<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wrongulator: a gag calculator that gives the wrong&#160;outcome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J-Zen Wenzoski</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1176481</link>
		<dc:creator>J-Zen Wenzoski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1176481</guid>
		<description>Slap a different label on it and voila! A codebreaking game!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slap a different label on it and voila! A codebreaking game!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Sachs</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1176332</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Sachs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1176332</guid>
		<description>A program I wrote a number of years ago:/*This is the MATHULATOR 9000, it tries to do math*/

#include 
#include  /*include time travel capability*/

/*declare stuff*/
int sel;
int loop;
float num1;
float num2;
float answer;

/*here is the program*/
int main()
{
	loop = 0;

	srand(time(NULL)); /*Putting clock into the random!*/

	/*main menu*/
	while (loop == 0){
 printf(&quot;Welcome to the MATHULATOR 9000n&quot;);
 printf(&quot;You are using the worlds most advanced number calculating machinen&quot;);
 printf(&quot;Please enter the type of calculation you would like to perform:nn&quot;);
 printf(&quot;1. Combine two numbers... to make one bigger numbern&quot;);
 printf(&quot;2. Remove one number from another numbern&quot;);
 printf(&quot;3. Multiplixicaton!n&quot;);
 printf(&quot;4. Make a number into a certain number of pilesn&quot;);
 printf(&quot;5. Quantum calculusn&quot;);
 printf(&quot;6. Exitnn&quot;);
 printf(&quot;Make your selection now: &quot;);

 scanf(&quot;%d&quot;, &amp;sel);

 /*addition portion*/
 if (sel == 1){
 	printf(&quot;Enter the first number you wish to use: &quot;);
 	scanf(&quot;%f&quot;, &amp;num1);
 	printf(&quot;Enter the second number to combine with the first: &quot;);
 	scanf(&quot;%f&quot;, &amp;num2);
 	printf(&quot;Now Addifying!n&quot;);
 	answer = num1 + num2 + (rand()%10) - (rand()%10);
 	if (answer &gt; 1000) answer = answer + (rand()%100) - (rand()%100);
 	/*answer output*/
 	if (answer &gt; 0 &amp;&amp; answer &lt; 10000) printf(&quot;Those two numbers make something near %.0f... or something like thatn&quot;, answer);
 	if (answer  9999) printf(&quot;The answer is: a lot, like more than four digits or somethingn&quot;);
 	if (answer &gt; 1000000) printf(&quot;what the hell is wrong with you? trying to make me add numbers like that!n&quot;);
 	if (answer == 1337) printf(&quot;I hate that number!n&quot;);
 	printf(&quot;nnn&quot;);
 }

 /*subtraction portion*/
 if (sel == 2){
 	printf(&quot;Enter the first number you wish to use: &quot;);
 	scanf(&quot;%f&quot;, &amp;num1);
 	printf(&quot;Enter the second number to take away from the first: &quot;);
 	scanf(&quot;%f&quot;, &amp;num2);
 	printf(&quot;Now booleaning!n&quot;);
 	answer = num1 - num2 + (rand()%10) - (rand()%10);
 	if (answer &gt; 1000) answer = answer + (rand()%100) - (rand()%100);
 	/*answer output*/
 	if (answer &gt; 0 &amp;&amp; answer &lt; 10000) printf(&quot;That means you have %.0f apples, i mean, uh. numbers n&quot;, answer);
 	if (answer  9999) printf(&quot;The answer is: a lot, like more than four digits or somethingn&quot;);
 	printf(&quot;nnn&quot;);
 }

 /*multiplication portion*/
 if (sel == 3){
 	printf(&quot;Enter the first number you wish to use: &quot;);
 	scanf(&quot;%f&quot;, &amp;num1);
 	printf(&quot;that number how many times?: &quot;);
 	scanf(&quot;%f&quot;, &amp;num2);
 	printf(&quot;Now multiplexoring!n&quot;);
 	answer = (num1 + (rand()%3) - (rand()%3)) * (num2 + (rand()%3) - (rand()%3));
 	/*answer output*/
 	if (answer &gt; 0 &amp;&amp; answer &lt; 10000) printf(&quot;That&#039;s like %.0f, I thinkn&quot;, answer);
 	if (answer  9999) printf(&quot;The answer is: a lot, like more than four digits or somethingn&quot;);
 	printf(&quot;nnn&quot;);
 }

