<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reuters staff in trouble after Japan-related jokes in company&#160;chatroom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086723</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086723</guid>
		<description>It &#039;s funny joke. I get his humor..
He shoudlnt be fired. crazy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It &#8216;s funny joke. I get his humor..<br />
He shoudlnt be fired. crazy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xeni Jardin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086727</link>
		<dc:creator>Xeni Jardin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086727</guid>
		<description>Apparently two guys: one reprimanded, one fired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently two guys: one reprimanded, one fired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EricT</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086728</link>
		<dc:creator>EricT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086728</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s so constitutionally amoral about (poor) gallows humor?  Don&#039;t they know it&#039;s a coping mechanism?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s so constitutionally amoral about (poor) gallows humor?  Don&#8217;t they know it&#8217;s a coping mechanism?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1087240</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1087240</guid>
		<description>Bob Saget&#039;s version is filthier, but Gilbert Gottfried&#039;s delivery blows everyone else away. He&#039;s gleefully taking vengeance on his audience for complaining about the 9/11 joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob Saget&#8217;s version is filthier, but Gilbert Gottfried&#8217;s delivery blows everyone else away. He&#8217;s gleefully taking vengeance on his audience for complaining about the 9/11 joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1088012</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1088012</guid>
		<description>It sounds like the larger problem was not this baldness/radiation joke, it was the lewd comments about Japanese women made in a business forum.  That&#039;s not considered gallows humor, it&#039;s considered sexual harassment in the workplace (http://bit.ly/hyw1iY).  IMO that&#039;s quite a different thing altogether.

It seems like the baldness/radiation joke just served to entangle the first guy in the whole mess, so he got a stern warning.

This is all just based on those 2 little articles that don&#039;t really say much about the actual facts of the situation though, so maybe I&#039;m way off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like the larger problem was not this baldness/radiation joke, it was the lewd comments about Japanese women made in a business forum.  That&#8217;s not considered gallows humor, it&#8217;s considered sexual harassment in the workplace (<a href="http://bit.ly/hyw1iY" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/hyw1iY</a>).  IMO that&#8217;s quite a different thing altogether.</p>
<p>It seems like the baldness/radiation joke just served to entangle the first guy in the whole mess, so he got a stern warning.</p>
<p>This is all just based on those 2 little articles that don&#8217;t really say much about the actual facts of the situation though, so maybe I&#8217;m way off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister44</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1087245</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1087245</guid>
		<description>That was a fantastic film. 


re: &quot;Gottfried was an extended victim of 9/11... &quot;

That is why black jokes may only be made by black people.
Jewish jokes may only be made by other Jews.
Gay jokes may only be made by other gays.
Women jokes may only be made by other women.
etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a fantastic film. </p>
<p>re: &#8220;Gottfried was an extended victim of 9/11&#8230; &#8221;</p>
<p>That is why black jokes may only be made by black people.<br />
Jewish jokes may only be made by other Jews.<br />
Gay jokes may only be made by other gays.<br />
Women jokes may only be made by other women.<br />
etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerwin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086742</link>
		<dc:creator>jerwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086742</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What&#039;s so constitutionally amoral about (poor) gallows humor?&lt;/i&gt;

My ancestors were hung at the gallows, you insensitive clod!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What&#8217;s so constitutionally amoral about (poor) gallows humor?</i></p>
<p>My ancestors were hung at the gallows, you insensitive clod!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unmutual</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086744</link>
		<dc:creator>Unmutual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086744</guid>
		<description>Sounds like he was making a joke at the bald guy&#039;s expense, not Japan&#039;s. Give me a break here . . . I can&#039;t even count the Blinky (3 eyed fish from The Simpsons) jokes I&#039;ve heard about japanese sushi.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like he was making a joke at the bald guy&#8217;s expense, not Japan&#8217;s. Give me a break here . . . I can&#8217;t even count the Blinky (3 eyed fish from The Simpsons) jokes I&#8217;ve heard about japanese sushi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086760</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086760</guid>
		<description>People need to joke to keep their spirits up. It doesn&#039;t mean they are callous, cruel, unfeeling, unconcerned or uncompassionate.

The people who would outlaw this sort of thing are the enemies (moderate hyperbole) of humanity.

