<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pakistan: American arrested after shootings worked for&#160;CIA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thebes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1033993</link>
		<dc:creator>Thebes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1033993</guid>
		<description>From ANI News Service:

[quote] Double murder-accused US official Raymond Davis has been found in possession of top-secret CIA documents, which point to him or the feared American Task Force 373 (TF373) operating in the region, providing Al-Qaeda terrorists with &quot;nuclear fissile material&quot; and &quot;biological agents,&quot; according to a report. [/quote]

It seems that the two ISI agents who Davis shot were tracking his and his teams movements in regards to collaborating with terrorists to provide them with WMD materials to attack the US &quot;Homeland&quot;. This would demonstrate Pakistan&#039;s inability to contain its nuclear arsenal and allow the USA to exert global military force in an effort to renew economic hegemony. At least thats what the rest of the story alleges.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From ANI News Service:</p>
<p>[quote] Double murder-accused US official Raymond Davis has been found in possession of top-secret CIA documents, which point to him or the feared American Task Force 373 (TF373) operating in the region, providing Al-Qaeda terrorists with &#8220;nuclear fissile material&#8221; and &#8220;biological agents,&#8221; according to a report. [/quote]</p>
<p>It seems that the two ISI agents who Davis shot were tracking his and his teams movements in regards to collaborating with terrorists to provide them with WMD materials to attack the US &#8220;Homeland&#8221;. This would demonstrate Pakistan&#8217;s inability to contain its nuclear arsenal and allow the USA to exert global military force in an effort to renew economic hegemony. At least thats what the rest of the story alleges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobthecitizen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032723</link>
		<dc:creator>bobthecitizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032723</guid>
		<description>&quot;bush foreign policy&quot;?

When is it Obama&#039;s foreign policy? He could have cut the budget for our wars, he didn&#039;t, or not followed in bush&#039;s warrantless wiretapping footsteps, yet he did. In the worlds eyes Obama and bush are equally war mongering.

Bad foreign policy is bad, saying &quot;blame the last guy&quot; while doing the same crap just perpetuates it. Whoever comes after Obama will undoubtably blame this crap on him.

We need to stand up to our aggressive foreign policy in general and demand it stop now. If eqypt can do it, so can we.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;bush foreign policy&#8221;?</p>
<p>When is it Obama&#8217;s foreign policy? He could have cut the budget for our wars, he didn&#8217;t, or not followed in bush&#8217;s warrantless wiretapping footsteps, yet he did. In the worlds eyes Obama and bush are equally war mongering.</p>
<p>Bad foreign policy is bad, saying &#8220;blame the last guy&#8221; while doing the same crap just perpetuates it. Whoever comes after Obama will undoubtably blame this crap on him.</p>
<p>We need to stand up to our aggressive foreign policy in general and demand it stop now. If eqypt can do it, so can we.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobthecitizen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032981</link>
		<dc:creator>bobthecitizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032981</guid>
		<description>Bush, Obama, whoever comes next... Same bullshit, different flavor. We need to rise up as Egypt, Bahrain, Tunisia, Dubai, Yemen, Libya, Algiers, etc. are doing and demand justice and democratic representation. Our foreign policy is not only loathed by the world at large and provides constant danger to us personally, but is also not the will of the people.

It&#039;s time to take to the streets, general strike anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush, Obama, whoever comes next&#8230; Same bullshit, different flavor. We need to rise up as Egypt, Bahrain, Tunisia, Dubai, Yemen, Libya, Algiers, etc. are doing and demand justice and democratic representation. Our foreign policy is not only loathed by the world at large and provides constant danger to us personally, but is also not the will of the people.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time to take to the streets, general strike anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a_user</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032989</link>
		<dc:creator>a_user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032989</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not inferring that this &quot;operation&quot; was organised/sanctioned by Bush, but I am saying this has become a very public spat is down to the use of Chuck Norris Diplomacy (tm) by the Bush regime.

So anyway here&#039;s my plot idea for the next episode of &quot;24&quot;

Fade up from black to see Jack Bauer driving a black SUV along a dusty city road in Unnamed Middle Eastern Country. A rusty white Nissan pickup  drives alongside and a stuntman wearing a black beret and sunglasses pokes an AK47 out of the window. A high speed tussle ensues ending with Jack forcing the Nissan to stop so he can go mano a mano with the terrorists on board. Jack guns down the occupants  but suddenly find himself surrounded by angry people trying to grab him. He uses his encrypted bluetooth headset to call for help, his back up arrives in a second SUV which cuts across the central reservation to get to him, killing a civilian on a motorcycle which just seems to make people more angry at Jack, so they drive off, dumping ammunition and surveillance gear onto the street straight to the American consul so they can stash the car and call a taxi to the airport. Meanwhile Jack jumps back into his car then drives off while being peppered with bullets and is caught by 2 parking wardens after a gruelling 5  minute chase. A daring young journalist just out of journalism school, through a source he calls &quot;the US serviceman&#039;s employment record&quot; discovers in that Jack was infact an ex employee of Blackwater. Fade to black, roll credits behind &quot;To be continued?&quot; caption.

