<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Candy Hierarchy&#160;(2011)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Petersen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1261688</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1261688</guid>
		<description>Aw, don&#039;t be such a Sour Skittle.  The list is quite clearly chococentric and clearly undervalues treats that have a broad appeal among the trickortreatiati.  Certainly the wee ones appreciate the full-size candy bar over nearly anything else that gets dropped into their plastic pumpkin or stripey pillowcase, but your and my childhoods aren&#039;t so far back in the dim haze of antediluvian history that we can&#039;t remember eyeing a few non-chocolate treats with possessive glee once they were spread out upon the bedspread as we surveyed our haul.  For me it was the Abba-Zabas and the Lik-M-Aid, which I&#039;d have to hide so my sister didn&#039;t try to swap an abhorred Almond Joy for it.

I certainly do appreciate your quizzing Robert the Store Manager for his insight, as it does provide some data as to what actually sells at the retail level. And yes, that&#039;s certainly important!  My only point, clumsily and I guess rudely made, was that what the children covet upon the Dumping of the Bag may not quite equate to what is purchased by the Parental Powers That Be.

For the benefit of future candy hierarchies, I attempted to employ my own offspring, new as they are to the whole trick-or-treating custom (this is Milo&#039;s freshman year, Annabel&#039;s third), and solicit their own opinions as to what&#039;s most sublime and what&#039;s most apt to stay hardening in the candy bowl for the next eleven months, unwanted and untouched.  I tried to ask them, but their mouths were too full of... well, yes, chocolate.

For what it&#039;s worth, though, Milo&#039;s second favorite appears to be lollipops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw, don&#8217;t be such a Sour Skittle.  The list is quite clearly chococentric and clearly undervalues treats that have a broad appeal among the trickortreatiati.  Certainly the wee ones appreciate the full-size candy bar over nearly anything else that gets dropped into their plastic pumpkin or stripey pillowcase, but your and my childhoods aren&#8217;t so far back in the dim haze of antediluvian history that we can&#8217;t remember eyeing a few non-chocolate treats with possessive glee once they were spread out upon the bedspread as we surveyed our haul.  For me it was the Abba-Zabas and the Lik-M-Aid, which I&#8217;d have to hide so my sister didn&#8217;t try to swap an abhorred Almond Joy for it.</p>
<p>I certainly do appreciate your quizzing Robert the Store Manager for his insight, as it does provide some data as to what actually sells at the retail level. And yes, that&#8217;s certainly important!  My only point, clumsily and I guess rudely made, was that what the children covet upon the Dumping of the Bag may not quite equate to what is purchased by the Parental Powers That Be.</p>
<p>For the benefit of future candy hierarchies, I attempted to employ my own offspring, new as they are to the whole trick-or-treating custom (this is Milo&#8217;s freshman year, Annabel&#8217;s third), and solicit their own opinions as to what&#8217;s most sublime and what&#8217;s most apt to stay hardening in the candy bowl for the next eleven months, unwanted and untouched.  I tried to ask them, but their mouths were too full of&#8230; well, yes, chocolate.</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, though, Milo&#8217;s second favorite appears to be lollipops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1261488</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1261488</guid>
		<description>You accused the authors earlier of not being candy lovers for being so &#039;chococentric&#039;, now you say the authors are too &#039;adult&#039; in their tastes.  Only children should be putting in their two cents worth here, or it should be limited to adults with child-like palates.  Well, ya got me there, Donald.  I recuse myself from further judgement or comment on &#039;The Candy Hierarchy&#039;; I&#039;m clearly not qualified and my memories of childhood are very old indeed. 

You win again.  Bon appetit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You accused the authors earlier of not being candy lovers for being so &#8216;chococentric&#8217;, now you say the authors are too &#8216;adult&#8217; in their tastes.  Only children should be putting in their two cents worth here, or it should be limited to adults with child-like palates.  Well, ya got me there, Donald.  I recuse myself from further judgement or comment on &#8216;The Candy Hierarchy&#8217;; I&#8217;m clearly not qualified and my memories of childhood are very old indeed. </p>
<p>You win again.  Bon appetit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Petersen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1261430</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1261430</guid>
		<description>Mom and Dad do the shopping.  Mom and Dad like to raid the chocolate.  Actually, Mom raids the chocolate.  Dad raids whatever he can pry out of everyone else&#039;s sticky fists.

