<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In praise of &quot;crap&quot;&#160;technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie B</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1264415</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1264415</guid>
		<description>@Philosophistry:twitter  I think you&#039;ve reversed the players...  the iPod and iPhone &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; the GAP, they &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; top 40.  They represent an investment in values other than reliability and function - they embody ten thousand hours of research into &lt;i&gt;pretty&lt;/i&gt; and not just ergonomics.   They are designed to flick a trend-following switch in our brains that will make you want them - despite any other attributes they may or may not have.

I&#039;m not saying Rob&#039;s iPod is unreliable or subfunctional - I&#039;m saying it&#039;s heavily styled, and you pay for that styling in addition to anything you are paying for reliability or function.  

In the context of this thread, &quot;crap&quot; is a categorical term for anything pragmatic or utilitarian.  Try hard physical labor for eight hours in GAP clothing - utilitarian it ain&#039;t, I predict blown out armseams as well as permanent sags and stains.   See if you can melt the heart of the prettiest [insert desired gender noun here] with top 40 - also not your best bet, although it is bound to work occasionally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Philosophistry:twitter  I think you&#8217;ve reversed the players&#8230;  the iPod and iPhone <i>are</i> the GAP, they <i>are</i> top 40.  They represent an investment in values other than reliability and function &#8211; they embody ten thousand hours of research into <i>pretty</i> and not just ergonomics.   They are designed to flick a trend-following switch in our brains that will make you want them &#8211; despite any other attributes they may or may not have.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying Rob&#8217;s iPod is unreliable or subfunctional &#8211; I&#8217;m saying it&#8217;s heavily styled, and you pay for that styling in addition to anything you are paying for reliability or function.  </p>
<p>In the context of this thread, &#8220;crap&#8221; is a categorical term for anything pragmatic or utilitarian.  Try hard physical labor for eight hours in GAP clothing &#8211; utilitarian it ain&#8217;t, I predict blown out armseams as well as permanent sags and stains.   See if you can melt the heart of the prettiest [insert desired gender noun here] with top 40 &#8211; also not your best bet, although it is bound to work occasionally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyet</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1264376</link>
		<dc:creator>nyet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1264376</guid>
		<description>between a Ferrari and a nice commuter car with enough torque (at low rpm), I pick the later</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>between a Ferrari and a nice commuter car with enough torque (at low rpm), I pick the later</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyet</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1264373</link>
		<dc:creator>nyet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1264373</guid>
		<description>Muvo TX FM: FM receiver for my local public radio, simple USB interface, FAT directory sync, AAA battery powered, and voice recorder.  I love that thing more than iPod stubby. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muvo TX FM: FM receiver for my local public radio, simple USB interface, FAT directory sync, AAA battery powered, and voice recorder.  I love that thing more than iPod stubby. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blindwanderer</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1263993</link>
		<dc:creator>blindwanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1263993</guid>
		<description>I recommend the Sandisk Sansa c250 or c240. Sure it&#039;s an older player but you can easily replace the battery and you can get them really cheap (especially so if you don&#039;t mind resoldering the audio jack). With Rockbox you can use a Micro SDHC card to add an extra 32GB.

