Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Animal-sex Friday

Maggie Koerth-Baker at 8:04 am Fri, Apr 29, 2011

— FEATURED —

Book Review

The Man Who Laughs: grotesque Victor Hugo potboiler was the basis for The Joker

Feature

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

Book Review

The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle

It's Friday, and you know what that means. Yes, blogger Scicurious (who brought us the whale threesome) has another post about animal sex research.

This time, it's about chicken sperm. Specifically, whether roosters alter the quality of their sperm depending on how many other roosters they think have been, uh, laying with their hen—and what social status the hen, herself, has.

cocksoup.jpg

Believe it or not, studies in various species have shown that males in more dominant roles often produce a LOWER quality and quantity of sperm than those in subordinate roles. This is presumably because the dominant males don't have to compete as much as the subordinates, they get first pick of the females. But this hasn't been tested before, because the animals being studied understandably get annoyed when you try to get between them and their chosen female to get a sample of the semen.

In this case they decided to try again, using chickens. But not your normal chickens, these were Swedish fowl that live in social groups of up to 16 animals. The males form a dominance hierarchy for access to the females. The most dominant males are obviously going to get first crack at the hens, but the hens will often have multiple matings, and sperm competition is intense. Not only do the females go multiple times, the males can ejaculate up to 40 times within a few hours, which often results in quantity over quality, as the sperm quality decreases over time.

They took males of high and low status, and put them through randomized mating trials over several females, ALSO of high and low status. They took the ejaculate and measured the number of sperm, as well as the velocity, or how good their little swimmers were doing.

And the result? Well, you'll have to go read it. There are graphs that are integral to the story, and I don't want to spoil it. Suffice to say, chicken sperm is a lot more interesting than I would have previously guessed.

Image: Some rights reserved by quinn.anya

Maggie Koerth-Baker is the science editor at BoingBoing.net. She writes a monthly column for The New York Times Magazine and is the author of Before the Lights Go Out, a book about electricity, infrastructure, and the future of energy. You can find Maggie on Twitter and Facebook.

Maggie goes places and talks to people. Find out where she'll be speaking next.

MORE:  Science

More at Boing Boing

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

  • Anonymous

    Did he really have to say “The most dominant males are obviously going to get first crack…”??

  • Anonymous

    I have a bottle of “Cock” brand fish sauce in my cabinet right now. I NEVER get tired of asking my wife, “Want some cock with dinner?”

  • Bruce Arthurs

    “Suffice to say, chicken sperm is a lot more interesting than I would have previously guessed.”

    You need to get out more, Maggie.

  • Anonymous

    This seems like an eminently good subject for me to add a pointless observation.

    The (in my opinion superior) package design for the UK Cock Soup consumer: http://www.flickr.com/photos/thepeppertree/2256183382/

    (Note the “Serving Suggestion” caption next to the illustration – and I wish you bon appetit).

  • Antinous / Moderator

    This bowl of oatmeal has suddenly lost much of its appeal.

  • jamiethehutt

    Read about a study into chicken sperm or the Royal wedding?

    Chicken sperm every time.

  • Anonymous

    Not once in my lifetime did i ever think i would find myself analyzing multiple graphs on chicken sperm.

  • Eric R

    Of course they were Swedish chickens, with their totally relaxed sexual attitudes, being all non-monogamous with each other.

  • Anonymous

    I spotted the Crown in your deceptive closet tribute to the Royal Wedding to day. Good on you!

    “Rejoice with those who rejoice”

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13229961

  • joeygsb

    Waiter, there’s something in my soup…

  • Ty_MY

    In the Guangdong province in China, a local delicacy are chicken testicles.

    I’ve just had some.

    They are white-ish sacs, surprisingly large. The biggest is almost the size of a golf ball. You bite into them, and then presumably into the sperm, which then kind of, of course, oozes into the rest of your mouth.

    Thinking about it now, my stomach is churning a bit and my testicles have withdrawn a bit.

  • irksome

    Soory, I have little to no interest in chicken sperm. But the illustration reminds me of walking down an aisle at my local market and being arrested by something I had just walked past; Cock-Flavoured Soup. I wasn’t even certain I had read it and had to walk back several feet.

    I have yet to actually taste said soup but have attached a bag to several different backgrounds of hand-made paper, put them into odd yard-sale frames and given them as gifts.

    Every kitchen needs one.

  • Daemon

    This reminds me, a friend has been suggesting I use cock sauce for ages.

  • Teller

    Too soon! Too soon!

  • Manooshi

    Yum. I love cock [flavor].

  • Art

    Such a delectable flavour concept, why stop at soup? :)

    The winner so far: joeygsb…(rimshot, cymbal splash)

  • Deidzoeb

    Farmer resigns after joking about how poultry sperm decreases chance of depression in hens.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-smerconish/semengate-stuns-scientifi_b_853164.html

  • facetedjewel

    Um…that would be ‘quality’ since 1957.