<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Japan nuclear crisis: &quot;Should I take potassium iodide pills to protect against radiation&#160;exposure?&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldBrownSquirrel</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1059584</link>
		<dc:creator>OldBrownSquirrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1059584</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Also, that is not the case for the cesium or strontium species, which both have half lives of around 30 years. Any radioactive decay of these species would be negligible by the time they reached the West Coast.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

True, but irrelevant to the subject of this post:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Japan nuclear crisis: &quot;Should I take potassium iodide pills to protect against radiation exposure?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

KI protects against absorption of radioactive iodine but does nothing to protect people against absorption of cesium or strontium (or uranium or plutonium or...).  Cesium and strontium are entirely relevant to discussions of long-term radiation risk in the US, but they are (or at least should be) irrelevant to the KI hysteria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Also, that is not the case for the cesium or strontium species, which both have half lives of around 30 years. Any radioactive decay of these species would be negligible by the time they reached the West Coast.</p></blockquote>
<p>True, but irrelevant to the subject of this post:</p>
<blockquote><p>Japan nuclear crisis: &#8220;Should I take potassium iodide pills to protect against radiation exposure?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>KI protects against absorption of radioactive iodine but does nothing to protect people against absorption of cesium or strontium (or uranium or plutonium or&#8230;).  Cesium and strontium are entirely relevant to discussions of long-term radiation risk in the US, but they are (or at least should be) irrelevant to the KI hysteria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urbanhick</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1058820</link>
		<dc:creator>urbanhick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1058820</guid>
		<description>To each their own, I suppose.

My American mother and English father both insisted it was nerve-racking - must be an inherited prejudice!

A little research indicates that the difference would seem to be in degree, not kind: When one&#039;s nerves are Racked, it would indicate that they are being tortured, strained, etc. When they are Wracked, it would mean they are being destroyed, wrecked.

Nothing like a little wordplay fun to take one&#039;s mind off the horrible news, huh? Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To each their own, I suppose.</p>
<p>My American mother and English father both insisted it was nerve-racking &#8211; must be an inherited prejudice!</p>
<p>A little research indicates that the difference would seem to be in degree, not kind: When one&#8217;s nerves are Racked, it would indicate that they are being tortured, strained, etc. When they are Wracked, it would mean they are being destroyed, wrecked.</p>
<p>Nothing like a little wordplay fun to take one&#8217;s mind off the horrible news, huh? Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1058821</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1058821</guid>
		<description>So, here&#039;s a question (not really a concern, but I&#039;m curious). A good friend of mine is undergoing  radiation treatments for Hodgkin&#039;s lymphoma. Would someone who is already receiving radiation treatments (like my friend, or someone who just received an intense dose of radiation for something like thyroid cancer) need to be any more worried than the rest of us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, here&#8217;s a question (not really a concern, but I&#8217;m curious). A good friend of mine is undergoing  radiation treatments for Hodgkin&#8217;s lymphoma. Would someone who is already receiving radiation treatments (like my friend, or someone who just received an intense dose of radiation for something like thyroid cancer) need to be any more worried than the rest of us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Keller</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1058828</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1058828</guid>
		<description>Maggie, your explanations are leading me to read up on subjects I haven&#039;t looked into in decades. Thanks.

Cancer as a result of radiation seems kind of a crap-shoot to me. But it still happens, though. Is it because of the radioactive isotopes remaining in the body or the relentless bombardment of particles? If the DNA strands have to get struck with a particle in order for the bases to get damaged and then get recombined wrong,c ausing mutation, then the particles released from the isotopes have to be hammering away pretty intensely. 

