Space Shuttle Endeavour STS-134 launch: BB liveblog on-site, SpaceFlightNow webcast with Miles O'Brien

By Xeni Jardin

Shuttle Endeavour launch webcast hosted by Miles O'Brien at SpaceFlightNow.com

[ 1:53pm ET: ] President Obama is en route despite launch scrub, scheduled to arrive Kennedy Space Center at 2:10pm ET. We may see Air Force One overhead shortly. The president is reportedly en route to say hello to astronauts and Gabrielle Giffords.

[ 1:03pm ET: ] Mike Leinbach, Shuttle Launch Director with NASA, is speaking about why the launch was called off. NASA now says Endeavour won't launch before Monday at 2:33pm EDT. My notes:

A thermostat on one of the fuel lines, one of the heater units, failed. We tried to get the line to cool down, to see if thermostat would kick in, and tried other methods to activate -- but failed. We have a hard failure. There was another heater also exhibiting funny behavior. We believe we have a problem in the LCA, load control assemblies, switch box. Maybe a problem in the box, or in the line leading in to the box, or out of the box. But we didn't want to commit to flight with only one of the heaters functioning. Need to be able to heat the fuel [Ed. note: fuel can become very cold in space, you don't want your fuel freezing]. Probably tomorrow afternoon they'll get hands on the assembly. Once we can get in to the avionics bay where the LCA exists, we can do troubleshooting, see if we need to change out that box. We've declared a minimum of 72 hours. Today the orbiter's not ready to fly. We will not fly before we're ready.

[12:52pm ET] NASA: launch may be scrubbed for at least 72 hours.

[12:30pm ET] Steven Young from SpaceFlightNow explains what we know about why Endeavour's launch today was scrubbed. Short version: Not the weather, but reportedly because of a problem with one of the orbiter's Auxillary Power Units. Steven explains that there are three of these on the shuttle, to provide power for hydraulic system: during launch, they are a crucial element. They're started up about 5 minutes before launch, and they sound like giant steam engines; they're run until the shuttle reaches orbit, then they shut down. The day before launch, they fire up one of them to see if it's still working, and right before launch, they fire up one again. The rules, Steven explains, are that you want all three to be working. Two are enough to fly the shuttle normally. We don't know exactly what the problem was yet, but whatever it is, it's serious enough to cause the launch to be called off. NASA is telling us that the delay will be more than 48 hours.

[ 12:18pm ET ]: Space shuttle Endeavour's launch has been scrubbed due to a problem with one of the orbiter's Auxillary Power Units. The launch will not take place at 3:47pm ET today as planned. Will post an update when we know the next launch window, but at best, odds are at least 48 hours we are now told the next window will be longer than 48 hours.

[12:17pm ET] Something unusual just happened. The crew normally heads to the launch pad, but this time they stopped at Launch Control Center (LCC) to drop off officials who were with them but aren't going to the launchpad. They pulled into the LCC entrance, went into parking lot (normally they just stop on the road outside), then made a U-turn. This may mean the launch is scrubbed.

[11:52am ET] We're seeing a cavalcade of tweeters walking out of the NASA Tweetup tent, heading off to greet the STS-134 astronauts. Pretty cool to see NASA exploring new ways to connect with people through Twitter and the like. Follow the Tweetup with the hashtag #nasatweetup.

[11:41am ET] I asked this last night over Twitter, and I'll ask you good folk here: What do atheists say when they want to wish someone (or someshuttle) a good flight? "Sciencespeed"? Your thoughts in the comments, please.

[11:34am ET] Today's scheduled launch is the penultimate launch for NASA's shuttle program; walking around KSC today, I'm hearing much nostalgia in snippets of conversations among journalists and NASA folk. As you drive around the towns surrounding Cape Canaveral, signs on local businesses—pizza parlors, strip clubs, churches—are all wishing "Godspeed Endeavour." What will happen to these communities, the countless mom and pop enterprises that depend on space industry and concomitant tourism? What happens to these thousands of space workers when the shuttle program ends? Some will be swooped up by private space industry, but how many will, say, SpaceX employ? Much talk of 15% or greater unemployment, property values plummeting, and an ambient sense of the rug being pulled out from under a place that calls itself the Space Coast, a place with a glamorous history during the Apollo years. Those years here are over.

[11:30am ET] Thanks for tuning in to Boing Boing's royal wedding coverage: the marriage of a spacecraft with her sky.

