<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the study of evolution&#160;matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 02:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: psychodegu</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1288056</link>
		<dc:creator>psychodegu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1288056</guid>
		<description>This video I fraught with fallacious statements. Most of the definitions of evolution they gave are actually definitions of other concepts in biology. Also statements like &#039;all science requires evolution&#039;, or &#039;is essential for understanding modern biological sciences&#039; are simple untrue. Most biology sub-fields develop independently of evolution theory, and do not even require evolution to be true to function. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This video I fraught with fallacious statements. Most of the definitions of evolution they gave are actually definitions of other concepts in biology. Also statements like &#8216;all science requires evolution&#8217;, or &#8216;is essential for understanding modern biological sciences&#8217; are simple untrue. Most biology sub-fields develop independently of evolution theory, and do not even require evolution to be true to function. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robuluz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1285303</link>
		<dc:creator>robuluz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 04:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1285303</guid>
		<description>I agree! Forced schooling, why it&#039;s like forced healthcare! The government should let me die in a pool of my own stupidity! God bless America</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree! Forced schooling, why it&#8217;s like forced healthcare! The government should let me die in a pool of my own stupidity! God bless America</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fett101</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1285286</link>
		<dc:creator>fett101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 03:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1285286</guid>
		<description>Forced schooling of facts is immoral? wtf?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forced schooling of facts is immoral? wtf?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alvis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1285213</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1285213</guid>
		<description>Evolution, SHMevolution.

Let&#039;s talk about the elephant in the room: disrespect and ignorance towards ASPECT RATIOS.

I know it makes me sound like an elitist, but I&#039;m simply not watching anything that&#039;s been edited so poorly, regardless of the content. I don&#039;t want to see photos taken with your thumb on the lens, watch video recorded with the lens cap on, nor check out something that&#039;s just out-of-focus altogether - same diff. Is it wrong that I find it just a little bit insulting that I&#039;m supposed to ignore random funhouse-mirror freak-out special effects?

I can only think of a few explanations for this behavior: the editor either isn&#039;t aware of aspect ratio issues, doesn&#039;t know how to correct them, or thinks things look fine as-is. All those cases scream, &quot;I&#039;m not someone who should be tasked with making videos&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evolution, SHMevolution.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s talk about the elephant in the room: disrespect and ignorance towards ASPECT RATIOS.</p>
<p>I know it makes me sound like an elitist, but I&#8217;m simply not watching anything that&#8217;s been edited so poorly, regardless of the content. I don&#8217;t want to see photos taken with your thumb on the lens, watch video recorded with the lens cap on, nor check out something that&#8217;s just out-of-focus altogether &#8211; same diff. Is it wrong that I find it just a little bit insulting that I&#8217;m supposed to ignore random funhouse-mirror freak-out special effects?</p>
<p>I can only think of a few explanations for this behavior: the editor either isn&#8217;t aware of aspect ratio issues, doesn&#8217;t know how to correct them, or thinks things look fine as-is. All those cases scream, &#8220;I&#8217;m not someone who should be tasked with making videos&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julien Couvreur</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1285179</link>
		<dc:creator>Julien Couvreur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1285179</guid>
		<description>Best talk on evolution: http://w-uh.com/posts/110907-evolution.html (Why evolution is true). It&#039;s much better than the one above, which only offers sound bites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best talk on evolution: <a href="http://w-uh.com/posts/110907-evolution.html" rel="nofollow">http://w-uh.com/posts/110907-evolution.html</a> (Why evolution is true). It&#8217;s much better than the one above, which only offers sound bites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brainologist</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1285170</link>
		<dc:creator>brainologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1285170</guid>
		<description>As a scientist, I&#039;m terribly disappointed in the quote that opens this post. It may seem like it&#039;s clever, highlighting the fundamental importance of evolution by relating it to the &quot;basic&quot; units of the alphabet; unfortunately, the analogy falls apart completely, and in fact a bit self-destructively, once you know a little bit about the science of language.

Sentence structure (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntax&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;syntax&lt;/a&gt;) has nothing to do with the alphabet.  There is no natural human language whose syntax depends at all on an alphabet.  Moreover, there are numerous examples of languages (say, the Chinese languages) that have no alphabet, but whose syntax can still be described.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphabet&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Alphabets&lt;/a&gt; are arbitrary ways of encoding the sounds of language in static, visual form.  What&#039;s worse, alphabets are &lt;i&gt;invented&lt;/i&gt; by humans as a tool for recording language. It&#039;s a dangerous analogy to make to suggest that evolution is invented by people.

Let me hazard another analogy in the same form as the quote above &quot;Teaching science without teaching evolution is like teaching calculus without Roman numerals.&quot;

Although the intent is noble, and the video is otherwise one of the best I&#039;ve seen for conveying fundamental importance of evolution to science, the rampant misinformation people have about linguistics is always disappointing.

