Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Fake British WWII passport for Hitler

Cory Doctorow at 10:02 pm Wed, Nov 9, 2011

— FEATURED —

Book Review

Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation

Book Review

We Can Fix it! - a graphic novel time travel memoir

Science

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle


This fake German passport for Hitler was produced in 1941 by Britain's Special Operations Executive, the spy branch in charge of forging documents for moles, spies, partisans, and other covert operatives, as a proof of concept. In a moment of spirited hijinks, the SOE made Herr Schicklgruber into a Jew seeking a visa to enter British-controlled Palestine.

This passport shows what the forgers were capable of producing. It also hints at their sense of humour and their opinion of Hitler and his beliefs. They've given Hitler's passport a red 'J' (which stood for 'Jew' on a German passport). He has a visa allowing his entry into Palestine, which was under British control at that time. The passport also describes Hitler's occupation as a 'painter'. Under distinguishing features, they list his 'little moustache'.

Adolf Hitler's fake passport (via Neatorama)

I write books. My latest is a YA science fiction novel called Homeland (it's the sequel to Little Brother). More books: Rapture of the Nerds (a novel, with Charlie Stross); With a Little Help (short stories); and The Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow (novella and nonfic). I speak all over the place and I tweet and tumble, too.

MORE:  espionage • History • military • WWII

More at Boing Boing

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

Hackers prepare for first "national holiday" in their honor

  • RodPN

    Looks fake..
    that’s the most common picture of Hitler

    • semiotix

      Looks fake..

      I can tell from the penstrokes, and from having seen quite a few faked passports for genocidal tyrants in my time.

  • Antinous / Moderator

    Distinguishing features: only one, big ball.

  • Nick Chaiyachakorn

    Nice to see those date stampers haven’t changed since World War II. You can still buy stamps with a font that’s virtually alike, I swear…

  • LogrusZed

    Same people who did Obama’s birf cert.

  • puufuu

    Two grammar mistakes in the handwritten part though. I hope their actual forged documents were better ;-).

    • http://glitch.tl/ Michael Smith

      I believe mistakes are an important part of making a document look legitimate.

      • http://twitter.com/faultier_ Nikolaus Holzer

        the two mistakes (schwarze instead of schwarz & kleine instead of kleiner) actually seem rather suspicious as they are very obvious to a native speaker. I’d agree that a spelling error here or there could be beneficial for a fake, mistakes like these however are very common for non-natives – not something to go for when faking a document. hope they did better on their real stuff ;D

      • trieste

        This was in 1941. These mistakes were soon caught to the chagrin of the British as cries of “They are merciless about grammar, Nazis!” echoed down the corridors of the SOE. 

        And that’s why we use the phrase today.

      • puufuu

        Even mistakes a native speaker would never ever make? We’re not talking less than perfect spelling here, this is basic stuff that looks horribly wrong. They just didn’t bother to run it by somebody with a decent command of German.

        • mguffin

          Hey Johnny Chuckles, don’t for heaven’s sake let the overall fun of the fake get in the way of some lumpen pedantry or who know wot grammatical and speling kaos mite Nsue

          • puufuu

            Thanks to a constant generous supply of electrons, we can both be delighted by this _and_  comment that the quality of this ‘proof of concept’ would not have cut it in the real world. Imagine that!

            (I still ‘liked’ your comment though.)

          • mguffin

            On reflection, I was gracelessly commenting prior to replenishing my own personal supply of morning caffeine electrons hence grouchy lack of resultant generosity in comment. I withdraw the JC and the ‘lumpen p’.

      • AirPillo

        Those particular mistakes are more of a shibboleth than a good forger would be comfortable with making on purpose.

  • hadlockk

    The passport also describes Hitler’s occupation as a ‘painter’.

    It’s worth pointing out that Hitler’s occupation was originally a sign painter before he became a politician through the democratic process. One of the 99%-ers, so to speak ;)

  • http://twitter.com/Warfreak2 Andrew Kay

     You can immediately tell that it’s fake, because that photo would never be approved for a passport. He should be facing the camera, against an evenly-lit background.

  • Jesse in Japan

    That’s an obvious fake.

    Everyone knows that the Foreign Office in 1941 would NEVER have granted a Jew an entry permit for Palestine.

  • retepslluerb

    He actually was born as Hitler. It was his father, Alois, who was born out of wedlock, but he took his father’s name – so it’s not that Alois  didn’t have a “legitimate claim”, whatever that’s supposed to mean – before Adolf was born.

    Where does this strange obsession with the Schicklgruber-name come from? We usually don’t go around and refer to Dschugaschwili, Clay or Ciccone, either.  Or John. F. Fitzgerald, for that matter.

    • puufuu

      Two reasons, at least in Austria (where Hitler is from):

      - Many people avoid saying Hitler’s name if possible. All kinds of substitutes exist; basically anything that does not have as many horrible connotations will do.
      - “Schicklgruber” just sounds funny. It’s a pretty common (though underhanded) way of mocking him.

      • retepslluerb

        Why would I not want those horrible connotations? He’s Adolf Hitler, few chrissakes. I *want* people to understand that he is one of the most horrible person in history, especially us Germans and Austrians.

        I also find the mockery pointless. It’s a good way during war, builds morale and all that, but afterwards?

        But perhaps it’s just my pedantry kicking in here – and I so do hate diminutives.

        • puufuu

          You asked a question and got an answer. Disagree with it all you like but please, don’t shoot the messenger ;-).

          Also, to answer your first question: same reason you don’t swear in polite company.

        • http://twitter.com/writebastard Ian Wood

          Know who else hated diminutives?

        • pauldrye

          I also find the mockery pointless. It’s a good way during war, builds morale and all that, but afterwards?

          I think that’s the ultimate revenge against Hitler — mockery, down to the end of history. He and the Nazis took themselves very seriously, what with all that historical destiny &^%$ and the like. Making fun of him, forever, goes exactly against what he wanted for himself in posterity.

          I’m reminded of the Groucho Marx’s request, while on tour of immediate post-war Berlin, to stop at the site of the Führerbunker. He proceeded to literally dance the Charleston on Hitler’s grave.

          (Thus cementing my opinion that Groucho’s the coolest man in history.)

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3CUF7YZSDV2G77CHHNZSGNYJHA ntinnyc

    It’s not meant to be analyzed to death; the first paragraph clearly says the Brits created it as a joke. Sheesh.