If the kids had the purchasing power, chocolate would not dominate so.  I guarangoddamntee it.  Seriously, when you see TV commercials for candy, all the Snickers/3 Musketeers/Milky Way ads are obviously aimed at adults looking for a snack to get them through until lunchtime.  (Or, in the case of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qh1nZ5lfcco&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twix&lt;/a&gt;, something to get you through the next awkward moment.)  Kids like chocolate just fine, but they&#039;re really into all the brightly-colored Wonka stuff, the bubblegum, the extremely sour stuff that no grownup dares to ingest, the pixie stix that grown-ups would rather snort than swallow, the everlasting gobstoppers that look like great fun to gradeschoolers but just look like impending periodontal trauma to a grownup.

And kids, yes kids, do the trick-or-treating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mom and Dad do the shopping.  Mom and Dad like to raid the chocolate.  Actually, Mom raids the chocolate.  Dad raids whatever he can pry out of everyone else&#8217;s sticky fists.</p>
<p>If the kids had the purchasing power, chocolate would not dominate so.  I guarangoddamntee it.  Seriously, when you see TV commercials for candy, all the Snickers/3 Musketeers/Milky Way ads are obviously aimed at adults looking for a snack to get them through until lunchtime.  (Or, in the case of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qh1nZ5lfcco" rel="nofollow">Twix</a>, something to get you through the next awkward moment.)  Kids like chocolate just fine, but they&#8217;re really into all the brightly-colored Wonka stuff, the bubblegum, the extremely sour stuff that no grownup dares to ingest, the pixie stix that grown-ups would rather snort than swallow, the everlasting gobstoppers that look like great fun to gradeschoolers but just look like impending periodontal trauma to a grownup.</p>
<p>And kids, yes kids, do the trick-or-treating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AidelMaidel</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1261385</link>
		<dc:creator>AidelMaidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1261385</guid>
		<description>Look, I can&#039;t read through all 150+ comments, but you have failed here to take into account the deliciousness of &quot;local&quot; candy. i.e. in my neighborhood the local candy store carries chocolate-caramel-espresso balls. Yes, it&#039;s chocolate on the outside, caramel on the inside, and all flavored with espresso.They are about 1 inch across. And they are clearly too dangerous for children to eat. I mean they are a choking hazard after all. That&#039;s why when the children receive them for Purim (we don&#039;t celebrate Halloween, we&#039;re Jews), I swiftly remove them from their haul lest they choke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, I can&#8217;t read through all 150+ comments, but you have failed here to take into account the deliciousness of &#8220;local&#8221; candy. i.e. in my neighborhood the local candy store carries chocolate-caramel-espresso balls. Yes, it&#8217;s chocolate on the outside, caramel on the inside, and all flavored with espresso.They are about 1 inch across. And they are clearly too dangerous for children to eat. I mean they are a choking hazard after all. That&#8217;s why when the children receive them for Purim (we don&#8217;t celebrate Halloween, we&#8217;re Jews), I swiftly remove them from their haul lest they choke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimbalaya</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1260548</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimbalaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 04:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1260548</guid>
		<description>Oh, those Mary Jane things are terrible and awful at the same time. I always thought &quot;Well, if there&#039;s a razor blade in my candy this year it&#039;s probably this one, but... oh, well. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, those Mary Jane things are terrible and awful at the same time. I always thought &#8220;Well, if there&#8217;s a razor blade in my candy this year it&#8217;s probably this one, but&#8230; oh, well. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1260454</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 02:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1260454</guid>
		<description>It seems to me, Petersen, that if you can use a photo to lend credibility to your argument that chocolate-covered cherries are superior to Almond Roca; I can do the same &#039;gathering of evidence&#039;, while browsing the seasonal candy aisle at the grocery store... today, for example.  

There was very little chocolate anything left on the shelves.  There were, however, boxes and bags of the very candies you&#039;re proposing be given higher status.  There was a bounty of Nerds, Jolly Ranchers, and Smarties, bubble gum galore, Dum-Dums out the wazoo, and big variety packs shoppers wisely passed on, to be discounted later and snapped up by bargain hunters buying for next year (and let us now bow our heads in prayers for the teeth of those poor young souls...)

