It makes me wonder.
Will the hackers fundamentally change this corrupt world? Or do they point out that not only is the corruption not some persecutive-delusion (as some might hope it to be from time to time), but it’s built out of equal parts bumbling overlords and poorly built structure… That we aren’t doing too much to outright Jenga… 

I came to the understanding that there’s a cycle of violent upheaval, naive optimism, and corruption. that revolutions in the old sense cost lives to end up back where you started, or are only shortly supported (costing fewer actual lives:more imprisonment). these hackers on whole seem to reflect our general consensuses and pointing the finger- we attacked these people because they suck… I agree but is this a means of change?  I don’t know. I dig it, but I don’t know. terrorism didn’t work (WeatherUnderground), just bred more antithesis… which is good on one hand (mass solidarity/awareness) but bad in that it costs lives on the other end of the scale(both sides).  Why do people need to amass power that in the end changes little. are there evil masterminds with a plan, or just idiots gaining wealth on mass for no real purpose by any means necessary? If the market screwed most governments why don’t they agree on a new system instead of working within a broken one. the system generally throws money at people who might rise up why are they spending money on military/controls  and taking it away from the poor who rise up…. seems like the system isn’t playing by its own rules- which never ends well for the system, or the people. Here comes part two of the cycle. Why do they never learn that their end (fascism) never works, it pisses people off, and yet the keep playing that hand?

“If Jake Davis really is Topiary, he’s got a great writing style. Def shits all over how I wrote at 18. Bet he writes a book. OK, e-book.”

http://twitter.com/charltonbrooker/status/98025488513118208

Eighteen  is adult, in UK, at least, so can people stop referring to him as if he was a child?

Ummm lemme show you pastebin and the contents LulzSec posted there.
There are LOTS of people out there with the exact same details right now because corporations screwed their users over, please explain why they are not being charged with negligence.

“His laptop was examined and it apparently showed that he wrote a fake
article claiming that Rupert Murdoch was dead, and such an article
appeared on the Sun’s website recently when its own system was hacked.”

Oh you pretend no one has ever written about Murdoch dying just to make themselves feel better.
Was he just proofing the article as it appeared on the servers as an exercise in grammar?
I wrote something once that started with it was the best of times it was the worst of times, does this mean I am a famous author as those words were seen in a famous literary work?

“The suspected LulzSec member is accused of coordinating Anonymous and LulzSec attacks”

Oh so he is an expert in cat herding, that is very damaging to his case. *blink*

I might have the contents of the ACS:Law server on my computer, doesn’t mean I took them down.
I might have the contents of the Gawker server on my comptuer, doesn’t mean I took them down.