Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Two NASA astrophysics projects get the axe due to budget cutbacks

Xeni Jardin at 9:50 am Wed, Apr 20, 2011

— FEATURED —

THE LATEST

Guatemala: Archive of documents from Rios Montt genocide trial, overturned 10 days after guilty verdict

THE LATEST

Guatemala: Nation's highest court throws out Ríos Montt genocide trial verdict and prison sentence

Feature

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

Book Review

The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel

Book Review

Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle
NASA is shutting down LISA, the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, and the International X-Ray Observatory, due to budget cutbacks. Reports PopSci, the "gigantic laser experiment intended to study the nature of gravity and an x-ray telescope designed to look at black holes are being swept into the dustbin of history, too big and too expensive to survive the federal budget ax."

Boing Boing editor/partner and tech culture journalist Xeni Jardin hosts and produces Boing Boing's in-flight TV channel on Virgin America airlines (#10 on the dial), and writes about living with breast cancer. Diagnosed in 2011. @xeni on Twitter. email: xeni@boingboing.net.

MORE:  Science • Space

More at Boing Boing

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

  • Anonymous

    I just got this news feed via time machine from 2020!

    “China has announced the first definite proof of gravitational waves from their space laser interferometry satellites. Homeless US scientists congratulated them from their medicare-civil war wracked shelters.”

    • Anonymous

      Faulkner correctly predicts China learning to control gravity!

      • Anonymous

        Sorry all, it’s Vonnegut that correctly predicted gravity manipulation. I should really read more than one book per decade.

  • snakedart

    Luckily, investment in science has never contributed to the United States’ prosperity, so the impact of this and other cuts should be minimal.

  • Anonymous

    Luckily, investment in science has never contributed to the United States’ prosperity, so the impact of this and other cuts should be minimal.

    Yes, and it’s important to realize that this money is desperately needed to subsidize the lifestyles of banksters and other US corporate overlords. We’ll all have to make some sacrifices.

    And if you are an attractive young man or woman, please call 1-800-USA-GOVT to find out exactly how you can serve! Clean bill of health required. Some diminution of personal integrity may result. No termination of contract without refund of signing bonuses and return of lingerie or other costume materials. All rights reserved. Be all that you can legally be!

  • desiredusername

    LISA definitely sounds cooler than the Iraq war.

    • telaquapacky

      Not if you’re Lockheed Martin or Xe or Halliburton. And after all, who decides when and if we go to war? Ain’t the president. Ain’t congress. It’s the defense industry. Only they have the $Authority$ to decide those things.

  • Anonymous

    See, if the LISA project had military applications, we’d be gutting healthcare and education to keep it going instead.

    ~D. Walker

  • Drabula

    ditto, that’s what I was about to say….does LISA funding amount to about what, 2 hours of operations costs in Afghanistan? Good that America has it’s priorities in order.

  • semiotix

    I can’t decide whether to make a Simpsons joke or an Apple joke.

  • grimc

    But, hey: AT-AT walker.

    Something is seriously wrong with this country.

    • g-clef

      Important point, though: another project (the James Webb Space Telescope) is running $1.4B over budget. That almost completely covers the LISA contribution that NASA’s bailing out on. IXO is still screwed independently of that, but if I were working on LISA, I’d be pretty seriously annoyed at the Webb overruns.

  • Angryjim

    Mind you, yeah a huge part of our country’s budget goes to military, which does suck. And that may be a major reason we are in this mess, but we have some serious problems with our financial system that need to be fixed. maybe stuff like this should survive that ax, and I hope they would. But it’s one of those things. it’s hard to make cuts anywhere, because everything we spend money on has some logic behind it. And there’s gonna be heated debate of which of those is worthwhile. Some arts and sciences that don’t have direct impact on people’s health and wellbeing are going to be vulnerable under such conditions.

    That said, I love that we support things like this, and I think it is valuable. It’s a sad state of affairs.

  • MrScience

    Argh! This would have been good science. I’m really hoping that SIM Lite doesn’t get canned next.

    • HD

      Sorry MrScience, SIM got canned the day the Astro2010 report came out. There was hope at the time for LISA, since it was rated highly, but between JWST and manned spaceflight, there is no money in the NASA astrophysics budget for anything else in this decade.

  • Heisenberg

    Dear NASA,

    Please use the billions of dollars we give you to fix the embarrassment that is our human spaceflight program, so we can stop relying on the Russians as the only way to get to that really fancy space station we built. Your x-rays and lasers can wait.

    Sincerely,
    Everyone

    • echolocate chocolate

      Speak for yourself! I’d much rather NASA spent its money on actual science and pushing the limits of exploration, not running an overpriced low-orbit taxi service. The tech for getting people into orbit is proven and ripe for commercialization–SpaceX is practically there already. NASA should be focusing on the stuff that private companies can’t do.

    • Anonymous

      ‘Heisenberg’ doesn’t speak for ‘Everyone’ in spite of their pompous byline. I’d rather have invesment in essential science than life-support for human exploration. If budget is an issue, sending humans to space is the biggest boondoggle of all. Well, except for foreign wars on false pretenses and unneeded and unasked-for weapons programs.

  • Anonymous

    As long as we spend $7+ trillion on defense spending so I don’t have to make the slightest adjustment in my wasteful, throw-away lifestyle I don’t care about anything else.