What d&#039;you mean it&#039;s too realistic?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not inferring that this &#8220;operation&#8221; was organised/sanctioned by Bush, but I am saying this has become a very public spat is down to the use of Chuck Norris Diplomacy &#8482; by the Bush regime.</p>
<p>So anyway here&#8217;s my plot idea for the next episode of &#8220;24&#8243;</p>
<p>Fade up from black to see Jack Bauer driving a black SUV along a dusty city road in Unnamed Middle Eastern Country. A rusty white Nissan pickup  drives alongside and a stuntman wearing a black beret and sunglasses pokes an AK47 out of the window. A high speed tussle ensues ending with Jack forcing the Nissan to stop so he can go mano a mano with the terrorists on board. Jack guns down the occupants  but suddenly find himself surrounded by angry people trying to grab him. He uses his encrypted bluetooth headset to call for help, his back up arrives in a second SUV which cuts across the central reservation to get to him, killing a civilian on a motorcycle which just seems to make people more angry at Jack, so they drive off, dumping ammunition and surveillance gear onto the street straight to the American consul so they can stash the car and call a taxi to the airport. Meanwhile Jack jumps back into his car then drives off while being peppered with bullets and is caught by 2 parking wardens after a gruelling 5  minute chase. A daring young journalist just out of journalism school, through a source he calls &#8220;the US serviceman&#8217;s employment record&#8221; discovers in that Jack was infact an ex employee of Blackwater. Fade to black, roll credits behind &#8220;To be continued?&#8221; caption.</p>
<p>What d&#8217;you mean it&#8217;s too realistic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sirkowski</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032995</link>
		<dc:creator>sirkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032995</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t watch the news often, do you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t watch the news often, do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032740</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032740</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;When is it Obama&#039;s foreign policy?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Never. Bush foreign policy was a notable change in what the US were doing, and Obama is part of it. There is no Obama foreign policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When is it Obama&#8217;s foreign policy?</p></blockquote>
<p>Never. Bush foreign policy was a notable change in what the US were doing, and Obama is part of it. There is no Obama foreign policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forgeweld</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032741</link>
		<dc:creator>forgeweld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032741</guid>
		<description>The thing that really jumps out of the story for me is the NY Times&#039; meek subservience to the Administration in sitting on the story until they got the o.k. Have all the major news outlets in this country been lobotomized? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that really jumps out of the story for me is the NY Times&#8217; meek subservience to the Administration in sitting on the story until they got the o.k. Have all the major news outlets in this country been lobotomized? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buddy66</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032997</link>
		<dc:creator>buddy66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032997</guid>
		<description>&#039;&#039;It&#039;s time to take to the streets, general strike anyone?&#039;&#039;

Let&#039;s not confuse the two...

Taking to the streets, one can get hurt. Staying home, shit, I&#039;m good at that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221;It&#8217;s time to take to the streets, general strike anyone?&#8221;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not confuse the two&#8230;</p>
<p>Taking to the streets, one can get hurt. Staying home, shit, I&#8217;m good at that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: splinterfoot</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1033262</link>
		<dc:creator>splinterfoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1033262</guid>
		<description>Just in case you are really really really naive, I&#039;d like to point out, this is Obama&#039;s foreign policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case you are really really really naive, I&#8217;d like to point out, this is Obama&#8217;s foreign policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1033026</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1033026</guid>
		<description>Being a Pakistani; I just wanted to say this is probably not the first time something like this has happened. Just that the dude was unlucky enough to get caught on camera and have the images flashed on network news all over the country.

The Pakistani political &quot;leadership&quot; is pretty darn scared these days; what with all the uprising happening all around them (although I hate being bundled into the &quot;Middle East&quot;, we&#039;re more Indian than Middle Eastern). They&#039;re going to release him once the whole Revolution Fever dies down.

Also, there are now reports that Mr. Davis had link to the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan.

