<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What atheists are really concerned&#160;about</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chgoliz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1017600</link>
		<dc:creator>chgoliz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1017600</guid>
		<description>Other than the one reference to Christmas, there&#039;s no specific religion(s) mentioned. Why do you assume every reference to religion and/or a god means YOUR religion and YOUR god? Yours isn&#039;t even the majority religion in the world.

Seriously. Think about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than the one reference to Christmas, there&#8217;s no specific religion(s) mentioned. Why do you assume every reference to religion and/or a god means YOUR religion and YOUR god? Yours isn&#8217;t even the majority religion in the world.</p>
<p>Seriously. Think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1017601</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1017601</guid>
		<description>Plenty don&#039;t, as well.

Broad generalizations lead to faulty thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plenty don&#8217;t, as well.</p>
<p>Broad generalizations lead to faulty thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phlip</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1018113</link>
		<dc:creator>Phlip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1018113</guid>
		<description>I also heard that - _sometimes_ - some churches teach their flock to play the Victim Card, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also heard that &#8211; _sometimes_ &#8211; some churches teach their flock to play the Victim Card, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hools Verne</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1017858</link>
		<dc:creator>Hools Verne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1017858</guid>
		<description>Because they don&#039;t believe in him or because they are not kosher/halal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because they don&#8217;t believe in him or because they are not kosher/halal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lthrcoat</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1017603</link>
		<dc:creator>lthrcoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1017603</guid>
		<description>All atheists are politically motivated at their core.  Why else be so outspoken.  If liberal ideology were pro religion they would change in a minute.  The last war whose justification was Christianity occurred about 800 years ago...time to get over it. 

This post tries to make Christians look like narrow-minded morons...sure shows what side Boing comes in on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All atheists are politically motivated at their core.  Why else be so outspoken.  If liberal ideology were pro religion they would change in a minute.  The last war whose justification was Christianity occurred about 800 years ago&#8230;time to get over it. </p>
<p>This post tries to make Christians look like narrow-minded morons&#8230;sure shows what side Boing comes in on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1017859</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1017859</guid>
		<description>have yet to meet an atheist, who wasn&#039;t just a christian/relegionista in reverse.dogmatic rhetoric is,just that! no matter who is throwing it. why? because jesus blahblahblah..or why? because nietzsche blahblahblah... the biggest douchegroup by far, no matter which end. hello atheists, meet the christians. Now get over yourselves. because in the end any group that thinks others should be like them and all those who are not must be stupiduncivilizedbackwarduneducatedsiningwizards, is really just more o&#039; the same B.S. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have yet to meet an atheist, who wasn&#8217;t just a christian/relegionista in reverse.dogmatic rhetoric is,just that! no matter who is throwing it. why? because jesus blahblahblah..or why? because nietzsche blahblahblah&#8230; the biggest douchegroup by far, no matter which end. hello atheists, meet the christians. Now get over yourselves. because in the end any group that thinks others should be like them and all those who are not must be stupiduncivilizedbackwarduneducatedsiningwizards, is really just more o&#8217; the same B.S. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1017604</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1017604</guid>
		<description>UU churches and Ethical Societies welcome atheists and agnostics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UU churches and Ethical Societies welcome atheists and agnostics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1018373</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1018373</guid>
		<description>This is completely untrue at the jail where I work.  If I ask if you have any dietary restrictions, I ask &quot;for any religious or moral observation&quot; and include vegetarianism in that.  And, btw, I am an atheist so if you tell me your vegetarian to be vegetarian, then you get to eat vegetarian in here.  I&#039;ll also ask which form of vegetarian you eat.

Stop claiming that all institutions are run the same and on some form of oppressive religious regime without having the facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is completely untrue at the jail where I work.  If I ask if you have any dietary restrictions, I ask &#8220;for any religious or moral observation&#8221; and include vegetarianism in that.  And, btw, I am an atheist so if you tell me your vegetarian to be vegetarian, then you get to eat vegetarian in here.  I&#8217;ll also ask which form of vegetarian you eat.</p>
<p>Stop claiming that all institutions are run the same and on some form of oppressive religious regime without having the facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1017862</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1017862</guid>
		<description>That stereotype goes back way further than that. You shouldn&#039;t blame atheists for the low opinion of them that has existed for a very long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That stereotype goes back way further than that. You shouldn&#8217;t blame atheists for the low opinion of them that has existed for a very long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1019910</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1019910</guid>
		<description>Just as a note, Judaism is particularly influential because it&#039;s widespread, but it&#039;s not one of the three most populous religions by any means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as a note, Judaism is particularly influential because it&#8217;s widespread, but it&#8217;s not one of the three most populous religions by any means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lthrcoat</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1017607</link>
		<dc:creator>lthrcoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1017607</guid>
		<description>By the way....I googled anti-christianity and it came up with a ton of stuff from atheists.  I googled anti-atheism and it came up with more sites from atheists.  you make your own conclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way&#8230;.I googled anti-christianity and it came up with a ton of stuff from atheists.  I googled anti-atheism and it came up with more sites from atheists.  you make your own conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: momus_98</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1018120</link>
		<dc:creator>momus_98</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1018120</guid>
		<description>+10 internets to Ugly Canuck! Most people read that as two separate words - &quot;mom&quot; and &quot;us&quot; - and assume I&#039;m female. I came up with that handle back in the days of Yahoo! Chat circa 1997 and you&#039;re the only person (so far) that got the meaning right off. Good job, sir!

