<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hanging chain&#160;clocks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/10/02/hanging-chain-clocks.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/02/hanging-chain-clocks.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Sands</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/02/hanging-chain-clocks.html#comment-1233148</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Sands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=121372#comment-1233148</guid>
		<description>Email from the maker:

Due to overwhelming demand, I am temporarily out of the pre-built clocks.  I am in the process (yes, I’m a one-man shop, with a day job) of building more, but the building process takes about 10 business days, depending on how quickly ponoko can produce the laser-cut parts. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Email from the maker:</p>
<p>Due to overwhelming demand, I am temporarily out of the pre-built clocks.  I am in the process (yes, I’m a one-man shop, with a day job) of building more, but the building process takes about 10 business days, depending on how quickly ponoko can produce the laser-cut parts. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brainflakes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/02/hanging-chain-clocks.html#comment-1232731</link>
		<dc:creator>brainflakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 11:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=121372#comment-1232731</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a synchronous A/C motor, so it&#039;s synchronised to the mains frequency (50 or 60hz) and thus turns at a constant speed independent of torque.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a synchronous A/C motor, so it&#8217;s synchronised to the mains frequency (50 or 60hz) and thus turns at a constant speed independent of torque.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AA</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/02/hanging-chain-clocks.html#comment-1232702</link>
		<dc:creator>AA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 08:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=121372#comment-1232702</guid>
		<description>- You are late!
- My clock got derailed!!!
(Avoid such surprises with Shimano Chronographs...)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- You are late!<br />
- My clock got derailed!!!<br />
(Avoid such surprises with Shimano Chronographs&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phisrow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/02/hanging-chain-clocks.html#comment-1232579</link>
		<dc:creator>phisrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 03:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=121372#comment-1232579</guid>
		<description>Their particular offering appears to not be available in kit form; but(aside from the motor module, which I&#039;m pretty sure they got right off the shelf, along with screws, bushings, the chain, etc.), I don&#039;t see anything that couldn&#039;t be duplicated with a jigsaw, a chain tool, and a modest collection of drill bits and screwdrivers...

I&#039;m assuming that the chain tool(especially if the chain is a different size than a common bicycle chain) is the presumed sticking point. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their particular offering appears to not be available in kit form; but(aside from the motor module, which I&#8217;m pretty sure they got right off the shelf, along with screws, bushings, the chain, etc.), I don&#8217;t see anything that couldn&#8217;t be duplicated with a jigsaw, a chain tool, and a modest collection of drill bits and screwdrivers&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming that the chain tool(especially if the chain is a different size than a common bicycle chain) is the presumed sticking point. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SparcMan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/02/hanging-chain-clocks.html#comment-1232567</link>
		<dc:creator>SparcMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=121372#comment-1232567</guid>
		<description>This has been Tweeted by Adam Savage </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been Tweeted by Adam Savage </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phisrow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/02/hanging-chain-clocks.html#comment-1232563</link>
		<dc:creator>phisrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=121372#comment-1232563</guid>
		<description>If the motor is under-spec, that would be an issue; but &#039;synchronous&#039; motors, by design, run at a speed determined by the frequency of the drive current unless overloaded, when they stall.

Given the plummeting cost of doing things with silicon, sensors, and a little feedback cleverness, you could probably make something like this work(particularly given how coarse the resolution of the &#039;display&#039; is), with a normal brushless motor and a driver circuit that counted links as they passed and sped up or slowed down as needed; it might even be cheaper to do it that way.

A synchronous motor, though, handles the compensation for changes in load, within its limits, purely by electromagnetic cleverness...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the motor is under-spec, that would be an issue; but &#8216;synchronous&#8217; motors, by design, run at a speed determined by the frequency of the drive current unless overloaded, when they stall.</p>
<p>Given the plummeting cost of doing things with silicon, sensors, and a little feedback cleverness, you could probably make something like this work(particularly given how coarse the resolution of the &#8216;display&#8217; is), with a normal brushless motor and a driver circuit that counted links as they passed and sped up or slowed down as needed; it might even be cheaper to do it that way.</p>
<p>A synchronous motor, though, handles the compensation for changes in load, within its limits, purely by electromagnetic cleverness&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamSam</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/02/hanging-chain-clocks.html#comment-1232559</link>
		<dc:creator>SamSam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=121372#comment-1232559</guid>
		<description>Man, I had plans to build something almost identical to this even before this idea was &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://boingboing.net/2009/11/11/clock-on-a-bicycle-c.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;first&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; published on BB two years ago, and I still havem&#039;t done so now that it&#039;s been posted a second time. Sigh... too many projects and too little time. I have, finally, bought a high-torque clock motor for it.