 /*division portion*/
 if (sel == 4){
 	printf(&quot;Enter the first number you wish to use: &quot;);
 	scanf(&quot;%f&quot;, &amp;num1);
 	printf(&quot;How many piles do you want to make?: &quot;);
 	scanf(&quot;%f&quot;, &amp;num2);
 	printf(&quot;Now multiplexoring!n&quot;);
 	/*make sure there is no divide by zero. because that sucks*/
 	if (num2 != 0){
  answer = num1 / num2 + (rand()%10) - (rand()%10);
  if (answer &gt; 1000) answer = answer + (rand()%100) - (rand()%100);
  /*answer output*/
  if (answer &gt; 0 &amp;&amp; answer &lt; 10000) printf(&quot;That&#039;s like %.0f, I thinkn&quot;, answer);
  if (answer  9999) printf(&quot;The answer is: a lot, like more than four digits or somethingn&quot;);
  }
 	if (num2 == 0){
  printf(&quot;ARE YOU TRYING TO KILL ME OR SOMETHING? BYE!nn&quot;);
  break; /*the program is really pissed off*/
 	}
 	printf(&quot;nnn&quot;);
 }

 /*quantum calculus*/
 if (sel == 5){
 	printf(&quot;nnNow cal... Uh, you know, It&#039;s been a long time since school and all.n&quot;);
 	printf(&quot;I&#039;m like sort of tired and, well, why don&#039;t you just pick a simpler one.nnn&quot;);
 }