Either nerver-racking or nerve-wracking are acceptable, according to Merriam - Webster. They&#039;re linguistic isotopes. Maybe that would make anagrams isomers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maggie, your explanations are leading me to read up on subjects I haven&#8217;t looked into in decades. Thanks.</p>
<p>Cancer as a result of radiation seems kind of a crap-shoot to me. But it still happens, though. Is it because of the radioactive isotopes remaining in the body or the relentless bombardment of particles? If the DNA strands have to get struck with a particle in order for the bases to get damaged and then get recombined wrong,c ausing mutation, then the particles released from the isotopes have to be hammering away pretty intensely. </p>
<p>Either nerver-racking or nerve-wracking are acceptable, according to Merriam &#8211; Webster. They&#8217;re linguistic isotopes. Maybe that would make anagrams isomers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lyd</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1058830</link>
		<dc:creator>lyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1058830</guid>
		<description>That assertion is highly debatable.  Both appear to be acceptable and &quot;wracking&quot; may be the original form.

http://eggcorns.lascribe.net/forum/viewtopic.php?id=177</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That assertion is highly debatable.  Both appear to be acceptable and &#8220;wracking&#8221; may be the original form.</p>
<p><a href="http://eggcorns.lascribe.net/forum/viewtopic.php?id=177" rel="nofollow">http://eggcorns.lascribe.net/forum/viewtopic.php?id=177</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeligula</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1059086</link>
		<dc:creator>jeligula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1059086</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Maggie.  Sure do miss the Saturday morning science feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Maggie.  Sure do miss the Saturday morning science feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lyd</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1058832</link>
		<dc:creator>lyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1058832</guid>
		<description>Ooops, I misread the part about which may be the earlier form, but the assertion is still highly debatable.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops, I misread the part about which may be the earlier form, but the assertion is still highly debatable.  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TOBDNCNG</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1059858</link>
		<dc:creator>TOBDNCNG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1059858</guid>
		<description>Although many people don&#039;t know this, we need Iodine EVERY DAY.  Our foods are very deficient in it.  

There is no need for someone to have a thyroidectomy and the radiation following.  It is COMPLETELY unnecessary if you take iodine.  

There is a complete iodine protocol where people are cured from thyroid cancer, which most people who are &quot;diagnosed&quot; with it don&#039;t really have it 90% of the time.  So someone goes through all that and then didn&#039;t need to lose their thyroid, a VERY important organ of the body.  

You can learn more at http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/iodine/?yguid=23991874.  

We have been lied to for a very long time about the demise of the food chain.  Regular table salt is BAD for us.  However, I take 1/2 tsp of Himalayan salt every day.  And then I put salt on EVERYTHING I eat!  Since starting the Iodine Protocol, I have been healthier. So are many on that Yahoo Group.  

We need to take our own health care seriously.  

Due to taking my iodine daily, keeps me fearless of the radiation that will come OR not come.  

Glad Maggie is getting at the fact that we don&#039;t need to be concerned, yet. Why hasn&#039;t the media picked up on this?  Just kidding.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although many people don&#8217;t know this, we need Iodine EVERY DAY.  Our foods are very deficient in it.  </p>
<p>There is no need for someone to have a thyroidectomy and the radiation following.  It is COMPLETELY unnecessary if you take iodine.  </p>
<p>There is a complete iodine protocol where people are cured from thyroid cancer, which most people who are &#8220;diagnosed&#8221; with it don&#8217;t really have it 90% of the time.  So someone goes through all that and then didn&#8217;t need to lose their thyroid, a VERY important organ of the body.  </p>
<p>You can learn more at <a href="http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/iodine/?yguid=23991874" rel="nofollow">http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/iodine/?yguid=23991874</a>.  </p>
<p>We have been lied to for a very long time about the demise of the food chain.  Regular table salt is BAD for us.  However, I take 1/2 tsp of Himalayan salt every day.  And then I put salt on EVERYTHING I eat!  Since starting the Iodine Protocol, I have been healthier. So are many on that Yahoo Group.  </p>
<p>We need to take our own health care seriously.  </p>
<p>Due to taking my iodine daily, keeps me fearless of the radiation that will come OR not come.  </p>
<p>Glad Maggie is getting at the fact that we don&#8217;t need to be concerned, yet. Why hasn&#8217;t the media picked up on this?  Just kidding.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1059091</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1059091</guid>
		<description>Thank you Maggie! That&#039;s the most cogent summary I&#039;ve seen yet. I&#039;m sending it to all my potentially misguided office mates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Maggie! That&#8217;s the most cogent summary I&#8217;ve seen yet. I&#8217;m sending it to all my potentially misguided office mates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1059603</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1059603</guid>
		<description>Several on-line sources indicate clearly that either usage is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several on-line sources indicate clearly that either usage is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gravitysrainbow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1059092</link>
		<dc:creator>gravitysrainbow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1059092</guid>
		<description>People should also be very careful about the K in KI. Having too much potassium in your blood can cause serious problems. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperkalemia </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People should also be very careful about the K in KI. Having too much potassium in your blood can cause serious problems.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperkalemia" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperkalemia</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zadaz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1058840</link>
		<dc:creator>Zadaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1058840</guid>
		<description>Glad to see -someone- putting out a little bit of information in the midst of all they hysteria that every media outlet (including BB) has been feeding.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see -someone- putting out a little bit of information in the midst of all they hysteria that every media outlet (including BB) has been feeding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1058841</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1058841</guid>
		<description>Anon #14:

Your friend&#039;s chances of getting cancer in the future as a result of her radiation treatments should be less of a concern, as she already has cancer - the die has already fallen, the possibility has already been realized.

PS: Sorry to hear about your friend, hope they fully recover.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon #14:</p>
<p>Your friend&#8217;s chances of getting cancer in the future as a result of her radiation treatments should be less of a concern, as she already has cancer &#8211; the die has already fallen, the possibility has already been realized.</p>
<p>PS: Sorry to hear about your friend, hope they fully recover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1059609</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1059609</guid>
		<description>A couple of people have asked about plutonium reaching the West Coast.  Since I have not seen an expert response yet, I&#039;m going to give it a shot.  Plutonium, like it&#039;s cousin Uranium, is very heavy, roughly 20% more heavy than Lead and almost twice as heavy as Iodine.  Nothing is ever absolute, but I would venture to say you would have to throw a lot of plutonium up into the atmosphere and have it travel very quickly in order for enough of it to remain in the plume to reach any great distance.  For that to happen, you would pretty much need the entire reactor to blow up, dispersing the entire contents of the reactor and that plume would have to reach the jet stream.  Naturally, the largest danger is nearest the reactor, but the West Coast is at least 7 time zones away.  Hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of people have asked about plutonium reaching the West Coast.  Since I have not seen an expert response yet, I&#8217;m going to give it a shot.  Plutonium, like it&#8217;s cousin Uranium, is very heavy, roughly 20% more heavy than Lead and almost twice as heavy as Iodine.  Nothing is ever absolute, but I would venture to say you would have to throw a lot of plutonium up into the atmosphere and have it travel very quickly in order for enough of it to remain in the plume to reach any great distance.  For that to happen, you would pretty much need the entire reactor to blow up, dispersing the entire contents of the reactor and that plume would have to reach the jet stream.  Naturally, the largest danger is nearest the reactor, but the West Coast is at least 7 time zones away.  Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pshaffer</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1059098</link>
		<dc:creator>pshaffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1059098</guid>
		<description>@oldbrownsquirrel - 

OK found some info in the Journal of Clinical thyriodology (free downloads). 

review articles from 2008 - overall conclusion is that I-131 therapy increases chances of second primary malignancies.


But - as usual - the follow up research is behind the curve. Data from patients collected over 10-40 years, and the average dose was 163 mCi. These are patients treated as many as 30-40 years ago, before tailoring doses to the risk level of the patients. Most of our patients now are getting less than 100 mCi. One reviewed paper which had the lowest average dose (70mCi) had no increase in cancers, but it was a small number of patients

so there is no hard data about what the lower doses would do - and we will have to wait 20 years to find out. 

