<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An explanation for Roswell that&#039;s crazier than&#160;aliens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Barrus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114890</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Barrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114890</guid>
		<description>Jacobsen&#039;s Roswell theory is more or less cribbed from Fortean investigator Nick Redfern&#039;s book &quot;Body Snatchers In The Desert.&quot; Redfern comments on the Jacobsen&#039;s theories at his book&#039;s blog: http://desertdarkness.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacobsen&#8217;s Roswell theory is more or less cribbed from Fortean investigator Nick Redfern&#8217;s book &#8220;Body Snatchers In The Desert.&#8221; Redfern comments on the Jacobsen&#8217;s theories at his book&#8217;s blog: <a href="http://desertdarkness.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://desertdarkness.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wil9000</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114385</link>
		<dc:creator>wil9000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114385</guid>
		<description>Up until the Mengele/Stalin/Flying Disk/mutilated children bit, it was very solid and interesting, but then.....
Holy cripes! Perhaps exposure to all the real horrors of Area 51 (dirty bomb testing)led her source to cobble together this nonsensical, impossible, far beyond ludicrous story. And you know what? Now, that is the only part of this book that will get any notice. The actual important parts will be ignored because of this bullshit. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Up until the Mengele/Stalin/Flying Disk/mutilated children bit, it was very solid and interesting, but then&#8230;..<br />
Holy cripes! Perhaps exposure to all the real horrors of Area 51 (dirty bomb testing)led her source to cobble together this nonsensical, impossible, far beyond ludicrous story. And you know what? Now, that is the only part of this book that will get any notice. The actual important parts will be ignored because of this bullshit. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lasttide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114387</link>
		<dc:creator>lasttide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114387</guid>
		<description>So... the Soviets had saucer-shaped aircraft with a range of 5000+ miles that were never put in to use and remained completely secret until now? I&#039;m more prepared to believe in aliens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; the Soviets had saucer-shaped aircraft with a range of 5000+ miles that were never put in to use and remained completely secret until now? I&#8217;m more prepared to believe in aliens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Badger</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114388</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114388</guid>
		<description>The idea of Roswell being a Soviet hoax reminds me of the explanation in Peter Millar&#039;s thriller &quot;Stealing Thunder&quot; -- except Millar&#039;s novel was more plausible.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of Roswell being a Soviet hoax reminds me of the explanation in Peter Millar&#8217;s thriller &#8220;Stealing Thunder&#8221; &#8212; except Millar&#8217;s novel was more plausible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114394</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114394</guid>
		<description>Plutonium distribution tests: real.
OXCART: real (it&#039;s just the A-12 / SR-71 Blackbird)
Nuclear rocket: real (look up NERVA)
The rest of it: pretty damn far-fetched