 /*exit*/
 if (sel == 6) loop = 1;
	}
	return (0);
}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A program I wrote a number of years ago:/*This is the MATHULATOR 9000, it tries to do math*/</p>
<p>#include<br />
#include  /*include time travel capability*/</p>
<p>/*declare stuff*/<br />
int sel;<br />
int loop;<br />
float num1;<br />
float num2;<br />
float answer;</p>
<p>/*here is the program*/<br />
int main()<br />
{<br />
	loop = 0;</p>
<p>	srand(time(NULL)); /*Putting clock into the random!*/</p>
<p>	/*main menu*/<br />
	while (loop == 0){<br />
 printf(&#8220;Welcome to the MATHULATOR 9000n&#8221;);<br />
 printf(&#8220;You are using the worlds most advanced number calculating machinen&#8221;);<br />
 printf(&#8220;Please enter the type of calculation you would like to perform:nn&#8221;);<br />
 printf(&#8220;1. Combine two numbers&#8230; to make one bigger numbern&#8221;);<br />
 printf(&#8220;2. Remove one number from another numbern&#8221;);<br />
 printf(&#8220;3. Multiplixicaton!n&#8221;);<br />
 printf(&#8220;4. Make a number into a certain number of pilesn&#8221;);<br />
 printf(&#8220;5. Quantum calculusn&#8221;);<br />
 printf(&#8220;6. Exitnn&#8221;);<br />
 printf(&#8220;Make your selection now: &#8220;);</p>
<p> scanf(&#8220;%d&#8221;, &amp;sel);</p>
<p> /*addition portion*/<br />
 if (sel == 1){<br />
 	printf(&#8220;Enter the first number you wish to use: &#8220;);<br />
 	scanf(&#8220;%f&#8221;, &amp;num1);<br />
 	printf(&#8220;Enter the second number to combine with the first: &#8220;);<br />
 	scanf(&#8220;%f&#8221;, &amp;num2);<br />
 	printf(&#8220;Now Addifying!n&#8221;);<br />
 	answer = num1 + num2 + (rand()%10) &#8211; (rand()%10);<br />
 	if (answer &gt; 1000) answer = answer + (rand()%100) &#8211; (rand()%100);<br />
 	/*answer output*/<br />
 	if (answer &gt; 0 &amp;&amp; answer &lt; 10000) printf(&quot;Those two numbers make something near %.0f&#8230; or something like thatn&quot;, answer);<br />
 	if (answer  9999) printf(&#8220;The answer is: a lot, like more than four digits or somethingn&#8221;);<br />
 	if (answer &gt; 1000000) printf(&#8220;what the hell is wrong with you? trying to make me add numbers like that!n&#8221;);<br />
 	if (answer == 1337) printf(&#8220;I hate that number!n&#8221;);<br />
 	printf(&#8220;nnn&#8221;);<br />
 }</p>
<p> /*subtraction portion*/<br />
 if (sel == 2){<br />
 	printf(&#8220;Enter the first number you wish to use: &#8220;);<br />
 	scanf(&#8220;%f&#8221;, &amp;num1);<br />
 	printf(&#8220;Enter the second number to take away from the first: &#8220;);<br />
 	scanf(&#8220;%f&#8221;, &amp;num2);<br />
 	printf(&#8220;Now booleaning!n&#8221;);<br />
 	answer = num1 &#8211; num2 + (rand()%10) &#8211; (rand()%10);<br />
 	if (answer &gt; 1000) answer = answer + (rand()%100) &#8211; (rand()%100);<br />
 	/*answer output*/<br />
 	if (answer &gt; 0 &amp;&amp; answer &lt; 10000) printf(&quot;That means you have %.0f apples, i mean, uh. numbers n&quot;, answer);<br />
 	if (answer  9999) printf(&#8220;The answer is: a lot, like more than four digits or somethingn&#8221;);<br />
 	printf(&#8220;nnn&#8221;);<br />
 }</p>
<p> /*multiplication portion*/<br />
 if (sel == 3){<br />
 	printf(&#8220;Enter the first number you wish to use: &#8220;);<br />
 	scanf(&#8220;%f&#8221;, &amp;num1);<br />
 	printf(&#8220;that number how many times?: &#8220;);<br />
 	scanf(&#8220;%f&#8221;, &amp;num2);<br />
 	printf(&#8220;Now multiplexoring!n&#8221;);<br />
 	answer = (num1 + (rand()%3) &#8211; (rand()%3)) * (num2 + (rand()%3) &#8211; (rand()%3));<br />
 	/*answer output*/<br />
 	if (answer &gt; 0 &amp;&amp; answer &lt; 10000) printf(&quot;That&#039;s like %.0f, I thinkn&quot;, answer);<br />
 	if (answer  9999) printf(&#8220;The answer is: a lot, like more than four digits or somethingn&#8221;);<br />
 	printf(&#8220;nnn&#8221;);<br />
 }</p>
<p> /*division portion*/<br />
 if (sel == 4){<br />
 	printf(&#8220;Enter the first number you wish to use: &#8220;);<br />
 	scanf(&#8220;%f&#8221;, &amp;num1);<br />
 	printf(&#8220;How many piles do you want to make?: &#8220;);<br />
 	scanf(&#8220;%f&#8221;, &amp;num2);<br />
 	printf(&#8220;Now multiplexoring!n&#8221;);<br />
 	/*make sure there is no divide by zero. because that sucks*/<br />
 	if (num2 != 0){<br />
  answer = num1 / num2 + (rand()%10) &#8211; (rand()%10);<br />
  if (answer &gt; 1000) answer = answer + (rand()%100) &#8211; (rand()%100);<br />
  /*answer output*/<br />
  if (answer &gt; 0 &amp;&amp; answer &lt; 10000) printf(&quot;That&#039;s like %.0f, I thinkn&quot;, answer);<br />
  if (answer  9999) printf(&#8220;The answer is: a lot, like more than four digits or somethingn&#8221;);<br />
  }<br />
 	if (num2 == 0){<br />
  printf(&#8220;ARE YOU TRYING TO KILL ME OR SOMETHING? BYE!nn&#8221;);<br />
  break; /*the program is really pissed off*/<br />
 	}<br />
 	printf(&#8220;nnn&#8221;);<br />
 }</p>
<p> /*quantum calculus*/<br />
 if (sel == 5){<br />
 	printf(&#8220;nnNow cal&#8230; Uh, you know, It&#8217;s been a long time since school and all.n&#8221;);<br />
 	printf(&#8220;I&#8217;m like sort of tired and, well, why don&#8217;t you just pick a simpler one.nnn&#8221;);<br />
 }</p>
<p> /*exit*/<br />
 if (sel == 6) loop = 1;<br />
	}<br />
	return (0);<br />
}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1176247</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1176247</guid>
		<description>Hee! XD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hee! XD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thad_E_Ginathom</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1176181</link>
		<dc:creator>Thad_E_Ginathom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1176181</guid>
		<description>I had a piece of software that did this. It was a piece of middleware which allowed staff to extract and use data from the company&#039;s accounting system directly into spreadsheets on their PC. It was, in business terms, really wonderful, and revolutionised a lot of routine stuff. It also saved me the chore of running dozens of batch files with different parameters to extract that data. It was a hot all around.