Definition of Momus according to Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+10 internets to Ugly Canuck! Most people read that as two separate words &#8211; &#8220;mom&#8221; and &#8220;us&#8221; &#8211; and assume I&#8217;m female. I came up with that handle back in the days of Yahoo! Chat circa 1997 and you&#8217;re the only person (so far) that got the meaning right off. Good job, sir!</p>
<p>Definition of Momus according to Wikipedia:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momus" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momus</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lecti</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1019400</link>
		<dc:creator>lecti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1019400</guid>
		<description>What atheists are REALLY concerned about: If your boss is christian and you are not, are you gonna be passed up for promotion and get marginalized?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What atheists are REALLY concerned about: If your boss is christian and you are not, are you gonna be passed up for promotion and get marginalized?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1018633</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1018633</guid>
		<description>Gee, an atheist who feels misunderstood demonstrates he misunderstands christians.  how clever of you!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, an atheist who feels misunderstood demonstrates he misunderstands christians.  how clever of you!  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1017866</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1017866</guid>
		<description>You find it sadly ironic that tolerant atheists get stereotyped, but you also think that jokes stereotyping all atheists are awesome.

I love cognitive dissonance, but at the same time I hate cognitive dissonance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You find it sadly ironic that tolerant atheists get stereotyped, but you also think that jokes stereotyping all atheists are awesome.</p>
<p>I love cognitive dissonance, but at the same time I hate cognitive dissonance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hools Verne</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1017868</link>
		<dc:creator>Hools Verne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1017868</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the way they sold it, not really the way they believed it to be. The current adventurism in the Middle East has far more to do with Orientalist constructs and the transfer of responsibilities for Western hegemony from across the pond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the way they sold it, not really the way they believed it to be. The current adventurism in the Middle East has far more to do with Orientalist constructs and the transfer of responsibilities for Western hegemony from across the pond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PFlint</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1017869</link>
		<dc:creator>PFlint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1017869</guid>
		<description>This sounded like my first days on the web, a dozen years ago.  Nothing has changed.  Never will.  I&#039;m not sure what it was for. Thanks for this, BoingBoing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounded like my first days on the web, a dozen years ago.  Nothing has changed.  Never will.  I&#8217;m not sure what it was for. Thanks for this, BoingBoing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1017872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1017872</guid>
		<description>Atheism isn&#039;t a belief; it&#039;s merely an observation.

I observe the Universe around me, and see no evidence of god(s).  Just a simple observation.  That is also the main reason why atheists don&#039;t need atheist churches.  We don&#039;t have a belief that needs reinforcing in spite of observations to the contrary.  If god(s) existed, and made their existence plainly known (stopping by your house for dinner, helping rake the yard, etc.) religious people wouldn&#039;t need churches to help prop up their beliefs either, because in that case it would just be an observation too, like atheism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atheism isn&#8217;t a belief; it&#8217;s merely an observation.</p>
<p>I observe the Universe around me, and see no evidence of god(s).  Just a simple observation.  That is also the main reason why atheists don&#8217;t need atheist churches.  We don&#8217;t have a belief that needs reinforcing in spite of observations to the contrary.  If god(s) existed, and made their existence plainly known (stopping by your house for dinner, helping rake the yard, etc.) religious people wouldn&#8217;t need churches to help prop up their beliefs either, because in that case it would just be an observation too, like atheism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister44</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1018128</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1018128</guid>
		<description>re&quot;.. point and laugh at the silly robes, vestments, and rituals of the various churches; we look at what Christianity says (the earth is only 6,000 years old) and *know* that that&#039;s simply not true;&quot;

Hey - don&#039;t hate on the robes. Some of them are stylin&#039;. And we got some neat hats.

