<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LulzSec disbands, Anonymous dumps, what&#039;s next in #Antisec? Xeni on The Madeleine Brand radio&#160;show</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/06/27/lulzsec-disbands-ano.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/06/27/lulzsec-disbands-ano.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hadlock</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/06/27/lulzsec-disbands-ano.html#comment-1149737</link>
		<dc:creator>hadlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1149737</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s your background in hacking that you were chosen to speak about the topic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s your background in hacking that you were chosen to speak about the topic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/06/27/lulzsec-disbands-ano.html#comment-1149749</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1149749</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of a recent Pete Holmes bit about criticizing movies, etc. &quot;Hey!! Hey!! You try make a movie.&quot; &quot;Hey!! Hey!! You make a cake!! What do you know about cakes!?!?&quot;

She runs a blog that covers all things internet/nerdy. She has an interest in it. She&#039;s allowed to talk about it. I&#039;m sorry they didn&#039;t call you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of a recent Pete Holmes bit about criticizing movies, etc. &#8220;Hey!! Hey!! You try make a movie.&#8221; &#8220;Hey!! Hey!! You make a cake!! What do you know about cakes!?!?&#8221;</p>
<p>She runs a blog that covers all things internet/nerdy. She has an interest in it. She&#8217;s allowed to talk about it. I&#8217;m sorry they didn&#8217;t call you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: travtastic</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/06/27/lulzsec-disbands-ano.html#comment-1150776</link>
		<dc:creator>travtastic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1150776</guid>
		<description>Please present your Commenting Arts degree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please present your Commenting Arts degree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/06/27/lulzsec-disbands-ano.html#comment-1149759</link>
		<dc:creator>Lincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1149759</guid>
		<description>@hadlock

Brilliant. Just the question that needs to be asked in this era of namby-pamby journalism. The masses can&#039;t be bothered to check the credentials so we must work behind the scenes to quiet the whimpering simpletons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@hadlock</p>
<p>Brilliant. Just the question that needs to be asked in this era of namby-pamby journalism. The masses can&#8217;t be bothered to check the credentials so we must work behind the scenes to quiet the whimpering simpletons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Smith</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/06/27/lulzsec-disbands-ano.html#comment-1150029</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1150029</guid>
		<description>What a bunch of dopes. Wrecking stuff to get their names in the paper, and more often than not, going after the softest of targets. Then logging their IRC conversations and having their server get blown along with one of their number. Using botnets. Whats this brute force rubbish?

Kids these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a bunch of dopes. Wrecking stuff to get their names in the paper, and more often than not, going after the softest of targets. Then logging their IRC conversations and having their server get blown along with one of their number. Using botnets. Whats this brute force rubbish?</p>
<p>Kids these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borgs_of_Canada</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/06/27/lulzsec-disbands-ano.html#comment-1150066</link>
		<dc:creator>Borgs_of_Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1150066</guid>
		<description>She is a reporter, she covered the case since beginning with objectivity. That is what (good) journalists do. If a quantum physicist were to make an incredible discovery, should the reporter double-check every calculation ? No. Of course, a bit of knowledge and doublecheck is necessary, but I am fairly convinced that Xeni knows quite a lot of people well versed in the arts of exploitation and that she checked her facts and hypothesis with them.

As to the analysis of consequences of cybercrime, no hacking skill is needed for that, it falls in the domain of social sciences. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is a reporter, she covered the case since beginning with objectivity. That is what (good) journalists do. If a quantum physicist were to make an incredible discovery, should the reporter double-check every calculation ? No. Of course, a bit of knowledge and doublecheck is necessary, but I am fairly convinced that Xeni knows quite a lot of people well versed in the arts of exploitation and that she checked her facts and hypothesis with them.</p>
<p>As to the analysis of consequences of cybercrime, no hacking skill is needed for that, it falls in the domain of social sciences. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicky G</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/06/27/lulzsec-disbands-ano.html#comment-1149887</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicky G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1149887</guid>
		<description>So, uh, what&#039;s the juicy shit in the AT&amp;T document?  Please say that the new data network WON&#039;T SUCK BALLS.  Please?  Especially in NYC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, uh, what&#8217;s the juicy shit in the AT&#038;T document?  Please say that the new data network WON&#8217;T SUCK BALLS.  Please?  Especially in NYC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Beschizza</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/06/27/lulzsec-disbands-ano.html#comment-1149895</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Beschizza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1149895</guid>
		<description>You say that like you need a background in hacking to talk meaningfully about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say that like you need a background in hacking to talk meaningfully about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