People can be heroes, engaged in saving people&#039;s lives, doing worthwhile things (yeah .. I know, these guys were just journalists) and crack the most appalling jokes about the most terrible trajedies. Doesn&#039;t mean squat. They have to do it, to lift themselves - too much sincerity can grind you down. People have to lighten themselves and their friends/colleagues up.

Personally, I&#039;d fire the people who fired/reprimaned the people who were fired/reprimanded.

No one wants a world where we all have to walk around with a stick up our asses, afraid to say the wrong thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People need to joke to keep their spirits up. It doesn&#8217;t mean they are callous, cruel, unfeeling, unconcerned or uncompassionate.</p>
<p>The people who would outlaw this sort of thing are the enemies (moderate hyperbole) of humanity.</p>
<p>People can be heroes, engaged in saving people&#8217;s lives, doing worthwhile things (yeah .. I know, these guys were just journalists) and crack the most appalling jokes about the most terrible trajedies. Doesn&#8217;t mean squat. They have to do it, to lift themselves &#8211; too much sincerity can grind you down. People have to lighten themselves and their friends/colleagues up.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d fire the people who fired/reprimaned the people who were fired/reprimanded.</p>
<p>No one wants a world where we all have to walk around with a stick up our asses, afraid to say the wrong thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: max</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1087019</link>
		<dc:creator>max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1087019</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t know what is considered offensive though. There are jokes I&#039;ll tell to 20 different people and then one outlier will be shocked when I tell it to them. I had a very religious teacher once who got offended that I made a joke related to (not at the expense of) saying grace and he was upset by it, then 15 minutes later he made a joke about Guantanamo. I was expecting this guy said something way more fucked up when I read that he was reprimanded. I&#039;m actually sort of disappointed it wasn&#039;t funnier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t know what is considered offensive though. There are jokes I&#8217;ll tell to 20 different people and then one outlier will be shocked when I tell it to them. I had a very religious teacher once who got offended that I made a joke related to (not at the expense of) saying grace and he was upset by it, then 15 minutes later he made a joke about Guantanamo. I was expecting this guy said something way more fucked up when I read that he was reprimanded. I&#8217;m actually sort of disappointed it wasn&#8217;t funnier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086771</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086771</guid>
		<description>Jokes are srs bsns.  You can&#039;t be in the professional world without being srs bsns about everything ever.

*troll face*

It&#039;s blatant overreacting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jokes are srs bsns.  You can&#8217;t be in the professional world without being srs bsns about everything ever.</p>
<p>*troll face*</p>
<p>It&#8217;s blatant overreacting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teller</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1087031</link>
		<dc:creator>Teller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1087031</guid>
		<description>The cool irony: if Reuters reported a public figure making that same remark under the same circumstances, it&#039;d get that person fired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cool irony: if Reuters reported a public figure making that same remark under the same circumstances, it&#8217;d get that person fired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086776</link>
		<dc:creator>daen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086776</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Reuters insiders in Asia said Marshallâ€™s story is part of a wider saga, details of which are likely to be told soon.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Doesn&#039;t surprise me.  Some friends of mine used to work there in the late 80s and early 90s, when it was (apparently) a fun place with a sense of humour.  Then another friend of mine started working there in the late 90s (Reuters bought his company who were providing the Tablet applications for Reuters 3000) and after a year, he&#039;d had enough and went back home to Australia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Reuters insiders in Asia said Marshallâ€™s story is part of a wider saga, details of which are likely to be told soon.</p></blockquote>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t surprise me.  Some friends of mine used to work there in the late 80s and early 90s, when it was (apparently) a fun place with a sense of humour.  Then another friend of mine started working there in the late 90s (Reuters bought his company who were providing the Tablet applications for Reuters 3000) and after a year, he&#8217;d had enough and went back home to Australia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr_awkward</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086781</link>
		<dc:creator>dr_awkward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086781</guid>
		<description>I hate HR departments.  Fire them all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate HR departments.  Fire them all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Zip</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1091901</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Zip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1091901</guid>
		<description>I happen to have been related to one of the principles in this and have inside knowledge of the situation. 

