AT&T merger leak: it's all about raising prices and reducing competition


28 Responses to “AT&T merger leak: it's all about raising prices and reducing competition”

  1. virtual human says:

    Not like he leaked anything we didn’t already know, but it’s great to hear it from the horse’s mouth — now we can only hope this is actually used in denying the merger. (Not holding my breath =( … )

    Also, somebody’s looking for a new job on Monday morning.

  2. LikesTurtles says:

    It’s really hard not to be cynical about anything good coming out of this. We live in an age where corporations are our gods.  The larger they are, the more worthy they are belived to be of worship. It wouldn’t surprise me if AT&T came out and said “so what” while apologists lined up to tell us that allowing these companies to do whatever they want is the ultimate in liberty and freedom.

  3. Bubba73 says:

    Shouldn’t that be ‘ex-AT&T legal staffer’?

  4. voiceinthedistance says:

    In other breaking news:

    The Easter Bunny is a hoax!

    Wake up sheeple.

    • Nonentity says:

      Many of the “sheeple” have already been awake.  Unfortunately, it’s rather difficult to argue effectively against the “bu-bu-but government regulation is *bad*” crowd.

      Having an argument for government regulation coming (inadvertently) straight from the AT&T’s mouth, however, is breaking news.

  5. AwesomeRobot says:

    Great lawyer, or greatest lawyer? 

  6. i_i says:

    And they say big corporations works for our farewell.

  7. paulj says:

    As that video shows, corporations are people too! You don’t want to make those cute girls sad by not letting them be BFFs, do you?

  8. Eddie Perkins says:

    I’m with T-Mobile currently. If this merger does go though I’ll be switching to Sprint on principle alone, higher rates or not. 

  9. It looks to me that T-Mobile is cashing out! They abandon a sinking ship.

    • Terrin Bell says:

      Cashing out certainly, but a sinking ship no. Once the iPhone officially comes to T-Mobile (and hopefully Sprint) the ship will be sailing fine. 

      T-Mobile and Sprint’s problem is Verizon and AT&T have all the top selling phones. 

  10. The Turtle says:

    I’ve been on TM for seven or eight years after firing the “old” lying-sack-of-shit AT&T, so the idea I’d be getting the NEW lying-sack-of-shit AT&T back wasn’t appealing.

    Oh, by the way, guys, your Tweet link on the front page for this article is effed up.  You need to escape the ampersand in “AT&T” in the URL.

  11. ft says:

    Hey assuming I understand this correctly, when a company lies (?) in its merger applications and various filings, and then a new document comes along that shows that their previous assertions are false…

    …shouldn’t there be consequences?

    • Consequences like the ones I think you allude to only apply to individual people, not corporate people. Think of what damage would be done to the collective egos of everyone involved by slapping the wrist of a giant corporation that knows best what a free market monopoly looks like. Too big to give a shit about lying, market-fixing & anti-competitive behaviour? Say, weren’t the RICO laws created to deal with things like this?

  12. ScytheNoire says:

    Of course it’s all about less competition and charging higher prices. That’s what it has always been about. They are just trying to do the same thing as what Canada has to suffer through, shitty service with very few provider choices (only two networks, three providers), and are extremely over-priced. Same thing for all telecom services, only the people suffer from this lack of choices and competition. It should be illegal.

  13. blissfulight says:

    The politicians and non-profits supported the merger because they were paid to do so, not because they had any reasonable justification for supporting a merger that will ultimately lead to higher prices, fewer jobs, and less competition.  (And of course, the same bad service that they’ve always had, for years.)  If this goes through, why not just merge AT&T and Verizon and call it Ma & Pa Bell?  Wake me when I can make a call without dropping it and send/receive data with the 5-9′s that they used to use as the standard for communication 

  14. blissfulight says:

    Next, AT&T will say if the merger doesn’t go through, they’ll be forced to raise prices because they have to pay T-Mobile $6 billion if it doesn’t go through.  Huh.  I don’t know about you, but I’ll take the $6 billion over the $39 billion, let T-Mobile stand alone (or sell itself to Sprint), and AT&T can spend the remainder they would have spent on the T-Mobile acquisition to build out its network.  Instead of having no improvement for $39 billion, they can have considerable improvement in their network (and some limited justification for jacking up their prices).  

  15. Paul Ihrig says:

    site is messed up

  16. BookGuy says:

    I like the interaction between the two young ladies in these spots.  I hope they use them in the real commercials once the merger goes through.

  17. Palomino says:

    Some one correct me please: Didn’t  AT&T  lose an anti-trust lawsuit in the U.S.A. and then, as SBC, repurchase a company named AT&T Corp and later renamed itself AT&T Inc? And no one is surprised at their current shenanigans?

    • Telegram Sam says:

      That was after SBC, formerly Southwestern Bell, acquired Pacific Telesis and Ameritech, and before the acquisition of BellSouth — whereupon AT&T had reabsorbed four of the seven Regional Bell Operating Companies into which it had been split two decades earlier. 

      “We don’t care.  We don’t have to.  We’re The Phone Company.”

  18. oggelbe says:

    AT&T never changed it just respawned from the corporate cestpool.

  19. Mcneri says:

    Now we have seen the truth, I sure hope it sets us free. This merger was never necessary, is not necessary and will never be necessary. Now I will see whether the DOJ stands for Department of Justice or Department of Jokers!

  20. t3kna2007 says:

    Is the document available, somewhere?

    I traced back through four layers of “via”, and none of them had a link to the document that I saw.  Maybe I overlooked it.

    (I don’t see how the proposed merger would be good for consumers.)

  21. been with all of the cell phone companies and now they goin to be ATT man who needs a cell phone if the best avail merges with garbage il jus go prepaid and save myself the headache

  22. Daemonworks says:

    You really think the politicians are going to say no to their corporate masters?

    Could happen, I suppose.

  23. Chris Sexton says:

    So what will it take to start an independent cell phone (or other) communication network? Some kind of ‘undergound’ or ‘dark’ net?

Leave a Reply