True, it was just one store in one city, among many within a corporation, and that corp. may have over ordered, so I hunted up the grocery manager for a chat -- his name is Robert.  He said that&#039;s what he sees more or less every year the day after Halloween.  The lower tier candies are passed over for the preferred chocolate, caramel and nougat.

Nature herself demands it be so?  Well, I can&#039;t speak for Nature, she&#039;d kick my ass... again.  But I do have faith in the candy preferences of the middle class folks who do most of their grocery shopping at my neighborhood store.  They have correctly assessed what is popular with all those little ghouls and witches that show up on their doorstep on All Hallows Eve, knowing perfectly well that Mom and Dad too will be raiding those treats.   Their methodology is not scientific, yet their palates are unerringly in line with the consensus represented by &#039;The Candy Hierarchy.  I respectfully nod  to the majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me, Petersen, that if you can use a photo to lend credibility to your argument that chocolate-covered cherries are superior to Almond Roca; I can do the same &#8216;gathering of evidence&#8217;, while browsing the seasonal candy aisle at the grocery store&#8230; today, for example.  </p>
<p>There was very little chocolate anything left on the shelves.  There were, however, boxes and bags of the very candies you&#8217;re proposing be given higher status.  There was a bounty of Nerds, Jolly Ranchers, and Smarties, bubble gum galore, Dum-Dums out the wazoo, and big variety packs shoppers wisely passed on, to be discounted later and snapped up by bargain hunters buying for next year (and let us now bow our heads in prayers for the teeth of those poor young souls&#8230;)</p>
<p>True, it was just one store in one city, among many within a corporation, and that corp. may have over ordered, so I hunted up the grocery manager for a chat &#8212; his name is Robert.  He said that&#8217;s what he sees more or less every year the day after Halloween.  The lower tier candies are passed over for the preferred chocolate, caramel and nougat.</p>
<p>Nature herself demands it be so?  Well, I can&#8217;t speak for Nature, she&#8217;d kick my ass&#8230; again.  But I do have faith in the candy preferences of the middle class folks who do most of their grocery shopping at my neighborhood store.  They have correctly assessed what is popular with all those little ghouls and witches that show up on their doorstep on All Hallows Eve, knowing perfectly well that Mom and Dad too will be raiding those treats.   Their methodology is not scientific, yet their palates are unerringly in line with the consensus represented by &#8216;The Candy Hierarchy.  I respectfully nod  to the majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OtherMichael</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1260433</link>
		<dc:creator>OtherMichael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 01:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1260433</guid>
		<description>&quot;Scented Gum&quot; or &quot;Violet Candy&quot; oh yeah! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Scented Gum&#8221; or &#8220;Violet Candy&#8221; oh yeah! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OtherMichael</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1260426</link>
		<dc:creator>OtherMichael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 01:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1260426</guid>
		<description>DIE HERETIC!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DIE HERETIC!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OtherMichael</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1260421</link>
		<dc:creator>OtherMichael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 01:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1260421</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I see &quot;healthy fruit&quot; on here, but where is &quot;unhealthy fruit?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Durian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I see &#8220;healthy fruit&#8221; on here, but where is &#8220;unhealthy fruit?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Durian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Petersen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1260360</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 00:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1260360</guid>
		<description>I must also register a complaint about the chart&#039;s chococentrism.  Nobody likes chocolate more than I do, but to demote all flavors of non-chocolate to the Bottom Tier or below (with the exception of the admittedly delicious Skittles, red licorice, candy corn, and Starburst, as well as the filling-extraction system known to the consumer as the Jolly Rancher, all of which still register no higher than third tier) just shows that the authors aren&#039;t actually candy-lovers, and have no business pretending to study this field in the first place.  I guess I must expect them to be shills for Hershey and M&amp;M/Mars, or perhaps the cacao bean growers&#039; lobby, even if they do honor me with a citation in this year&#039;s chart.

My sister would have protested quite loudly, as she was allergic to chocolate into her late twenties, and to imply that her Halloween diet of Abba-Zabas, Sugar Daddies, Lik-M-Aid Fun Dips, Pixie Stix, Bazooka, Charms, Dum-Dums, SweeTarts, Bottlecaps, Nerds, and Jolly Ranchers somehow conferred upon her a third-class childhood, well... tellya what, O brave Messrs. Cohen &amp; Ng, why don&#039;tcha go tell her yourself?  And gird your loins for the furious diatribe you thereby instigate!

