Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Time magazine cover of Osama bin Laden in Times Square looks odd

Mark Frauenfelder at 10:08 pm Tue, May 3, 2011

— FEATURED —

Science

Making sense of the confusing Supreme Court DNA patent ruling

Science

Ants and Stars: Bruce Sterling and Jasmina Tesanovic visit the Sardinia Radio Telescope in Italy

Feature

The Snowden Principle

Book Review

Carl Hiaasen's Bad Monkey

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle
time-osama.jpg

The windows of the building match Osama bin Laden's eyes, giving him a Roger McGuinn square-hippy-glasses look.
Photo by John McNab. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic.

Mark Frauenfelder is the founder of Boing Boing and the editor-in-chief of MAKE and Cool Tools. Twitter: @frauenfelder. Come and hear Mark speak at the ALA conference in Chicago on July 1.

More at Boing Boing

Ants and Stars: Bruce Sterling and Jasmina Tesanovic visit the Sardinia Radio Telescope in Italy

The Snowden Principle

  • Shart Tsung

    So they can’t release pictures of his body but they allow a humungous sign with his face exed out in Time Square? How easy is it to smell the bullshit nowadays?

    Also, very bad taste. We don’t celebrate death in this country, just violence.

  • Ryan

    Ummmm… wasn’t he shot in the eye? Makes it even more gruesome.

  • whisper dog

    Reminds me of the video that accompanies that numbers station recording that always creeps me out.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McFRonD-sjg

  • John Goldsmith

    Strikingly similar from yesterday’s The Independent:

    http://yfrog.com/z/h2v4mxej

  • j0phus

    Does this seem like we are keeping track of the death of our enemies on a big sign at our doorstep? It kind of makes us look like savages.

    • Mister44

      “I do not think that word means what you think it means.”

      Above: not savages.

      These guys:

      http://www.historycommons.org/events-images/a140_blackwater_massacre_2050081722-13250.jpg (graphic pic!)

      http://www.exohuman.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/killteam.jpg (on trial for murdering civilians)

      Savages

      • Jake0748

        Sorry, but giant picture of dead guy we just killed (yes, he deserved it), in the middle of New York City, while maybe not savage, is still ugly and unnecessary.

  • EH

    Oh exploitable!

  • Pavlo

    Inappropriate and in bad taste.

  • Jesse M.

    Bin Laden looks like an emoticon!

  • Jake0748

    I thought the Time magazine cover was very lame. I mean were all their artists and editors on vacation?
    And then to blow up this stupid cover “art” to side-of-building size… makes me sad.

    Really? We can’t do better than this?

  • scifijazznik

    In case you needed proof the people who occupy the building are not creative types….

    Oh the fun to be had in those eyeball offices.

  • nehoccramcire

    Thanks for the advice for my morning commute, and which crossroads of the world to avoid. Yechhhh.

  • MacBookHeir

    It’s probably the most heartless and poorly-designed magazine covers I’ve seen – and that’s including all the gruesome Nixon and Kissinger Newsweek hatchet designs from the early 70s. This TIME design doesn’t even work as powerful primitive propaganda

  • Infinite Decay

    Jake0748 & MacBookHeir:
    It’s an homage to the same style cover that Time first ran in 1945 with the death of Hitler. (Which they reused for Saddam Hussein, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, and now Osama bin Laden.)

    • Jake0748

      Fine, but that doesn’t make it any less crude and ugly.

    • MacBookHeir

      Thanks for the tip RE the original cover(s) – Who would have known TIME had used the same motif for other covers? I have to say that the Hitler version doesn’t do anything for me either, then again post-Modern art criticism had yet to take off and flourish in 1945

  • Jack

    The biggest problem with that Time magazine cover is the fact it has been used before: Once for Hitler and THREE TIMES IN THE PAST 10 YEARS!

    So Saddam Hussein, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Osama bin Laden are all worthy of that big-red “X” treatment? Really?

    Saddam Hussein & Abu Musab al-Zarqawi should not have gotten that treatment. In the long run—heck right now—it reflects the psychotic nature of the Bush presidency’s obsessed desire to find a “villain” when they couldn’t find Osama bin Laden. And Time played right into the whole flawed concept. Osama bin Laden was the only one other than Hitler who deserved that treatment.

    And having that cover in Times Square makes all the sense in the world: The WTC site is now a new rallying point for folks who are happy that Osama bin Laden is dead. Did the same exuberance exist for Saddam Hussein & Abu Musab al-Zarqawi? Nope.

  • marco antonio

    Unfortunately this is not showing Americans in the best light to the rest of the world. Americans are coming across as an immature, vindictive, savage bunch fond of public executions – just like in the middle ages or the Wild West.

    Just wait for the ‘gruesome’ photos of Bin Laden to be released, it’s going to be a grotesque feeding frenzy out there.

  • Jack

    Oh, and for those who care, check out the reaction this YouTuber gets when he tries to start a “U.S.A.! U.S.A.!” chant on the L train:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jox5vMFASLA

    • MacBookHeir

      “Oh, and for those who care”

      I don’t know if you’ve ever commuted daily via subway train,
      but I think the non-response to the chant has more to do
      with wanting to be left alone rather than any lack of patriotism
      or desire to participate. Whenever I was on my morning train I just
      wanted to read my book

  • Jack

    Oh, I have commuted on NYC subways since I was a wee little lad; even on my own at 11! So I know what you mean. But I wanted to just place a bit of perspective on all of this. For example, this sign in Times Square is probably not like that 24/7. No idea what the cycling is, but there is no way that ad space would be dominated by that image for more than a few moments a day.

    NYC is a mixed city. But 911 affected us. It’s complicated.

  • Louis Kid

    I don’t get the point of showing trophees like this, it’s so puerile. Definetely not the kind of attitude that we need to slow all those conflicts.

    By the way, the confrontation with the Nasdaq logo is kind of frightning.

  • Matt Cornell

    In this case, it’s also an accidental reference to the claim that OBL was shot “in the eyes.” Both Stewart & Colbert were very keen on this idea, repeating it often. Also, it shows up here:

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/05/03/article-0-0BE0624D00000578-769_306x464.jpg

  • Andrew Katz

    I for one am now incapable of seeing a picture of OBL without hearing “Americuh, FUCK YEAH!” playing on repeat in my head: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcmuPc8_SWQ

    (warning: don’t read the comments)

  • Anonymous

    Basically the sanitized and mass marketed version of a head on a spike.

  • travtastic

    Do we get to drink his blood?