[11:26am ET] The continuing gusts (whoosh, there's another one!) we're feeling here at Kennedy Space Center in Florida are but one challenge. Meteorologists also keeping an eye on the iffy conditions at emergency runways in Europe, where the shuttle would make an emergency landing if there were problems. SpaceFlightNow:

The outlook is a chance of showers at the Zaragoza and Moron runways in Spain. The Istres landing site France had been promising, but the most recent update from meteorologists calls for a "slight chance" of showers there today.

[11:06am ET] The weather is the story out here today, and specifically: they'll be watching the wind. Gusts are so forceful out here that my Mac Air just blew right off the table and hit the ground when I stepped away for a moment. More importantly: will the wind affect the launch? Miles just spoke to the chief weather officer for NASA. 15 knots is the maximum threshold NASA will be allow, and some forecasts are calling for 18 knots. Last night, there were dramatic lightning storms and menacing clouds around KSC; the last of the storm bands from the powerful series of fronts that spawned devastating tornadoes throughout the south.

[10:56am ET] Greetings from a spot on the grass just 3 miles away from the launchpad where Space Shuttle Endeavour is set to lift off today. Blast-off is scheduled for 3:47pm ET, and I'll be here liveblogging all day from the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) with the SpaceFlightNow team. Miles O'Brien is hosting their live webcast, tune in here. Notable guests expected at the launch today include President Barack Obama and the first family (we're told they'll land nearby around 2:20pm ET), and Arizona congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, whose husband Mark Kelly is the commander of the STS-134 mission.

286908289.jpg
Image (Robert Pearlman): The shuttle Endeavour, bathed in blue light, April 29, 2011.

Published 7:57 am Fri, Apr 29, 2011

, , ,

About the Author

Boing Boing editor/partner and tech culture journalist Xeni Jardin hosts and produces Boing Boing's in-flight TV channel on Virgin America airlines (#10 on the dial), and writes about living with breast cancer. Diagnosed in 2011. @xeni on Twitter. email: xeni@boingboing.net.

32 Responses to “Space Shuttle Endeavour STS-134 launch: BB liveblog on-site, SpaceFlightNow webcast with Miles O'Brien”

  1. Sekino says:

    Thanks for tuning in to Boing Boing’s royal wedding coverage: the marriage of a spacecraft with her sky.

    Naaaawwww!!:D

    Thank you SO much for this fantastic alternative.

  2. putty says:

    Steven Young from SpaceFlightNow explains what we know about why Endeavour’s launch today was scrubbed. Short version: Not the weather, but reportedly because of a problem with one of the orbiter’s Auxillary Power Units

    Which would spell certain disaster if they were to find themselves trapped in one of the Empire’s tractor beams!

  3. Kevin says:

    Hi Xeni! I was at Discovery’s last launch at the Saturn V viewing area and I had zero wireless internet there. All cell towers were swamped. You are lucky to have connections.

    Enjoy the liftoff! Thanks for live-blogging.

    • Xeni Jardin says:

      SpaceFlightNow rolled their own connectivity, thank goodness. The 3G and 4G networks get swamped as more people show up.

  4. Anonymous says:

    In http://somafm.com/missioncontrol/ mix of ambient and experimental music mixed live mission audio.

  5. tp1024 says:

    Two down, just one more to go.

    Those guys might actually get some space-flying done once those white elephants are out of the way.

  6. hassenpfeffer says:

    Glad the MacBook AIR is living up to its name…

  7. victorvodka says:

    am i the only person on earth who was tired of the space shuttle before the FIRST launch? it’s a space pickup truck, for christ’s sake. (my father worked at nasa and had a similar disparaging attitude, pissing off colleagues in meetings by referring to it as “the space shovel”)

    • TSE says:

      Sounds like you and your dad are some real life of the party types.

    • Brainspore says:

      it’s a space pickup truck, for christ’s sake.

      The shuttle program certainly had its share of flaws, limitations, and misguided priorities… but how can you say something like “space pickup truck” as if that idea isn’t totally awesome?

      “Yeah, me and some buddies are drivin’ down to Florida this weekend to help move a couple of Commsats. Into SPACE.

  8. logicblog says:

    Good luck Xeni!

    Thanks for covering this.

  9. SamSam says:

    Gusts are so forceful out here that my Mac Air just blew right off the table and hit the ground when I stepped away for a moment.

    They should turn that into a Macbook Air commercial….

  10. TSE says:

    scrubbed

  11. Kevin says:

    Are you staying for the next attempt on Sunday?