Chocolate is good (nay, great!), and it&#039;s been my tongue&#039;s best friend since 1971 when it supplanted mom&#039;s teat.  But it is neither the be-all nor the end-all, so you really gotta start bumping the Red Vines and the strawberry Starbursts and the Skittles and the Abba-Zabas and the Bottlecaps up closer to the top if you want to retain a fingernail&#039;s grip on credibility!  Not necessarily top tier, for I would not upend the throne of God thereby, but certainly at or above second tier!

Nature herself demands it be so!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must also register a complaint about the chart&#8217;s chococentrism.  Nobody likes chocolate more than I do, but to demote all flavors of non-chocolate to the Bottom Tier or below (with the exception of the admittedly delicious Skittles, red licorice, candy corn, and Starburst, as well as the filling-extraction system known to the consumer as the Jolly Rancher, all of which still register no higher than third tier) just shows that the authors aren&#8217;t actually candy-lovers, and have no business pretending to study this field in the first place.  I guess I must expect them to be shills for Hershey and M&amp;M/Mars, or perhaps the cacao bean growers&#8217; lobby, even if they do honor me with a citation in this year&#8217;s chart.</p>
<p>My sister would have protested quite loudly, as she was allergic to chocolate into her late twenties, and to imply that her Halloween diet of Abba-Zabas, Sugar Daddies, Lik-M-Aid Fun Dips, Pixie Stix, Bazooka, Charms, Dum-Dums, SweeTarts, Bottlecaps, Nerds, and Jolly Ranchers somehow conferred upon her a third-class childhood, well&#8230; tellya what, O brave Messrs. Cohen &amp; Ng, why don&#8217;tcha go tell her yourself?  And gird your loins for the furious diatribe you thereby instigate!</p>
<p>Chocolate is good (nay, great!), and it&#8217;s been my tongue&#8217;s best friend since 1971 when it supplanted mom&#8217;s teat.  But it is neither the be-all nor the end-all, so you really gotta start bumping the Red Vines and the strawberry Starbursts and the Skittles and the Abba-Zabas and the Bottlecaps up closer to the top if you want to retain a fingernail&#8217;s grip on credibility!  Not necessarily top tier, for I would not upend the throne of God thereby, but certainly at or above second tier!</p>
<p>Nature herself demands it be so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobsyeruncle</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1260108</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobsyeruncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1260108</guid>
		<description>Warheads! If they could just make &#039;em a little more sour.  The pain wears off in less than 10 seconds. :(