In retrospect you don&#039;t really need a replaceable battery, if you play the rockbox games, you will wear through the plastic buttons long before the battery dies. But being able to swap the battery out (I have a spare player that I use as a charger) means I can continue listening without ever having to tether the darn thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend the Sandisk Sansa c250 or c240. Sure it&#8217;s an older player but you can easily replace the battery and you can get them really cheap (especially so if you don&#8217;t mind resoldering the audio jack). With Rockbox you can use a Micro SDHC card to add an extra 32GB.</p>
<p>In retrospect you don&#8217;t really need a replaceable battery, if you play the rockbox games, you will wear through the plastic buttons long before the battery dies. But being able to swap the battery out (I have a spare player that I use as a charger) means I can continue listening without ever having to tether the darn thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philosophistry</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1263277</link>
		<dc:creator>Philosophistry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1263277</guid>
		<description>What about crap music? What about crap clothing? Why not buy all your clothes at the GAP and just listen to Top 40 hits?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about crap music? What about crap clothing? Why not buy all your clothes at the GAP and just listen to Top 40 hits?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ladyfingers</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1263247</link>
		<dc:creator>Ladyfingers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1263247</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right. I remembered reading this: http://daniel.haxx.se/rockbox-sandisk-connection.html
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right. I remembered reading this: <a href="http://daniel.haxx.se/rockbox-sandisk-connection.html" rel="nofollow">http://daniel.haxx.se/rockbox-sandisk-connection.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hall</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1263184</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 19:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1263184</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I am an owner of the Sansa Clip+, running the open source Rockbox firmware (which is supported by Sandisk).&lt;/blockquote&gt;While the love for Rockbox is appreciated, Sandisk does not support the use of Rockbox on their players.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I am an owner of the Sansa Clip+, running the open source Rockbox firmware (which is supported by Sandisk).</p></blockquote>
<p>While the love for Rockbox is appreciated, Sandisk does not support the use of Rockbox on their players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sTmykal</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262882</link>
		<dc:creator>sTmykal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262882</guid>
		<description>I chose a Coby 2gb &quot;touch screen&quot; media player as my no-prize for 10 years of employment at my corp. The interface sucks. Getting through the menus to your music sucks. The battery life sucks. Song management sucks.

But damnit if it doesn&#039;t do the job if I want a quick, no hassle media player for yard work, running, hiking, biking on the trail or whatever. It&#039;s light, I can stash it in any pocket or under a layer of lycra without fear of damage and I don&#039;t have to worry about openly advertising that I have expensive tech on my person by wearing a sports band.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I chose a Coby 2gb &#8220;touch screen&#8221; media player as my no-prize for 10 years of employment at my corp. The interface sucks. Getting through the menus to your music sucks. The battery life sucks. Song management sucks.</p>
<p>But damnit if it doesn&#8217;t do the job if I want a quick, no hassle media player for yard work, running, hiking, biking on the trail or whatever. It&#8217;s light, I can stash it in any pocket or under a layer of lycra without fear of damage and I don&#8217;t have to worry about openly advertising that I have expensive tech on my person by wearing a sports band.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Mielke</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262828</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Mielke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262828</guid>
		<description>I love my Fuze, even if (IFAIK) it&#039;s not the Rockbox-happy one. Just about the *ONLY* problem I have is avoiding duplicating stuff I have native onto the SD card, and that&#039;s because I don&#039;t trust media managers ( I want to KNOW where my files are going!) and insist on doing everything through File Manager.

That iPods don&#039;t let me treat them like a standard HD is one of the major problems I have with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my Fuze, even if (IFAIK) it&#8217;s not the Rockbox-happy one. Just about the *ONLY* problem I have is avoiding duplicating stuff I have native onto the SD card, and that&#8217;s because I don&#8217;t trust media managers ( I want to KNOW where my files are going!) and insist on doing everything through File Manager.</p>
<p>That iPods don&#8217;t let me treat them like a standard HD is one of the major problems I have with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eryximachus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262768</link>
		<dc:creator>eryximachus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262768</guid>
		<description>I use COBY&#039;s as my MP3 player; I like them quite a bit for music, but they fail with audiobooks...

You can&#039;t sort out the files into alphabetical order, so when you try to load the thing with the 90+ files for a Discworld audiobook, they end up being scrambled and you have to keep jumping back and forth to try and keep them in order.

For music though, it is really all one needs.  $20, no pain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use COBY&#8217;s as my MP3 player; I like them quite a bit for music, but they fail with audiobooks&#8230;</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t sort out the files into alphabetical order, so when you try to load the thing with the 90+ files for a Discworld audiobook, they end up being scrambled and you have to keep jumping back and forth to try and keep them in order.</p>
<p>For music though, it is really all one needs.  $20, no pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Maldia</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262565</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Maldia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 03:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262565</guid>
		<description>just beware of devices that fail quickly. There are tons of stuff like this from chinese manufacturers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just beware of devices that fail quickly. There are tons of stuff like this from chinese manufacturers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marilove</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262548</link>
		<dc:creator>marilove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 02:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262548</guid>
		<description>I prefer my music to be separate from my phone, though it&#039;s nice to be able to use both.  I plug my Sansa clip into my car.

Battery power can be an issue, too.  Listening to music on a smartphone means your battery will drain that much quicker.

