<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google to buy Motorola Mobility for&#160;$12.5bn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martijn Vos</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188981</link>
		<dc:creator>Martijn Vos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188981</guid>
		<description>&quot;How many people will lose their jobs due to this merger?&quot;

Hopefully Motorola&#039;s entire software division and management.

I like the support, rootability and moddability of the Nexus phones, but
 don&#039;t like their hardware much. I really like Motorola&#039;s hardware (at 
least my Milestone), but the people responsible for their software, 
(lack of) updates and needlessly restrictive policies need to be shot 
hard.

If Google is willing to do that, then I can see a bright future ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How many people will lose their jobs due to this merger?&#8221;</p>
<p>Hopefully Motorola&#8217;s entire software division and management.</p>
<p>I like the support, rootability and moddability of the Nexus phones, but<br />
 don&#8217;t like their hardware much. I really like Motorola&#8217;s hardware (at<br />
least my Milestone), but the people responsible for their software,<br />
(lack of) updates and needlessly restrictive policies need to be shot<br />
hard.</p>
<p>If Google is willing to do that, then I can see a bright future ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob jones</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188679</link>
		<dc:creator>bob jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188679</guid>
		<description>you&#039;re assuming that motorola is making a profit on hardware.  they&#039;re not.  they&#039;re actually losing money every quarter, see here:  http://www.asymco.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Screen-Shot-2011-08-05-at-10.23.23-AM.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re assuming that motorola is making a profit on hardware.  they&#8217;re not.  they&#8217;re actually losing money every quarter, see here:  <a href="http://www.asymco.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Screen-Shot-2011-08-05-at-10.23.23-AM.png" rel="nofollow">http://www.asymco.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Screen-Shot-2011-08-05-at-10.23.23-AM.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188487</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188487</guid>
		<description>How many people will lose their jobs due to this merger?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many people will lose their jobs due to this merger?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penguinchris</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188424</link>
		<dc:creator>penguinchris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188424</guid>
		<description>As a happy unlocked Nexus One user, I want to believe that this will lead to a truly ultimate Google Phone by the time I need a new one (my N1 is still going strong). But as others have noted, Motorola hardware - and software - has sucked hard for quite a long time (I did have a Razr back in the day, like seemingly everyone else did).

However, given the quality of the N1, perhaps we can hope for something better from Motorola now? It&#039;s always been a bit unclear how much influence Google had over the hardware design for the Nexus phones (N1 is HTC, NS is Samsung), but I like to think that it was significant, and so I am hopeful for future Motorola Android phones (which currently I&#039;d avoid like the plague if I needed a new one).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a happy unlocked Nexus One user, I want to believe that this will lead to a truly ultimate Google Phone by the time I need a new one (my N1 is still going strong). But as others have noted, Motorola hardware &#8211; and software &#8211; has sucked hard for quite a long time (I did have a Razr back in the day, like seemingly everyone else did).</p>
<p>However, given the quality of the N1, perhaps we can hope for something better from Motorola now? It&#8217;s always been a bit unclear how much influence Google had over the hardware design for the Nexus phones (N1 is HTC, NS is Samsung), but I like to think that it was significant, and so I am hopeful for future Motorola Android phones (which currently I&#8217;d avoid like the plague if I needed a new one).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xian</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188383</link>
		<dc:creator>xian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188383</guid>
		<description>Moogle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moogle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaduncan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188369</link>
		<dc:creator>jaduncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188369</guid>
		<description>Prediction: Factories etc of MM get sold to China (ZTE, maybe?), IP is kept, Google partners remain happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prediction: Factories etc of MM get sold to China (ZTE, maybe?), IP is kept, Google partners remain happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lesbianjesus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188352</link>
		<dc:creator>lesbianjesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188352</guid>
		<description>Googlerolla
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Googlerolla</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daneel</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188349</link>
		<dc:creator>Daneel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188349</guid>
		<description>Motooogle? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Motooogle? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188350</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188350</guid>
		<description>There used to be this anti-trust law...it kinda worked for awhile. But corporate entities sorted that crap out.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There used to be this anti-trust law&#8230;it kinda worked for awhile. But corporate entities sorted that crap out.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syncrotic</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188338</link>
		<dc:creator>syncrotic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188338</guid>
		<description>So a software company had to buy a hardware company for $12B - despite this not aligning with Google&#039;s overall vision or philosophy at all - just so that it would have ammunition to use in the endless battle of patent lawsuits to which a tech company is subjected today.

Were it not for the patent mess, Google would have no interest in the hardware business. The margins are decent today, but there&#039;s a reason Motorola spun off the handset business from its telecom hardware business: one of these has a very profitable future, the other will follow the PC industry in becoming a cut-throat battle among Chinese OEMs.