Finally, these secondary cancers may, in a way, be irrelevent:

&quot;Lastly, it is important to know that an important study by Links et al. (2) which investigated life expectancy in patients with thyroid cancer found that patients who were free of disease had a normal residual life span after being cured, whereas median life expectancy was reduced to 60% in patients with residual disease.The authors concluded that treatment, including radioiodine, is safe and did not affect life expectancy.&quot;


http://www.thyroid.org/professionals/publications/clinthy/clinthy_v202.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@oldbrownsquirrel &#8211; </p>
<p>OK found some info in the Journal of Clinical thyriodology (free downloads). </p>
<p>review articles from 2008 &#8211; overall conclusion is that I-131 therapy increases chances of second primary malignancies.</p>
<p>But &#8211; as usual &#8211; the follow up research is behind the curve. Data from patients collected over 10-40 years, and the average dose was 163 mCi. These are patients treated as many as 30-40 years ago, before tailoring doses to the risk level of the patients. Most of our patients now are getting less than 100 mCi. One reviewed paper which had the lowest average dose (70mCi) had no increase in cancers, but it was a small number of patients</p>
<p>so there is no hard data about what the lower doses would do &#8211; and we will have to wait 20 years to find out. </p>
<p>Finally, these secondary cancers may, in a way, be irrelevent:</p>
<p>&#8220;Lastly, it is important to know that an important study by Links et al. (2) which investigated life expectancy in patients with thyroid cancer found that patients who were free of disease had a normal residual life span after being cured, whereas median life expectancy was reduced to 60% in patients with residual disease.The authors concluded that treatment, including radioiodine, is safe and did not affect life expectancy.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thyroid.org/professionals/publications/clinthy/clinthy_v202.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.thyroid.org/professionals/publications/clinthy/clinthy_v202.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benher</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1059355</link>
		<dc:creator>benher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1059355</guid>
		<description>Are a large percent of Americans completely barking mad? 

How can people live their lives like that? 
Stockpiling against non-existant threats because talky-mcTalking head tells them to...
Huddling in their McMansions, cradling shotguns, afraid of every snapping twig and sudden breeze.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are a large percent of Americans completely barking mad? </p>
<p>How can people live their lives like that?<br />
Stockpiling against non-existant threats because talky-mcTalking head tells them to&#8230;<br />
Huddling in their McMansions, cradling shotguns, afraid of every snapping twig and sudden breeze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1058846</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1058846</guid>
		<description>Re: &quot;some will drift away on the breeze&quot;

There is no &quot;away&quot;. One planet. And the ocean life is life, which is likely to be profoundly effected by radiation falling into the ocean. 
And nothing in this article about plutonium.

Still, thanks. 

Ariadne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: &#8220;some will drift away on the breeze&#8221;</p>
<p>There is no &#8220;away&#8221;. One planet. And the ocean life is life, which is likely to be profoundly effected by radiation falling into the ocean.<br />
And nothing in this article about plutonium.</p>
<p>Still, thanks. </p>
<p>Ariadne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackie31337</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1059358</link>
		<dc:creator>jackie31337</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1059358</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just the US where people are hoarding iodine pills. Many Finns have been buying up pills, and in some places &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yle.fi/uutiset/news/2011/03/finns_seek_radiation_protection_with_iodine_pills_2429257.html&quot;&gt;pharmacies have run out&lt;/a&gt; of supplies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just the US where people are hoarding iodine pills. Many Finns have been buying up pills, and in some places <a href="http://www.yle.fi/uutiset/news/2011/03/finns_seek_radiation_protection_with_iodine_pills_2429257.html">pharmacies have run out</a> of supplies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1059619</link>
		<dc:creator>daen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1059619</guid>
		<description>@Ugly Canuck: The pre-accident I-131 has been decaying since the core was shut down, and hence yes, has already decayed by one half-life.  But any &lt;i&gt;new&lt;/i&gt; I-131, if there is any, will not have.

@OldBrownSquirrel: My point precisely. Some people believe that taking potassium iodide protects against &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; radioactivity.  It would also be useful for that to be explicitly stated in Maggie&#039;s article.