I second the black licorice vote.  The more Australian, the better. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warheads! If they could just make &#8216;em a little more sour.  The pain wears off in less than 10 seconds. :(</p>
<p>I second the black licorice vote.  The more Australian, the better. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StreamingMurder</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259747</link>
		<dc:creator>StreamingMurder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 18:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259747</guid>
		<description>Now n&#039; Later is pronounced &quot;NIHILATOR.&quot; They&#039;re delicious and they turn your tongue green. Instant costume!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now n&#8217; Later is pronounced &#8220;NIHILATOR.&#8221; They&#8217;re delicious and they turn your tongue green. Instant costume!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TurkTurkelton</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259397</link>
		<dc:creator>TurkTurkelton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259397</guid>
		<description>Licorice is quite obviously a Communist candy, therefore I can derive from your statement that you are from North Korea.  Please stop exporting black licorice.  It sucks as a candy and must only be used as the horrible weapon for which it was designed.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Licorice is quite obviously a Communist candy, therefore I can derive from your statement that you are from North Korea.  Please stop exporting black licorice.  It sucks as a candy and must only be used as the horrible weapon for which it was designed.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mkanoap</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259359</link>
		<dc:creator>mkanoap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259359</guid>
		<description>Because of the subjective nature of the candy hierarchy, we try to give out stuff that EVERY kid wants.  And judging from the number of kids who try to sneak back, a tell tail glow in their bag or from under their costume, are fairly successful.   We give out glow sticks that can be bent into bracelets.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because of the subjective nature of the candy hierarchy, we try to give out stuff that EVERY kid wants.  And judging from the number of kids who try to sneak back, a tell tail glow in their bag or from under their costume, are fairly successful.   We give out glow sticks that can be bent into bracelets.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xkot</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259357</link>
		<dc:creator>xkot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259357</guid>
		<description>I live in Atlanta, GA, and one of our supermarket chains, Publix, has had an &quot;English imports&quot; section for a couple of years now. Along with tins of spotted dick and Lyle&#039;s Golden Syrup, Irn Bru, digestive biscuits, etc. , we now have access to Cadbury Flakes (and other Cadbury bars), wine gums,  fruit pastilles (though not the superior Rowntree version), Lion bars, Bassett&#039;s All-Sorts, Maltesers, Bounty bars and a few others I can&#039;t recall right now. No Smarties, though. We have to make do with the overrated M&amp;M. Do they still make Bovril crisps in Blighty? Those are harsh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in Atlanta, GA, and one of our supermarket chains, Publix, has had an &#8220;English imports&#8221; section for a couple of years now. Along with tins of spotted dick and Lyle&#8217;s Golden Syrup, Irn Bru, digestive biscuits, etc. , we now have access to Cadbury Flakes (and other Cadbury bars), wine gums,  fruit pastilles (though not the superior Rowntree version), Lion bars, Bassett&#8217;s All-Sorts, Maltesers, Bounty bars and a few others I can&#8217;t recall right now. No Smarties, though. We have to make do with the overrated M&amp;M. Do they still make Bovril crisps in Blighty? Those are harsh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kristen shields</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259355</link>
		<dc:creator>kristen shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259355</guid>
		<description>First, I say gum is not candy.  It, in fact, prohibits you from eating any more candy once you start chewing gum.  Second, tootsie rolls are the bastard child of chewy and chocolate- so so gross and they turn your saliva brown.  Third, I used to get starlight mints in my candy haul every year as a child (I think they might be in the assorted hard candy bags) Not candy!  All three should be in the bottom tier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I say gum is not candy.  It, in fact, prohibits you from eating any more candy once you start chewing gum.  Second, tootsie rolls are the bastard child of chewy and chocolate- so so gross and they turn your saliva brown.  Third, I used to get starlight mints in my candy haul every year as a child (I think they might be in the assorted hard candy bags) Not candy!  All three should be in the bottom tier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benenglish</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259326</link>
		<dc:creator>benenglish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259326</guid>
		<description>I shudder at the thought but you might just be right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shudder at the thought but you might just be right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peregrinus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259318</link>
		<dc:creator>peregrinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259318</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a bad, and greedy, and avaricious person.  I am a chocolate insatiate, destitute and lonesome in a world packed with awful sweets.

The entire catalogue in the post  is on my &quot;no, no, no&quot; list.  In that Russian Cat kind of way.

I eat chocolate rarely, as once I start, like with wine, or cigarettes, or other noxious substances, I cannot stop until it runs out.  So when I have it, it must matter, it must be significant, it must change my insides to sparkling and warm tides of melting gold.  I must Remember those moments.

So:  my choccie choices are limited to:

Prestat.  Neuhaus.  F&amp;M.  Wonka (not the candy bars, but the British Genius Who Probably Changed His Name by Deed Poll).

Yes, Leonidas.

But I do agree with the Hershey&#039;s school - it is not bad chocolate always, and reminds me of my youth.  Kisses, no, but bars, yes.