The individual who was fired is one of the few reporters left at Reuters who has the experience, fortitude and talent to go into extremely difficult and sometimes dangerous situations at the drop of a hat and get the story right. He has worked in many hotspots for the last 20 years and his writing is always precise, accurate and humane.

I am pretty sure that I am correct in saying that when he realised the nature of the error he will have moved heaven and earth to correct it, the new regime at Reuters gave him no support and gave hime the axe. 

Given the length of his tenure and the nature of his service, it is safe to assume that Reuters&#039; new masters at Thompson will have regarded this error as a godsend, enabling them to rid themselves of a respected representative of the old Reuters and saving themselves what will surely have been a substantial pension in the future.

Piheads. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happen to have been related to one of the principles in this and have inside knowledge of the situation. </p>
<p>The individual who was fired is one of the few reporters left at Reuters who has the experience, fortitude and talent to go into extremely difficult and sometimes dangerous situations at the drop of a hat and get the story right. He has worked in many hotspots for the last 20 years and his writing is always precise, accurate and humane.</p>
<p>I am pretty sure that I am correct in saying that when he realised the nature of the error he will have moved heaven and earth to correct it, the new regime at Reuters gave him no support and gave hime the axe. </p>
<p>Given the length of his tenure and the nature of his service, it is safe to assume that Reuters&#8217; new masters at Thompson will have regarded this error as a godsend, enabling them to rid themselves of a respected representative of the old Reuters and saving themselves what will surely have been a substantial pension in the future.</p>
<p>Piheads. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1087039</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1087039</guid>
		<description>One thing I&#039;ve noticed over the past twenty years or so, is that now everyone is a comedian. The cult of standup comedy has so saturated our culture, that every cubicle monkey and button pusher thinks he&#039;s Richard Pryor.

Richard Pryor was funny. So was George Carlin. So was Bill Hicks and Lenny Bruce. I paid money to see them, and got my money&#039;s worth. But it seems every wageslave nowadays goes out of his way to be amusing, and make lame humor out of tragic situations.

If all you office funnymen have balls, then step up onstage next open mic if you think you&#039;re a comedian, give it a try, don&#039;t inflict it on your co-workers, a captive audience. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I&#8217;ve noticed over the past twenty years or so, is that now everyone is a comedian. The cult of standup comedy has so saturated our culture, that every cubicle monkey and button pusher thinks he&#8217;s Richard Pryor.</p>
<p>Richard Pryor was funny. So was George Carlin. So was Bill Hicks and Lenny Bruce. I paid money to see them, and got my money&#8217;s worth. But it seems every wageslave nowadays goes out of his way to be amusing, and make lame humor out of tragic situations.</p>
<p>If all you office funnymen have balls, then step up onstage next open mic if you think you&#8217;re a comedian, give it a try, don&#8217;t inflict it on your co-workers, a captive audience. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086794</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086794</guid>
		<description>This is gallows humor.
There is a difference between that and gloating.
Whoever made a fuss about it is an EQ idiot.
As Eric T said, it&#039;s a coping mechanism. If you deny that to people in stressful situation then you are making waay more damage than good.
Imo the person who should really be fired is the guy who made a fuss about it. His ignorance of basic human psychology is actively damaging. I suspect a sociopathological personality. We are not robots ffs.
I have friends up there in Sendai area and I haven&#039;t heard from two of them. And I love them. And I can crack a joke about it. That&#039;s what being human means. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is gallows humor.<br />
There is a difference between that and gloating.<br />
Whoever made a fuss about it is an EQ idiot.<br />
As Eric T said, it&#8217;s a coping mechanism. If you deny that to people in stressful situation then you are making waay more damage than good.<br />
Imo the person who should really be fired is the guy who made a fuss about it. His ignorance of basic human psychology is actively damaging. I suspect a sociopathological personality. We are not robots ffs.<br />
I have friends up there in Sendai area and I haven&#8217;t heard from two of them. And I love them. And I can crack a joke about it. That&#8217;s what being human means. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SonOfSamSeaborn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086799</link>
		<dc:creator>SonOfSamSeaborn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086799</guid>
		<description>I generally assume that HR departments and, in the UK, anybody with &quot;Health and Safety&quot; responsibilities are just unable to get actual jobs. They must have to actively seek things to do during the day, hence shit like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I generally assume that HR departments and, in the UK, anybody with &#8220;Health and Safety&#8221; responsibilities are just unable to get actual jobs. They must have to actively seek things to do during the day, hence shit like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shavedlummox</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086800</link>
		<dc:creator>shavedlummox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086800</guid>
		<description>Ever hang with a morgue attendant or someone who does human autopsies? You have not seen sick senses of humor. It is a coping mechanisms. If I had to deal with the daily news, categorizing disaster after disaster on a daily basis, I would develop that sick sense of humor too. It&#039;s not like they&#039;re publishing this stuff, this is meant for in house.

