Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

High temperatures change parenting behavior in birds

Maggie Koerth-Baker at 5:38 am Fri, Aug 5, 2011

— FEATURED —

Feature

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

Book Review

The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel

Book Review

Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle

So here's a statistic I'd never heard before: Between 1979 and 2003 years, more Americans died from heat exposure than from hurricanes, lightning, tornadoes, floods, and earthquakes combined.

Wow.

That comes from Jason Goldman, a scientist and science blogger, who has a post up today about how animals that thrive in extreme heat situations actually manage to do that. Specifically, he's writing about a recent paper that studied how harsh environments change the parenting behavior of desert birds. Apparently, the hotter the nest, the more the male bird is likely to be involved in incubating the eggs.

Biparental care, which is the care of offspring by both male and female parents, represents a classic example of the trade-off between cooperation and conflict in social behavior in the animal kingdom. If they cooperate, parents can work to improve the odds of the survival of their offspring. By withholding care, however, an individual can potentially survive longer and increase the odds of successful breeding later in life. Assuming that biparental care is even possible in a given species, mathematical models expect it to occur anytime the possibility of offspring survival is significantly greater than when cared for by a single parent. In particular, the harsh environment hypothesis predicts that parents should both contribute to the care of their young in environments susceptible to harsh weather conditions, where food is scarce, where there is intense competition for resources, if desiccation of eggs is a possibility, or in areas where the offspring are regularly preyed upon.

The Kentish plover provided Al-Rashidi with the opportunity to conduct a particularly clever experiment. These birds lay their eggs on the ground, which means that the eggs as well as both parents have direct exposure to the surrounding environment. Some nests are located under bushes, and are therefore naturally protected from direct sunlight, while others are out in the open. This provided an obvious way for Al-Rashidi to create two experimental groups – one in direct sunlight and a second in the shade. In general, males tend to sit on the nest during the cooler nighttime, while females tend to take the daytime shift. The problem is that the females risk overheating if they incubate the eggs all day. The harsh environment hypothesis, therefore, predicts that the warmest nests will not only show evidence of more biparental care but that the two parents will take turns more often throughout the day.

... As expected, males and females both spent more time sitting on the exposed nests than the covered ones over the whole day, and as predicted by the harsh environment hypothesis, there were more change-overs – that is, they took turns more often – during the hottest part of the day at the exposed nests.

Maggie Koerth-Baker is the science editor at BoingBoing.net. She writes a monthly column for The New York Times Magazine and is the author of Before the Lights Go Out, a book about electricity, infrastructure, and the future of energy. You can find Maggie on Twitter and Facebook.

Maggie goes places and talks to people. Find out where she'll be speaking next.

MORE:  animals • behavior • Kids • Science

More at Boing Boing

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

  • hassenpfeffer

    Oddly enough, high temps change parenting behaviors in humans too. “KIDS! STOP FIGHTING AND GO TO THE POOL!”

  • hassenpfeffer

    BTW, Maggie, it’s “lightning,” not “lightening.”

    • Gulliver

      Maybe they died from a sudden loss of weight.

      It’s always the un-newsworthy stuff that blindsides ya.

    • Maggie Koerth-Baker

      Thanks, fixed now. 

  • UniAce

    Cool research; thanks Maggie!
    I was going to say that the study described used a quasi-experimental (rather than experimental) design because the nests weren’t randomly assigned to shade conditions, which would limit interpretation because differences in behavior could have then been due to other variables that caused different birds to make their nests in different locations in the first place.  Or, as the SciAm article by Goldman mentions, “environmental factors tend to operate together, making it a challenge to identify which among a set of environmental variables might be the factor driving changes in parenting behavior.”  BUT!  Later in the article it describes how, after the quasi-experimental part of the study, Al-Rashidi et al. actually experimentally manipulated nest covering, removing the bush from some nests and adding a bush to others.  
    There’s still a little bit of quasi-ness because the two groups of nests weren’t randomly assigned to be different initially, but the resulting crossover interaction is nevertheless very compelling.  This was furthermore a clever and powerful study because, again quoting Goldman, “it’s very challenging to modify the environment in any sort of  ecologically valid way.”  So: bravo!  SCIENCE!!

  • Jesse Anttila-Hughes

    So on the temperatures thing, my coauthor / coblogger / good friend Sol Hsiang has a paper in PNAS showing that high temperatures are associated with decreased *macro* economic outcomes in the Caribbean:
    http://www.pnas.org/content/107/35/15367.full and
    http://www.fight-entropy.com/2010/08/new-mechanism-to-consider-when.html

    Moreover it looks like the loss relationship is structurally similar to ergonomics literature estimates of human labor capacity’s response to excess heating. I.e., there’s a reason office buildings are air conditioned. 

    … And while we’re talking about the fact that humans are vulnerable to high temperatures, there’s also a bunch of evidence that temperature affects birth and neonatal outcomes, e.g., this recent paper in Environmental Research as well as a bunch of current health econ working papers:
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21333980

    Cheers,

    -J

  • SandySachs

    Global warming is the biggest culprit in this case.