<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian Tories refuse to send soldiers to help flood victims because they&#039;d compete with the private&#160;sector</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121541</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121541</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Please, someone tell me what &quot;defense&quot; operations are currently underway by infantry?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Apparently they are defending disaster profiteers from the dreaded scourge of neighborly cooperation.

North America has gone from believing in economic systems that can easily cope with amoral players (well regulated market capitalism) to implementing systems that reward immoral players (Reagan socialism and lazy-fare capitalism).  Instead of coping with the reality of greed, we idolize it - and thus we reward anyone who displays a sociopathic obsession with accumulating wealth through the displacement of costs onto profitless victims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Please, someone tell me what &#8220;defense&#8221; operations are currently underway by infantry?</p></blockquote>
<p>Apparently they are defending disaster profiteers from the dreaded scourge of neighborly cooperation.</p>
<p>North America has gone from believing in economic systems that can easily cope with amoral players (well regulated market capitalism) to implementing systems that reward immoral players (Reagan socialism and lazy-fare capitalism).  Instead of coping with the reality of greed, we idolize it &#8211; and thus we reward anyone who displays a sociopathic obsession with accumulating wealth through the displacement of costs onto profitless victims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeposts</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121545</link>
		<dc:creator>joeposts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121545</guid>
		<description>And really, why does Manitoba get troops? They&#039;re farmers - they got Kubotas and shovels and strong arms and a lot of dirt - and they could use the money. 

All you&#039;d need to do in Quebec and Manitoba is form a government committee to oversee the bidding process, the integration of work using various contractors, equipment procurement, training, safety issues, temp worker importation, communications and damage assessment and re-evaluation. Then they could spend a few weeks developing a plan that doles out taxpayer money to the companies that promised to implement the plan at the lowest cost possible. 

That would free up our troops to do the important things, like stand behind Stephen Harper at photo ops. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And really, why does Manitoba get troops? They&#8217;re farmers &#8211; they got Kubotas and shovels and strong arms and a lot of dirt &#8211; and they could use the money. </p>
<p>All you&#8217;d need to do in Quebec and Manitoba is form a government committee to oversee the bidding process, the integration of work using various contractors, equipment procurement, training, safety issues, temp worker importation, communications and damage assessment and re-evaluation. Then they could spend a few weeks developing a plan that doles out taxpayer money to the companies that promised to implement the plan at the lowest cost possible. </p>
<p>That would free up our troops to do the important things, like stand behind Stephen Harper at photo ops. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrDrew</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1122570</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrDrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1122570</guid>
		<description>Canada, maybe, Quebec no. Quebec didn&#039;t cast much of a vote for &quot;The Harper Government&quot; (formerly the government of Canada).

What is so unique is how well this can be contrasted with Manitoba&#039;s situation right now. And, well, I&#039;m sorry to say that province didn&#039;t vote so overwhelmingly against the status quo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canada, maybe, Quebec no. Quebec didn&#8217;t cast much of a vote for &#8220;The Harper Government&#8221; (formerly the government of Canada).</p>
<p>What is so unique is how well this can be contrasted with Manitoba&#8217;s situation right now. And, well, I&#8217;m sorry to say that province didn&#8217;t vote so overwhelmingly against the status quo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William George</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121548</link>
		<dc:creator>William George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121548</guid>
		<description>Way to vote stupidly, Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to vote stupidly, Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121558</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121558</guid>
		<description>+ to Hamish.

A flood is the wrong time to push a people solution rather than a government solution.  But it does lead to a discussion that should probably happen in quieter times.  It&#039;s far too easy to throw up one&#039;s hands and call up a distant and faceless bureaucracy for help instead of turning to the community first.  People will often surprise you.  Give them a chance sometime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+ to Hamish.</p>
<p>A flood is the wrong time to push a people solution rather than a government solution.  But it does lead to a discussion that should probably happen in quieter times.  It&#8217;s far too easy to throw up one&#8217;s hands and call up a distant and faceless bureaucracy for help instead of turning to the community first.  People will often surprise you.  Give them a chance sometime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fnc</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121816</link>
		<dc:creator>fnc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121816</guid>
		<description>&quot;Municipalities should not expect labour paid for by their tax dollars for repairing damage after flood water subsides.&quot;

Fixed yer post.