However, there was one very un-obvious parameter in the set up file, which, if you got wrong, would pass completely unnoticed until some bright spark in accounts noticed that it was churning out numbers, as it should --- but they were the wrong numbers!  

Ahhh... red-faced days in my career. Happy memories! (sort of!)  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a piece of software that did this. It was a piece of middleware which allowed staff to extract and use data from the company&#8217;s accounting system directly into spreadsheets on their PC. It was, in business terms, really wonderful, and revolutionised a lot of routine stuff. It also saved me the chore of running dozens of batch files with different parameters to extract that data. It was a hot all around.</p>
<p>However, there was one very un-obvious parameter in the set up file, which, if you got wrong, would pass completely unnoticed until some bright spark in accounts noticed that it was churning out numbers, as it should &#8212; but they were the wrong numbers!  </p>
<p>Ahhh&#8230; red-faced days in my career. Happy memories! (sort of!)  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Perkowitz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1176049</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Perkowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1176049</guid>
		<description>Regarding Cory&#039;s question, if they actually guarantee that it&#039;s *never* right then it can&#039;t just be generating random answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Cory&#8217;s question, if they actually guarantee that it&#8217;s *never* right then it can&#8217;t just be generating random answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frogfactory</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175681</link>
		<dc:creator>frogfactory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175681</guid>
		<description>Does it return &quot;A suffusion of yellow&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it return &#8220;A suffusion of yellow&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bosman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175657</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bosman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175657</guid>
		<description>If I was devising a calculator like this and wanted the effect to be really subtle I would always keep the first and last digits of integer results correct that way back checking wouldn&#039;t be as easy.

However, I agree with everyone else who thinks there are some bad consequences lying in wait for the users of such a product and I hope one that subtle is not made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I was devising a calculator like this and wanted the effect to be really subtle I would always keep the first and last digits of integer results correct that way back checking wouldn&#8217;t be as easy.</p>
<p>However, I agree with everyone else who thinks there are some bad consequences lying in wait for the users of such a product and I hope one that subtle is not made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knoxblox</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175655</link>
		<dc:creator>knoxblox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175655</guid>
		<description>Having never been an engineer or mathematician, I never really needed a calculator, so I still have my trusty TI-36X SOLAR. It never died, so I still use it. The stamp on the back says it was manufactured on June 6, 1994.