In fact, now that I&#039;m self employed, I will make it policy for my first, and all future employees to have a sick sense of humor, with little regard for political correctness. As long as the customers don&#039;t see it. Do you know why? Because it makes the work place tolerable, and dare I say, fun?

Please, Reuters, keep up the good work, and keep up employee freedom to crack a joke and have fun. It&#039;s what keeps your people happy, and it shows in their work.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever hang with a morgue attendant or someone who does human autopsies? You have not seen sick senses of humor. It is a coping mechanisms. If I had to deal with the daily news, categorizing disaster after disaster on a daily basis, I would develop that sick sense of humor too. It&#8217;s not like they&#8217;re publishing this stuff, this is meant for in house.</p>
<p>In fact, now that I&#8217;m self employed, I will make it policy for my first, and all future employees to have a sick sense of humor, with little regard for political correctness. As long as the customers don&#8217;t see it. Do you know why? Because it makes the work place tolerable, and dare I say, fun?</p>
<p>Please, Reuters, keep up the good work, and keep up employee freedom to crack a joke and have fun. It&#8217;s what keeps your people happy, and it shows in their work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mausium</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1087072</link>
		<dc:creator>mausium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1087072</guid>
		<description>&quot;The cult of standup comedy has so saturated our culture, that every cubicle monkey and button pusher thinks he&#039;s Richard Pryor.&quot;

I agree that most people think they&#039;re funnier than they are, but standup comedy hasn&#039;t changed social humor THAT much, there were always terrible yuk yuk jokes.

Hell, there were plenty of poop/fart jokes in greek plays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The cult of standup comedy has so saturated our culture, that every cubicle monkey and button pusher thinks he&#8217;s Richard Pryor.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree that most people think they&#8217;re funnier than they are, but standup comedy hasn&#8217;t changed social humor THAT much, there were always terrible yuk yuk jokes.</p>
<p>Hell, there were plenty of poop/fart jokes in greek plays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hostile17</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1087332</link>
		<dc:creator>hostile17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1087332</guid>
		<description>The trouble is, if you&#039;re talking to a large group of people - and not one to one - you know you could upset someone. So that&#039;s why it&#039;s best to play safe. 

Would he have made the joke in his article for example? If not, then he would probably consider it to be a dangerous statement.

As to working night shift etc... BS, no excuse. We all work at different times. Working after 10pm doesn&#039;t mean you can suddenly say or do what you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trouble is, if you&#8217;re talking to a large group of people &#8211; and not one to one &#8211; you know you could upset someone. So that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s best to play safe. </p>
<p>Would he have made the joke in his article for example? If not, then he would probably consider it to be a dangerous statement.</p>
<p>As to working night shift etc&#8230; BS, no excuse. We all work at different times. Working after 10pm doesn&#8217;t mean you can suddenly say or do what you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086823</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086823</guid>
		<description>Well hung? Or hanged?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well hung? Or hanged?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teapot</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1087100</link>
		<dc:creator>teapot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1087100</guid>
		<description>Z-grade loser Gilbert Gottfried deserves more anger than this guy (who was merely making a joke at the bald guy&#039;s expense). 

My response to Gottfried&#039;s shit jokes:
Hey Gottfried - Japan called, they have found some of your relatives&#039; possessions in the tsunami debris.. of the Miyagi Auschwitz museum!