It sounds like the time for massive intervention and assistance is past in this case, and maybe the military is no longer called for but geez that politician couldn&#039;t have made himself sound more like an ass. He should have just said &#039;the worst is over, it&#039;s time for the community to rebuild&#039;, then quietly taken his kickbacks behind the scenes. That&#039;s the way American politicians do it anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Municipalities should not expect labour paid for by their tax dollars for repairing damage after flood water subsides.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fixed yer post.</p>
<p>It sounds like the time for massive intervention and assistance is past in this case, and maybe the military is no longer called for but geez that politician couldn&#8217;t have made himself sound more like an ass. He should have just said &#8216;the worst is over, it&#8217;s time for the community to rebuild&#8217;, then quietly taken his kickbacks behind the scenes. That&#8217;s the way American politicians do it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1122586</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1122586</guid>
		<description>If I recall the report I heard correctly, the situation is that soldiers are being used for emergency reponse, but not for general cleanup duties (which is not, after all, their proper role). Note the first part of the statement:

==
As you can appreciate the role of the Canadian Forces is mainly centred on defence activities and therefore they must maintain a capacity in this area to deal with other events should they occur in the country or abroad.
==

In other words, don&#039;t tie down soldiers (generally the single most expensive class of individuals) doing work that anyone with a shovel can do. It&#039;s not their purpose, and renders them unable to respond if something else happens.

You seem to be focusing on:

==
Moreover the services you are requesting, if they were authorized, would place the Canadian Forces in competition with the private sector at the local and provincial level which could accomplish this type of reintegration work
==

Which is essentially an aftertthought (note the moreover) and states the plain truth that it isn&#039;t the army&#039;s proper role to be doing the job of city and provincial contractors.

Poorly worded? Yes. Outrageous? Not really, no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I recall the report I heard correctly, the situation is that soldiers are being used for emergency reponse, but not for general cleanup duties (which is not, after all, their proper role). Note the first part of the statement:</p>
<p>==<br />
As you can appreciate the role of the Canadian Forces is mainly centred on defence activities and therefore they must maintain a capacity in this area to deal with other events should they occur in the country or abroad.<br />
==</p>
<p>In other words, don&#8217;t tie down soldiers (generally the single most expensive class of individuals) doing work that anyone with a shovel can do. It&#8217;s not their purpose, and renders them unable to respond if something else happens.</p>
<p>You seem to be focusing on:</p>
<p>==<br />
Moreover the services you are requesting, if they were authorized, would place the Canadian Forces in competition with the private sector at the local and provincial level which could accomplish this type of reintegration work<br />
==</p>
<p>Which is essentially an aftertthought (note the moreover) and states the plain truth that it isn&#8217;t the army&#8217;s proper role to be doing the job of city and provincial contractors.</p>
<p>Poorly worded? Yes. Outrageous? Not really, no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1122589</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1122589</guid>
		<description>Was kind of disappointed with this article(especially the comment section) being a soldier and the husband of one Â I just watched many of my friends leave and return from the floods what you don&#039;t see is 1.we have other jobs- training to do just imagine dropping what your doing and leaving your job and family in a matter of hours for 3 weeks to come back to an increased work load ( gotta catch up) 2.people want to abuse us we don&#039;t mind helping but were not there to do everybody&#039;s else&#039;s job you wouldn&#039;t believe how many people say look the army&#039;s here I can sit down have a beer and let them do the work next well be cutting peoples grassÂ </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was kind of disappointed with this article(especially the comment section) being a soldier and the husband of one Â I just watched many of my friends leave and return from the floods what you don&#8217;t see is 1.we have other jobs- training to do just imagine dropping what your doing and leaving your job and family in a matter of hours for 3 weeks to come back to an increased work load ( gotta catch up) 2.people want to abuse us we don&#8217;t mind helping but were not there to do everybody&#8217;s else&#8217;s job you wouldn&#8217;t believe how many people say look the army&#8217;s here I can sit down have a beer and let them do the work next well be cutting peoples grassÂ </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nylund</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121581</link>
		<dc:creator>Nylund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121581</guid>
		<description>Conservatives purportedly like the involvement of the private sector because it increases competition, thus bringing down costs.  In reality, they don&#039;t like competition, and don&#039;t give two hoots about bringing down costs.  They like profits for private firms, and they will put profit before people any chance they get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives purportedly like the involvement of the private sector because it increases competition, thus bringing down costs.  In reality, they don&#8217;t like competition, and don&#8217;t give two hoots about bringing down costs.  They like profits for private firms, and they will put profit before people any chance they get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cupcakecalamity</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1122356</link>
		<dc:creator>cupcakecalamity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1122356</guid>
		<description>Not what the army is for? Not according to the commercials they play before my movies.
FIGHT CHAOS
FIGHT DISTRESS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vnzz6WznsE8

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not what the army is for? Not according to the commercials they play before my movies.<br />
FIGHT CHAOS<br />
FIGHT DISTRESS<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vnzz6WznsE8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vnzz6WznsE8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121591</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121591</guid>
		<description>&quot;Help!  I can&#039;t swim!&quot;

&quot;Don&#039;t worry, citizen!  The free market will come up with a solution!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Help!  I can&#8217;t swim!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t worry, citizen!  The free market will come up with a solution!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121848</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121848</guid>
		<description>Maudit Harper Ã  marde!!!!