Also, I highly suggest you NOT go jogging or running while listening to music using a smartphone or an iPod.  The music will skip, or you may damage the phone/player.

Plus, the Sansa Clip+ is at most, $40.  It&#039;s the type of player you can take anywhere, while you are doing anything, and it won&#039;t matter as much if you break or lose it.

Plus, capacity (Micro SD slot!).  And the Sansa Clip+ is going to have far better audio quality than any smart phone.  And it has more features tailored for a music player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer my music to be separate from my phone, though it&#8217;s nice to be able to use both.  I plug my Sansa clip into my car.</p>
<p>Battery power can be an issue, too.  Listening to music on a smartphone means your battery will drain that much quicker.</p>
<p>Also, I highly suggest you NOT go jogging or running while listening to music using a smartphone or an iPod.  The music will skip, or you may damage the phone/player.</p>
<p>Plus, the Sansa Clip+ is at most, $40.  It&#8217;s the type of player you can take anywhere, while you are doing anything, and it won&#8217;t matter as much if you break or lose it.</p>
<p>Plus, capacity (Micro SD slot!).  And the Sansa Clip+ is going to have far better audio quality than any smart phone.  And it has more features tailored for a music player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billstreeter</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262546</link>
		<dc:creator>billstreeter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 02:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262546</guid>
		<description>Ah yeah I guess that makes sense. My daily routine includes listening to several hours of audio podcasts, but I&#039;m never far from a USB port to recharge so It&#039;s never been a problem for me. But my phone also lasts for several hours even while listening to audio on it so I guess I overlooked the battery problems.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yeah I guess that makes sense. My daily routine includes listening to several hours of audio podcasts, but I&#8217;m never far from a USB port to recharge so It&#8217;s never been a problem for me. But my phone also lasts for several hours even while listening to audio on it so I guess I overlooked the battery problems.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billstreeter</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262544</link>
		<dc:creator>billstreeter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 02:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262544</guid>
		<description>I get that. But to be clear I was responding to something that the author said in the post: that she recently just got her first smart phone. I understand not wanting or needing a smart phone for whatever reason, but once you have one why would you need something else to play music? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get that. But to be clear I was responding to something that the author said in the post: that she recently just got her first smart phone. I understand not wanting or needing a smart phone for whatever reason, but once you have one why would you need something else to play music? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincenzo Ravina</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262510</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincenzo Ravina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262510</guid>
		<description>I had a Sony mini-disc player back in the day. Anyone else have one of those? They were magic. Mine ran on AA batteries and somehow it powered the device for a month at a time or something. It was crazy. If some jerk hadn&#039;t stolen it, I might still be listening to it.

That said, I&#039;m glad I have my iPhone 4. 

After the mini-disc player got stolen, I upgraded to the 5th generation iPod, then I got an iPod touch, and now I have the iPhone 4. All of those devices still work, though. They&#039;ve just been passed around to various family members.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a Sony mini-disc player back in the day. Anyone else have one of those? They were magic. Mine ran on AA batteries and somehow it powered the device for a month at a time or something. It was crazy. If some jerk hadn&#8217;t stolen it, I might still be listening to it.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m glad I have my iPhone 4. </p>
<p>After the mini-disc player got stolen, I upgraded to the 5th generation iPod, then I got an iPod touch, and now I have the iPhone 4. All of those devices still work, though. They&#8217;ve just been passed around to various family members.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YY</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262503</link>
		<dc:creator>YY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262503</guid>
		<description>I rotate amongst a Sansa clip (old), shuffle 2gen, shuffle 4gen, and a zen stone.   Clip has best features (delete,  remembering where you left off and sleep) , Zen the most reasonable way of navigating, Shuffle 2gen using Anapod is best for podcasts (allows easy reordering),  and 4gen shuffle is waiting for someone to comeup with a better than itunes interface.  I-tunes is truly crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rotate amongst a Sansa clip (old), shuffle 2gen, shuffle 4gen, and a zen stone.   Clip has best features (delete,  remembering where you left off and sleep) , Zen the most reasonable way of navigating, Shuffle 2gen using Anapod is best for podcasts (allows easy reordering),  and 4gen shuffle is waiting for someone to comeup with a better than itunes interface.  I-tunes is truly crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Kaufman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262493</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Kaufman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262493</guid>
		<description>Radio Shack carries the Sansa&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radio Shack carries the Sansa&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtresco</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262452</link>
		<dc:creator>rtresco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262452</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to see this post and the comments in our post-Jobs world. It was getting to be too much to take with all the premium device worshiping. A ferrari is nice, but a commuter car will get you there too - some people don&#039;t care about how attractive it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see this post and the comments in our post-Jobs world. It was getting to be too much to take with all the premium device worshiping. A ferrari is nice, but a commuter car will get you there too &#8211; some people don&#8217;t care about how attractive it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie B</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262429</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262429</guid>
		<description>OK, I guess I understand your point.

