<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shutterstock models are swell make-believe Herman Cain&#160;endorsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 03:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: elix</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1286740</link>
		<dc:creator>elix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 04:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1286740</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57336185-503544/herman-cain-suspends-white-house-bid/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;You didn&#039;t have to wait long&lt;/a&gt;, as it turns out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57336185-503544/herman-cain-suspends-white-house-bid/" rel="nofollow">You didn&#8217;t have to wait long</a>, as it turns out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chaopoiesis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1286734</link>
		<dc:creator>chaopoiesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 03:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1286734</guid>
		<description>Now that Cain&#039;s transitioning from candidate to celebuputz, he&#039;s bound to show up on Shutterfly himself under that very category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that Cain&#8217;s transitioning from candidate to celebuputz, he&#8217;s bound to show up on Shutterfly himself under that very category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddy Bradley</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1286679</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddy Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 00:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1286679</guid>
		<description>Gawker readers came up with an appropriate replacement  for the previous banner:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gawker readers came up with an appropriate replacement  for the previous banner:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Swain</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1286651</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Swain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 22:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1286651</guid>
		<description>Say what you will about this being a legitimate use of stock photography, I can&#039;t help but notice that this generic thumbs up photo has now been replaced by a (badly composited) pic of a smiling Mr. and Mrs. Herman (during happier times, apparently) less than 24 hours later.
 Could it be that Boing Boing actually impacts the course of a political campaign ?? (albeit a totally ridiculous one that is utterly doomed)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say what you will about this being a legitimate use of stock photography, I can&#8217;t help but notice that this generic thumbs up photo has now been replaced by a (badly composited) pic of a smiling Mr. and Mrs. Herman (during happier times, apparently) less than 24 hours later.<br />
 Could it be that Boing Boing actually impacts the course of a political campaign ?? (albeit a totally ridiculous one that is utterly doomed)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thebes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1286544</link>
		<dc:creator>Thebes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1286544</guid>
		<description>This is what you get when a Womanizing Godfather runs for POTUS

When is he dropping out anyway? He&#039;s obviously unelectable, apart from his moral issues with the ol&#039; trouser snake- he is too easily blackmailed by former lovers and possible love children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what you get when a Womanizing Godfather runs for POTUS</p>
<p>When is he dropping out anyway? He&#8217;s obviously unelectable, apart from his moral issues with the ol&#8217; trouser snake- he is too easily blackmailed by former lovers and possible love children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon_Mahna</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1286338</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon_Mahna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 05:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1286338</guid>
		<description>Screwed up part is your parody isn&#039;t even 1/32 of a step off from reality.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screwed up part is your parody isn&#8217;t even 1/32 of a step off from reality.. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister44</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1286326</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1286326</guid>
		<description>I agree.  Even though he WAS getting good numbers, his actual fund raising is pretty meager. Holding photo shoots at this point would be rather unnecessarily. Had I been hired to do their site, I most likely would have just used stock photos. 