So...what is the equivalent of the technology I&#039;m using? Tin-can telephone? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having never been an engineer or mathematician, I never really needed a calculator, so I still have my trusty TI-36X SOLAR. It never died, so I still use it. The stamp on the back says it was manufactured on June 6, 1994.</p>
<p>So&#8230;what is the equivalent of the technology I&#8217;m using? Tin-can telephone? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antoine Tallon</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175653</link>
		<dc:creator>Antoine Tallon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175653</guid>
		<description>French Police has been using this device to figure out the number of strikers in the streets for a long time now, they never coplained about it !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>French Police has been using this device to figure out the number of strikers in the streets for a long time now, they never coplained about it !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teresa Nielsen Hayden</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175645</link>
		<dc:creator>Teresa Nielsen Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175645</guid>
		<description>I have yet to see an error-free spellchecker. They also tell you that long-established words and equally well-established alternate spellings don&#039;t exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have yet to see an error-free spellchecker. They also tell you that long-established words and equally well-established alternate spellings don&#8217;t exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackie31337</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175628</link>
		<dc:creator>jackie31337</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175628</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Don&#039;t people do the same with &quot;spell check&quot;?&lt;/i&gt;

Yep, that&#039;s how I once ended up with &quot;opera rational objectives&quot;. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Don&#8217;t people do the same with &#8220;spell check&#8221;?</i></p>
<p>Yep, that&#8217;s how I once ended up with &#8220;opera rational objectives&#8221;. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Gilbert</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175571</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Gilbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 03:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175571</guid>
		<description>Same! But I programmed my TI83 to give the correct answer if the problem was something you could do in your head. As soon as you use logarithms, Pi, or a large enough exponent, though, it makes subtle changes to the answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same! But I programmed my TI83 to give the correct answer if the problem was something you could do in your head. As soon as you use logarithms, Pi, or a large enough exponent, though, it makes subtle changes to the answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Cram</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175565</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Cram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175565</guid>
		<description>That explains why the debt ceiling hasn&#039;t been resolved!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That explains why the debt ceiling hasn&#8217;t been resolved!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuck411</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175561</link>
		<dc:creator>stuck411</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 03:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175561</guid>
		<description>@donttrythisathome:disqus  tweeted about his calculator giving wrong answers. Was this what Adam was talking about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@donttrythisathome:disqus  tweeted about his calculator giving wrong answers. Was this what Adam was talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lane Yarbrough</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175556</link>
		<dc:creator>Lane Yarbrough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 02:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175556</guid>
		<description>I bought a level that was not manufactured properly, I wasted so much wood. It&#039;s strange how long I chose to believe the fault was mine, I never questioned the accuracy of the level itself. 

Don&#039;t people do the same with &quot;spell check&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a level that was not manufactured properly, I wasted so much wood. It&#8217;s strange how long I chose to believe the fault was mine, I never questioned the accuracy of the level itself. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t people do the same with &#8220;spell check&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Mcintyre</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175537</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Mcintyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 02:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175537</guid>
		<description>I have been told that HP did a test when electronic calculators were new: they gave a large group of people brand-new calculators, and told them to &quot;test the calculators&quot; by solving a series of problems. This was back in the days when people actually were taught to do arithmetic without calculators. 