Just one at a time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bad, and greedy, and avaricious person.  I am a chocolate insatiate, destitute and lonesome in a world packed with awful sweets.</p>
<p>The entire catalogue in the post  is on my &#8220;no, no, no&#8221; list.  In that Russian Cat kind of way.</p>
<p>I eat chocolate rarely, as once I start, like with wine, or cigarettes, or other noxious substances, I cannot stop until it runs out.  So when I have it, it must matter, it must be significant, it must change my insides to sparkling and warm tides of melting gold.  I must Remember those moments.</p>
<p>So:  my choccie choices are limited to:</p>
<p>Prestat.  Neuhaus.  F&amp;M.  Wonka (not the candy bars, but the British Genius Who Probably Changed His Name by Deed Poll).</p>
<p>Yes, Leonidas.</p>
<p>But I do agree with the Hershey&#8217;s school &#8211; it is not bad chocolate always, and reminds me of my youth.  Kisses, no, but bars, yes.</p>
<p>Just one at a time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259313</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259313</guid>
		<description>Oh, yeah,  In fact, the Lindt chocolate bar with &#039;a hint of sea salt&#039; is my current favorite.  Nomnomnom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yeah,  In fact, the Lindt chocolate bar with &#8216;a hint of sea salt&#8217; is my current favorite.  Nomnomnom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xkot</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259306</link>
		<dc:creator>xkot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259306</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m American, but have lived in England for 4.5 years and travelled some in Europe. My &quot;easily available&quot; chocolate (pure chocolate, without nuts, crispies, toffee, caramel, etc.) rating is thus:

1 - Lindt - smooth and delicious
2 - Dove (by M&amp;M Mars) - best of the American domestics, by FAR
3 - Cadbury - a little bit too milky, but very good, and with a pleasant, but distinctive, flavor

Then way, WAY further down the list:

4 - Hershey - terrible, really. Acrid and waxy
5 - Nestle - milder than Hershey, but with less chocolate flavor. Bland and waxy.
6 - Palmer - like eating a mildly cocoa-scented candle

Godiva is horrible chocolate, BTW. A triumph of marketing. Don&#039;t fall for it, people!

Premium chocolate that will make you cry with happiness is found in Leonidas shops, sprinkled throughout Europe and a few choice U.S. cities. Worth seeking out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m American, but have lived in England for 4.5 years and travelled some in Europe. My &#8220;easily available&#8221; chocolate (pure chocolate, without nuts, crispies, toffee, caramel, etc.) rating is thus:</p>
<p>1 &#8211; Lindt &#8211; smooth and delicious<br />
2 &#8211; Dove (by M&amp;M Mars) &#8211; best of the American domestics, by FAR<br />
3 &#8211; Cadbury &#8211; a little bit too milky, but very good, and with a pleasant, but distinctive, flavor</p>
<p>Then way, WAY further down the list:</p>
<p>4 &#8211; Hershey &#8211; terrible, really. Acrid and waxy<br />
5 &#8211; Nestle &#8211; milder than Hershey, but with less chocolate flavor. Bland and waxy.<br />
6 &#8211; Palmer &#8211; like eating a mildly cocoa-scented candle</p>
<p>Godiva is horrible chocolate, BTW. A triumph of marketing. Don&#8217;t fall for it, people!</p>
<p>Premium chocolate that will make you cry with happiness is found in Leonidas shops, sprinkled throughout Europe and a few choice U.S. cities. Worth seeking out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug McArthur</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259287</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug McArthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259287</guid>
		<description>Not mentioned on the lowest tier: Thrills, the gum that tastes like soap. A cruel joke to any child not familiar with its outright awfulness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not mentioned on the lowest tier: Thrills, the gum that tastes like soap. A cruel joke to any child not familiar with its outright awfulness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alissa mower clough</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259285</link>
		<dc:creator>alissa mower clough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259285</guid>
		<description>Heath Bars register very well. C.Howards anything is top tier. Some like the &quot;sour milk&quot; flavor of Hershey&#039;s, others would rather suck rocks. Pastilles, sugar toys, violets....those are *Christmas* candy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heath Bars register very well. C.Howards anything is top tier. Some like the &#8220;sour milk&#8221; flavor of Hershey&#8217;s, others would rather suck rocks. Pastilles, sugar toys, violets&#8230;.those are *Christmas* candy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noah django</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259240</link>
		<dc:creator>noah django</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259240</guid>
		<description>hey, f. you.  yes, the confections from europe are demonstrably better than anything from the US of A.  also, we don&#039;t care.  but thanks for pointing out how much of a snob you are.  Hilary White: is that a metaphor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, f. you.  yes, the confections from europe are demonstrably better than anything from the US of A.  also, we don&#8217;t care.  but thanks for pointing out how much of a snob you are.  Hilary White: is that a metaphor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noah django</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259239</link>
		<dc:creator>noah django</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259239</guid>
		<description>[zapped by the disqus]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[zapped by the disqus]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BijouxBoy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259238</link>
		<dc:creator>BijouxBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259238</guid>
		<description>Oddfellows.  Not on the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oddfellows.  Not on the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EH</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259234</link>
		<dc:creator>EH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259234</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;PayDays have no chocolate, but have caramelly goodness&lt;/i&gt;

