Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Tsunami photos from Fukushima

Maggie Koerth-Baker at 3:04 pm Mon, May 23, 2011

— FEATURED —

Feature

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

Book Review

The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel

Book Review

Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle
110519_2_1.jpg

Last week, the Japanese utility company Tepco released photos taken of the March 11 tsunami as it struck the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Out of the two sets of shots, this photo, in particular, caught me cold. From this angle, the wave looks like such a small thing, doesn't it?

Also chilling: A series of shots taken as the tsunami flooded in and then receded from the power plant, sucking away a bunch of cars and leaving behind one totaled SUV. (Among other damage.)

Maggie Koerth-Baker is the science editor at BoingBoing.net. She writes a monthly column for The New York Times Magazine and is the author of Before the Lights Go Out, a book about electricity, infrastructure, and the future of energy. You can find Maggie on Twitter and Facebook.

Maggie goes places and talks to people. Find out where she'll be speaking next.

MORE:  Emotional • Japan • News

More at Boing Boing

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

  • thomasrdotorg

    The odd thing about this wave is that it is hollow and breaking like a a good surfable wave. It looks like it’s about to close out however.
    I always thought the waves were more like a wall of white water.

  • justin

    In this photo I think those green things are the diesel generators. Looking at the next several, you can see how they’re about to be under water.

  • Anonymous

    Looking at the end of the seawall in the upper right of the picture tells the whole story. The perspective everywhere else in the image doesn’t give a correct impression. Assuming the seawall is of an even evelvation the fact that the wave is significantly higher than the wall shows the basis of the upcoming story.

  • Nedril

    It is not the height. Waves that big are nothing. Coastlines all over the world are hit by much bigger waves everyday with no ill consequences. You can surf and be hit by a wave that big without nary a scratch.

    It is the wavelength that makes the difference. The wavelength for a well formed swell wave hovers around 10 meters or so but for a Tsunami the wavelength can be hundreds of kilometers…

    The amount of water in a Tsunami is orders and orders of magnitude higher than the amount of water in a common ocean wind generated wave. One will just eventually turn into an unstable trochoid and deliver its energy in the form of forward momentum against the shore mostly harmlessly the other will do pretty much the same but obliterate everything in its way.

    For a comparison, this wave was much higher than the one that hit Fukushima but it was a common ocean wave note the difference in the amount of water and energy that is released as the wave hits:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-C6KyzYSaU

  • Nedril

    And in case someone is wondering how big that wave is. Here is the nearest buoy data for that location at the date the wave hit:

    http://calipso.puertos.es/cgi-bin/Wave_Max_Sal.cgi?Base=BO&Codigo=2246&Year=2008&Submit=Generar+Tabla%2FTable+Generation

    Look for march Hs (significant height) 12.6 meters, that is 41.34 feet. And Significant Height is not the biggest height recorded just the average of the 1/3 largest recorded waves, so that wave was definitely significantly bigger than 41 feet

    MODERATOR NOTE:
    DON’T USE URL SHORTENERS
    YOUR COMMENT WILL NOT APPEAR

  • Captain Obviousness

    “the wave looks like such a small thing, doesn’t it?”

    No, it looks pretty massive to me actually. Look at the boat in the foreground for scale. 25 feet of whitewater is nothing to trifle with, especially since it’s not a “wave”. It’s more like the level of the ocean violently and temporarily rising 25 feet than it is a wave.

    It’s not like dropping a pebble into a bucket and watching the waves radiate outward. It’s like taking the bucket and shaking it side to side until the water sloshes out.

    • roselucile

      I didn’t realize it was a boat, scale was telling me it must be a buoy.

  • mkultra

    Is it bad to admit that I can’t stand to look at any more photos of this horrible disaster? As much as I’m a voyeur like most everyone else, at some point the horror and tragedy just overwhelmed the spectacle, and I just can’t stand to look anymore.

    I kind of felt the same way back after 9/11.

    I know this is important for engineers to study the failure modes of a system like this, and it’s got to be helpful in designing facilities that can survive this sort of thing better, but considering I’m not in either of those groups, I think I’m going to pass.

    • Ugly Canuck

      Look away if you must, but do not close your eyes – do not forget.

  • Anonymous

    I’ve made an animation with those pictures…

    http://www.imagup.com/data/1120858346.html

    Fromage.

  • Anonymous

    Nedril
    The data from that link is from 2008.

  • Anonymous

    When you get to learning about tsunamis, you find out that the height of the wave is important, but the LENGTH is VERY important. a 3 foot wide wave is very different than a 300 yard long wave (not that I know how long this was, threw out that size as an example.

  • Nedril

    @Anon, Yes that is when the wave in the Youtube video I posted hit the coast. I posted the video to show the difference between a Tsunami and a normal wind generated ocean wave. The chart gives you an idea of the size of the wave in the video (well above 40 feet +) and allows you to compare its effects to the similarly sized Tsunami that struck the Fukushima nuclear power plant (estimated at 43 feet)

  • Anonymous

    The green things mentioned by Justin are screen and rakes used to remove seaweed and other debris from ocean water before it enters the plant for use as cooling water. They are certainly not diesel generators.