I expect your results on my desk 5:00 o’clock.

Thanks!!!

I are graphic designer.

So, they clearly didn’t get very many entries – as others have noted some of these are just mediocre and not particularly interesting. And at least one of them – the one at the end – is a photo that’s circulated across the internet previously (a few months ago as I recall), and I’m guessing the person who submitted it here is not actually the person who took the photo, they just grabbed it off some other website.

The prize was InFocus projectors, which is a pretty good prize, and considering the small audience there was considerable incentive to just rip off the photo and send it in on a lark.

Finally, yeah, the rabbit and hot dog one is obviously fake. The funny thing about that, though, is that it’s actually the best slide on there – it keeps its information to a minimum and the graphics are clear and readable. This slide would be perfectly fine (though certainly not outstanding) for most presentation needs – just replace the rabbit and hot dog with appropriate graphics for whatever the presentation is about, or take them out altogether (or leave them in if your audience has a sense of humor).

- That rabbit slide looks to me like it was invented for the contest. The “Weird assets” graph is just too satirical.

- The slide on the bottom of the context page with all the cheesy character assets is brutally bad. I can picture the person adding each one of those words and carefully picking fonts. I can also picture the poor person in the presentation who is so depressed by the slide that they just have to get a photo of it.

But you can’t tell me the one with the rabbit and the hot dog is ‘unintentional’

Funny, yes. . .but bad on purpose. Some of those others: what were they thinking?