It seems that the staining agent Prussian Blue can chelate cesium-137.  I am looking forward to seeing people with Mentat-style stained lips walking around Hollywood once this knowledge becomes more common.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ugly Canuck: The pre-accident I-131 has been decaying since the core was shut down, and hence yes, has already decayed by one half-life.  But any <i>new</i> I-131, if there is any, will not have.</p>
<p>@OldBrownSquirrel: My point precisely. Some people believe that taking potassium iodide protects against <i>any</i> radioactivity.  It would also be useful for that to be explicitly stated in Maggie&#8217;s article.</p>
<p>It seems that the staining agent Prussian Blue can chelate cesium-137.  I am looking forward to seeing people with Mentat-style stained lips walking around Hollywood once this knowledge becomes more common.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1070117</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1070117</guid>
		<description>Yep, the shellfish/iodine thing is a myth.  Iodine allergy is rare, and we&#039;re not even talking about iodine here - potassium iodide is an ionic compound of iodine. You can&#039;t ingest pure sodium or chlorine too easily, but sodium chloride (table salt) isn&#039;t so bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, the shellfish/iodine thing is a myth.  Iodine allergy is rare, and we&#8217;re not even talking about iodine here &#8211; potassium iodide is an ionic compound of iodine. You can&#8217;t ingest pure sodium or chlorine too easily, but sodium chloride (table salt) isn&#8217;t so bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CANTFIGHTTHEDITE</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1058854</link>
		<dc:creator>CANTFIGHTTHEDITE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1058854</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the well researched writing, Maggie!  Keep an eye out for woo on this subject, as I have a nagging feeling that it&#039;s just around the corner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the well researched writing, Maggie!  Keep an eye out for woo on this subject, as I have a nagging feeling that it&#8217;s just around the corner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AirPillo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1058859</link>
		<dc:creator>AirPillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1058859</guid>
		<description>People in the US worried about nuclear fallout need to remember that we have already irradiated our own soil a lot more than a Japanese reactor ever did, by testing (detonating) truly massive amounts of nuclear weapons in the middle of the southwestern United States.

It might help put people at ease to remind them that we have detonated over a thousand nuclear weapons in Nevada alone, 100 of which were above ground, and that we&#039;re all still doing fine afterward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People in the US worried about nuclear fallout need to remember that we have already irradiated our own soil a lot more than a Japanese reactor ever did, by testing (detonating) truly massive amounts of nuclear weapons in the middle of the southwestern United States.</p>
<p>It might help put people at ease to remind them that we have detonated over a thousand nuclear weapons in Nevada alone, 100 of which were above ground, and that we&#8217;re all still doing fine afterward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1058862</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1058862</guid>
		<description>I had assumed that nerve-wracking referred to the neurological sequelae of wrackspurt infestation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had assumed that nerve-wracking referred to the neurological sequelae of wrackspurt infestation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coliver</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1059119</link>
		<dc:creator>coliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1059119</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this.  A female friend called us in a panic a couple of days ago, asking if we might have any potassium iodide tablets on hand that she could have.  (We have a reputation for being preparedness geeks.)  She wanted them for her 10-month-old twins.  Here&#039;s the best part: she lives in PHILADELPHIA.  And this is a smart, smart woman in all other respects.  Luckily we could honestly say that we don&#039;t keep that particular item on hand.  Radiation is a scary thing, but I don&#039;t see fiery doom on the horizon quite yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this.  A female friend called us in a panic a couple of days ago, asking if we might have any potassium iodide tablets on hand that she could have.  (We have a reputation for being preparedness geeks.)  She wanted them for her 10-month-old twins.  Here&#8217;s the best part: she lives in PHILADELPHIA.  And this is a smart, smart woman in all other respects.  Luckily we could honestly say that we don&#8217;t keep that particular item on hand.  Radiation is a scary thing, but I don&#8217;t see fiery doom on the horizon quite yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1058864</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1058864</guid>
		<description>An radioactive atom, when it  radiates, is said to spit out or emit a proton or a neutron from its nucleus;  iirc, these are also called alpha and beta particles.

Are these particles actually discrete quanta with a specific and specifiable direction of travel from the atom emitting it; or, does it a wave of energy, which expands spherically in all directions from the atom?