He&#039;s all ears for Manitoba&#039;s fires and don&#039;t care for QuÃ©bec.
It&#039;s gonna be a VERY long mandate.

I somehow wish that Quebec gets ABSOULUTELY NOTHING from Harper (nor the opposition), so that people will mobilise and bring back the glory of the Bloc QuÃ©bÃ©cois.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maudit Harper Ã  marde!!!!</p>
<p>He&#8217;s all ears for Manitoba&#8217;s fires and don&#8217;t care for QuÃ©bec.<br />
It&#8217;s gonna be a VERY long mandate.</p>
<p>I somehow wish that Quebec gets ABSOULUTELY NOTHING from Harper (nor the opposition), so that people will mobilise and bring back the glory of the Bloc QuÃ©bÃ©cois.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T Nielsen Hayden</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1124668</link>
		<dc:creator>T Nielsen Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1124668</guid>
		<description>dno1967b: No, it would not be more constructive, and it would not be enough.

Government and the military &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; the citizenry deciding to organize to get some necessary things done. It&#039;s just that they&#039;re organized to do them on an ongoing basis, and the work is supported via taxes the body politic levies on itself. If Harper thinks the government is an organization that&#039;s separate from the rest of Canadian society -- an assumption that&#039;s implicit in his notion that it might &quot;compete&quot; with private firms -- he&#039;s already gone profoundly wrong.

By the way, by pure chance I was there in Saint Jean-sur-Richelieu when it was flooding. That was a nontrivial amount of water. If the locals need more help, they should get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dno1967b: No, it would not be more constructive, and it would not be enough.</p>
<p>Government and the military <i>are</i> the citizenry deciding to organize to get some necessary things done. It&#8217;s just that they&#8217;re organized to do them on an ongoing basis, and the work is supported via taxes the body politic levies on itself. If Harper thinks the government is an organization that&#8217;s separate from the rest of Canadian society &#8212; an assumption that&#8217;s implicit in his notion that it might &#8220;compete&#8221; with private firms &#8212; he&#8217;s already gone profoundly wrong.</p>
<p>By the way, by pure chance I was there in Saint Jean-sur-Richelieu when it was flooding. That was a nontrivial amount of water. If the locals need more help, they should get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cservant</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121855</link>
		<dc:creator>cservant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121855</guid>
		<description>So applying your logic further, we should be hiring mercenaries to fight wars just instead of having soldiers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So applying your logic further, we should be hiring mercenaries to fight wars just instead of having soldiers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Burton</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1122122</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1122122</guid>
		<description>Eric Cantor, opinion leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Cantor, opinion leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamish Grant</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121867</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamish Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121867</guid>
		<description>it worked for the US government in Iraq and Afghanistan...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it worked for the US government in Iraq and Afghanistan&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1122126</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1122126</guid>
		<description>People, people.  It would be far more efficient, read LESS COSTLY, to use the military.  We already paid for the military at whatever level it currently is in our taxes.  So why should we pay out of the same pocket AGAIN for more expensive private contractors? Because with the Tories, government is in the back pocket of private industry.  This benefits the 5 people who own the cleanup companies, but NOT the 95 people who paid their taxes!  Less accountability, for the LESSER GOOD.  Vote Tory you say?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People, people.  It would be far more efficient, read LESS COSTLY, to use the military.  We already paid for the military at whatever level it currently is in our taxes.  So why should we pay out of the same pocket AGAIN for more expensive private contractors? Because with the Tories, government is in the back pocket of private industry.  This benefits the 5 people who own the cleanup companies, but NOT the 95 people who paid their taxes!  Less accountability, for the LESSER GOOD.  Vote Tory you say?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121616</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121616</guid>
		<description>FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF-