Google just wants to deliver advertising associated with search. They made a mobile OS so that other companies - Apple and Microsoft - wouldn&#039;t get to control how their content is presented to users. They have no interest in becoming a manufacturer of phones, and you could argue that making money off Android isn&#039;t really one of their primary considerations either. They just wanted to make sure that users could see their ads.

Now they&#039;re stuck with a business they have no idea how to run.

Software patents are vampires draining the life out of the tech industry, enriching only lawyers and sleazebag patent trolls, serving to ensure that newcomers are barred from the market or forced to pay a toll to the incumbents if they want to stay alive. Even a company with a &quot;don&#039;t be evil&quot; policy has no choice but to get its hands bloody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So a software company had to buy a hardware company for $12B &#8211; despite this not aligning with Google&#8217;s overall vision or philosophy at all &#8211; just so that it would have ammunition to use in the endless battle of patent lawsuits to which a tech company is subjected today.</p>
<p>Were it not for the patent mess, Google would have no interest in the hardware business. The margins are decent today, but there&#8217;s a reason Motorola spun off the handset business from its telecom hardware business: one of these has a very profitable future, the other will follow the PC industry in becoming a cut-throat battle among Chinese OEMs.</p>
<p>Google just wants to deliver advertising associated with search. They made a mobile OS so that other companies &#8211; Apple and Microsoft &#8211; wouldn&#8217;t get to control how their content is presented to users. They have no interest in becoming a manufacturer of phones, and you could argue that making money off Android isn&#8217;t really one of their primary considerations either. They just wanted to make sure that users could see their ads.</p>
<p>Now they&#8217;re stuck with a business they have no idea how to run.</p>
<p>Software patents are vampires draining the life out of the tech industry, enriching only lawyers and sleazebag patent trolls, serving to ensure that newcomers are barred from the market or forced to pay a toll to the incumbents if they want to stay alive. Even a company with a &#8220;don&#8217;t be evil&#8221; policy has no choice but to get its hands bloody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atimoshenko</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188331</link>
		<dc:creator>atimoshenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188331</guid>
		<description>Hmm, 19,000 employees to Google&#039;s 24,000. Such big integrations are usually hell to pull off correctly.

Also, looks like the future of devices is moving towards an integrated model (Apple, Google/Moto, MS/Nokia, HP/Palm, RIM). Would actually be nice to see five differentiated competing ecosystems to emerge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, 19,000 employees to Google&#8217;s 24,000. Such big integrations are usually hell to pull off correctly.</p>
<p>Also, looks like the future of devices is moving towards an integrated model (Apple, Google/Moto, MS/Nokia, HP/Palm, RIM). Would actually be nice to see five differentiated competing ecosystems to emerge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scifijazznik</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188328</link>
		<dc:creator>scifijazznik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188328</guid>
		<description>Still trying to decide if &quot;Googlorola&quot; sounds more like a venereal disease or a pasta dish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still trying to decide if &#8220;Googlorola&#8221; sounds more like a venereal disease or a pasta dish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scifijazznik</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188325</link>
		<dc:creator>scifijazznik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188325</guid>
		<description>Of all the dumb phones I had, the best by far were Samsung and HTC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all the dumb phones I had, the best by far were Samsung and HTC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: error27</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188324</link>
		<dc:creator>error27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188324</guid>
		<description> The Nortel deal was $4.5 billion for 6000 patents and patent 
applications.  This is $12.5 for 17000 patents and 6000 applications 
plus a running business.  Plus Google needed the patents more than Microsoft does. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The Nortel deal was $4.5 billion for 6000 patents and patent<br />
applications.  This is $12.5 for 17000 patents and 6000 applications<br />
plus a running business.  Plus Google needed the patents more than Microsoft does. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Thompson Five</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188314</link>
		<dc:creator>The Thompson Five</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188314</guid>
		<description>I hope they buy Sprint next.  I think it may be the only thing that can prevent a complete AT&amp;T/Verizon duopoly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they buy Sprint next.  I think it may be the only thing that can prevent a complete AT&amp;T/Verizon duopoly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paool</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188305</link>
		<dc:creator>Paool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188305</guid>
		<description>Google is skynet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is skynet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bibulb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188304</link>
		<dc:creator>bibulb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188304</guid>
		<description>So Google can now directly control the direction of the Droid line, AND they get direct profits from sales of hardware. 

