<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harry Houdini and Arthur Conan&#160;Doyle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Millard</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1284982</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Millard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1284982</guid>
		<description>If no one has previously mentioned, William Shatner was the co-author of a novel on this topic: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/042513296X&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Believe&lt;/a&gt;.

I enjoyed it a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If no one has previously mentioned, William Shatner was the co-author of a novel on this topic: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/042513296X" rel="nofollow">Believe</a>.</p>
<p>I enjoyed it a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rabidpotatochip</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282550</link>
		<dc:creator>rabidpotatochip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282550</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;At any rate, I think that I prefer their congenial gullibility to the billions of smug internet commenters who think that everything is fake. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Your post is an obvious photoshop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>At any rate, I think that I prefer their congenial gullibility to the billions of smug internet commenters who think that everything is fake. </p></blockquote>
<p>Your post is an obvious photoshop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mandoran</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282455</link>
		<dc:creator>mandoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282455</guid>
		<description>How is Fortean the opposite of Skeptic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is Fortean the opposite of Skeptic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mccrum</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282447</link>
		<dc:creator>mccrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282447</guid>
		<description>Oh no, I have.  I can only conclude you haven&#039;t actually taken off Trek glasses to view him as the rest of us do.

Seriously, this is worth discussing?  And in that shirt?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BYNdTHjstI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no, I have.  I can only conclude you haven&#8217;t actually taken off Trek glasses to view him as the rest of us do.</p>
<p>Seriously, this is worth discussing?  And in that shirt?<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BYNdTHjstI" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BYNdTHjstI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retepslluerb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282347</link>
		<dc:creator>retepslluerb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 08:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282347</guid>
		<description>Personally, I was never really impressed by Holmes&#039;s skills - while he was and is an endearing character, his reasoning often seemed far-fetched and like guesswork, like guided by a supernatural sense for picking the correct line of thought.

I&#039;m not at all surprised to hear that Doyle believed in psychic phenomena.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I was never really impressed by Holmes&#8217;s skills &#8211; while he was and is an endearing character, his reasoning often seemed far-fetched and like guesswork, like guided by a supernatural sense for picking the correct line of thought.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not at all surprised to hear that Doyle believed in psychic phenomena.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth Starke</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282322</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Starke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282322</guid>
		<description>Spoken with the benefit of hindsight and a 21st century consciousness. These were the very early days of photography. Kodak and other experts could prove no tampering with the photographic plates. People saw what they wanted to see. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spoken with the benefit of hindsight and a 21st century consciousness. These were the very early days of photography. Kodak and other experts could prove no tampering with the photographic plates. People saw what they wanted to see. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Veitch</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282270</link>
		<dc:creator>James Veitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282270</guid>
		<description>Last I&#039;d heard, Straczynski was working on a script based around their friendship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last I&#8217;d heard, Straczynski was working on a script based around their friendship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: planettom</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282159</link>
		<dc:creator>planettom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 01:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282159</guid>
		<description>Seconded that FAIRY TALE: A TRUE STORY is worth watching.    It&#039;s pretty clever that, though the movie does depict fairies as real, it clearly shows that the photos were faked.

The crux of the movie is that the hoax is more along the lines of what Houdini did --- add a little magic to the world --- as opposed to the fake spiritualists who were preying on the grief of parents for their dead sons killed in WWI.

And as you say, Harvey Keitel as Houdini is inspired.

I have a reproduction of the notebook that Arthur Conan Doyle&#039;s father kept in the asylum, where he sketched fairies (that he may have believed he actually saw), excerpts of which are shown in the movie.