    • Xeni Jardin says:

      There is no word yet of a launch attempt on Sunday. But if that’s when they do reschedule, I will endeavour (snort) to be here for it.

  12. Anonymous says:

    >I asked this last night over Twitter, and I’ll ask you good folk here: What do atheists say when they want to wish someone (or someshuttle) a good flight? “Sciencespeed”? Your thoughts in the comments, please.

    Unless you’re trying to be sanctimonious, I think godspeed is just fine. English is full of words from many origins. By the way, if you have a problem with godspeed, you might also consider eliminating “sanctimonious” from your vocabulary too – look it up. “Sciencespeed” is about sensible as freedom fries.

  13. joelfinch says:

    Godspeed Endeavour!

    If atheists had to avoid using words with a religious derivation, we’d need to rename the days of the week, and a thousand other things. Intent, not etymology!

    • mccrum says:

      I concur. I’m not avoiding the word Godspeed because it mentions a fictional character that billions believe in, thus making up it’s own word though the years. We’re not out there saying “God’s Speed Atlantis!” (And even if we were, who’s not to say that we’re not wishing them the speed of Mercury [god, not spacecraft]?)

      If it makes you feel better, throw out a “Goodspeed Atlantis,” but then you seem just as bad as the ultra-religious people who write out G-d because they consider it blasphemy to write out the whole word.

  14. tallpat says:

    What do atheists say when they want to wish someone (or someshuttle) a good flight?

    I would say “bon voyage”, but I’m not French.

  15. penguinchris says:

    I know you can see launches from quite a distance away, but is there any difficulty getting “close” if I wanted to go see it? I assume the crowds are bigger than normal.

    I’m making a cross-country drive for unrelated reasons and with a very open schedule and very soon, and while Florida is a *bit* out of the way for a New York – California trip, this would definitely be worth seeing when it actually launches (assuming it will be a few days until a re-launch). I won’t be available for the final shuttle launch so it would be my last chance.

    Well, it’s ~1500 miles out of the way to be more precise, which is about $240 worth of gas alone in my car, so maybe I can’t afford it… but I’ll certainly regret it later.

    • mccrum says:

      If I recall from 1991 (what up Atlantis STS-37!), you find yourself a nice spot across the street from the McDonald’s in Titusville (Google gives the address as 3835 South Washington Avenue Titusville, FL 32780-5847) and you sleep in your car. This puts you just across the bay and it is truly awesome.

      If you don’t go, I’ll even regret it. $240 is totally a bargain.

  16. Anonymous says:

    I think a nice secular humanist send-off to someone would be, “Keep your wits about you!”

  17. Kosmoid says:

    To me, the most fascinating aspect of the space shuttle is how they can manage a dead stick landing with a 2,000 ton spacecraft.

    The Airbus A380 has a maximum take-off weight of approx. 715 tons.

    (Is this right? I’m going by the listings on Wikipedia.)

    • Guysmiley says:

      The for landing the Shuttle Orbiter has a maximum landing weight of 230,000 lbs or 115 tons.

      At LAUNCH when you include the solid rocket boosters and topped off external fuel tank the entire stack weighs 4.4 million pounds.

  18. grikdog says:

    Godspeed? Who the hell says godspeed these days? “CUL8R G8R” works for me.

  19. Maggie Pax says:

    I would say, “Ad astra!” or use Heinlein’s phrase, “Hot jets!”

  20. Ar-Ghost says:

    Am I the only one upset at the wasted time and effort this technical glitch has caused? Have we become the laughingstock of space programs?

    • Guysmiley says:

      Yes, I think you are. Launch delays are not uncommon and if Challenger and Columbia have taught NASA anything it’s to err on the side of safety and ignore the pressure to “look good”.

      A failed APU fuel heater could cause significant damage if the hydrazine inside froze while in orbit and ruptured the tank. They have these tests and checks in place for a reason.

    • SamSam says:

      Do any of the other space programs laugh at us? I seriously doubt it. The US already puts more humans into space every year than every other country combined. (ref) How does being diligent and safe make the US into a laughing stock?

      Or maybe you were joking. I can’t tell.

    • Brainspore says:

      Have we become the laughingstock of space programs?

      Yeah, they laugh… and then NASA is all like “Oh, we’re sorry. Is our reusable space transport not as good as your reusable space transport? Yeah, well, you’ve probably got a way better reusable space transport.”

Leave a Reply