...or is it both at once?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An radioactive atom, when it  radiates, is said to spit out or emit a proton or a neutron from its nucleus;  iirc, these are also called alpha and beta particles.</p>
<p>Are these particles actually discrete quanta with a specific and specifiable direction of travel from the atom emitting it; or, does it a wave of energy, which expands spherically in all directions from the atom?</p>
<p>&#8230;or is it both at once?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1060657</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1060657</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, I think it is reckless to say that you know what the outcome will be as far as cancer rates in the future.  This is a unique situation that hasn&#039;t happened before.  We don&#039;t know how our countries particular soils will react to the particular radiation now landing on the west coast.  It could very well have a very negative effect.  Contaminating the food supply with radiation WOULD be dangerous, or at the very least, have UNPREDICTABLE outcomes.  Especially for anyone under the age of around 16 and every newborn for an unpredictable number of years.
If you have an opinion, you should say you THINK it will not have negative consequences.  Be honest.  This has not happened before, we do not know what will happen.  We shouldn&#039;t panic...yet.  However please stop blowing smoke up people asses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, I think it is reckless to say that you know what the outcome will be as far as cancer rates in the future.  This is a unique situation that hasn&#8217;t happened before.  We don&#8217;t know how our countries particular soils will react to the particular radiation now landing on the west coast.  It could very well have a very negative effect.  Contaminating the food supply with radiation WOULD be dangerous, or at the very least, have UNPREDICTABLE outcomes.  Especially for anyone under the age of around 16 and every newborn for an unpredictable number of years.<br />
If you have an opinion, you should say you THINK it will not have negative consequences.  Be honest.  This has not happened before, we do not know what will happen.  We shouldn&#8217;t panic&#8230;yet.  However please stop blowing smoke up people asses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1059125</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1059125</guid>
		<description>A few days after the Chernobyl explosion, all schoolchildren in Poland were given a small amount of Lugol&#039;s iodine solution to drink (iodide tablets were not available in the required quantities). 

This was an unprecedented step by the Polish government who acted to protect the country&#039;s citizens even though it meant disobeying their Soviet handlers. Another step was replacing regular dairy products with those based on powdered milk for the next few weeks. The Soviets, BTW, provided no information on the explosion. For two full days nobody knew that anything had happened. Then the radiation monitoring stations in eastern Poland detected radiation levels that were half a million times higher than usual. At first they thought a nuclear bomb exploded somewhere in the Soviet Union but soon the government learnt what happened. From the BBC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few days after the Chernobyl explosion, all schoolchildren in Poland were given a small amount of Lugol&#8217;s iodine solution to drink (iodide tablets were not available in the required quantities). </p>
<p>This was an unprecedented step by the Polish government who acted to protect the country&#8217;s citizens even though it meant disobeying their Soviet handlers. Another step was replacing regular dairy products with those based on powdered milk for the next few weeks. The Soviets, BTW, provided no information on the explosion. For two full days nobody knew that anything had happened. Then the radiation monitoring stations in eastern Poland detected radiation levels that were half a million times higher than usual. At first they thought a nuclear bomb exploded somewhere in the Soviet Union but soon the government learnt what happened. From the BBC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1059637</link>
		<dc:creator>daen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1059637</guid>
		<description>@OldBrownSquirrel: ... which Maggie already does.  My bad ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@OldBrownSquirrel: &#8230; which Maggie already does.  My bad &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raddoc</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1058883</link>
		<dc:creator>Raddoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1058883</guid>
		<description>Nice post, but I must vehemently disagree with the idea that a shellfish allergy and an iodine allergy are related. This is a myth. A shellfish allergy is related to muscle proteins, not iodine. I am allergic to shellfish, I give iodine containing contrast to patients all day, and I would not hesitate to take iodine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, but I must vehemently disagree with the idea that a shellfish allergy and an iodine allergy are related. This is a myth. A shellfish allergy is related to muscle proteins, not iodine. I am allergic to shellfish, I give iodine containing contrast to patients all day, and I would not hesitate to take iodine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/03/17/four-questions-about.html#comment-1070918</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1070918</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this! Many customers at the little grocery and supplement store where I work have questions about this. I&#039;ll let them know that their panic-driven avarice may be giving Japanese children cancer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this! Many customers at the little grocery and supplement store where I work have questions about this. I&#8217;ll let them know that their panic-driven avarice may be giving Japanese children cancer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