Tasteless joke is tasteless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Z-grade loser Gilbert Gottfried deserves more anger than this guy (who was merely making a joke at the bald guy&#8217;s expense). </p>
<p>My response to Gottfried&#8217;s shit jokes:<br />
Hey Gottfried &#8211; Japan called, they have found some of your relatives&#8217; possessions in the tsunami debris.. of the Miyagi Auschwitz museum!</p>
<p>Tasteless joke is tasteless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernunnos</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086852</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernunnos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086852</guid>
		<description>I have to wonder if they&#039;ve considered what kind of work environment they&#039;ll create by only hiring or keeping people who don&#039;t crack the occasional sick joke in the face of tragedy. How else are they coping? Or more creepy still, what if they don&#039;t  need to cope? Imagine being a new hire at Reuters, playing the game of, &quot;Which of my coworkers are sociopaths, and which are merely alcoholics?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to wonder if they&#8217;ve considered what kind of work environment they&#8217;ll create by only hiring or keeping people who don&#8217;t crack the occasional sick joke in the face of tragedy. How else are they coping? Or more creepy still, what if they don&#8217;t  need to cope? Imagine being a new hire at Reuters, playing the game of, &#8220;Which of my coworkers are sociopaths, and which are merely alcoholics?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wylkyn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086856</link>
		<dc:creator>wylkyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086856</guid>
		<description>My grandfather died in the great Dirt Clod War of 06, you heartless tool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My grandfather died in the great Dirt Clod War of 06, you heartless tool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086859</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086859</guid>
		<description>In my experience good HR is about caring for the employees, not grinding down on them.  I have known bad HR managers, but then you get bad &lt;i&gt;everything&lt;/i&gt; managers.

In my years if I got fired it would have been from my boss, HR would have just done the paperwork.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience good HR is about caring for the employees, not grinding down on them.  I have known bad HR managers, but then you get bad <i>everything</i> managers.</p>
<p>In my years if I got fired it would have been from my boss, HR would have just done the paperwork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1087117</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1087117</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t hate Gilbert Gottfried if you&#039;ve seen &lt;i&gt;The Aristocrats&lt;/i&gt;. He told a 9/11 joke at a roast only three weeks after the event. When the audience yelled, &quot;Too soon.&quot;, he launched into the aristocrats. It&#039;s a work of art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t hate Gilbert Gottfried if you&#8217;ve seen <i>The Aristocrats</i>. He told a 9/11 joke at a roast only three weeks after the event. When the audience yelled, &#8220;Too soon.&#8221;, he launched into the aristocrats. It&#8217;s a work of art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086862</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086862</guid>
		<description>Take it from someone in the know, this is NOT a case of humour deficit. When asked if the radioactivity had caused his hair to fall out, the (bald) guy that was fired replied he was not, then made a very crude comment about Japanese women. 

The exchange took place in a work chat-room seen by other colleagues, including women. Being &#039;under duress&#039; is hardly an excuse. The offending remark came from someone who has worked in war zones and he made the remark in downtown Tokyo -- which though earthquake-shaken is hardly downtown Baghdad. And what about our other colleagues in Tokyo who continue to work with quiet dignity and without making sexually crude comments?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take it from someone in the know, this is NOT a case of humour deficit. When asked if the radioactivity had caused his hair to fall out, the (bald) guy that was fired replied he was not, then made a very crude comment about Japanese women. </p>
<p>The exchange took place in a work chat-room seen by other colleagues, including women. Being &#8216;under duress&#8217; is hardly an excuse. The offending remark came from someone who has worked in war zones and he made the remark in downtown Tokyo &#8212; which though earthquake-shaken is hardly downtown Baghdad. And what about our other colleagues in Tokyo who continue to work with quiet dignity and without making sexually crude comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agreenster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086867</link>
		<dc:creator>agreenster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086867</guid>
		<description>How offensive!!  My great grandmother had her heart cut out with a socket-wrench!  The indignity!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How offensive!!  My great grandmother had her heart cut out with a socket-wrench!  The indignity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danegeld</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/04/19/senior-reuters-edito.html#comment-1086870</link>
		<dc:creator>danegeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1086870</guid>
		<description>apparently Reuters then hired a guy from Fukushima to give more sensitive and appropriate coverage - the HR department said he came with glowing references</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apparently Reuters then hired a guy from Fukushima to give more sensitive and appropriate coverage &#8211; the HR department said he came with glowing references</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
