Twitter today announced that it will soon roll out a new version of search that includes photo and video results. "Relevance" is the focus, rather than chronological order. The announcement came at the "All Things D" conference, and
Joshua Topolsky had an interesting followup question:
Just asked @dickc about why Twitter won't let me get at older tweets.
Costolo's reply, as paraphrased by Joshua [on Twitter]:
Basically? The infrastructure isn't there.
Danny Sullivan of Search Engine Land addressed this shortcoming back in 2010, with a pointer to third-party services that can help: basically, Topsy is it. Or, I suppose, you could always ask the Library of Congress!
report this ad
When “social media” meant “blogs,” there were many tools, services and protocols that comprised an infrastructure for federated, open, loosely joined interaction: the rise of the social giants has killed off much of this infrastructure, all but erasing it from our memories.
Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen funded the Allen Brain Observatory, a detailed, rich data-set derived from parts of a mouse-brain: what’s striking is that the Allen Institute released all the data into the public domain, at once, as soon as it was available, which is exactly what you’d want the publicly funded alternatives to do, and […]
People’s Ride is a co-op ride-hailing company in Grand Rapids, Michigan: drivers own the service in common and collectively decide how to spend its profits (for example, on deploying an app to go with its website); for-profit competitors like Uber take 30% commissions from their drivers and deliver them to investors, while People’s Ride spends […]
You won’t want to hit another music festival without these essentials. Read on to find out what we’re packing for the final festivals of the year.This Smart Charger Always Knows Where The Car Is ParkedIn addition to charging your phone, the Zus Smart Car Charger and Locator ($29.99) helps you locate your car no matter […]
When the mood strikes you and you’re looking to light up, you shouldn’t have to hunt around for all the things you need: your pipe, your grinder, your favorite munchies, and so on. And with the Happy Kit, you won’t have to.This compact black case houses everything you need, including a grinder, a glass pipe, […]
Everybody knows that if you want to earn the big bucks these days, you need to learn how to code. Luckily, you don’t even need to spend thousands on grad school to make coding your career. The Entry-Level Python & JavaScript Programming Bundle is the easiest way to get started in programming in two of […]
report this ad
So, like Boing Boing’s search then?
Comedy for you; tragedy for me.
Oh for god’s sake.
Can we come back to reality here and realize that “twitter” is a storage and retrieval mechanism for small strings of … wait for it … plain ascii text.
If the core of twitter is more than 8 lines of perl code, the person who “designed” it is an asshole. And that’s the facts, jack.
So to speak of “historical tweets” and then to further speak of “infrastructure” behind said historical tweets as if they even remotely resemble anything complex is just clownish.
You can access historical Tweets that are relevant to you on PostPo.st ( http://postpo.st )
The results you get are Tweets, links, photos and videos from the people you follow.
Try it: http://postpo.st/search/links
Since Topsy got it from Twitter, wouldn’t it be fair for Twitter to get it back from Topsy?
Whenever they have their, you know, “infrastructure” in order.
> “Relevance” is the focus, rather than chronological order
I’ve thought for a long time that Twitter could do with some sort of threaded conversation, to avoid the eventual back-and-forth arguments and widen conversation to a larger audience.
I know Twitter is meant to be about following updates; but without a more engaging discussion, Twitter is turning into a poor version of an announcement service; something that RSS often does better.
It’s a shame that this ‘relevance’ sounds more like Facebook’s useless ‘Top News’ than an attempt to make Twitter more social.
> I’ve thought for a long time that Twitter could do with some sort of threaded conversation
You mean like identi.ca and other StatusNet free-as-in-freedom distributed microblogging sites have had for ages?
> > I’ve thought for a long time that Twitter could do with some sort of threaded conversation
> You mean like identi.ca and other StatusNet free-as-in-freedom distributed microblogging sites have had for ages?
According to their website, yes! I’d not heard of them before; I’m going to sign up. Thanks!