But for me a computer is just a way to move a process from my head into text files - most frequently, for writing glue code, but in any case as a highly generic tool, like a hammer or a stillson wrench.   The macOS is not optimized for that, and gets in my way with its heavy dependence on fanciful metaphors (I want to delete a file or unmount a device, not drag a small picture across a decorative desktop into in a trash can).  Ubuntu is nearly as bad (unless you turn off the GUI) but the price/performance ratio is phenomenally better.

For me, the point of this entire conversation was not &quot;you can&#039;t judge a book by its cover&quot; - it&#039;s the (closely related) point that &lt;i&gt;function&lt;/i&gt; trumps &lt;i&gt;form&lt;/i&gt;.  Not just the observation that form and function are separate, but rather a wholehearted endorsement of the latter.   Grasp the crappy old world with your bare hands, and discard superficial illusions of style.  A beautifully crafted device is great - especially if you build it yourself - but it&#039;s not always &lt;i&gt;necessary&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I guess I understand your point.</p>
<p>But for me a computer is just a way to move a process from my head into text files &#8211; most frequently, for writing glue code, but in any case as a highly generic tool, like a hammer or a stillson wrench.   The macOS is not optimized for that, and gets in my way with its heavy dependence on fanciful metaphors (I want to delete a file or unmount a device, not drag a small picture across a decorative desktop into in a trash can).  Ubuntu is nearly as bad (unless you turn off the GUI) but the price/performance ratio is phenomenally better.</p>
<p>For me, the point of this entire conversation was not &#8220;you can&#8217;t judge a book by its cover&#8221; &#8211; it&#8217;s the (closely related) point that <i>function</i> trumps <i>form</i>.  Not just the observation that form and function are separate, but rather a wholehearted endorsement of the latter.   Grasp the crappy old world with your bare hands, and discard superficial illusions of style.  A beautifully crafted device is great &#8211; especially if you build it yourself &#8211; but it&#8217;s not always <i>necessary</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Ralph</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262404</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262404</guid>
		<description>I have a Pure Digital Bug (http://www.thebug.com/index.asp) at my bedside, bought in 2003. Still working fine, and I&#039;ve made good use of the ability to record late-night radio shows to an SD card. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Pure Digital Bug (<a href="http://www.thebug.com/index.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.thebug.com/index.asp</a>) at my bedside, bought in 2003. Still working fine, and I&#8217;ve made good use of the ability to record late-night radio shows to an SD card. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmonkees</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262390</link>
		<dc:creator>webmonkees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262390</guid>
		<description>Some of the (more than a) Dollar stores and such have a little DC/USB mp3 player that&#039;s $8, has a FM transmitter, a LCD display, IR remote, plays off either USB or audio input, and widely varies in quality. But it basically means you can put your flash drive in it and play your music in any car with a radio and a lighter plug.

One copy didn&#039;t have the main power cords internally hooked up, and the LCD panel looked weird. I think they may have been throwing duds into the batch. Cost savings..?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the (more than a) Dollar stores and such have a little DC/USB mp3 player that&#8217;s $8, has a FM transmitter, a LCD display, IR remote, plays off either USB or audio input, and widely varies in quality. But it basically means you can put your flash drive in it and play your music in any car with a radio and a lighter plug.</p>
<p>One copy didn&#8217;t have the main power cords internally hooked up, and the LCD panel looked weird. I think they may have been throwing duds into the batch. Cost savings..?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penguinchris</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262366</link>
		<dc:creator>penguinchris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262366</guid>
		<description>No, I think you missed my point (which may have not been that clear, I didn&#039;t proof-read).