*repeated headdesking*

Canada, I&#039;m so sorry this asshattery is spreading from us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF-</p>
<p>*repeated headdesking*</p>
<p>Canada, I&#8217;m so sorry this asshattery is spreading from us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xof</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121873</link>
		<dc:creator>Xof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121873</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Our men and women in uniform are not construction workers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Except, of course, the Canadian Military Engineers who, just like the US Army Corps of Engineers, are in fact constructor workers (among other things).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Our men and women in uniform are not construction workers.</p></blockquote>
<p>Except, of course, the Canadian Military Engineers who, just like the US Army Corps of Engineers, are in fact constructor workers (among other things).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lorq</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121619</link>
		<dc:creator>lorq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121619</guid>
		<description>â€Ž&#039;Cuz, y&#039;know, private enterprise can&#039;t *compete* with government flood relief assistance! So government has to *help* it compete. &#039;Cuz it can&#039;t compete. On its own. Help it. Compete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€Ž&#8217;Cuz, y&#8217;know, private enterprise can&#8217;t *compete* with government flood relief assistance! So government has to *help* it compete. &#8216;Cuz it can&#8217;t compete. On its own. Help it. Compete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121623</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121623</guid>
		<description>What is ironic is that had Quebec managed to separate from the rest of Canada we surely would have been first to respond with foreign aid to helping our suffering neighbour country.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is ironic is that had Quebec managed to separate from the rest of Canada we surely would have been first to respond with foreign aid to helping our suffering neighbour country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121629</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121629</guid>
		<description>&quot;So wouldn&#039;t that mean that the local government would be hiring private contractors to do clean-up, etc etc, meaning that the money (from Federal disaster relief funds) would therefore stay in the community &quot;

...because we all know that Quebec has a HUGE local disaster recovery industry. That money won&#039;t possibly go out of the community to companies that operate (inter)nationally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So wouldn&#8217;t that mean that the local government would be hiring private contractors to do clean-up, etc etc, meaning that the money (from Federal disaster relief funds) would therefore stay in the community &#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;because we all know that Quebec has a HUGE local disaster recovery industry. That money won&#8217;t possibly go out of the community to companies that operate (inter)nationally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1122656</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1122656</guid>
		<description>What of the Parti Quebecois?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What of the Parti Quebecois?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: travtastic</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1122147</link>
		<dc:creator>travtastic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1122147</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Our men and women in uniform are not construction workers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hell no! They&#039;re for killin&#039; things!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Our men and women in uniform are not construction workers.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hell no! They&#8217;re for killin&#8217; things!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sirkowski</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121637</link>
		<dc:creator>sirkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121637</guid>
		<description>This is classic Harper. He&#039;s a petty and small man. What can you expect from someone who believes Global Warming is a socialist conspiracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is classic Harper. He&#8217;s a petty and small man. What can you expect from someone who believes Global Warming is a socialist conspiracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: genre slur</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1122424</link>
		<dc:creator>genre slur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1122424</guid>
		<description>...now if we can only privatize the Canadian Government. Get Bombardier or Inco or Sunice to take over...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;now if we can only privatize the Canadian Government. Get Bombardier or Inco or Sunice to take over&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121913</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121913</guid>
		<description>Translation: &quot;The soldiers whose salaries you pay and whose equipment, clothing, and food you paid for, cannot help you because that would threaten the profits of the companies whose lobbyists buy us things.&quot;  Congratulations, Canadian government, you have turned the sin of corporate whoring into a fine art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Translation: &#8220;The soldiers whose salaries you pay and whose equipment, clothing, and food you paid for, cannot help you because that would threaten the profits of the companies whose lobbyists buy us things.&#8221;  Congratulations, Canadian government, you have turned the sin of corporate whoring into a fine art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1122176</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1122176</guid>
		<description>With a majority in Parliament (no thanks to Quebec voters, who voted overwhelmingly for the socialist NDP) and the separatist Bloc Quebecois almost gone, Harper doesn&#039;t need to pretend to care about Quebec anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a majority in Parliament (no thanks to Quebec voters, who voted overwhelmingly for the socialist NDP) and the separatist Bloc Quebecois almost gone, Harper doesn&#8217;t need to pretend to care about Quebec anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121688</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121688</guid>
		<description>It seems like Canada is living a Monty Python sketch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like Canada is living a Monty Python sketch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: romulusnr</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/05/26/canadian-tories-refu.html#comment-1121701</link>
		<dc:creator>romulusnr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1121701</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the Canucks really fucked up this last election. It was mind wobbling that they went full-on wingnut. 

(I realize that the average Canadian Conservative Party MP is somewhere to the left of a US Blue Dog Democrat, but everything&#039;s relative.)

Take your cold war culture and take a hike. NDP &#039;15!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the Canucks really fucked up this last election. It was mind wobbling that they went full-on wingnut. </p>
<p>(I realize that the average Canadian Conservative Party MP is somewhere to the left of a US Blue Dog Democrat, but everything&#8217;s relative.)</p>
<p>Take your cold war culture and take a hike. NDP &#8217;15!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