Nevertheless, only one of the sample, a 12 year old boy, noticed that the calculators were deliberately programmed to give wrong answers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been told that HP did a test when electronic calculators were new: they gave a large group of people brand-new calculators, and told them to &#8220;test the calculators&#8221; by solving a series of problems. This was back in the days when people actually were taught to do arithmetic without calculators. </p>
<p>Nevertheless, only one of the sample, a 12 year old boy, noticed that the calculators were deliberately programmed to give wrong answers. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BarBarSeven</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175521</link>
		<dc:creator>BarBarSeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175521</guid>
		<description>John Boehner called.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Boehner called.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nuschu</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175515</link>
		<dc:creator>nuschu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175515</guid>
		<description>That is the first thing that popped into my head :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the first thing that popped into my head :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: semiotix</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175500</link>
		<dc:creator>semiotix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175500</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;My TI-86 had a minor problem where after a few months of reliable work it would get a corrupted floating point stack. So every now and then I&#039;d get 12/3=4.00000008. &lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Actually, 12/3 &lt;i&gt;does&lt;/i&gt; equal 4.000000079771263 (±.000000000000005) at sea level. Most calculators ignore relativistic effects, but you got a real nice precision calculator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>My TI-86 had a minor problem where after a few months of reliable work it would get a corrupted floating point stack. So every now and then I&#8217;d get 12/3=4.00000008. </p></blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Actually, 12/3 <i>does</i> equal 4.000000079771263 (±.000000000000005) at sea level. Most calculators ignore relativistic effects, but you got a real nice precision calculator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lightning</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175489</link>
		<dc:creator>lightning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175489</guid>
		<description>Considering that most people can&#039;t do simple arithmetic without a calculator, these could be really &lt;del&gt;funny&lt;/del&gt; nasty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering that most people can&#8217;t do simple arithmetic without a calculator, these could be really <del>funny</del> nasty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zix</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175476</link>
		<dc:creator>Zix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175476</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m guessing that this thing *does* generate obviously wrong results (like 5+2 = -973.284), rather than subtly wrong ones. The former makes it obviously a gag/annoyance, whereas the latter could actually endanger lives, financial wellbeing, and property, and expose the users, sellers, and manufacturer of this product to liability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing that this thing *does* generate obviously wrong results (like 5+2 = -973.284), rather than subtly wrong ones. The former makes it obviously a gag/annoyance, whereas the latter could actually endanger lives, financial wellbeing, and property, and expose the users, sellers, and manufacturer of this product to liability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrEricSir</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175469</link>
		<dc:creator>MrEricSir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175469</guid>
		<description>You wouldn&#039;t have to if you were using Windows 3.1 and its notoriously inaccurate calculator:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/72540</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wouldn&#8217;t have to if you were using Windows 3.1 and its notoriously inaccurate calculator:<br />
<a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/72540" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/72540</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awjt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175467</link>
		<dc:creator>awjt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175467</guid>
		<description>A lotttttttta people are already using these.  Most of them work for the government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lotttttttta people are already using these.  Most of them work for the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fxq</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175463</link>
		<dc:creator>fxq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175463</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a Dadadder. Brion Gysin used to sell &#039;em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a Dadadder. Brion Gysin used to sell &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TooGoodToCheck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175452</link>
		<dc:creator>TooGoodToCheck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175452</guid>
		<description>If I was going to have a useless calculator, I&#039;d rather have one that represent results greater than four as &quot;a suffusion of yellow&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I was going to have a useless calculator, I&#8217;d rather have one that represent results greater than four as &#8220;a suffusion of yellow&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mypalmike</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175437</link>
		<dc:creator>mypalmike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175437</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the Calcucorn!

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7064178994016272127
(Fast forward to about 4:05)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the Calcucorn!</p>
<p><a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7064178994016272127" rel="nofollow">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7064178994016272127</a><br />
(Fast forward to about 4:05)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilbert Wham</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175419</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert Wham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175419</guid>
		<description>Shit, I can do this with a &lt;i&gt;normal&lt;/i&gt; calculator. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shit, I can do this with a <i>normal</i> calculator. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GIFtheory</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175397</link>
		<dc:creator>GIFtheory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175397</guid>
		<description>I could see accounting firms buying these up by the bushel. Can you say, &quot;plausible deniability?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could see accounting firms buying these up by the bushel. Can you say, &#8220;plausible deniability?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lamb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175391</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 22:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175391</guid>
		<description>Perhaps someone was faced with large pile of failures from a run of cheap calculators and cleverly avoided losing money on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps someone was faced with large pile of failures from a run of cheap calculators and cleverly avoided losing money on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chevan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/07/28/wrongulator-a-gag-calculator-that-gives-the-wrong-outcome.html#comment-1175386</link>
		<dc:creator>Chevan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=111177#comment-1175386</guid>
		<description>I can just see someone leaving a couple of these scattered around a classroom the day of a final exam in something like chemistry (where you&#039;re often allowed to use calculators, but not advanced ones) for all the people who forgot theirs to find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can just see someone leaving a couple of these scattered around a classroom the day of a final exam in something like chemistry (where you&#8217;re often allowed to use calculators, but not advanced ones) for all the people who forgot theirs to find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
