am I just paranoid? is there enough evidence at this point to keep someone from saying “well if this dose create x benefit, how much more benefit could we get from trying 10x, or 100x, 1,000x?”

You don’t realize the frankenstein computer god controls you through your thin white pedigree skull with the synthetic nerve radio directional antenna loop.

“completely unrelated”? “bunch of independently tested studies”?

parroting puppets, you are a terrorized member of the master race world wide gangster computer god earphone radio.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/body/how-does-the-brain-work.html

if moderate level fields (9v battery) can have demonstrable/measureable effects, then it would be reasonable to expect that lower level fields to have some lower level affect.
The frequency range of the external field could have very specific effects as well.

Naturally, the billions of dollars in wireless technology sales and usage trump any real funding of research on those effects. “nothing to see here, move along”

There’s some difference between strapping a wet sponge with an electric current to your temple and putting a cell phone with an extremely minute electro-MAGNETIC field neat your ear.

Not that there have been a bunch of independently tested studies that ring inconclusive of anything. You might as well be a Birther.

–

tDCS does sound promising. I can see in the future though misuse where a college undergrad straps a helmet on his head for every upcoming exam.

“Yeah, these burn marks on my temple? I was up for a 12-hour study exam”.

Wrong thinking will be punished.

My TENS machine comes with a very clear warning about use on the head. NEVER use with electrodes on both sides of the head [lest you inadvertently give yourself a dose of ECT presumably].

If you think the above article sounds credible, which I am condfident it is, do a web search for the Neurophone and/or Patrick Flanagan.

I found it to be a rather interesting device.