Not that I didn&#8217;t resent it, but I felt I&#8217;d earned a bit of smugness by refusing them the privilege of using their expensive machines.</p>
<p>Sadly, nobody else chose the patdown.  Presumably they had better things to do with their 90 seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1000286</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1000286</guid>
		<description>I think that there&#039;s a pretty big difference between warrantless domestic surveillance and searching the baggage of people entering the country. Given that they don&#039;t comprehensively search all baggage, how do you think customs should choose who to pay more attention to? Working at a company that is generally acknowledged to have been working with someone being prosecuted by the US military seems like a pretty big red flag to me. It&#039;s not really the same thing as having a cousin who once got into a barfight. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that there&#8217;s a pretty big difference between warrantless domestic surveillance and searching the baggage of people entering the country. Given that they don&#8217;t comprehensively search all baggage, how do you think customs should choose who to pay more attention to? Working at a company that is generally acknowledged to have been working with someone being prosecuted by the US military seems like a pretty big red flag to me. It&#8217;s not really the same thing as having a cousin who once got into a barfight. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Life Of Bryan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1000033</link>
		<dc:creator>The Life Of Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1000033</guid>
		<description>The governmentâ€™s reaction to Wikileaks has told us more than all the leaks combined ever could.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The governmentâ€™s reaction to Wikileaks has told us more than all the leaks combined ever could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1000291</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1000291</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a Canadian living in Vancouver, so this is certainly of interest to me. I recall boingboing published an article about PBS Democracy Now anchor Amy Goodman&#039;s difficulties crossing the border to do a talk at the public library a few months prior to the 2010 Olympic Games. 75 minute detention. This sort of thing happened to several journalists, activists, and educators. 

I have a lawyer friend who works for the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association whom I alerted about Mr. Appelbaum&#039;s treatment when he crossed earlier this month. I&#039;ll definitely be sharing this article with him. I will also contact the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and inform them.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Canadian living in Vancouver, so this is certainly of interest to me. I recall boingboing published an article about PBS Democracy Now anchor Amy Goodman&#8217;s difficulties crossing the border to do a talk at the public library a few months prior to the 2010 Olympic Games. 75 minute detention. This sort of thing happened to several journalists, activists, and educators. </p>
<p>I have a lawyer friend who works for the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association whom I alerted about Mr. Appelbaum&#8217;s treatment when he crossed earlier this month. I&#8217;ll definitely be sharing this article with him. I will also contact the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and inform them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris-Mouse</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1000292</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris-Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1000292</guid>
		<description>&quot;I&#039;d have to assume that being a wikileaks volunteer would make you a known associate of Bradley Manning,...&quot;

Um no, you wouldn&#039;t.
There is no evidence of anyone from wikileaks having any more than the sort of casual contact with Manning that you would have with the cashier at your local store. 

Yes wikileaks has copies of a bunch of material the US government would rather they didn&#039;t have. The US government would also love to be able to arrest everyone involved with wikileaks. It&#039;s funny though, in spite of weeks of trying, the US government hasn&#039;t even been able to identify which law may have been broken by any wikileaks volunteer, let alone evidence showing which volunteer it may have been.

Until such time as the US government can show which law is broken and at least some evidence of who broke the law, the US constitution forbids the sort of guilt by association and harassment that is currently occurring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I&#8217;d have to assume that being a wikileaks volunteer would make you a known associate of Bradley Manning,&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Um no, you wouldn&#8217;t.<br />
There is no evidence of anyone from wikileaks having any more than the sort of casual contact with Manning that you would have with the cashier at your local store. </p>
<p>Yes wikileaks has copies of a bunch of material the US government would rather they didn&#8217;t have. The US government would also love to be able to arrest everyone involved with wikileaks. It&#8217;s funny though, in spite of weeks of trying, the US government hasn&#8217;t even been able to identify which law may have been broken by any wikileaks volunteer, let alone evidence showing which volunteer it may have been.</p>
<p>Until such time as the US government can show which law is broken and at least some evidence of who broke the law, the US constitution forbids the sort of guilt by association and harassment that is currently occurring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1000809</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1000809</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Working at a company that is generally acknowledged to have been working with someone being prosecuted by the US military seems like a pretty big red flag to me. It&#039;s not really the same thing as having a cousin who once got into a barfight.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Mark, do you have any loose connections with anyone who has ever been accused of a crime?  If so, please go report yourself to the authorities.  As a matter of fact, just being suspicious enough for me to have to ask you that seems very suspicious to me.