I will explain why I think a macbook pro is better than a dirt cheap or free 2nd hand Dell that weighs less and runs Ubuntu. But I will first reiterate that everyone&#039;s situation is different. If all you can afford (or want to spend) is enough to get you a 2nd hand Dell, or that&#039;s simply all that you need, then so be it.

I&#039;m no novice to computers, and I have second-hand Dells and several other laptops and desktops. I run linux on both older and current machines (don&#039;t use Windows on anything). To be clear, my current main machine is a 2-year-old macbook pro, but I have several other computers that are in current use as well.

If you have a specific set of simple needs that an outdated, cheaply-built computer running Ubuntu fills, then that&#039;s great and you shouldn&#039;t spend more money than you need to. Problem is, this isn&#039;t an analogous situation to the Sansa Clip because a general-purpose computer is a much different problem than a device meant to do one thing (and a relatively simple thing, at that).

If you&#039;re a serious computer user using a laptop and you travel, go to work/school, etc. with it a second hand Dell running Ubuntu brings with it a long list of (potential) problems and frustrations. Key among them for me when I was using such a machine as my primary computer were issues with certain wifi networks, battery life, poor build quality, bulky power adapter, interoperability with other people&#039;s computers, etc. These were sometimes enough to cause me serious problems with getting things done (and I had these issues with a relatively high-end Thinkpad, not a cheap Dell). A macbook pro has none of these issues, will last longer under abuse because of the build quality, and is much nicer to use anyway.

There&#039;s a reason why once people switch to macbook pros, they generally don&#039;t go back to anything else.

&lt;b&gt;The point of this entire conversation is that you can&#039;t judge a book by its cover.&lt;/b&gt; If you just want to play music you can pay $20 for a Sansa Clip or $300 for an ipod, and chances are most people would be happier (ultimately) with the Sansa Clip. Or if you&#039;re a power computer user you can pay $100 ($500 new) for a second-hand Dell or ~$500 ($1500 new) for a second-hand macbook with lower technical specs, and most people would be happier with the macbook. If you just do light browsing and e-mail and don&#039;t move your laptop from your desk at home very often, then yeah the 2nd hand Dell is fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I think you missed my point (which may have not been that clear, I didn&#8217;t proof-read).</p>
<p>I will explain why I think a macbook pro is better than a dirt cheap or free 2nd hand Dell that weighs less and runs Ubuntu. But I will first reiterate that everyone&#8217;s situation is different. If all you can afford (or want to spend) is enough to get you a 2nd hand Dell, or that&#8217;s simply all that you need, then so be it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m no novice to computers, and I have second-hand Dells and several other laptops and desktops. I run linux on both older and current machines (don&#8217;t use Windows on anything). To be clear, my current main machine is a 2-year-old macbook pro, but I have several other computers that are in current use as well.</p>
<p>If you have a specific set of simple needs that an outdated, cheaply-built computer running Ubuntu fills, then that&#8217;s great and you shouldn&#8217;t spend more money than you need to. Problem is, this isn&#8217;t an analogous situation to the Sansa Clip because a general-purpose computer is a much different problem than a device meant to do one thing (and a relatively simple thing, at that).</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a serious computer user using a laptop and you travel, go to work/school, etc. with it a second hand Dell running Ubuntu brings with it a long list of (potential) problems and frustrations. Key among them for me when I was using such a machine as my primary computer were issues with certain wifi networks, battery life, poor build quality, bulky power adapter, interoperability with other people&#8217;s computers, etc. These were sometimes enough to cause me serious problems with getting things done (and I had these issues with a relatively high-end Thinkpad, not a cheap Dell). A macbook pro has none of these issues, will last longer under abuse because of the build quality, and is much nicer to use anyway.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a reason why once people switch to macbook pros, they generally don&#8217;t go back to anything else.</p>
<p><b>The point of this entire conversation is that you can&#8217;t judge a book by its cover.</b> If you just want to play music you can pay $20 for a Sansa Clip or $300 for an ipod, and chances are most people would be happier (ultimately) with the Sansa Clip. Or if you&#8217;re a power computer user you can pay $100 ($500 new) for a second-hand Dell or ~$500 ($1500 new) for a second-hand macbook with lower technical specs, and most people would be happier with the macbook. If you just do light browsing and e-mail and don&#8217;t move your laptop from your desk at home very often, then yeah the 2nd hand Dell is fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retepslluerb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262362</link>
		<dc:creator>retepslluerb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262362</guid>
		<description>16 years ago? That would have  been 1995.   That was when DVD was being developed and put on the market a little bit later.   I doubt very much that there were $60 players well into the 2000s.  Lots of current movies on laserdisc in 1996, too, even in 1998, when I last shopped in Manhattan.   Jurassic Park was a hit on VHS!