PHOTOGRAPHING FAIRIES (1997) is another movie inspired by the Cottingley fairies.    I haven&#039;t seen it, but apparently it&#039;s much less of a movie for kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seconded that FAIRY TALE: A TRUE STORY is worth watching.    It&#8217;s pretty clever that, though the movie does depict fairies as real, it clearly shows that the photos were faked.</p>
<p>The crux of the movie is that the hoax is more along the lines of what Houdini did &#8212; add a little magic to the world &#8212; as opposed to the fake spiritualists who were preying on the grief of parents for their dead sons killed in WWI.</p>
<p>And as you say, Harvey Keitel as Houdini is inspired.</p>
<p>I have a reproduction of the notebook that Arthur Conan Doyle&#8217;s father kept in the asylum, where he sketched fairies (that he may have believed he actually saw), excerpts of which are shown in the movie.</p>
<p>PHOTOGRAPHING FAIRIES (1997) is another movie inspired by the Cottingley fairies.    I haven&#8217;t seen it, but apparently it&#8217;s much less of a movie for kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EvilSpirit</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282124</link>
		<dc:creator>EvilSpirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282124</guid>
		<description>I can only conclude you haven&#039;t been paying attention for the last 15 years or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only conclude you haven&#8217;t been paying attention for the last 15 years or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mccrum</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282048</link>
		<dc:creator>mccrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282048</guid>
		<description>A... pity... yes.   But!... a pity for... whom?

Seriously, would you want to be in a small room with William Shatner going overboard on his acting for two hours?  I can only assume he&#039;d have something to do with the script as well, which wouldn&#039;t bode well for those attending either.

Let&#039;s just leave him in those Priceline commercials, I think we&#039;re all a little better off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A&#8230; pity&#8230; yes.   But!&#8230; a pity for&#8230; whom?</p>
<p>Seriously, would you want to be in a small room with William Shatner going overboard on his acting for two hours?  I can only assume he&#8217;d have something to do with the script as well, which wouldn&#8217;t bode well for those attending either.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s just leave him in those Priceline commercials, I think we&#8217;re all a little better off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halloween_Jack</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282016</link>
		<dc:creator>Halloween_Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282016</guid>
		<description>Fun fact: at one point, William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy talked about doing a two-man stage play of them playing Houdini and Doyle, respectively. Pity it fell through. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fun fact: at one point, William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy talked about doing a two-man stage play of them playing Houdini and Doyle, respectively. Pity it fell through. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: $19428857</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282003</link>
		<dc:creator>$19428857</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1282003</guid>
		<description>For a different take on the relationship, FairyTale: A True Story is  fictionalized account of the Cottingley fairies, featuring Harvey Keitel as Houdini (seriously brilliant physical casting) and Peter O&#039;Toole as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. A sweet movie for the faerie besotted child in your life, like my daughter, who LOVES this movie. Not intolerable for many adult tastes, especially those of us for whom Hallmark Card commercials are like crack, and Anglophiles. The friendship between Doyle and Houdini is not the main story, but it is there, as is the conflict between their views on mediums and the occult. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119095/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a different take on the relationship, FairyTale: A True Story is  fictionalized account of the Cottingley fairies, featuring Harvey Keitel as Houdini (seriously brilliant physical casting) and Peter O&#8217;Toole as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. A sweet movie for the faerie besotted child in your life, like my daughter, who LOVES this movie. Not intolerable for many adult tastes, especially those of us for whom Hallmark Card commercials are like crack, and Anglophiles. The friendship between Doyle and Houdini is not the main story, but it is there, as is the conflict between their views on mediums and the occult. <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119095/" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119095/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flesh of Sadie</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281988</link>
		<dc:creator>Flesh of Sadie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281988</guid>
		<description>Just last week I found out there was a Cricket League of Extraordinary Gentlemen including Doyle, Wodehouse, Barrie, Kipling, Milne, Jerome, et al.