And just a point - Christianity doesn&#039;t say the earth is 6000-10000years old, Fundamentalists, Evangelicals and some Baptists say that. A vast majority do not.

That is the problem I see. You have &#039;smug&#039; (to barrow your term) atheists actively waving the truth in the faces of Fundamentalists, who feel attacked and cling even more so to a belief - thinking it defines their faith. 

I home school and once a week I take my kiddo to a group class with other kids. It is a nice place - great people - but most of them are much more fundamentalists than me. I overheard one of them heard Ken Ham speak and yadda yadda. I am thinking of making a   paper or something that helps explain both the science of evolution, but how it doesn&#039;t have to clash with scripture. I am just waiting for someone to ask me. Cocked and loaded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re&#8221;.. point and laugh at the silly robes, vestments, and rituals of the various churches; we look at what Christianity says (the earth is only 6,000 years old) and *know* that that&#8217;s simply not true;&#8221;</p>
<p>Hey &#8211; don&#8217;t hate on the robes. Some of them are stylin&#8217;. And we got some neat hats.</p>
<p>And just a point &#8211; Christianity doesn&#8217;t say the earth is 6000-10000years old, Fundamentalists, Evangelicals and some Baptists say that. A vast majority do not.</p>
<p>That is the problem I see. You have &#8216;smug&#8217; (to barrow your term) atheists actively waving the truth in the faces of Fundamentalists, who feel attacked and cling even more so to a belief &#8211; thinking it defines their faith. </p>
<p>I home school and once a week I take my kiddo to a group class with other kids. It is a nice place &#8211; great people &#8211; but most of them are much more fundamentalists than me. I overheard one of them heard Ken Ham speak and yadda yadda. I am thinking of making a   paper or something that helps explain both the science of evolution, but how it doesn&#8217;t have to clash with scripture. I am just waiting for someone to ask me. Cocked and loaded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agreenster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1018896</link>
		<dc:creator>agreenster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1018896</guid>
		<description>Gotta tell ya sapere_aude, I really dont think your list is very representative of what the common Christian in America thinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta tell ya sapere_aude, I really dont think your list is very representative of what the common Christian in America thinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1019412</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1019412</guid>
		<description>atheists really like using big words and complex sentence structure in order to justify their miserable internals. what people dont understand is, religion is meant to believe in the unbelievable in order to create hope that something unbelievable will happen. trying to disprove religion, which many anti religion and atheists do, is counter productive to their &quot;said&quot; intentions. words have no meaning in the real word. only actions which lead to a morally GOOD end result. how can you explain miracles with science? all religions are based around miracles. the asians have it right with their philosophy about life. life is full of coincidence yet it is up you the individual to decode what happened. there is no such thing as coincidence in my mind, only opportunity.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>atheists really like using big words and complex sentence structure in order to justify their miserable internals. what people dont understand is, religion is meant to believe in the unbelievable in order to create hope that something unbelievable will happen. trying to disprove religion, which many anti religion and atheists do, is counter productive to their &#8220;said&#8221; intentions. words have no meaning in the real word. only actions which lead to a morally GOOD end result. how can you explain miracles with science? all religions are based around miracles. the asians have it right with their philosophy about life. life is full of coincidence yet it is up you the individual to decode what happened. there is no such thing as coincidence in my mind, only opportunity.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cook!EMonstA</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1017621</link>
		<dc:creator>Cook!EMonstA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1017621</guid>
		<description>Oh, for the love of God, let us not be smug about it all (WTF?)  I am not an atheist.  I&#039;m a ordained minister and a Universal Unitarian.  Still, I fit this debate more as an atheist than a theist.  If you believe in the mystery of the Universe, great.  If you believe in bible &#039;magic&#039; and unfounded hokum, you deserve to be derided and thought of as stupid.  Sorry, you do.  I&#039;m talking about stuff like this;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5UlRQHxoN8