At least these commercial versions have dropped in price -- the one posted two years ago was over $2000. That said, that one was a lot prettier. This is perfect -- the one I am going to make would probably have looked more like this, but now that I can see them side-by-side, I can decide whether I ought tocompress and hide my gearing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, I had plans to build something almost identical to this even before this idea was <i><a href="http://boingboing.net/2009/11/11/clock-on-a-bicycle-c.html" rel="nofollow">first</a></i> published on BB two years ago, and I still havem&#8217;t done so now that it&#8217;s been posted a second time. Sigh&#8230; too many projects and too little time. I have, finally, bought a high-torque clock motor for it.</p>
<p>At least these commercial versions have dropped in price &#8212; the one posted two years ago was over $2000. That said, that one was a lot prettier. This is perfect &#8212; the one I am going to make would probably have looked more like this, but now that I can see them side-by-side, I can decide whether I ought tocompress and hide my gearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dewi Morgan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/02/hanging-chain-clocks.html#comment-1232551</link>
		<dc:creator>Dewi Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=121372#comment-1232551</guid>
		<description>One thing I&#039;d be wary of when creating this is that 11 and 12 are heavier than most numbers. Unless all the numbers were close enough in weight that the motor&#039;s torque makes it irrelevant, half the day will pass faster than expected, and half slower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I&#8217;d be wary of when creating this is that 11 and 12 are heavier than most numbers. Unless all the numbers were close enough in weight that the motor&#8217;s torque makes it irrelevant, half the day will pass faster than expected, and half slower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anderalert</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/02/hanging-chain-clocks.html#comment-1232550</link>
		<dc:creator>anderalert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=121372#comment-1232550</guid>
		<description>Dusting nightmare. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dusting nightmare. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hohum</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/02/hanging-chain-clocks.html#comment-1232549</link>
		<dc:creator>hohum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=121372#comment-1232549</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s tricky… While the &#039;numbers&#039; go in the wrong direction, the &#039;thing that moves&#039; goes in the right direction. Since these are one and the same, a design choice must be made… I think I&#039;d prefer it this way, but it&#039;s difficult to say for certain without actually seeing it work, and whether my instinct would be to read quarter of or quarter past, when one comes up… I do wish there were more minute-less clocks out there, though…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s tricky… While the &#8216;numbers&#8217; go in the wrong direction, the &#8216;thing that moves&#8217; goes in the right direction. Since these are one and the same, a design choice must be made… I think I&#8217;d prefer it this way, but it&#8217;s difficult to say for certain without actually seeing it work, and whether my instinct would be to read quarter of or quarter past, when one comes up… I do wish there were more minute-less clocks out there, though…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sockdoll</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/02/hanging-chain-clocks.html#comment-1232528</link>
		<dc:creator>sockdoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 01:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=121372#comment-1232528</guid>
		<description>&quot;Handmade,&quot; using laser-cut and industrial components which can&#039;t be assembled by the end users.

Curse my common hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Handmade,&#8221; using laser-cut and industrial components which can&#8217;t be assembled by the end users.</p>
<p>Curse my common hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rrh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/02/hanging-chain-clocks.html#comment-1232497</link>
		<dc:creator>rrh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 00:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=121372#comment-1232497</guid>
		<description>Previously:
http://boingboing.net/2009/11/11/clock-on-a-bicycle-c.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Previously:<br />
<a href="http://boingboing.net/2009/11/11/clock-on-a-bicycle-c.html" rel="nofollow">http://boingboing.net/2009/11/11/clock-on-a-bicycle-c.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianOman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/02/hanging-chain-clocks.html#comment-1232480</link>
		<dc:creator>BrianOman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 00:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=121372#comment-1232480</guid>
		<description>I kind of the like the surreality of counter-clocks. I think the chain drive is just fine in the direction it is in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of the like the surreality of counter-clocks. I think the chain drive is just fine in the direction it is in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awjt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/02/hanging-chain-clocks.html#comment-1232466</link>
		<dc:creator>awjt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 00:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=121372#comment-1232466</guid>
		<description>Exactery what I was thinking.  It should be represented like a clock face and there could be a secondary chain with 00-59 in smaller numerals for the minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactery what I was thinking.  It should be represented like a clock face and there could be a secondary chain with 00-59 in smaller numerals for the minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EH</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/02/hanging-chain-clocks.html#comment-1232452</link>
		<dc:creator>EH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=121372#comment-1232452</guid>
		<description>Should have the numbers in the other direction, and I guess clock motion to match.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should have the numbers in the other direction, and I guess clock motion to match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
