<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sustainable Materials: indispensable, impartial popular engineering book on the future of our built and made&#160;world</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/11/17/sustainable-materials.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/17/sustainable-materials.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: screwt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/17/sustainable-materials.html#comment-1272761</link>
		<dc:creator>screwt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=129898#comment-1272761</guid>
		<description>Cost.

The following (2yo, but I don&#039;t think things have changed much in the mean time) graph shows comparison of costs for carbon fibre vs steel in car manufacture. Note the cost shown is per vehicle, not per kilo - i.e. it already takes the weight saving into account.
http://www.rmi.org/RFGraph-carbonfiber_vs_steel_manufacturing
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cost.</p>
<p>The following (2yo, but I don&#8217;t think things have changed much in the mean time) graph shows comparison of costs for carbon fibre vs steel in car manufacture. Note the cost shown is per vehicle, not per kilo &#8211; i.e. it already takes the weight saving into account.<br />
<a href="http://www.rmi.org/RFGraph-carbonfiber_vs_steel_manufacturing" rel="nofollow">http://www.rmi.org/RFGraph-carbonfiber_vs_steel_manufacturing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hbgvfcdxsz hbgvfcdxsz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/17/sustainable-materials.html#comment-1272659</link>
		<dc:creator>hbgvfcdxsz hbgvfcdxsz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=129898#comment-1272659</guid>
		<description>Brilliant. Refreshing to see an attempt at an impartial text into this subject.

Why is a train made of heavy steel when it would be more efficient if they were made of a strong and light material like carbon fibre? or even a car made of CF?

(Carbon fibre weighs roughly 1,800kg per cubic metre, which compares well with mildsteels at around 7,800kg per cubic metre.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant. Refreshing to see an attempt at an impartial text into this subject.</p>
<p>Why is a train made of heavy steel when it would be more efficient if they were made of a strong and light material like carbon fibre? or even a car made of CF?</p>
<p>(Carbon fibre weighs roughly 1,800kg per cubic metre, which compares well with mildsteels at around 7,800kg per cubic metre.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: querent</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/17/sustainable-materials.html#comment-1272622</link>
		<dc:creator>querent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=129898#comment-1272622</guid>
		<description>First!

Neat.  The side of me that pairs beers with chocolates wants to see this work paired with that of the Open Source Ecology people.

http://opensourceecology.org/gvcs.php </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First!</p>
<p>Neat.  The side of me that pairs beers with chocolates wants to see this work paired with that of the Open Source Ecology people.</p>
<p><a href="http://opensourceecology.org/gvcs.php" rel="nofollow">http://opensourceecology.org/gvcs.php</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