You seriously overestimate the time span.

Myself, I was an early adopter and knew that I pay through the nose when I bought a very expensive Sony player (at least with User Prohibitions turned off).   But I was so fed up with VHS that it was worth to me.   It worked for about 7 years or a little bit more,  the cheap discount machine it replaced croaked after 2 years.  (Still less expensive per year and nearly as good, of course.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>16 years ago? That would have  been 1995.   That was when DVD was being developed and put on the market a little bit later.   I doubt very much that there were $60 players well into the 2000s.  Lots of current movies on laserdisc in 1996, too, even in 1998, when I last shopped in Manhattan.   Jurassic Park was a hit on VHS!</p>
<p>You seriously overestimate the time span.</p>
<p>Myself, I was an early adopter and knew that I pay through the nose when I bought a very expensive Sony player (at least with User Prohibitions turned off).   But I was so fed up with VHS that it was worth to me.   It worked for about 7 years or a little bit more,  the cheap discount machine it replaced croaked after 2 years.  (Still less expensive per year and nearly as good, of course.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie B</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262348</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262348</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;key example is macbook pros vs. any other laptop...&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
@penguinChris:twitter : Can you explain exactly how a macbook pro is better than a dirt cheap or free 2nd hand Dell that weighs less and runs Ubuntu?  Because I fear you are missing the whole point of this thread.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>key example is macbook pros vs. any other laptop&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>@penguinChris:twitter : Can you explain exactly how a macbook pro is better than a dirt cheap or free 2nd hand Dell that weighs less and runs Ubuntu?  Because I fear you are missing the whole point of this thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Narrativist</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262325</link>
		<dc:creator>Narrativist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262325</guid>
		<description>Years ago against my better judgment, I paid too much for a DVD player ($400 for a multidisk player and stereo), while my wife&#039;s parents wisely went to Walmart and got a $60 region-free Apex. Oh unhappy day! My expensive DVD player was dead within two years, while my in-laws&#039; Apex continues to function exactly as intended 16 years later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Years ago against my better judgment, I paid too much for a DVD player ($400 for a multidisk player and stereo), while my wife&#8217;s parents wisely went to Walmart and got a $60 region-free Apex. Oh unhappy day! My expensive DVD player was dead within two years, while my in-laws&#8217; Apex continues to function exactly as intended 16 years later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penguinchris</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262259</link>
		<dc:creator>penguinchris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262259</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a very narrow range of products where buying the &quot;crap&quot; version pays off. I&#039;m having trouble thinking of anything besides the Sansa Clip, actually. Of course, everyone&#039;s experience is different.

A similar item might be the cheap Casio digital watch that al qaeda supposedly uses. That thing will last you forever. But then... an expensive watch will last you forever, too, and will be more stylish (and more functional, potentially) in the process. The thing that &lt;i&gt;won&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; last you forever is a mid-range product - something relatively fashionable.

It&#039;s this mid-range zone that most people tend to buy into. They don&#039;t want the cheapest thing available, mainly just as a status thing, but can&#039;t afford the good stuff. So they buy something that seems fashionable, but which is over-priced and will break fairly quickly.

So, you have to choose your battles. If there&#039;s something available like the Sansa Clip that does what you want and is dirt cheap, get it. If the product you&#039;re looking for doesn&#039;t have something equivalent available, which is the case for most things, you&#039;re better off in the long run getting a higher-end item (key example is macbook pros vs. any other laptop). Just be sure it&#039;s actually high-end, not just priced as if it were.

