<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Machine balances pencil on its&#160;tip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/01/21/machine-balances-pen.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/21/machine-balances-pen.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/21/machine-balances-pen.html#comment-1003010</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1003010</guid>
		<description>I sometimes wish I had studied engineering at ETH. They keep publishing these videos of relatively simple, useless, but very cool contraptions. Must be fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sometimes wish I had studied engineering at ETH. They keep publishing these videos of relatively simple, useless, but very cool contraptions. Must be fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robcat2075</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/21/machine-balances-pen.html#comment-1002009</link>
		<dc:creator>robcat2075</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1002009</guid>
		<description>In another age this would show up as an executive toy in the Sharper Image catalog next to must-haves like the motorized tie rack and the electric back hair shaver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In another age this would show up as an executive toy in the Sharper Image catalog next to must-haves like the motorized tie rack and the electric back hair shaver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankieboy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/21/machine-balances-pen.html#comment-1001766</link>
		<dc:creator>frankieboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1001766</guid>
		<description>Pfffft! I&#039;ll bet NASA could do the same thing for only $500 mil. What did you guys spend, huh? Probably didn&#039;t even let the taxpayers in on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pfffft! I&#8217;ll bet NASA could do the same thing for only $500 mil. What did you guys spend, huh? Probably didn&#8217;t even let the taxpayers in on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InsertFingerHere</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/21/machine-balances-pen.html#comment-1002278</link>
		<dc:creator>InsertFingerHere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1002278</guid>
		<description>&quot;I am&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I am&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kpkpkp</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/21/machine-balances-pen.html#comment-1001786</link>
		<dc:creator>kpkpkp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1001786</guid>
		<description>I am curious if the machine can achieve quiet equilibrium.   This would most likely require the ability to measure the mass of the pencil in the course of corrective actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious if the machine can achieve quiet equilibrium.   This would most likely require the ability to measure the mass of the pencil in the course of corrective actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/21/machine-balances-pen.html#comment-1001801</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1001801</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of W. C. Fields.  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MZWq14uD-A&amp;t=2m20s
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of W. C. Fields.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MZWq14uD-A&#038;t=2m20s" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MZWq14uD-A&#038;t=2m20s</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/21/machine-balances-pen.html#comment-1001803</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1001803</guid>
		<description>Interesting to me because I&#039;m the only person I know who can balance a pencil on my finger tip, everybody thinks it&#039;s a trick,
I just always have been able to, I can balance anything easier
 (weightier at the top) so still it looks like it glued to my finger, useless but neat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to me because I&#8217;m the only person I know who can balance a pencil on my finger tip, everybody thinks it&#8217;s a trick,<br />
I just always have been able to, I can balance anything easier<br />
 (weightier at the top) so still it looks like it glued to my finger, useless but neat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackm</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/21/machine-balances-pen.html#comment-1001808</link>
		<dc:creator>jackm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1001808</guid>
		<description>For their next research project, they&#039;ll be making a machine which can mechanically balance a spoon on their nose...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For their next research project, they&#8217;ll be making a machine which can mechanically balance a spoon on their nose&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phikus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/21/machine-balances-pen.html#comment-1002095</link>
		<dc:creator>Phikus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1002095</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see a pen installed in the bottom and a piece of paper locked beneath to see what it draws as it keeps the pencil on top upright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see a pen installed in the bottom and a piece of paper locked beneath to see what it draws as it keeps the pencil on top upright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cory</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/21/machine-balances-pen.html#comment-1002615</link>
		<dc:creator>cory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1002615</guid>
		<description>If I understand what you mean by &quot;quiet equilibrium&quot;, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s actually possible in the general case.  They said it was an &quot;abritrary standard pencil&quot;, i.e. not one that was specially balanced and sharpened to be exactly balanced.