This monk is actually preaching that the Tuscon Massacre is the fault of none other than Satan, that&#039;s all, no one else.  JL is a possessed satanist because he listened to &#039;Heavy Metal Music&#039; and smoked pot, natch.  If this is what religion gives you, I&#039;m sorry, I can&#039;t defend any of that and I think you deserve to be ridiculed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, for the love of God, let us not be smug about it all (WTF?)  I am not an atheist.  I&#8217;m a ordained minister and a Universal Unitarian.  Still, I fit this debate more as an atheist than a theist.  If you believe in the mystery of the Universe, great.  If you believe in bible &#8216;magic&#8217; and unfounded hokum, you deserve to be derided and thought of as stupid.  Sorry, you do.  I&#8217;m talking about stuff like this;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5UlRQHxoN8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5UlRQHxoN8</a></p>
<p>This monk is actually preaching that the Tuscon Massacre is the fault of none other than Satan, that&#8217;s all, no one else.  JL is a possessed satanist because he listened to &#8216;Heavy Metal Music&#8217; and smoked pot, natch.  If this is what religion gives you, I&#8217;m sorry, I can&#8217;t defend any of that and I think you deserve to be ridiculed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1019413</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1019413</guid>
		<description>you must be an existentialist like myself. SÃ¸ren Kierkegaard? its a good philosophy to use if your virtues are of good nature and you are also an altruist to stay consistent with your ideals. what we are reaching is a point of collision between all religions, ideas, philosophies, etc. you can blame this on communication technology. we never would have been this paranoid about what each person believes if we didnt try to butt in on personal lives ala facebook, twitter, media, anything &quot;informational&quot;. this is coming from someone who has seen the birth and been apart of the IT realm. we created technology to help people and explore new possibilities. not create drama and relations. LOL the biggest issue in egypt was how their internet was shut off. WTF ARE YOU KIDDING!? my internet goes out all the time thanks to americas aging telephone lines. the best part is we think we need newer technology in order to get things faster but all that does is cover up the fundamental problem of the age! people are so blind to how immature america is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you must be an existentialist like myself. SÃ¸ren Kierkegaard? its a good philosophy to use if your virtues are of good nature and you are also an altruist to stay consistent with your ideals. what we are reaching is a point of collision between all religions, ideas, philosophies, etc. you can blame this on communication technology. we never would have been this paranoid about what each person believes if we didnt try to butt in on personal lives ala facebook, twitter, media, anything &#8220;informational&#8221;. this is coming from someone who has seen the birth and been apart of the IT realm. we created technology to help people and explore new possibilities. not create drama and relations. LOL the biggest issue in egypt was how their internet was shut off. WTF ARE YOU KIDDING!? my internet goes out all the time thanks to americas aging telephone lines. the best part is we think we need newer technology in order to get things faster but all that does is cover up the fundamental problem of the age! people are so blind to how immature america is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xenu</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1017622</link>
		<dc:creator>Xenu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1017622</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Numerous times we find ourselves being looked down upon for our faith and beliefs. At no point have we ever done that to them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s a good thing you never gloat, and you came to BoingBoing to post about the fact that you never gloat.

That makes you a much better person than other people, doesn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Numerous times we find ourselves being looked down upon for our faith and beliefs. At no point have we ever done that to them.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s a good thing you never gloat, and you came to BoingBoing to post about the fact that you never gloat.</p>
<p>That makes you a much better person than other people, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1018647</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1018647</guid>
		<description>The confusion is over the word &lt;i&gt;absolutely&lt;/i&gt;. Atheists think gods do not exist - if you&#039;re simply not sure, you&#039;re agnostic - but I have never met any who argue this should be taken on faith. Instead, most will argue that the absence of evidence means gods are no more likely to exist than unicorns, and so for all practical purposes is as false as anything else; a few claim the word &lt;i&gt;god&lt;/i&gt; is currently too poorly defined to say much about in general.  Both could be disputed, and it&#039;s hard to see what&#039;s semi-religious about these positions.

Ito, the claim that atheists can&#039;t cope with Jainist, Zen, or pantheist semantics tells me you haven&#039;t talked to many. Most I&#039;ve heard have the same objections to their precepts, and will happily explain their objections to them when asked. They just don&#039;t usually bother, because they care more about the sorts of things outlined in the opening post, and pantheists aren&#039;t out there trying to dismantle science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The confusion is over the word <i>absolutely</i>. Atheists think gods do not exist &#8211; if you&#8217;re simply not sure, you&#8217;re agnostic &#8211; but I have never met any who argue this should be taken on faith. Instead, most will argue that the absence of evidence means gods are no more likely to exist than unicorns, and so for all practical purposes is as false as anything else; a few claim the word <i>god</i> is currently too poorly defined to say much about in general.  Both could be disputed, and it&#8217;s hard to see what&#8217;s semi-religious about these positions.</p>
<p>Ito, the claim that atheists can&#8217;t cope with Jainist, Zen, or pantheist semantics tells me you haven&#8217;t talked to many. Most I&#8217;ve heard have the same objections to their precepts, and will happily explain their objections to them when asked. They just don&#8217;t usually bother, because they care more about the sorts of things outlined in the opening post, and pantheists aren&#8217;t out there trying to dismantle science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agreenster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1019159</link>
		<dc:creator>agreenster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1019159</guid>
		<description>Then what in the world is this conversation even about?  If you&#039;re defending your own definition of god, good for you.  But we&#039;re talking about organized religions here, arent we?  