Which leads to my final point - all of this relies on you caring enough to do serious research before buying something. Most people would not assume the Sansa Clip was actually a great product - and because of its popularity on the internet, this is one of the easiest products to research. If you&#039;re looking for something else, it&#039;s quite difficult to figure out what the sweet spot is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a very narrow range of products where buying the &#8220;crap&#8221; version pays off. I&#8217;m having trouble thinking of anything besides the Sansa Clip, actually. Of course, everyone&#8217;s experience is different.</p>
<p>A similar item might be the cheap Casio digital watch that al qaeda supposedly uses. That thing will last you forever. But then&#8230; an expensive watch will last you forever, too, and will be more stylish (and more functional, potentially) in the process. The thing that <i>won&#8217;t</i> last you forever is a mid-range product &#8211; something relatively fashionable.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s this mid-range zone that most people tend to buy into. They don&#8217;t want the cheapest thing available, mainly just as a status thing, but can&#8217;t afford the good stuff. So they buy something that seems fashionable, but which is over-priced and will break fairly quickly.</p>
<p>So, you have to choose your battles. If there&#8217;s something available like the Sansa Clip that does what you want and is dirt cheap, get it. If the product you&#8217;re looking for doesn&#8217;t have something equivalent available, which is the case for most things, you&#8217;re better off in the long run getting a higher-end item (key example is macbook pros vs. any other laptop). Just be sure it&#8217;s actually high-end, not just priced as if it were.</p>
<p>Which leads to my final point &#8211; all of this relies on you caring enough to do serious research before buying something. Most people would not assume the Sansa Clip was actually a great product &#8211; and because of its popularity on the internet, this is one of the easiest products to research. If you&#8217;re looking for something else, it&#8217;s quite difficult to figure out what the sweet spot is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slurpy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262243</link>
		<dc:creator>Slurpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262243</guid>
		<description>&quot; it;s hard to find a good-crap product, cause if it were that good it wouldn&#039;t be crap and people would be shouting about it.      &quot;

Like the Sansa Clip that we all love?  I&#039;ve converted my roommate, my last girlfriend, AND every tech-friendly member of my family - and the girlfriend came from an Apple family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; it;s hard to find a good-crap product, cause if it were that good it wouldn&#8217;t be crap and people would be shouting about it.      &#8221;</p>
<p>Like the Sansa Clip that we all love?  I&#8217;ve converted my roommate, my last girlfriend, AND every tech-friendly member of my family &#8211; and the girlfriend came from an Apple family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew gair</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262224</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew gair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262224</guid>
		<description>The Sanza clip is closer to the shuffle in size yet has a screen so that you don&#039;t have to shuffle songs albums and playlists.  I use mine for cycling and it takes the knocks that would leave a nano toasted.  

The one in the picture is the fancy schmanzy version with what looks like a 2 colour display.  Pure ostentation! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sanza clip is closer to the shuffle in size yet has a screen so that you don&#8217;t have to shuffle songs albums and playlists.  I use mine for cycling and it takes the knocks that would leave a nano toasted.  </p>
<p>The one in the picture is the fancy schmanzy version with what looks like a 2 colour display.  Pure ostentation! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: regeya</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262207</link>
		<dc:creator>regeya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262207</guid>
		<description>My smart phone will run for two or three hours with the screen off.  I once accidentally left my Fuze running for 24 hours.  You can put one on your belt or in your pocket without worrying about dropping a device that&#039;ll run you $700+ if you break it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My smart phone will run for two or three hours with the screen off.  I once accidentally left my Fuze running for 24 hours.  You can put one on your belt or in your pocket without worrying about dropping a device that&#8217;ll run you $700+ if you break it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: regeya</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/02/in-praise-of-crap-technology.html#comment-1262205</link>
		<dc:creator>regeya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=127569#comment-1262205</guid>
		<description>Oh, you can go to Best Buy and get a Clip+ or a Fuze+, but I&#039;d recommend going the online route and getting a refurb of an older model.  e200, Clip, and Fuze are all fairly easy to find.  If you get one at a store, go for a Clip+ instead of a Fuze+; the touch pad on the new model  is terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, you can go to Best Buy and get a Clip+ or a Fuze+, but I&#8217;d recommend going the online route and getting a refurb of an older model.  e200, Clip, and Fuze are all fairly easy to find.  If you get one at a store, go for a Clip+ instead of a Fuze+; the touch pad on the new model  is terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