Boing Boing moderators, can we get this suspicious person&#039;s IP address?  I mean, being suspicious is only one step away from being a potential terrorist.

Moderators, we have a potential terrorist on our hands here.  Please report Mark&#039;s IP address to the authorities.  Mark obviously needs to be tracked, searched and harassed.

We just can&#039;t be too safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Working at a company that is generally acknowledged to have been working with someone being prosecuted by the US military seems like a pretty big red flag to me. It&#8217;s not really the same thing as having a cousin who once got into a barfight.</p></blockquote>
<p>Mark, do you have any loose connections with anyone who has ever been accused of a crime?  If so, please go report yourself to the authorities.  As a matter of fact, just being suspicious enough for me to have to ask you that seems very suspicious to me.</p>
<p>Boing Boing moderators, can we get this suspicious person&#8217;s IP address?  I mean, being suspicious is only one step away from being a potential terrorist.</p>
<p>Moderators, we have a potential terrorist on our hands here.  Please report Mark&#8217;s IP address to the authorities.  Mark obviously needs to be tracked, searched and harassed.</p>
<p>We just can&#8217;t be too safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1000060</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1000060</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have to assume that being a wikileaks volunteer would make you a known associate of Bradley Manning, currently being held pending trial under the UCMJ. Additionally I think it would be safe to assume that being the known associate of any accused felon would lead to more intensive screening when travelling internationally.

Since logistical concerns prevent the border patrol and customs agencies from thoroughly searching everyone&#039;s baggage (!) it seems like there are stupider ways to choose who to search. As to the interrogation, you don&#039;t actually have to answer any questions at all if you are a citizen returning to the United States. They are of course allowed to ask them, but not to detain you longer than necessary to confirm the veracity of your travel documents and examine your baggage. 

I&#039;m much more concerned with the fact that so many people pass through customs with only the most cursory of inspections, not that they would use this specific criterion for selecting whose baggage they inspect properly. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to assume that being a wikileaks volunteer would make you a known associate of Bradley Manning, currently being held pending trial under the UCMJ. Additionally I think it would be safe to assume that being the known associate of any accused felon would lead to more intensive screening when travelling internationally.</p>
<p>Since logistical concerns prevent the border patrol and customs agencies from thoroughly searching everyone&#8217;s baggage (!) it seems like there are stupider ways to choose who to search. As to the interrogation, you don&#8217;t actually have to answer any questions at all if you are a citizen returning to the United States. They are of course allowed to ask them, but not to detain you longer than necessary to confirm the veracity of your travel documents and examine your baggage. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m much more concerned with the fact that so many people pass through customs with only the most cursory of inspections, not that they would use this specific criterion for selecting whose baggage they inspect properly. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris-Mouse</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1000576</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris-Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1000576</guid>
		<description>Mark, a quick look at the Wikileaks site answers that. While the number of documents leaked by Manning is larger than any other leak, it&#039;s nowhere near the majority of the topics on the site.
I did a quick count of the &quot;latest leaks and censored media&quot; section. Out of some 200 entries, over 80% were obviously not from Manning as they did not relate to the US military or diplomatic communications. That&#039;s only the one&#039;s I&#039;m sure of. The actual percentage of leaks coming from sources other than Manning is probably even higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, a quick look at the Wikileaks site answers that. While the number of documents leaked by Manning is larger than any other leak, it&#8217;s nowhere near the majority of the topics on the site.<br />
I did a quick count of the &#8220;latest leaks and censored media&#8221; section. Out of some 200 entries, over 80% were obviously not from Manning as they did not relate to the US military or diplomatic communications. That&#8217;s only the one&#8217;s I&#8217;m sure of. The actual percentage of leaks coming from sources other than Manning is probably even higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deidzoeb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1001090</link>
		<dc:creator>Deidzoeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1001090</guid>
		<description>US citizens would very rarely find themselves clamouring for work. We would be clamoring for work. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US citizens would very rarely find themselves clamouring for work. We would be clamoring for work. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camp Freddie</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1000070</link>
		<dc:creator>Camp Freddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1000070</guid>
		<description>He just needs to change his middle name to ;droptable.  In works in XKCD comics!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He just needs to change his middle name to ;droptable.  In works in XKCD comics!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1000329</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1000329</guid>
		<description>Does wikileaks do anything besides release documents that Manning has admitted to sending them? I was under the impression that that was the bulk, if not the entirety, of their operations. 