It is certainly possible to sharpen a pencil so that it is lopsided which would make that equilibrium (non-moving pencil) impossible.  I believe it is probably the &lt;i&gt;most common case by far&lt;/i&gt; that a pencil will not have a perfect mass distribution, but I can&#039;t prove this off the top of my head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I understand what you mean by &#8220;quiet equilibrium&#8221;, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s actually possible in the general case.  They said it was an &#8220;abritrary standard pencil&#8221;, i.e. not one that was specially balanced and sharpened to be exactly balanced.</p>
<p>It is certainly possible to sharpen a pencil so that it is lopsided which would make that equilibrium (non-moving pencil) impossible.  I believe it is probably the <i>most common case by far</i> that a pencil will not have a perfect mass distribution, but I can&#8217;t prove this off the top of my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/21/machine-balances-pen.html#comment-1001851</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1001851</guid>
		<description>cool stuff.  FWIW, Tobi Delbruck is the son of the late Max Delbruck, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine in 1969.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool stuff.  FWIW, Tobi Delbruck is the son of the late Max Delbruck, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine in 1969.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JayConverse</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/21/machine-balances-pen.html#comment-1001868</link>
		<dc:creator>JayConverse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1001868</guid>
		<description>And how many of you just tried to do it at your desk? And failed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And how many of you just tried to do it at your desk? And failed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adralien</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/21/machine-balances-pen.html#comment-1001871</link>
		<dc:creator>adralien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1001871</guid>
		<description>@kp They&#039;re doing some neat visual processing that only detects pixel changes rather than detecting the actual pencil... They seem to do this to reduce the amount of information from the visual sensors and mimic how real eyes convey information.

I think that means that the pencil always has to be moving somewhat to generate input to adjust the motion table.

Other systems out there that use full-frame video and a bunch more processing can statically balance things like double pendulums on end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kp They&#8217;re doing some neat visual processing that only detects pixel changes rather than detecting the actual pencil&#8230; They seem to do this to reduce the amount of information from the visual sensors and mimic how real eyes convey information.</p>
<p>I think that means that the pencil always has to be moving somewhat to generate input to adjust the motion table.</p>
<p>Other systems out there that use full-frame video and a bunch more processing can statically balance things like double pendulums on end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaleberg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/21/machine-balances-pen.html#comment-1003451</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaleberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1003451</guid>
		<description>That really brings back memories. Back in 1974 Professor Dertouzos at MIT gave a robotics course. He had two big goals. He wanted a computer to accompany him on a recorder, listening as he played to match his tempo, and he wanted a robot that could balance a broomstick much as this device balances a pencil. The first computers on a chip were just being released. A friend of mine and I did a survey of available, and almost available processors, and both projects were near the hairy edge of their processing power given what we knew about physics and control theory. I remember he had a spec from Toshiba for a processor they were developing and hoped to sell to Ford to control automobile engines. It looked promising. I also remember an awful lot of neat gizmos being built in the lab, and Professor Dertouzos addressing our awkward question, &quot;That&#039;s right. You are probably wondering about getting a grade.&quot;

It took another year or two before he got his balancing robot. I&#039;m less sure about his recorder companion, though I gather there are such things today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That really brings back memories. Back in 1974 Professor Dertouzos at MIT gave a robotics course. He had two big goals. He wanted a computer to accompany him on a recorder, listening as he played to match his tempo, and he wanted a robot that could balance a broomstick much as this device balances a pencil. The first computers on a chip were just being released. A friend of mine and I did a survey of available, and almost available processors, and both projects were near the hairy edge of their processing power given what we knew about physics and control theory. I remember he had a spec from Toshiba for a processor they were developing and hoped to sell to Ford to control automobile engines. It looked promising. I also remember an awful lot of neat gizmos being built in the lab, and Professor Dertouzos addressing our awkward question, &#8220;That&#8217;s right. You are probably wondering about getting a grade.&#8221;</p>
<p>It took another year or two before he got his balancing robot. I&#8217;m less sure about his recorder companion, though I gather there are such things today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Hart</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/01/21/machine-balances-pen.html#comment-1002447</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1002447</guid>
		<description>This is strangely compelling to keep watching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is strangely compelling to keep watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
