Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Gentleman takes his heli-vector for a spin

Mark Frauenfelder at 9:55 am Fri, Aug 26, 2011

— FEATURED —

Science

Last chance to enter the Armchair Taxonomist challenge!

Book Review

Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation

Book Review

We Can Fix it! - a graphic novel time travel memoir

Science

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle
201108260942

Remember when people dressed up to operate their Heli-Vectors? (Via This Isn't Happiness)

Mark Frauenfelder is the founder of Boing Boing and the editor-in-chief of MAKE and Cool Tools. Twitter: @frauenfelder. Come and hear Mark speak at the ALA conference in Chicago on July 1.

More at Boing Boing

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

Hackers prepare for first "national holiday" in their honor

  • tylerkaraszewski

    Seems like it would be slightly safer with the blades not directly in the path between the pilot who is standing on a tiny platform and the water. “Oops, I slipped, thankfully I just got wet and crashed my flying machine,” vs a blood-spattering Raiders of the Lost Ark sort of death.

  • dragonfrog

    This is from ’56.  Given the date, I’d say he’s not dressed up, he’s just dressed.

    When did ‘suit and tie’ make the transition from ‘not going out in your underwear’  to ‘dressed up’ anyway?  Mid-sixties?  Later?

    • xunker

      Agreed, his pants aren’t the same colour as his jacket, which is itself only single-breasted.  

      This is the sort of thing our parents used to put on to go to the john in an the middle of the night.

      • marckaw

        That’s a shadow. They’re the same color.

    • http://artdonovan.typepad.com Art

      I’d say mid-sixties is pretty accurate. 

      (JFK had much to do with the onset of mens’ casual styling- as he never wore a hat, which was the style for so very long.)

    • http://aeronode.tumblr.com james

      Yeah, google Igor Sikorsky or VS-300. No shortage of menswear in early rotorcraft testing.

  • EH

    Is it more stable for him to be above the blades than below?

    • http://aeronode.tumblr.com james

      No, but it does significantly reduce power requirements by keeping the rotors closer to the ground. It’s a tradeoff.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Vincent-Maldia/100001023048460 Vincent Maldia

      if the engine weighs more than the passenger, maybe yes

  • bcsizemo

    Yup every time I see these I always think of them as a pure engineering creation.  Counter rotating blades spinning under a small platform with a rider strapped to the top.  It all makes logical sense, most weight at the bottom, no excess weight (like safety mesh).  All fun and games until someone looses a foot.

    • gadgetphile

      There’s also the ground effect that makes the blades more effective closer to the ground. Notice how you never (barely ever?) see pictures of those kinds of vehicles high in the air?

  • Quinx

    I bet that could make a salad really quick.

  • http://profiles.google.com/mlashcorp José Côrte-Real

    Walternate?

    • Ben Ehlers

      I was thinking more Leroy Palmer.

      • http://nelc.livejournal.com/ NelC

        I was thinking Leland Palmer. Is this an out-take from Twin Peaks?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1634872823 Daniel Reed

    Hey look!  Its Howard Stark!

  • novium

    Or the DEVIL! (He just looks like Ray Wise to me)

    • .

      That is exactly what I thought. Who else would ride an infernal machine like that?

    • http://twitter.com/ohotos Oliver Hoffmann

      My first thought was Ray Wise as well!

    • http://roofus.me/ RoofusKit

      Me three

  • grimc

    Goodbye, Mr. Bond.

    • Rich Keller

      “Do you expect me to walk?”

      “No, Mr. Bond. I expect you to fly.”

  • http://evilbobdayjob.blogspot.com/ Deidzoeb

    He’s all dressed up because he’s demonstrating the contraption at the Darwin Awards Television Special, in color!

  • http://twitter.com/AbelUndercity Abel Undercity

    Despite the fact that it looks like a really good way to get sliced up into coldcuts, I kinda want one.

  • Blaze Curry

    Would a safety cage over those blades be a serious impediment to their functioning?
    It’d be seriously heavy though…necessitating larger blades….but once the margins expand to a certain size, why not put a small cabin up top there?

  • jackrabbitslim

    As for safety concerns, this reminds me of the old days when Popular Mechanics would instruct you in building a table saw, lathe, bandsaw (from plywood!), even a power hacksaw. Safety features ranged from “be careful” to “don’t put your fingers in the blade”.  The gentleman shown above is simply operating his craft according to those basic precepts.

  • parfae

    Of course he’s in a suit. If he wasn’t, this would just look *stupid*!

  • nosehat

    I see this as a retro futurist Segway 2.0!

    • Petzl

      To quote a comment from the link:
      Like a Segway, but more lethal.

  • yri

    Sweet. And I love how cool and composed he looks despite standing mere inches above the giant salad shooter blades. He looks like he’s on his way to a lakeside garden party, at which the other guests better keep their distance as he arrives, or they’ll lose their legs at the knee.

  • http://emilylhauserinmyhead.wordpress.com/ Emily L. Hauser/ellaesther

    It was a more elegant age.

  • tempbot

    Looks like there’s a safety belt.

  • mappo

    That is one bad-ass suicide machine!  Nice of him to off himself over water so as to minimize the cleanup afterward.

  • Snarf Snarf

    And it’s rigged up to cook four giant twist breads over the campfire!

  • Stan Baker

    Once you arrive, how long do you have to wait before stepping off intact?

  • http://www.lightning-rose.com/ LightningRose

    “Hey everybody! Watch this!”

  • http://dougsamu.wordpress.com doug rogers

    As to safety, if he were the least bit clever, his hand would be on a deadman switch.

  • http://lectiblog.blogspot.com/ lecti

    Mobile human blender. mmmm…

  • http://avarana.blogspot.com MarlboroTestMonkey7

    Well, lets say that the blades could only rotate IF the pilot was securely standing -feet strapped- to a weight activated switch. Dont be a wussy.

  • pjcamp

    It’s a blender for people.

    • http://avarana.blogspot.com MarlboroTestMonkey7

      Does it blend?  yes!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_LEBMQXNCNAA25VNHPPYSS6WARM Fletch

    this is actually a very stable configuration… but this was also it’s downfall… it would not travel forward very well as it tended to self correct to it’s most stable (a still hover) modern helicopters are ‘unstable’ this is why they can fly forwards and maintain a forward speed. every craft in the design and testing stage tends to be kinda dangerous… the short falls as everyone has talked about here is WHY we don’t see these buzzing around overhead every day. 

    also note this would fly without an operator and still be stable where the reverse (blades over head) will slip off into the ground sidewise without constant correction… this stability is what was being proven here…