Cast your eyes to evidence of the legend of the chocolate-covered PayDay. It&#039;s a Thing!

http://www.candyblog.net/blog/item/chocolate_payday/

Do not search Urban Dictionary for &quot;chocolate covered payday.&quot; Trust me on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>PayDays have no chocolate, but have caramelly goodness</i></p>
<p>Cast your eyes to evidence of the legend of the chocolate-covered PayDay. It&#8217;s a Thing!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.candyblog.net/blog/item/chocolate_payday/" rel="nofollow">http://www.candyblog.net/blog/item/chocolate_payday/</a></p>
<p>Do not search Urban Dictionary for &#8220;chocolate covered payday.&#8221; Trust me on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilary White</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259225</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 07:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259225</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always felt terribly sorry for Americans. You poor shmoes have such crummy chocolate bars and seem to have no experience with the good stuff, that you a re reduced to creating candy (sweets) hierarchies out of this pathetic dross. 

I was shocked to my core the first time I went to the US and discovered that none of you had ever even heard of Smarties, Coffee Crisp, Flake and Almond Crunch. And as for other kinds of snack foods... why you didn&#039;t even get dill pickle and ketchup chips until the 90s. It&#039;s no wonder poor America is in the trouble it&#039;s in. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always felt terribly sorry for Americans. You poor shmoes have such crummy chocolate bars and seem to have no experience with the good stuff, that you a re reduced to creating candy (sweets) hierarchies out of this pathetic dross. </p>
<p>I was shocked to my core the first time I went to the US and discovered that none of you had ever even heard of Smarties, Coffee Crisp, Flake and Almond Crunch. And as for other kinds of snack foods&#8230; why you didn&#8217;t even get dill pickle and ketchup chips until the 90s. It&#8217;s no wonder poor America is in the trouble it&#8217;s in. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Dunlap</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259191</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Dunlap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 05:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259191</guid>
		<description>This is so relevant: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WBEo2QQJx8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so relevant: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WBEo2QQJx8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WBEo2QQJx8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avatar Roku</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259178</link>
		<dc:creator>Avatar Roku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259178</guid>
		<description>Anything  that combines peanut butter and chocolate should be top tier, which is why the absence of Reese&#039;s Pieces on this chart is so disconcerting. E.T. does not approve of this chart at all.

Personally I&#039;m not a huge fan of caramel and I&#039;d put whatever it is inside of a Three Muskateers above it.

Also Charms Blow Pops deserve a special exception from lolipops. The combination of lollipop and gum somehow makes it more than the sum of its parts.

Top 3 for me are the Reese&#039;s PB Cups, York Peppermint Patties, and Three Muskateers. I don&#039;t hate caramel, but it&#039;s not my favorite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything  that combines peanut butter and chocolate should be top tier, which is why the absence of Reese&#8217;s Pieces on this chart is so disconcerting. E.T. does not approve of this chart at all.</p>
<p>Personally I&#8217;m not a huge fan of caramel and I&#8217;d put whatever it is inside of a Three Muskateers above it.</p>
<p>Also Charms Blow Pops deserve a special exception from lolipops. The combination of lollipop and gum somehow makes it more than the sum of its parts.</p>
<p>Top 3 for me are the Reese&#8217;s PB Cups, York Peppermint Patties, and Three Muskateers. I don&#8217;t hate caramel, but it&#8217;s not my favorite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Adler</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/10/31/candyhierarchy.html#comment-1259168</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Adler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=126943#comment-1259168</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hershey&#039;s&quot;, as defined in my OED is thus:  &quot;a confection with the consistency of chalk made from salt, sand, and treacle.  Often misrepresented as chocolate.&quot;    ...of course I penciled that in myself - but there it stands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hershey&#8217;s&#8221;, as defined in my OED is thus:  &#8220;a confection with the consistency of chalk made from salt, sand, and treacle.  Often misrepresented as chocolate.&#8221;    &#8230;of course I penciled that in myself &#8211; but there it stands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
