Comments on: Once more, with feeling http://boingboing.net/2011/11/18/once-more-with-feeling.html Brain candy for Happy Mutants Sat, 25 May 2013 23:35:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 By: Richard http://boingboing.net/2011/11/18/once-more-with-feeling.html#comment-1274498 Richard Sat, 19 Nov 2011 03:59:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=130191#comment-1274498 I believe light is not the fastest thing.Take a neutrino for instance,anything that has mass,the neutrino travels with a sphere(called it wave) and within that wave the neutrino get transform into something else (like muon into tau neutrino).if within that sphere the transformation of the neutrino becoming strickly wave for a short period and produced a tau neutrino,the tau neutrino could be in front of the wave and thus faster than light I believe light is not the fastest thing.Take a neutrino for instance,anything that has mass,the neutrino travels with a sphere(called it wave) and within that wave the neutrino get transform into something else (like muon into tau neutrino).if within that sphere the transformation of the neutrino becoming strickly wave for a short period and produced a tau neutrino,the tau neutrino could be in front of the wave and thus faster than light

]]> By: flosofl http://boingboing.net/2011/11/18/once-more-with-feeling.html#comment-1274234 flosofl Fri, 18 Nov 2011 23:17:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=130191#comment-1274234 O.o Holy crap, I see that it has... O.o Holy crap, I see that it has…

]]> By: andrewprocter http://boingboing.net/2011/11/18/once-more-with-feeling.html#comment-1274051 andrewprocter Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:37:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=130191#comment-1274051 Sure, but that show has definitely hijacked it. See: https://www.google.com/search?gcx=w&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=once+more+with+feeling Sure, but that show has definitely hijacked it. See: https://www.google.com/search?gcx=w&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=once+more+with+feeling

]]> By: flosofl http://boingboing.net/2011/11/18/once-more-with-feeling.html#comment-1274048 flosofl Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:34:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=130191#comment-1274048 The phrase "Once more, with feeling" has been around far longer than that show. The phrase “Once more, with feeling” has been around far longer than that show.

]]> By: petertrepan http://boingboing.net/2011/11/18/once-more-with-feeling.html#comment-1273972 petertrepan Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:33:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=130191#comment-1273972 Please excuse my laymanship, but do we *know* for certain that photons are actually massless? What if they're more massive then neutrinos? Please excuse my laymanship, but do we *know* for certain that photons are actually massless? What if they’re more massive then neutrinos?

]]> By: sparky http://boingboing.net/2011/11/18/once-more-with-feeling.html#comment-1273871 sparky Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:17:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=130191#comment-1273871 It's just a matter of time before we have Warp Drive. Just sayin.' It’s just a matter of time before we have Warp Drive. Just sayin.’

]]> By: andrewprocter http://boingboing.net/2011/11/18/once-more-with-feeling.html#comment-1273867 andrewprocter Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:16:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=130191#comment-1273867 +1 for the Buffy reference. -1 because the article isn't actually about Buffy. +2 because they broke the light barrier again. Total awesomeness: +2. +1 for the Buffy reference. -1 because the article isn’t actually about Buffy. +2 because they broke the light barrier again.

Total awesomeness: +2.

]]> By: Guest http://boingboing.net/2011/11/18/once-more-with-feeling.html#comment-1273852 Guest Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:08:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=130191#comment-1273852 So, for a second time they have collected enormous volumes of data that back up their theory? And that's distinct from just having a second interesting data point? Because that's what so many people seem to be misunderstanding about this. So, for a second time they have collected enormous volumes of data that back up their theory? And that’s distinct from just having a second interesting data point? Because that’s what so many people seem to be misunderstanding about this.

]]>