If so I&#039;d say that the relationship was more like being a cashier at a pawn shop where most of the inventory came from one person who is currently in jail charged with stealing all of those items. If said cashier followed all the requisite policies and procedures and had no (known) reason for believing the items to be stolen then they would not be guilty of a crime. Still, if that same cashier was travelling internationally I&#039;d have to assume that the customs people would be interested in what was in their bags. At least I&#039;d hope they would be. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does wikileaks do anything besides release documents that Manning has admitted to sending them? I was under the impression that that was the bulk, if not the entirety, of their operations. </p>
<p>If so I&#8217;d say that the relationship was more like being a cashier at a pawn shop where most of the inventory came from one person who is currently in jail charged with stealing all of those items. If said cashier followed all the requisite policies and procedures and had no (known) reason for believing the items to be stolen then they would not be guilty of a crime. Still, if that same cashier was travelling internationally I&#8217;d have to assume that the customs people would be interested in what was in their bags. At least I&#8217;d hope they would be. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IronEdithKidd</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1000074</link>
		<dc:creator>IronEdithKidd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1000074</guid>
		<description>This.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ugly Canuck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1001640</link>
		<dc:creator>Ugly Canuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1001640</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right - if you publicly disagree with US Government policy, the Government&#039;s employees are free to harass you to their heart&#039;s content, because the US Court System does not mind one bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right &#8211; if you publicly disagree with US Government policy, the Government&#8217;s employees are free to harass you to their heart&#8217;s content, because the US Court System does not mind one bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baldhead</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1000361</link>
		<dc:creator>Baldhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1000361</guid>
		<description>It sounds like the sort of detention I had one time- except I ws kept longer. The difference is that I had six months worth of stuff and an employment contract and the US has for some time been very touchy about any foreigner entering to do work that supposedly US citizens are clamouring to do. Add to it the immense problem of illegal immigration from Canada (snicker) and you see why they held me. This gentleman however is a citizen with no luggage being bothered because he&#039;s worked with people who happened to be given some embarrassing documents. No intelligent reason exists to detain him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like the sort of detention I had one time- except I ws kept longer. The difference is that I had six months worth of stuff and an employment contract and the US has for some time been very touchy about any foreigner entering to do work that supposedly US citizens are clamouring to do. Add to it the immense problem of illegal immigration from Canada (snicker) and you see why they held me. This gentleman however is a citizen with no luggage being bothered because he&#8217;s worked with people who happened to be given some embarrassing documents. No intelligent reason exists to detain him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Variola (ret)</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-999851</link>
		<dc:creator>Major Variola (ret)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-999851</guid>
		<description>The USG is the new Rome; the evil empire.

But folks in glass empires shouldn&#039;t fly drones.

Obamabush should give its peace prize to Assange.