(For the people at home playing &quot;irony bingo&quot;: syntax is an evolved capacity of the human mind, whereas alphabets are intelligently designed...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a scientist, I&#8217;m terribly disappointed in the quote that opens this post. It may seem like it&#8217;s clever, highlighting the fundamental importance of evolution by relating it to the &#8220;basic&#8221; units of the alphabet; unfortunately, the analogy falls apart completely, and in fact a bit self-destructively, once you know a little bit about the science of language.</p>
<p>Sentence structure (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntax" rel="nofollow">syntax</a>) has nothing to do with the alphabet.  There is no natural human language whose syntax depends at all on an alphabet.  Moreover, there are numerous examples of languages (say, the Chinese languages) that have no alphabet, but whose syntax can still be described.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphabet" rel="nofollow">Alphabets</a> are arbitrary ways of encoding the sounds of language in static, visual form.  What&#8217;s worse, alphabets are <i>invented</i> by humans as a tool for recording language. It&#8217;s a dangerous analogy to make to suggest that evolution is invented by people.</p>
<p>Let me hazard another analogy in the same form as the quote above &#8220;Teaching science without teaching evolution is like teaching calculus without Roman numerals.&#8221;</p>
<p>Although the intent is noble, and the video is otherwise one of the best I&#8217;ve seen for conveying fundamental importance of evolution to science, the rampant misinformation people have about linguistics is always disappointing.</p>
<p>(For the people at home playing &#8220;irony bingo&#8221;: syntax is an evolved capacity of the human mind, whereas alphabets are intelligently designed&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Brown</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1285107</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 23:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1285107</guid>
		<description>good grief, watch the video before you take a sentence fragment out of context</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good grief, watch the video before you take a sentence fragment out of context</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laukarlueng</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1285082</link>
		<dc:creator>laukarlueng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1285082</guid>
		<description>Is she saying that to understand gravity or atomic structure I must know evolution first? If so, then it&#039;s a rather silly argument. 

I hate these stupid debates, because they skirt the core issue: forced schooling is immoral whether a creationist or an evolutionist does it. The politicization of the educational industry has been a massive mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is she saying that to understand gravity or atomic structure I must know evolution first? If so, then it&#8217;s a rather silly argument. </p>
<p>I hate these stupid debates, because they skirt the core issue: forced schooling is immoral whether a creationist or an evolutionist does it. The politicization of the educational industry has been a massive mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Davis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1285075</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 23:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1285075</guid>
		<description>Too bad there isn&#039;t an evolution based dietary/lifestyle program. Oh snap, there is. The one getting trashed by the mainstream medical community. Paleo! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad there isn&#8217;t an evolution based dietary/lifestyle program. Oh snap, there is. The one getting trashed by the mainstream medical community. Paleo! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell Glaser</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1285054</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchell Glaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 22:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1285054</guid>
		<description>Hey, they are participating in their own objectification. Not the brightest bulbs in the bin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, they are participating in their own objectification. Not the brightest bulbs in the bin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1285044</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1285044</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Unfair. You can&#039;t expect Miss America contestants to understand how they have evolved up from lower life forms. Because they haven&#039;t. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
The contestants might be pretty smart, but they still have to pander to the troglodyte judges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Unfair. You can&#8217;t expect Miss America contestants to understand how they have evolved up from lower life forms. Because they haven&#8217;t. </p></blockquote>
<p>The contestants might be pretty smart, but they still have to pander to the troglodyte judges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marilove</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1285038</link>
		<dc:creator>marilove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1285038</guid>
		<description>Saw this the other day on Skepchick.org.  Good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw this the other day on Skepchick.org.  Good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell Glaser</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1285004</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchell Glaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1285004</guid>
		<description>OMG! Lip Balm Lab? Unbelievable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG! Lip Balm Lab? Unbelievable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell Glaser</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1285001</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchell Glaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1285001</guid>
		<description>Unfair. You can&#039;t expect Miss America contestants to understand how they have evolved up from lower life forms. Because they haven&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfair. You can&#8217;t expect Miss America contestants to understand how they have evolved up from lower life forms. Because they haven&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily Jane McTavish</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1284978</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Jane McTavish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1284978</guid>
		<description>Yay Boing Boing for getting on this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay Boing Boing for getting on this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gourneau</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1284956</link>
		<dc:creator>gourneau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1284956</guid>
		<description>This is wonderful, I am just bummed y&#039;all didn&#039;t post it when I submitted it a week ago. I hope the new submit tool helps.

Consider having a programmer look for the connection between who submits what links, and what then gets posted later on.  To find good posters via software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is wonderful, I am just bummed y&#8217;all didn&#8217;t post it when I submitted it a week ago. I hope the new submit tool helps.</p>
<p>Consider having a programmer look for the connection between who submits what links, and what then gets posted later on.  To find good posters via software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Shipman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1284942</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Shipman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1284942</guid>
		<description>Thanks for helping promote this video, Maggie! (I should fess up and say, however, that I&#039;m a science writer and not a scientist.) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for helping promote this video, Maggie! (I should fess up and say, however, that I&#8217;m a science writer and not a scientist.) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SausageDong</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1284918</link>
		<dc:creator>SausageDong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1284918</guid>
		<description>Good stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Jones</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/why-the-study-of-evolution-mat.html#comment-1284915</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132524#comment-1284915</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t wait to watch this at home.

* * *
What a toy maker  thinks science means to girls: http://www.wildscience.net/girls.html (via @Damien)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait to watch this at home.</p>
<p>* * *<br />
What a toy maker  thinks science means to girls: <a href="http://www.wildscience.net/girls.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.wildscience.net/girls.html</a> (via @Damien)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