Lure &#039;em in with some truths, wind up, and hit&#039; just when they&#039;re ready to hear anything, hit &#039;em with the whoppers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plutonium distribution tests: real.<br />
OXCART: real (it&#8217;s just the A-12 / SR-71 Blackbird)<br />
Nuclear rocket: real (look up NERVA)<br />
The rest of it: pretty damn far-fetched</p>
<p>Lure &#8216;em in with some truths, wind up, and hit&#8217; just when they&#8217;re ready to hear anything, hit &#8216;em with the whoppers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114395</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114395</guid>
		<description>isn&#039;t area 51 the place where they are keeping the Bin Laden death photo? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn&#8217;t area 51 the place where they are keeping the Bin Laden death photo? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dculberson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114411</link>
		<dc:creator>dculberson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114411</guid>
		<description>I thought the surgically modified children idea was fascinating.  Completely implausible but fascinating and a truly new take on a really interesting part of our history.  Neat like a ghost story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the surgically modified children idea was fascinating.  Completely implausible but fascinating and a truly new take on a really interesting part of our history.  Neat like a ghost story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: betatron</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1122348</link>
		<dc:creator>betatron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1122348</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m working my way through the book, and just hit the first point where she mentions the WotW aliens: she makes the specific point that they were &quot;the size of bears with [something something] of/like octopus tentacles.   Your criticism sounds more like an inadvertent admission of failing to read the material than anything else...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m working my way through the book, and just hit the first point where she mentions the WotW aliens: she makes the specific point that they were &#8220;the size of bears with [something something] of/like octopus tentacles.   Your criticism sounds more like an inadvertent admission of failing to read the material than anything else&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1115696</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1115696</guid>
		<description>Actually the UFO &quot;theory&quot; sounds like it came from Adam Roberts&#039; book Yellow Blue Tibia. Stalin gathers a bunch of sci-fi hacks to his dacha and asks them to come up with an alien invasion plan. This book is brilliant and laugh out load funny. It was the first thing I thought of when both Stalin and UFO were used in the same sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the UFO &#8220;theory&#8221; sounds like it came from Adam Roberts&#8217; book Yellow Blue Tibia. Stalin gathers a bunch of sci-fi hacks to his dacha and asks them to come up with an alien invasion plan. This book is brilliant and laugh out load funny. It was the first thing I thought of when both Stalin and UFO were used in the same sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muteboy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114931</link>
		<dc:creator>muteboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114931</guid>
		<description>Most of what I know about the US in the 1950&#039;s I got from &#039;Welcome to Mars&#039;, the radio series posted about here in 2008.
http://boingboing.net/2008/10/03/ken-hollings-welcome.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of what I know about the US in the 1950&#8242;s I got from &#8216;Welcome to Mars&#8217;, the radio series posted about here in 2008.<br />
<a href="http://boingboing.net/2008/10/03/ken-hollings-welcome.html" rel="nofollow">http://boingboing.net/2008/10/03/ken-hollings-welcome.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1116213</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1116213</guid>
		<description>The book appears to be a good read but only if you take it for a good read and not reality. To read more about this topic with some great never before seen pics go to

http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2011/05/area-51-roswell-photos-never-seen.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The book appears to be a good read but only if you take it for a good read and not reality. To read more about this topic with some great never before seen pics go to</p>
<p><a href="http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2011/05/area-51-roswell-photos-never-seen.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2011/05/area-51-roswell-photos-never-seen.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drabula</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114935</link>
		<dc:creator>Drabula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114935</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m smack dab in the middle of reading &quot;Mirage Men&quot; right now and this article only added to my conspiracy-within-a-conspiracy headache.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m smack dab in the middle of reading &#8220;Mirage Men&#8221; right now and this article only added to my conspiracy-within-a-conspiracy headache.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Pottol</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114434</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Pottol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114434</guid>
		<description>Or for another source on her prior ravings http://dir.salon.com/tech/col/smith/2004/07/21/askthepilot95/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or for another source on her prior ravings <a href="http://dir.salon.com/tech/col/smith/2004/07/21/askthepilot95/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://dir.salon.com/tech/col/smith/2004/07/21/askthepilot95/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1115204</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1115204</guid>
		<description>Coincidentally, I just finished it. You thinkin&#039; Doty too?

BTW, &quot;...they had been made to look like aliens a la Orson Welles&#039; War of the Worlds...&quot;. 
From what I remember, what little we were told by H.G. about his Martians were that they had octopus characteristics. I don&#039;t think Orson strayed from this. No little people, no big eyes, etc.

Another sloppy &quot;fact&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coincidentally, I just finished it. You thinkin&#8217; Doty too?</p>
<p>BTW, &#8220;&#8230;they had been made to look like aliens a la Orson Welles&#8217; War of the Worlds&#8230;&#8221;.<br />
From what I remember, what little we were told by H.G. about his Martians were that they had octopus characteristics. I don&#8217;t think Orson strayed from this. No little people, no big eyes, etc.</p>
<p>Another sloppy &#8220;fact&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicky G</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114958</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicky G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114958</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m reading Area 51 right now.  Haven&#039;t gotten to the Roswell bit, but I did hear a chunk of the Fresh Air interview.

Obviously, it&#039;s highly unlikely that any of us will ever know exactly what took place at Roswell.