Also, please, YouTube the videos of his interrogation. They&#039;re quite &quot;fun&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a Pakistani; I just wanted to say this is probably not the first time something like this has happened. Just that the dude was unlucky enough to get caught on camera and have the images flashed on network news all over the country.</p>
<p>The Pakistani political &#8220;leadership&#8221; is pretty darn scared these days; what with all the uprising happening all around them (although I hate being bundled into the &#8220;Middle East&#8221;, we&#8217;re more Indian than Middle Eastern). They&#8217;re going to release him once the whole Revolution Fever dies down.</p>
<p>Also, there are now reports that Mr. Davis had link to the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan.</p>
<p>Also, please, YouTube the videos of his interrogation. They&#8217;re quite &#8220;fun&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuhfoo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032780</link>
		<dc:creator>stuhfoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032780</guid>
		<description>I like the part where he shot the &#039;robbers&#039; in the BACK...funny how self defense works sometimes.

I know I would be scared for my life if I saw two people running away from me when I had a gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the part where he shot the &#8216;robbers&#8217; in the BACK&#8230;funny how self defense works sometimes.</p>
<p>I know I would be scared for my life if I saw two people running away from me when I had a gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuhfoo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032781</link>
		<dc:creator>stuhfoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032781</guid>
		<description>btw it is now confirmed he was a CIA contractor...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw it is now confirmed he was a CIA contractor&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1118030</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1118030</guid>
		<description>Whether democracy works or not does not depend on whether you are &quot;us&quot; or &quot;them&quot;. It depends on what the people believe. Once people truly believe in democracy, it will work; if they&#039;re indifferent to corruption, it will become corrupt; and if they aren&#039;t interested in governing themselves, it will revert to an oligarchy. This is true the world over, and all that differs is how much time democratic values have had to become ingrained or lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether democracy works or not does not depend on whether you are &#8220;us&#8221; or &#8220;them&#8221;. It depends on what the people believe. Once people truly believe in democracy, it will work; if they&#8217;re indifferent to corruption, it will become corrupt; and if they aren&#8217;t interested in governing themselves, it will revert to an oligarchy. This is true the world over, and all that differs is how much time democratic values have had to become ingrained or lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gandalf23</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032787</link>
		<dc:creator>gandalf23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032787</guid>
		<description>Two armed men try to rob him and he kills them.  Where is the problem with that?  

They were armed, and chose to use those arms to rob someone, and by having arms they signified a willingness to use them, thus putting his life in danger.  They caused the shootings.  Unless y&#039;all are saying that he just rolled up to a stop light and randomly shot two dudes (probably who were minding their own business on the corner) and gosh it just happened that they had guns on them?  Or maybe he planted them?  

As for shooting them each five times?  So?  Is that really worse than shooting them each once?  Dead is dead.   

&quot;Oh noes!  He took their pictures after shooting them!&quot;  yeah, he did.  US Government employee, attempted robbery.  Was it random, or was he targeted specifically?  Take pictures of the dead guys and send them off and see if they are in any databases and figure it out.  Makes sense.  

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two armed men try to rob him and he kills them.  Where is the problem with that?  </p>
<p>They were armed, and chose to use those arms to rob someone, and by having arms they signified a willingness to use them, thus putting his life in danger.  They caused the shootings.  Unless y&#8217;all are saying that he just rolled up to a stop light and randomly shot two dudes (probably who were minding their own business on the corner) and gosh it just happened that they had guns on them?  Or maybe he planted them?  </p>
<p>As for shooting them each five times?  So?  Is that really worse than shooting them each once?  Dead is dead.   </p>
<p>&#8220;Oh noes!  He took their pictures after shooting them!&#8221;  yeah, he did.  US Government employee, attempted robbery.  Was it random, or was he targeted specifically?  Take pictures of the dead guys and send them off and see if they are in any databases and figure it out.  Makes sense.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MomentEye</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1033045</link>
		<dc:creator>MomentEye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1033045</guid>
		<description>[quote]Two armed men try to rob him and he kills them. Where is the problem with that? [/quote]

Pakistani Officials say that the men he shot were members of their secret service.

So the problem, broadly speaking, is that when a Xe operative being paid by the CIA shoots people in their own country they will sometimes also lie about why they did it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote]Two armed men try to rob him and he kills them. Where is the problem with that? [/quote]</p>
<p>Pakistani Officials say that the men he shot were members of their secret service.</p>
<p>So the problem, broadly speaking, is that when a Xe operative being paid by the CIA shoots people in their own country they will sometimes also lie about why they did it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032796</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032796</guid>
		<description>The US has been up to dirty business in Pakistan for decades, and Pakistan has been playing them in turn all the while. Historians are going to be puzzling over who was gaming who for a long, long time.