The livestock of the US should not be surprised at the next
feedback, but they will be.  Silly dumb animals.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The USG is the new Rome; the evil empire.</p>
<p>But folks in glass empires shouldn&#8217;t fly drones.</p>
<p>Obamabush should give its peace prize to Assange.</p>
<p>The livestock of the US should not be surprised at the next<br />
feedback, but they will be.  Silly dumb animals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-999856</link>
		<dc:creator>mdh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-999856</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be outraged when DHS/ICE does it to you again. This was Canada, and they sounded pleasant, prompt, and professional about it. Keep that powder dry. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be outraged when DHS/ICE does it to you again. This was Canada, and they sounded pleasant, prompt, and professional about it. Keep that powder dry. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xeni Jardin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-999858</link>
		<dc:creator>Xeni Jardin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-999858</guid>
		<description>So political harassment is okay as long as they&#039;re &quot;pleasant&quot; about it? Utterly stupid response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So political harassment is okay as long as they&#8217;re &#8220;pleasant&#8221; about it? Utterly stupid response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1000371</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1000371</guid>
		<description>Actually, I don&#039;t think that there&#039;s any legal justification to detain him at all. Once they have verified that he is a citizen then all they can do is mess with his baggage. Additionally it does not profit him to talk to the authorities at all, except in order to confirm his identity. Much like many police interviews/interrogations these interactions are actually not mandatory at all, people just tend to be afraid to repeatedly say things like &#039;I&#039;m done. I&#039;d like to go now. Are you holding me against my will?&#039;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I don&#8217;t think that there&#8217;s any legal justification to detain him at all. Once they have verified that he is a citizen then all they can do is mess with his baggage. Additionally it does not profit him to talk to the authorities at all, except in order to confirm his identity. Much like many police interviews/interrogations these interactions are actually not mandatory at all, people just tend to be afraid to repeatedly say things like &#8216;I&#8217;m done. I&#8217;d like to go now. Are you holding me against my will?&#8217;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deidzoeb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-1000116</link>
		<dc:creator>Deidzoeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1000116</guid>
		<description>Might I suggest that future instances of this event be communicated by the usual photo of this guy with tally marks added to show the number of times it has happened?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might I suggest that future instances of this event be communicated by the usual photo of this guy with tally marks added to show the number of times it has happened?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bureaucromancer</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-999861</link>
		<dc:creator>Bureaucromancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-999861</guid>
		<description>And more to the point the concept of the preclearance system has gone completely over your head.  This had nothing to do with the Canadian government in any way shape or form other than in that they allow American officials to operate on our soil for (normally) everyone&#039;s convenience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And more to the point the concept of the preclearance system has gone completely over your head.  This had nothing to do with the Canadian government in any way shape or form other than in that they allow American officials to operate on our soil for (normally) everyone&#8217;s convenience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hubert Figuiere</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-999863</link>
		<dc:creator>Hubert Figuiere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-999863</guid>
		<description>If you read his twitter feed properly, you&#039;ll notice that everything he said happened on the Canadian side, ie in the Canadian airport where he was departing form and where CBP has an &quot;outpost&quot; for pre-clearance to enter the US -- like it happens when flying to the US from most Canadian airports. Upon his arrival in SeaTac he was in the domestic terminal, therefore no CBP at all.

So your title and article is totally misleading as to where this happened. It was a &quot;Canadian airport&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you read his twitter feed properly, you&#8217;ll notice that everything he said happened on the Canadian side, ie in the Canadian airport where he was departing form and where CBP has an &#8220;outpost&#8221; for pre-clearance to enter the US &#8212; like it happens when flying to the US from most Canadian airports. Upon his arrival in SeaTac he was in the domestic terminal, therefore no CBP at all.</p>
<p>So your title and article is totally misleading as to where this happened. It was a &#8220;Canadian airport&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-999867</link>
		<dc:creator>mdh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-999867</guid>
		<description>No, but it wasn&#039;t my government, nor his. It was a foriegn government - and they get to treat people as their people see fit. 

Sounded courteous and reasonable in execution, if not justification. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, but it wasn&#8217;t my government, nor his. It was a foriegn government &#8211; and they get to treat people as their people see fit. </p>
<p>Sounded courteous and reasonable in execution, if not justification. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-999868</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-999868</guid>
		<description>Read the comment above you. Rinse and repeat as necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the comment above you. Rinse and repeat as necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xeni Jardin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/19/wikileaks-volunteer-2.html#comment-999872</link>
		<dc:creator>Xeni Jardin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-999872</guid>
		<description>Wrong, it was US agents. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong, it was US agents. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