However, I do think it is reasonable to believe that:

1) We may not know the extent of aeronautic capabilities the military/intelligence community has at its disposal today

2) There is a chance that UFOs as black-project scare-the-masses hoaxes has validity

Dismissing crazy ideas as out of hand inherently because they are crazy strikes me as obtuse, when there are many, many, many examples of things that were once totally batshit crazy ideas that were easy to scoff at, that eventually turned out to be true (and laughably, we now take for granted).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reading Area 51 right now.  Haven&#8217;t gotten to the Roswell bit, but I did hear a chunk of the Fresh Air interview.</p>
<p>Obviously, it&#8217;s highly unlikely that any of us will ever know exactly what took place at Roswell.</p>
<p>However, I do think it is reasonable to believe that:</p>
<p>1) We may not know the extent of aeronautic capabilities the military/intelligence community has at its disposal today</p>
<p>2) There is a chance that UFOs as black-project scare-the-masses hoaxes has validity</p>
<p>Dismissing crazy ideas as out of hand inherently because they are crazy strikes me as obtuse, when there are many, many, many examples of things that were once totally batshit crazy ideas that were easy to scoff at, that eventually turned out to be true (and laughably, we now take for granted).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114449</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114449</guid>
		<description>You are all agents of a mass anti-conspiracy conspiracy!
The bigger the lie the more believable it becomes, but what is the lie now?

I miss Art Bell...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are all agents of a mass anti-conspiracy conspiracy!<br />
The bigger the lie the more believable it becomes, but what is the lie now?</p>
<p>I miss Art Bell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muteboy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114462</link>
		<dc:creator>muteboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114462</guid>
		<description>I heard that. It was pretty bad. There was lots of breathless talk of experiments which actually! took! place!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that. It was pretty bad. There was lots of breathless talk of experiments which actually! took! place!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muteboy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114467</link>
		<dc:creator>muteboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114467</guid>
		<description>Yes, they were talking about NERVA.

Another thing about the interview which annoyed me was the repeated implication that experiments to test a theory which came back with a negative result had &quot;failed&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, they were talking about NERVA.</p>
<p>Another thing about the interview which annoyed me was the repeated implication that experiments to test a theory which came back with a negative result had &#8220;failed&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That Neil Guy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114213</link>
		<dc:creator>That Neil Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114213</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I thought the same thing after reading that yesterday. Sort of blows her credibility...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I thought the same thing after reading that yesterday. Sort of blows her credibility&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerwin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114481</link>
		<dc:creator>jerwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114481</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d kind of like to see a discussion on the Orion Project between Annie Jacobson and George Dyson. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d kind of like to see a discussion on the Orion Project between Annie Jacobson and George Dyson. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apollo18</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114483</link>
		<dc:creator>apollo18</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114483</guid>
		<description>All terrible &quot;reporting&quot; about potential ukulele bombers aside, Jacobsen&#039;s story about Area 51 isn&#039;t worth half the attention being given to it.  Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and neither Terry Gross nor Jon Stewart seemed to recognize that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All terrible &#8220;reporting&#8221; about potential ukulele bombers aside, Jacobsen&#8217;s story about Area 51 isn&#8217;t worth half the attention being given to it.  Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and neither Terry Gross nor Jon Stewart seemed to recognize that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114488</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114488</guid>
		<description>Look at the comments on the NPR page: A supposed NERVA engineer chastises Jacobsen for technical illiteracy with regards to radiation hazards.  

I&#039;d like to 2nd that, in the Fresh Air interview, it was (with respect to any science) the clueless talking to the ignorant.  (Sorry Terry.)

The Horten flying disk is rather well known, IIRC it appears in &quot;Warplanes of the Third Reich&quot; published in the 70&#039;s.  5k mile range? Uh, no.

Jacobsen also appears in Snopes for her breathless racism on NW Flight 327. http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/skyterror.asp

Fascinated as I am by Cold War black- (or just dark-)history, and a citizen hugely concerned with the cost of classification, I&#039;m still going to AVOID this book.  While I hope Ms. Jacobsen makes a lot of money off the rubes, I won&#039;t be one of them.