http://iconicphotos.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/allahakbarries-c-c/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just last week I found out there was a Cricket League of Extraordinary Gentlemen including Doyle, Wodehouse, Barrie, Kipling, Milne, Jerome, et al.</p>
<p><a href="http://iconicphotos.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/allahakbarries-c-c/" rel="nofollow">http://iconicphotos.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/allahakbarries-c-c/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGulow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281965</link>
		<dc:creator>CGulow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281965</guid>
		<description> Awesome! Thanks for posting this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Awesome! Thanks for posting this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marktech</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281889</link>
		<dc:creator>Marktech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281889</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The story of the Cottingley fairies has always fascinated me.  How anyone over the age of four could possibly mistake those obvious paper cutouts for three-dimensional beings is mindboggling.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Chopped.  I can tell from the pixies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The story of the Cottingley fairies has always fascinated me.  How anyone over the age of four could possibly mistake those obvious paper cutouts for three-dimensional beings is mindboggling.</p></blockquote>
<p>Chopped.  I can tell from the pixies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainspore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281857</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainspore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281857</guid>
		<description>Most literary critics agree that the Sherlock Holmes series started going downhill around the time that Holmes gave up on the whole &quot;deduction&quot; thing in lieu of holding seances to interview murder victims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most literary critics agree that the Sherlock Holmes series started going downhill around the time that Holmes gave up on the whole &#8220;deduction&#8221; thing in lieu of holding seances to interview murder victims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaylonWillie</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281851</link>
		<dc:creator>WaylonWillie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281851</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this! I remember a great story from one of Houdini&#039;s bios where Houdini performs the &quot;look-I-can-take-off-my-thumb!&quot; trick that everyone learns in 5th grade, and Mrs. Conan Doyle passes out in astonishment. Silverman&#039;s bio of Houdini is a great read if anyone gets into this (I&#039;m not a historian though, so am only assessing it from a reader&#039;s point of view....)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this! I remember a great story from one of Houdini&#8217;s bios where Houdini performs the &#8220;look-I-can-take-off-my-thumb!&#8221; trick that everyone learns in 5th grade, and Mrs. Conan Doyle passes out in astonishment. Silverman&#8217;s bio of Houdini is a great read if anyone gets into this (I&#8217;m not a historian though, so am only assessing it from a reader&#8217;s point of view&#8230;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Ruh - ブライアン・ルー</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281836</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Ruh - ブライアン・ルー</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281836</guid>
		<description>The story of people running away from a train on film is probably just an oft-reported legend. It undoubtedly caused reactions, but no widespread panic. See &quot;Lumière&#039;s Arrival of the Train: Cinema&#039;s Founding Myth&quot; by Martin Loiperdinger in The Moving Image 4.1 (2004) 89-11.
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story of people running away from a train on film is probably just an oft-reported legend. It undoubtedly caused reactions, but no widespread panic. See &#8220;Lumière&#8217;s Arrival of the Train: Cinema&#8217;s Founding Myth&#8221; by Martin Loiperdinger in The Moving Image 4.1 (2004) 89-11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Pescovitz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281823</link>
		<dc:creator>David Pescovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281823</guid>
		<description>+1 to that, Antinous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 to that, Antinous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281802</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281802</guid>
		<description>One of the first movies showed a train coming at the screen, and people ran out of the theater in terror.  People aren&#039;t very good at parsing unfamiliar things.  At any rate, I think that I prefer their congenial gullibility to the billions of smug internet commenters who think that everything is fake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the first movies showed a train coming at the screen, and people ran out of the theater in terror.  People aren&#8217;t very good at parsing unfamiliar things.  At any rate, I think that I prefer their congenial gullibility to the billions of smug internet commenters who think that everything is fake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wally Ballou</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281785</link>
		<dc:creator>Wally Ballou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281785</guid>
		<description>Looks interesting.  The story of the Cottingley fairies has always fascinated me.  How anyone over the age of four could possibly mistake those obvious paper cutouts for three-dimensional beings is mindboggling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks interesting.  The story of the Cottingley fairies has always fascinated me.  How anyone over the age of four could possibly mistake those obvious paper cutouts for three-dimensional beings is mindboggling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281782</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/2011/11/28/harry-houdini-and-arthur-conan.html#comment-1281782</guid>
		<description>Nikola Tesla and Mark Twain palled around, too.  Tesla invented a machine that made Twain poop!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikola Tesla and Mark Twain palled around, too.  Tesla invented a machine that made Twain poop!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
