Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Science fiction writers, editors, critics and publishers talk the future of publishing

Cory Doctorow at 2:26 am Thu, Jan 27, 2011

— FEATURED —

Book Review

Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation

Book Review

We Can Fix it! - a graphic novel time travel memoir

Science

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle
SFSignal, a website for the science fiction publishing industry, asks a number of writers, editors, critics and publishers "What will the publishing industry look like after 10 more years of advancing technology?" The answers are a mix of honest forthrightness about the unreliability of long-term predictions, grim business reality, and fascinating insight about the complimentary nature and economics of print and electronic publishing. Here's writer Tim Pratt:
More authors will experiment with self-publishing, as the barrier to entry for doing so with e-books is comparatively low. Some will have success with that; lots of others won't. Amazon.com and perhaps other purveyors of online books will increasingly attempt to take on the role of publishers, "curating" e-book collections. I don't expect publishing as we know it to disappear, by any means, but the field is going to become crowded by self-publishing -- some of it quite good -- and weird hybrids, and new companies springing up to fill whatever inevitable gaps are left by the relatively slow-moving major publishers.

It will likely get harder for writers to make a living doing nothing but writing fiction... but most writers I know don't make a living exclusively writing fiction anyway. We'll have to explore new methods: direct appeals to readers, weird limited editions with interesting extras, patrons, corporate sponsorship, kickstarter fundraisers in lieu of novel advances -- who knows.

Those are pretty cautious guesses, I know, but hey, science fiction writers are generally crap at predicting the future. (And I'm mostly a fantasy writer!) In ten years, the world could be unimaginably weird. I certainly hope it will be. But I'm sure I'll still be reading books, even if they don't look much like the books I grew up with.

Q: What will the publishing industry look like after 10 more years of advancing technology? (via Futurismic)

(Image: Government Printing Office Building Number Four Jackson Alley Cast Concrete Presswork Bas Relief (Washington, DC), a Creative Commons Attribution (2.0) image from takomabibelot's photostream)

 
  • Future of Publishing video will amuse and delight - Boing Boing
  • Publishers' shibboleths vs the future of publishing - Boing Boing
  • Sensible and interesting predictions for the future of publishing ...
  • Wonderful scans from a 1962 book of tech predictions for1975 ...
  • Publishing's crises (incompletely) explained - Boing Boing
  • Comprehensive excoriation of ebook stupidity - Boing Boing

I write books. My latest is a YA science fiction novel called Homeland (it's the sequel to Little Brother). More books: Rapture of the Nerds (a novel, with Charlie Stross); With a Little Help (short stories); and The Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow (novella and nonfic). I speak all over the place and I tweet and tumble, too.

MORE:  Business • ebooks • Technology

More at Boing Boing

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

Hackers prepare for first "national holiday" in their honor

  • sabik

    Hmm, two of the authors predict piracy will exist, one that it will be suppressed in a “Rainbows End” scenario. I’m holding out for the future where book piracy is a bizarre concept, like pirating an encyclopaedia or a web browser…

  • tweaked

    “Complimentary nature and economics of print and electronic publishing,” Cory? Do the nature and economics of print and electronic publishing say lots of nice things about others? If it were anyone else posting, I would’ve said nothing… but for you I have higher standards. Neat article though in any case.

  • Wally Ballou

    I expect that regardless of how publishing finally shakes out, the “science fiction” section of whatever the marketplace looks like will be

    45% cheesy, derivative swords-and-magic fantasy,

    30% vampires, zombies and vampire/zombie crossovers,

    15% movie and TV spinoffs,

    and if we are lucky, 10% original science fiction.

  • Random Royalty

    As a small publisher (of non-fiction) I cannot stress enough that the biggest factor is literacy.

    This is more than just an ability to read, but an ability to critically appreciate literature and thus bring that appreciation to others. This also extends to how current technology trends really have no effect on critical literacy, and how this is mainly an anxiety over losing the curator function (publishers are critically literate to a very high degree). If we leave this up to the marketplace it will take a while before this rectifies. But markets abhor vacuums, so no worries there for me.

    If the history of mass media is an indicator, it will be only a matter of time that we become more critically literate of the technology we are so worried about, something that always takes time. It took 50 years of television before it was no longer considered a direct threat to reading…this is because we became more literate about television and as a result stopped blaming it for all of society’s ills.

    We can expect perhaps 10 to 20 years before we fully understand how the new market dynamics will change literature, but the readers will come back, and hopefully fiction writers will be able to earn a living with their writing once again.

  • Cochituate

    Love the illo- what I have come to call Socialist Art Deco. There are several banks and public buildings in the Twin Cities decorated in this style I’ve come to love since I moved here a generation ago. Not found so much in New England.