And Maggie: I&#039;m surprised.  Really shocked that you give this person your credence.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at the comments on the NPR page: A supposed NERVA engineer chastises Jacobsen for technical illiteracy with regards to radiation hazards.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to 2nd that, in the Fresh Air interview, it was (with respect to any science) the clueless talking to the ignorant.  (Sorry Terry.)</p>
<p>The Horten flying disk is rather well known, IIRC it appears in &#8220;Warplanes of the Third Reich&#8221; published in the 70&#8242;s.  5k mile range? Uh, no.</p>
<p>Jacobsen also appears in Snopes for her breathless racism on NW Flight 327. <a href="http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/skyterror.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/skyterror.asp</a></p>
<p>Fascinated as I am by Cold War black- (or just dark-)history, and a citizen hugely concerned with the cost of classification, I&#8217;m still going to AVOID this book.  While I hope Ms. Jacobsen makes a lot of money off the rubes, I won&#8217;t be one of them.</p>
<p>And Maggie: I&#8217;m surprised.  Really shocked that you give this person your credence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114496</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114496</guid>
		<description>I heard Terry Gross interviewing her, and I have to say it sounded like she was spewing disinformation for propaganda purposes (either willingly or unwittingly, I can&#039;t say). Perhaps someone has decided the US needs a new bogeyman to fight and are trying to make us hate Russians again.

But who knows, maybe &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ironsky.net/&quot;&gt;Iron Sky&lt;/a&gt; is a docudrama.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard Terry Gross interviewing her, and I have to say it sounded like she was spewing disinformation for propaganda purposes (either willingly or unwittingly, I can&#8217;t say). Perhaps someone has decided the US needs a new bogeyman to fight and are trying to make us hate Russians again.</p>
<p>But who knows, maybe <a href="http://www.ironsky.net/">Iron Sky</a> is a docudrama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114754</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114754</guid>
		<description>What a pity the x-files ended 10 years ago. It would have made a fantastic episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a pity the x-files ended 10 years ago. It would have made a fantastic episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1117062</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1117062</guid>
		<description>I heard the Fresh Air interview, and Jacobsen&#039;s verification of credibility for her source on the Roswell stuff was that he had TS clearance, and Q clearance, and she verified his war record, and employment record, etc.  As though having a clearance is proof of sanity.  

Let me tell you (and posting anonymously obviously), there are lots of folks with weird ideas out there with clearances, especially in the engineering branches.  I assume that the operations branches try to keep their people sane.  Though there was that whole Angleton thing.  And J. Edgar.

Just because someone has a Ph.D and a clearance doesn&#039;t make them sane.  Or more specifically, innoculate them from having crazy ideas.  As long as you do your job and can keep a secret, it&#039;s unlikely that you&#039;ll get your clearance pulled because you believe in little green men.  Or gray children, as the case may be.  Especially if you happen to be really smart;  people are willing to overlook a great deal if you have good ideas in the area you&#039;re supposed to be working on.

I&#039;ve spent hours listening to otherwise sane people with clearances tell me their latest conspiracy theory.  Who cares, as long as the craziness doesn&#039;t extend to the things they&#039;re working on.  But the other side of the coin is that they&#039;re extremely smart and knowledgeable, and so if you&#039;re a journalist who is a bit gullible and easily led anyway (see A. Jacobsen&#039;s hysterical and largely discredited reporting of the terrorist dry runs) and not so sharp technically, you&#039;re easy pickins.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard the Fresh Air interview, and Jacobsen&#8217;s verification of credibility for her source on the Roswell stuff was that he had TS clearance, and Q clearance, and she verified his war record, and employment record, etc.  As though having a clearance is proof of sanity.  </p>
<p>Let me tell you (and posting anonymously obviously), there are lots of folks with weird ideas out there with clearances, especially in the engineering branches.  I assume that the operations branches try to keep their people sane.  Though there was that whole Angleton thing.  And J. Edgar.</p>
<p>Just because someone has a Ph.D and a clearance doesn&#8217;t make them sane.  Or more specifically, innoculate them from having crazy ideas.  As long as you do your job and can keep a secret, it&#8217;s unlikely that you&#8217;ll get your clearance pulled because you believe in little green men.  Or gray children, as the case may be.  Especially if you happen to be really smart;  people are willing to overlook a great deal if you have good ideas in the area you&#8217;re supposed to be working on.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve spent hours listening to otherwise sane people with clearances tell me their latest conspiracy theory.  Who cares, as long as the craziness doesn&#8217;t extend to the things they&#8217;re working on.  But the other side of the coin is that they&#8217;re extremely smart and knowledgeable, and so if you&#8217;re a journalist who is a bit gullible and easily led anyway (see A. Jacobsen&#8217;s hysterical and largely discredited reporting of the terrorist dry runs) and not so sharp technically, you&#8217;re easy pickins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie Koerth-Baker</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114511</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114511</guid>
		<description>If I were a member of a secret team of terrorists, we would DEFINITELY have matching track suits. 