(Also, I wonder if the Nexus line will be going to Moto from now on...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Google can now directly control the direction of the Droid line, AND they get direct profits from sales of hardware. </p>
<p>(Also, I wonder if the Nexus line will be going to Moto from now on&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stb Hernández</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188290</link>
		<dc:creator>Stb Hernández</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188290</guid>
		<description>How about Hello Google?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Hello Google?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sum.zero</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188289</link>
		<dc:creator>sum.zero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188289</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m pretty sure htc removed themselves from consideration when they signed that patent deal with ms re: their use of android.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m pretty sure htc removed themselves from consideration when they signed that patent deal with ms re: their use of android.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GTMoogle</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188286</link>
		<dc:creator>GTMoogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188286</guid>
		<description>Sometimes you still have to play a game you hate, even while you try to change it.

Note that that&#039;s a truism, not a defense of Google&#039;s opinions or strategy, both of which I have insufficient knowledge about to make any claim.  I&#039;d like it if they or anyone hated the patent game and tried to change it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes you still have to play a game you hate, even while you try to change it.</p>
<p>Note that that&#8217;s a truism, not a defense of Google&#8217;s opinions or strategy, both of which I have insufficient knowledge about to make any claim.  I&#8217;d like it if they or anyone hated the patent game and tried to change it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daneel</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188282</link>
		<dc:creator>Daneel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188282</guid>
		<description>I guess Google couldn&#039;t afford HTC. 

Must admit I&#039;ve never liked Motorola products. The last desirable phone they made was the StarTAC. Everyone I know who had a RAZR hated it, and the Droid looked 10 years old when it was released.

I guess the smartphone choice is now really between Apple, Wokia and Googlorola. Just sad that Nokia have abandoned MeeGo. I think I&#039;ll be after a grey-market N9 when they become available, since Nokia don&#039;t want to sell me one.

Seems like a bad day for Samsung and HTC, now the two main OSs they make phones for will be heavily integrated with their biggest rivals. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess Google couldn&#8217;t afford HTC. </p>
<p>Must admit I&#8217;ve never liked Motorola products. The last desirable phone they made was the StarTAC. Everyone I know who had a RAZR hated it, and the Droid looked 10 years old when it was released.</p>
<p>I guess the smartphone choice is now really between Apple, Wokia and Googlorola. Just sad that Nokia have abandoned MeeGo. I think I&#8217;ll be after a grey-market N9 when they become available, since Nokia don&#8217;t want to sell me one.</p>
<p>Seems like a bad day for Samsung and HTC, now the two main OSs they make phones for will be heavily integrated with their biggest rivals. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sum.zero</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188279</link>
		<dc:creator>sum.zero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188279</guid>
		<description>when we see google aggressively pursuing revenue through patent lawsuits your post might be correct. when we see google aggressively use patents to hinder competition your post also might be true. until then it is conjecture not based in fact. to date google has used patents defensively. to me, this looks like a response to apple&#039;sand ms&#039; recent actions in re: nortel, etc. want to bet google continue to lobby for patent reform [while stockpiling a defensive armoury]?

edit: they &gt; google</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when we see google aggressively pursuing revenue through patent lawsuits your post might be correct. when we see google aggressively use patents to hinder competition your post also might be true. until then it is conjecture not based in fact. to date google has used patents defensively. to me, this looks like a response to apple&#8217;sand ms&#8217; recent actions in re: nortel, etc. want to bet google continue to lobby for patent reform [while stockpiling a defensive armoury]?</p>
<p>edit: they &gt; google</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millie fink</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188271</link>
		<dc:creator>millie fink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188271</guid>
		<description>To me, &quot;Motorola&quot; sounds like &quot;the 1990s.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, &#8220;Motorola&#8221; sounds like &#8220;the 1990s.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Van Fleet</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188270</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Van Fleet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188270</guid>
		<description>So Google has joined the fray. It&#039;s unfortunate that instead of trying to fight software patents they decided to just start behaving like everyone else. But I imagine that getting involved in the patent business is more lucrative than trying to curtail it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Google has joined the fray. It&#8217;s unfortunate that instead of trying to fight software patents they decided to just start behaving like everyone else. But I imagine that getting involved in the patent business is more lucrative than trying to curtail it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: absimiliard</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/15/google-to-buy-motorola-mobility-for-12-5bn.html#comment-1188268</link>
		<dc:creator>absimiliard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=112703#comment-1188268</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t like the reasoning, but . . . 

-abs does admit &quot;It&#039;s about bloody time they got out of their Ivory Tower and got in with reality, maybe now the &#039;droid will be harder for Apple to patent-kill&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t like the reasoning, but . . . </p>
<p>-abs does admit &#8220;It&#8217;s about bloody time they got out of their Ivory Tower and got in with reality, maybe now the &#8216;droid will be harder for Apple to patent-kill&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