Meanwhile, the poor in Pakistan get repeatedly shafted. But hey, as far as Americans and Brits are concerned, they&#039;re basically all terrorists anyway, so who cares?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US has been up to dirty business in Pakistan for decades, and Pakistan has been playing them in turn all the while. Historians are going to be puzzling over who was gaming who for a long, long time.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the poor in Pakistan get repeatedly shafted. But hey, as far as Americans and Brits are concerned, they&#8217;re basically all terrorists anyway, so who cares?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brillow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032800</link>
		<dc:creator>brillow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032800</guid>
		<description>So these people should be happy with their dictatorships?  Is that all they deserve?  If American-style democracy doesn&#039;t work, what style of democracy will work for them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So these people should be happy with their dictatorships?  Is that all they deserve?  If American-style democracy doesn&#8217;t work, what style of democracy will work for them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ugly Canuck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032811</link>
		<dc:creator>Ugly Canuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032811</guid>
		<description>How&#039;d those Marines bombed in Lebanon get to be there in the first place?

I remember the battleship USS New Jersey shelling the villages of the valleys of the Shouf Mountains, as it cruised off the coast of Lebanon...is that what &quot;pussies&quot; do in your opinion?

Whatever. Here&#039;s a song about that action:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=as3ItSBrKnI


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#8217;d those Marines bombed in Lebanon get to be there in the first place?</p>
<p>I remember the battleship USS New Jersey shelling the villages of the valleys of the Shouf Mountains, as it cruised off the coast of Lebanon&#8230;is that what &#8220;pussies&#8221; do in your opinion?</p>
<p>Whatever. Here&#8217;s a song about that action:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=as3ItSBrKnI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=as3ItSBrKnI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ugly Canuck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032818</link>
		<dc:creator>Ugly Canuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032818</guid>
		<description>Oh come on: the USA has sought for and had an avowedly and openly bi-partisan foreign policy, throughout the term of my entire life, and in fact for quite some time before I was born.

That that has not recently changed comes as no surprise.
At least to me.

Nor do I think that the bipartisan nature of US foreign policy will change in the foreseeable future.

I just don&#039;t find that bipartisan character to be particularly remarkable or noteworthy, much less a reason for any discomfort.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come on: the USA has sought for and had an avowedly and openly bi-partisan foreign policy, throughout the term of my entire life, and in fact for quite some time before I was born.</p>
<p>That that has not recently changed comes as no surprise.<br />
At least to me.</p>
<p>Nor do I think that the bipartisan nature of US foreign policy will change in the foreseeable future.</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t find that bipartisan character to be particularly remarkable or noteworthy, much less a reason for any discomfort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1117820</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1117820</guid>
		<description>You cannot seriously still be blaming Bush? Obama is in charge now. He is responsible for the wellbeing of every U.S. Citizen on earth. If you disagree with this statement, ask yourself what a president IS for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You cannot seriously still be blaming Bush? Obama is in charge now. He is responsible for the wellbeing of every U.S. Citizen on earth. If you disagree with this statement, ask yourself what a president IS for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phisrow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032582</link>
		<dc:creator>phisrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032582</guid>
		<description>The CIA? Doing something covert, sinister, and almost certainly counterproductive by the standards of America&#039;s foreign policy objectives? I wish I were more surprised...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CIA? Doing something covert, sinister, and almost certainly counterproductive by the standards of America&#8217;s foreign policy objectives? I wish I were more surprised&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a_user</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032584</link>
		<dc:creator>a_user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032584</guid>
		<description>More fall out from Bush foreign policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More fall out from Bush foreign policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032843</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032843</guid>
		<description>well said.  can we claim press freedom is real when only at the permission of the federal authority? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well said.  can we claim press freedom is real when only at the permission of the federal authority? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strangefriend</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032848</link>
		<dc:creator>strangefriend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032848</guid>
		<description>You know, after Obama pardons &lt;a href=&quot;http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/Pakistani-scientist-sentenced-to-86-years-in-US-prison/articleshow/6616363.cms&quot;&gt;Aafia Siddiqui&lt;/a&gt; &amp; deports her back to Pakistan, I bet this whole thing blows over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, after Obama pardons <a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/Pakistani-scientist-sentenced-to-86-years-in-US-prison/articleshow/6616363.cms">Aafia Siddiqui</a> &#038; deports her back to Pakistan, I bet this whole thing blows over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrs</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032593</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032593</guid>
		<description>Seriously, we couldn&#039;t just hold this off for a while?  Not shooting some guys, just let some democracy happen while we sit on the sidelines for a bit?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, we couldn&#8217;t just hold this off for a while?  Not shooting some guys, just let some democracy happen while we sit on the sidelines for a bit?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: travtastic</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032849</link>
		<dc:creator>travtastic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032849</guid>
		<description>So these people are too stupid to vote?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So these people are too stupid to vote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuhfoo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032855</link>
		<dc:creator>stuhfoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032855</guid>
		<description>The Times reports that a Lahore police report published in English by The Daily Times over the weekend raises questions about the self-defense case, pointing out that the victims were shot in the back. 

so first off he shot them in the back - as a CIA contractor he should know when to and when not to shoot. Killing someone for stealing from you is not proportional retaliation.

