<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Space Shuttle Discovery STS-133 to land&#160;today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/03/09/space-shuttle-discov-4.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/09/space-shuttle-discov-4.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathanpeterson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/09/space-shuttle-discov-4.html#comment-1048391</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathanpeterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1048391</guid>
		<description>seems kind of a shame that they took the space shuttle&#039;s cargo arm back down with them.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seems kind of a shame that they took the space shuttle&#8217;s cargo arm back down with them.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmcgarry</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/09/space-shuttle-discov-4.html#comment-1048648</link>
		<dc:creator>jmcgarry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1048648</guid>
		<description>Two arms. SSRMS (Canadarm2) and JEM-RMS (in the Japanese Experimental Module). And by the end of the year the European Arm should be attached as well.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two arms. SSRMS (Canadarm2) and JEM-RMS (in the Japanese Experimental Module). And by the end of the year the European Arm should be attached as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/09/space-shuttle-discov-4.html#comment-1048403</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1048403</guid>
		<description>I wish I could accomplish a relative separation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I could accomplish a relative separation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imag</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/09/space-shuttle-discov-4.html#comment-1048421</link>
		<dc:creator>imag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1048421</guid>
		<description>Good point.  The ISS does have a pretty good one of its own though.

My guess is that the shuttle arm wouldn&#039;t be up to a long-term mission in space.  Linking it to ISS would be a trick too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.  The ISS does have a pretty good one of its own though.</p>
<p>My guess is that the shuttle arm wouldn&#8217;t be up to a long-term mission in space.  Linking it to ISS would be a trick too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Helfrich</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/09/space-shuttle-discov-4.html#comment-1048719</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Helfrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1048719</guid>
		<description>While I appreciate the symmetry of Discovery having spent 365 days in orbit, and everything the shuttle program has done, it still seems pretty disappointing that a nearly 30 year old vehicle designed to go into space has spent such a small fraction of its time there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I appreciate the symmetry of Discovery having spent 365 days in orbit, and everything the shuttle program has done, it still seems pretty disappointing that a nearly 30 year old vehicle designed to go into space has spent such a small fraction of its time there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainspore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/09/space-shuttle-discov-4.html#comment-1048743</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainspore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1048743</guid>
		<description>I kind of hope there&#039;s a freak storm in Florida and the shuttle has to use the landing site in California. Now that there aren&#039;t any more launches scheduled there&#039;s a chance that we&#039;d get to keep it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of hope there&#8217;s a freak storm in Florida and the shuttle has to use the landing site in California. Now that there aren&#8217;t any more launches scheduled there&#8217;s a chance that we&#8217;d get to keep it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainspore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/09/space-shuttle-discov-4.html#comment-1048745</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainspore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1048745</guid>
		<description>Oh- too late. I didn&#039;t notice the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh- too late. I didn&#8217;t notice the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TEKNA2007</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/09/space-shuttle-discov-4.html#comment-1048516</link>
		<dc:creator>TEKNA2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1048516</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t she lovely.  (And back home safely now.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t she lovely.  (And back home safely now.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wickedashtray</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/09/space-shuttle-discov-4.html#comment-1048804</link>
		<dc:creator>Wickedashtray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1048804</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t get too emotional about the SS. While the research it allowed is priceless it was a very inefficient use of NASA funds. One of the few things that Obama has done right is to encourage private investment to drive future expansion of space exploration. Its been suggested that a small-to-medium sized asteroid could be worth several trillion in base metals alone. That&#039;s the kind of incentive that will push space technology along at a faster rate than it is now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t get too emotional about the SS. While the research it allowed is priceless it was a very inefficient use of NASA funds. One of the few things that Obama has done right is to encourage private investment to drive future expansion of space exploration. Its been suggested that a small-to-medium sized asteroid could be worth several trillion in base metals alone. That&#8217;s the kind of incentive that will push space technology along at a faster rate than it is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
