Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Waterboarding is torture, but not when the U.S. does it

Rob Beschizza at 2:21 pm Wed, Mar 9, 2011

— FEATURED —

Book Review

The Man Who Laughs: grotesque Victor Hugo potboiler was the basis for The Joker

Feature

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

Book Review

The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle
One of the funny things about the New York Times' avoidance of the word "torture" is that everyone knew it eventually slip up or give up. It finally did so in a discussion of waterboarding. Glenn Greenwald:
So according to The New York Times, it's journalistically improper to call waterboarding "torture" -- when done by the United States, but when Nazi Germany (or China) does exactly the same thing, then it may be called "torture" repeatedly and without qualification. An organization which behaves this way may be called many things; "journalist" isn't one of them.
Presumably the NYT prefers to give up on the logic behind its euphemisms rather than follow it to places like Nazi Germany, where phrases like "enhanced interrogation techniques" would stop being a joke and become offensively stupid.

⟿ Follow Rob Beschizza on Twitter.

MORE:  News

More at Boing Boing

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

  • RickB

    Actually they already followed the way to Nazi Germany with ‘enhanced interrogation’:-

    The phrase “Verschärfte Vernehmung” is German for “enhanced interrogation”. Other translations include “intensified interrogation” or “sharpened interrogation”. It’s a phrase that appears to have been concocted in 1937, to describe a form of torture that would leave no marks, and hence save the embarrassment pre-war Nazi officials were experiencing as their wounded torture victims ended up in court.

    http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/05/verschfte_verne.html

    • peterbruells

      Straying off-topic: During the Middle Ages we called it “peinliche Befragung.” Modern German might misunderstand this as “embarrassing questionaire”, since the meaning shifted, but back then it was a truly honest term: “painful/pain-causing interrogation”.

  • Anonymous

    “…but not when the U.S. does it”

    That right there, unfortunately, is the primary cause of much of the world’s problems these days.

  • Brainspore

    Remind me why neocons always dismiss the NYT as part of the Liberal Mediaâ„¢ again?

    • billstewart

      Why the right wing calls the NYT the Liberal Media? Same reason they say that about Public Broadcasting. Yes, there are all kinds of wonderful people producing really high-quality programming there, but it’s still the Establishment’s radio and TV stations, even though it’s the more liberal and artistic side of the Establishment. Terry Gross has the guts to say “torture” in her program, but I’ve never heard any of the news shows use the term when they’re doing the government’s press releases with commentary from the usual sources, while they’ve said “enhanced interrogation” or “harsh interrogation” all the time.

  • Anonymous

    Come, get out of the way, boys
    Quick, get out of the way
    You’d better watch what you say, boys
    Better watch what you say
    We’ve rammed in your harbor and tied to your port
    And our pistols are hungry and our tempers are short
    So bring all your daughters around to the port
    ‘Cause we’re the Cops of the World, boys
    We’re the Cops of the World

    We pick and choose as we please, boys
    Pick and choose as we please
    You’d best get down on your knees, boys
    Best get down on your knees
    We’re hairy and horny and ready to shack
    And we don’t really care if you’re yellow or black
    Just take off your clothes and lay down on your back
    ‘Cause we’re the Cops of the World, boys
    We’re the Cops of the World

    Our boots are needing a shine, boys
    Boots are needing a shine
    But our Coca-Cola is fine, boys
    Coca-Cola is fine
    We’ve got to protect all our citizens fair
    So we’ll send a battalion for everyone there
    And maybe we’ll leave in a couple of years
    ‘Cause we’re the Cops of the World, boys
    We’re the Cops of the World

    And dump the reds in a pile, boys
    Dump the reds in a pile
    You’d better wipe off that smile, boys
    Better wipe off that smile
    We’ll spit on the streets of the cities we wreck
    And we’ll find you a leader that you can elect
    (Those treaties we signed were a pain in the neck)
    ‘Cause we’re the Cops of the World, boys
    We’re the Cops of the World

    And clean the johns with a rag, boys
    Clean the johns with a rag
    If you like you can use your flag, boys
    If you like you can use your flag
    We’ve got too much money we’re looking for toys
    And guns will be guns and boys will be boys
    But we’ll gladly pay for all we destroy
    ‘Cause we’re the Cops of the World, boys
    We’re the Cops of the World

    Please stay off of the grass, boys
    Please stay off of the grass
    Here’s a kick in the ass, boys
    Here’s a kick in the ass
    We’ll smash down your doors, we don’t bother to knock
    We’ve done it before, so why all the shock
    We’re the biggest and the toughest kids on the block
    And we’re the Cops of the World, boys
    We’re the Cops of the World

    And when we’ve butchered your sons, boys
    Once we’ve butchered your sons
    Have a stick of our gum, boys
    Have a stick of our bubble gum
    We own half the world, oh say can you see
    And the name for our profits is de-moc-racy
    So, like it or not, you will have to be free!
    ‘Cause we’re the Cops of the World, boys
    We’re the Cops of the World

    –Phil Ochs

  • Anonymous

    One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter.

    • Anonymous

      There is a real difference: hitting civilian vs. military targets, fighting according to the Geneva conventions vs. not, trying to expel forces vs. spread terror,and so on. Unfortunately we have rather blurred the difference in common speech thanks to double-speak like this.

  • Anonymous

    This is the world we live in. everyone thinks is right unfortunately the power beats the soul

  • phisrow

    It’s axiomatic that we are the good guys. And the good guys would never torture anyone. Ergo, we have never tortured anyone…

    • Anonymous

      In the same way, extremism is a point of view. We’re the “hardliners” who crack down on the “extremists”. And never the other way round.

  • happytweak

    Well said, Glenn.

    Now if only it wasn’t a fact that this also applies to 90% of mainstream news organisations in this country.

    Instead of getting facts, all we get are quickly jumbled images and pointless (and, need I say, mostly illogical) opinions.

    I love having to stick to comedy and foreign media as well as independent research to know what’s going on. So damn convenient.

  • Anonymous

    I assume the NYT (and most others) use this for their guidelines…

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing_Consent:_The_Political_Economy_of_the_Mass_Media

    … they certainly seem to tick the right boxes.

  • astrochimp

    I bet they’ll expect another Pulitzer for this.