I bet Stalin and Mengele had matching track suits, too, for that matter. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were a member of a secret team of terrorists, we would DEFINITELY have matching track suits. </p>
<p>I bet Stalin and Mengele had matching track suits, too, for that matter. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1115026</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1115026</guid>
		<description>She&#039;ll be at downtown Los Angeles Library&#039;s Aloud on July 26th.
http://www.lfla.org/event-detail/592/Annie-Jacobson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;ll be at downtown Los Angeles Library&#8217;s Aloud on July 26th.<br />
<a href="http://www.lfla.org/event-detail/592/Annie-Jacobson" rel="nofollow">http://www.lfla.org/event-detail/592/Annie-Jacobson</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: betatron</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114259</link>
		<dc:creator>betatron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114259</guid>
		<description>Annie wrote a series of pieces for Women&#039;s WSJ on air transportation safety (flying imams, probing missions, Air Marshall service feckls). I&#039;ve seen a lot of conflicting opinions on the conclusions AJ reached in her terror in the skies series, and she had to take a stint at Pajamas Media, but I very much like her writing style.  She&#039;s really good at what she does.   Sounds like great fun.  I hope she sells a lot of books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Annie wrote a series of pieces for Women&#8217;s WSJ on air transportation safety (flying imams, probing missions, Air Marshall service feckls). I&#8217;ve seen a lot of conflicting opinions on the conclusions AJ reached in her terror in the skies series, and she had to take a stint at Pajamas Media, but I very much like her writing style.  She&#8217;s really good at what she does.   Sounds like great fun.  I hope she sells a lot of books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: betatron</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114516</link>
		<dc:creator>betatron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114516</guid>
		<description>Based on my own experiences in a previous life, I&#039;ve found that journalists -- and even people who were actually there -- tend to get specific tech details wrong, but do tend to get the big brush strokes pretty close.  I haven&#039;t had a chance to look at any of the details coming out about her book, but it&#039;s worth remembering that the 50s was a very very kookie time.  Lots of ideas floating around, and a lot of industrial-complex-cum-nation-state pushing these projects.   

Remember The Rule:  If it doesn&#039;t violate the laws of nature then it&#039;s possible, and if it&#039;s possible then it&#039;s only a matter of money.  And the US had a lot of money in the 50s and a much greater percentage of our national intellectual capital applied to military stuff.   
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on my own experiences in a previous life, I&#8217;ve found that journalists &#8212; and even people who were actually there &#8212; tend to get specific tech details wrong, but do tend to get the big brush strokes pretty close.  I haven&#8217;t had a chance to look at any of the details coming out about her book, but it&#8217;s worth remembering that the 50s was a very very kookie time.  Lots of ideas floating around, and a lot of industrial-complex-cum-nation-state pushing these projects.   </p>
<p>Remember The Rule:  If it doesn&#8217;t violate the laws of nature then it&#8217;s possible, and if it&#8217;s possible then it&#8217;s only a matter of money.  And the US had a lot of money in the 50s and a much greater percentage of our national intellectual capital applied to military stuff.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ColHapablap</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/18/an-explanation-for-r.html#comment-1114265</link>
		<dc:creator>ColHapablap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114265</guid>
		<description>Was this source Ozymandias?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was this source Ozymandias?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