Secondly, he did this in a country whose population CLEARLY has an unfavorable disposition towards America... what did he expect ? Roses?

This was a HUGE laps in judgment or training.


also what strangefriend said... i bet you this all goes away if we free aafia Siddiqui ... gotta love politics</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Times reports that a Lahore police report published in English by The Daily Times over the weekend raises questions about the self-defense case, pointing out that the victims were shot in the back. </p>
<p>so first off he shot them in the back &#8211; as a CIA contractor he should know when to and when not to shoot. Killing someone for stealing from you is not proportional retaliation.</p>
<p>Secondly, he did this in a country whose population CLEARLY has an unfavorable disposition towards America&#8230; what did he expect ? Roses?</p>
<p>This was a HUGE laps in judgment or training.</p>
<p>also what strangefriend said&#8230; i bet you this all goes away if we free aafia Siddiqui &#8230; gotta love politics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032612</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032612</guid>
		<description>As an anarchist I&#039;m inclined to see CIA plots behind everything. As a skeptic and defender of rational modes of thinking, I need to be aware of that fact. Hence: devil&#039;s advocate.

Firstly, the CIA (Central *Intelligence* Agency) would have people monitoring important political events like this even if they were to remain neutral or hands-off, so the presence of CIA agents in Pakistan isn&#039;t by itself a demonstration of black ops.

Second, even CIA agents occasionally are victims of robbery. Robbery attempts, looting, etc... tend to increase in frequency during political upheavals (whether abroad or at home... when the NSM marched in Topeka, antifa counterprotests ended up being used by opportunists to riot and loot around). Further, the likelyhood of an American in Pakistan being CIA is a lot higher than, you know, an American in a random country. Finally, being an American might have made him a target of opportunity by actual robbers (probably richer than average, probably less likely to be helped by authorities or the community).

Still, it seems fishy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an anarchist I&#8217;m inclined to see CIA plots behind everything. As a skeptic and defender of rational modes of thinking, I need to be aware of that fact. Hence: devil&#8217;s advocate.</p>
<p>Firstly, the CIA (Central *Intelligence* Agency) would have people monitoring important political events like this even if they were to remain neutral or hands-off, so the presence of CIA agents in Pakistan isn&#8217;t by itself a demonstration of black ops.</p>
<p>Second, even CIA agents occasionally are victims of robbery. Robbery attempts, looting, etc&#8230; tend to increase in frequency during political upheavals (whether abroad or at home&#8230; when the NSM marched in Topeka, antifa counterprotests ended up being used by opportunists to riot and loot around). Further, the likelyhood of an American in Pakistan being CIA is a lot higher than, you know, an American in a random country. Finally, being an American might have made him a target of opportunity by actual robbers (probably richer than average, probably less likely to be helped by authorities or the community).</p>
<p>Still, it seems fishy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KrÃ¼zÎµr Î¦Î˜Î©Î´âˆž</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032615</link>
		<dc:creator>KrÃ¼zÎµr Î¦Î˜Î©Î´âˆž</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032615</guid>
		<description>Democracy isn&#039;t going to work in these countries. We found a system (democracy) that works (more or less) for us. That doesn&#039;t make is a cure all solution for political unrest in other countries, especially in ones that have been warring for thousands of years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democracy isn&#8217;t going to work in these countries. We found a system (democracy) that works (more or less) for us. That doesn&#8217;t make is a cure all solution for political unrest in other countries, especially in ones that have been warring for thousands of years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubernostrom</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/02/21/pakistan-american-ar.html#comment-1032616</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubernostrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1032616</guid>
		<description>These guys were in the country long before any of this civil unrest began. Anyway, IMHO, they can keep the bastard, and we&#039;ll just stop giving them billions of dollars in aid. Seems like a fair trade to me, seeing as how they hate us so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These guys were in the country long before any of this civil unrest began. Anyway, IMHO, they can keep the bastard, and we&#8217;ll just stop giving them billions of dollars in aid. Seems like a fair trade to me, seeing as how they hate us so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