I mean, Im agnostic.  I dont know what caused the big bang, maybe it was some sort of higher being or god, and perhaps we&#039;re in agreement on that.  I have no idea.  But what I can say with almost 100% certainty is that jesus was a reformer but not god, I dont need to accept him into my heart to be saved, there is no hell, the pope is just a regular human who wears a silly hat, etc etc. 

I mean, looking at your list, you sound more like a Deist, which puts you even more in the minority than atheists.  The reason I brought up american christianity is because to me atheism vs religion is primarily a social, cultural, scientific and political discussion (and its subsequent repercussions), and secondarily a discussion on the definition of god.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then what in the world is this conversation even about?  If you&#8217;re defending your own definition of god, good for you.  But we&#8217;re talking about organized religions here, arent we?  </p>
<p>I mean, Im agnostic.  I dont know what caused the big bang, maybe it was some sort of higher being or god, and perhaps we&#8217;re in agreement on that.  I have no idea.  But what I can say with almost 100% certainty is that jesus was a reformer but not god, I dont need to accept him into my heart to be saved, there is no hell, the pope is just a regular human who wears a silly hat, etc etc. </p>
<p>I mean, looking at your list, you sound more like a Deist, which puts you even more in the minority than atheists.  The reason I brought up american christianity is because to me atheism vs religion is primarily a social, cultural, scientific and political discussion (and its subsequent repercussions), and secondarily a discussion on the definition of god.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sapere_aude</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1018904</link>
		<dc:creator>sapere_aude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1018904</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really care what the common Christian in America thinks; and that&#039;s not what my list was about.  I was talking about God, not about Christianity (and certainly not about American Christianity in particular).  You&#039;re still falling into the atheist habit of equating God with religion â€“ and, particularly, with certain types of Christianity.  Criticize American Christianity as much as you want.  But don&#039;t assume that this has anything to do with God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really care what the common Christian in America thinks; and that&#8217;s not what my list was about.  I was talking about God, not about Christianity (and certainly not about American Christianity in particular).  You&#8217;re still falling into the atheist habit of equating God with religion â€“ and, particularly, with certain types of Christianity.  Criticize American Christianity as much as you want.  But don&#8217;t assume that this has anything to do with God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polama</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1017625</link>
		<dc:creator>polama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1017625</guid>
		<description>Damn, you figured us out. Of course we believe in Jesus, everybody secretly does, it&#039;s just liberal politics. Just like men don&#039;t really love men, it&#039;s just a gay agenda to overthrow America. Guess we&#039;ll need a new thing we can pretend to believe for political gain...maybe astrology?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, you figured us out. Of course we believe in Jesus, everybody secretly does, it&#8217;s just liberal politics. Just like men don&#8217;t really love men, it&#8217;s just a gay agenda to overthrow America. Guess we&#8217;ll need a new thing we can pretend to believe for political gain&#8230;maybe astrology?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1018651</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1018651</guid>
		<description>The militant atheists were the communists, who actually kill people for their beliefs the way other militants do. The new atheists are only outspoken, or &quot;smug&quot; I guess is how you&#039;re supposed to say it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The militant atheists were the communists, who actually kill people for their beliefs the way other militants do. The new atheists are only outspoken, or &#8220;smug&#8221; I guess is how you&#8217;re supposed to say it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agreenster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/04/what-atheists-are-re.html#comment-1017884</link>
		<dc:creator>agreenster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1017884</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Unfortunately, it seems that the most vocal atheists â€“ Dawkins, Dennett, Hitchens, et al. â€“ are unable to make these points without implying that anyone who believes in God must be a complete idiot.&lt;&lt;

They dont think people who believe in god are idiots, they think they are deluded, brainwashed, and scared.  And I agree.  Its sad to see people believe in imaginary fairy tales so vehemently.

The belief in god is slowly eroding away.  I give it 10 more generations. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>>Unfortunately, it seems that the most vocal atheists â€“ Dawkins, Dennett, Hitchens, et al. â€“ are unable to make these points without implying that anyone who believes in God must be a complete idiot.<<</p>
<p>They dont think people who believe in god are idiots, they think they are deluded, brainwashed, and scared.  And I agree.  Its sad to see people believe in imaginary fairy tales so vehemently.</p>
<p>The belief in god is slowly eroding away.  I give it 10 more generations. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