Remember too - this is selling politics, not the new iPhone. Until Obama, web and graphic design for political candidates vary between bad and gawd awful. I am sure if one were inclined, they would find all kinds of stock photos used on political sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Even though he WAS getting good numbers, his actual fund raising is pretty meager. Holding photo shoots at this point would be rather unnecessarily. Had I been hired to do their site, I most likely would have just used stock photos. </p>
<p>Remember too &#8211; this is selling politics, not the new iPhone. Until Obama, web and graphic design for political candidates vary between bad and gawd awful. I am sure if one were inclined, they would find all kinds of stock photos used on political sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Buck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1286239</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1286239</guid>
		<description>If you work as a &quot;creative&quot;, you probably still think that this kind of use of stock photography is OK.  But since the technology to track down the sources of images is now widely available, any politician using a stock image should be aware that it will soon be exposed as a stock image, and any implication that people in stock images are supporters of the candidate will be quickly blown up.  And the same will soon be true of other uses of stock images in advertising.  But hey, the economy sucks.  It won&#039;t hurt you to hire a real person and pay him/her if you need a photograph.  Stock photos will still be fine if you need a picture of a doughnut or something.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you work as a &#8220;creative&#8221;, you probably still think that this kind of use of stock photography is OK.  But since the technology to track down the sources of images is now widely available, any politician using a stock image should be aware that it will soon be exposed as a stock image, and any implication that people in stock images are supporters of the candidate will be quickly blown up.  And the same will soon be true of other uses of stock images in advertising.  But hey, the economy sucks.  It won&#8217;t hurt you to hire a real person and pay him/her if you need a photograph.  Stock photos will still be fine if you need a picture of a doughnut or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: social_maladroit</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1286236</link>
		<dc:creator>social_maladroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1286236</guid>
		<description>&lt;strike&gt;Can&#039;t touch this&lt;/strike&gt; Cain touched this. My, my, my.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cx723-n1wPA&amp;feature=youtu.be</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strike>Can&#8217;t touch this</strike> Cain touched this. My, my, my.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cx723-n1wPA&#038;feature=youtu.be" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cx723-n1wPA&#038;feature=youtu.be</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knappa</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1286235</link>
		<dc:creator>knappa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 01:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1286235</guid>
		<description>I think he&#039;s thinking of the one in back. (Who looks southern european to me but could maybe be biracial.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he&#8217;s thinking of the one in back. (Who looks southern european to me but could maybe be biracial.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainspore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1286127</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainspore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1286127</guid>
		<description>My bet is the preposition just didn&#039;t feel comfortable being associated with that guy. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bet is the preposition just didn&#8217;t feel comfortable being associated with that guy. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainspore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1286124</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainspore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1286124</guid>
		<description>Not for long! I heard he got an even better endorsement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not for long! I heard he got an even better endorsement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer Cross</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1286093</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1286093</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m unsurprised that it&#039;s been removed. Using a stock photo in a manner that implies that the model is endorsing a political view is almost certainly against the terms of the license.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m unsurprised that it&#8217;s been removed. Using a stock photo in a manner that implies that the model is endorsing a political view is almost certainly against the terms of the license.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voiceinthedistance</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1286057</link>
		<dc:creator>voiceinthedistance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1286057</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious what happened to FOR?  Was that a controversial word, or something, because removing the photo should have been a separate act from deleting a word of text.  Perhaps they are &quot;reevaluating&quot; their support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious what happened to FOR?  Was that a controversial word, or something, because removing the photo should have been a separate act from deleting a word of text.  Perhaps they are &#8220;reevaluating&#8221; their support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irksome</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1286049</link>
		<dc:creator>irksome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1286049</guid>
		<description>Hell, first they gotta get him to stop saying &quot;I&#039;d tap that.&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell, first they gotta get him to stop saying &#8220;I&#8217;d tap that.&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: social_maladroit</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1286014</link>
		<dc:creator>social_maladroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1286014</guid>
		<description>They sure did! That didn&#039;t do much for their message. (Screenshot attached.)

There&#039;s a discussion about Cain&#039;s &quot;Women for Herman Cain&quot; website &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/02/1041739/-Herman-Cain-website-launches-vicious-assault-on-husbandless-accusers?via=blog_1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;on Daily Kos&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They sure did! That didn&#8217;t do much for their message. (Screenshot attached.)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a discussion about Cain&#8217;s &#8220;Women for Herman Cain&#8221; website <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/02/1041739/-Herman-Cain-website-launches-vicious-assault-on-husbandless-accusers?via=blog_1" rel="nofollow">on Daily Kos</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sagodjur</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1286002</link>
		<dc:creator>sagodjur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1286002</guid>
		<description>The woman in front is Asian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The woman in front is Asian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sagodjur</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1285998</link>
		<dc:creator>sagodjur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1285998</guid>
		<description>It looks like they&#039;ve removed the photo from the website now. There&#039;s just a gap where the image was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like they&#8217;ve removed the photo from the website now. There&#8217;s just a gap where the image was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Horton</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1285982</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1285982</guid>
		<description>Hey they had a token black in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey they had a token black in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Petty</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1285979</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Petty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1285979</guid>
		<description>The big question is, did Cain* personally select the photo from the stock site? Licking his lips all the while?

*I had to resist spelling it as KANE, in all caps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big question is, did Cain* personally select the photo from the stock site? Licking his lips all the while?</p>
<p>*I had to resist spelling it as KANE, in all caps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtegnell</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1285976</link>
		<dc:creator>jtegnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1285976</guid>
		<description>And getting a shower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And getting a shower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TokenCapitalist</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1285947</link>
		<dc:creator>TokenCapitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1285947</guid>
		<description>Non-story. Moving along....

Nothing wrong with stock photography for this use case. It&#039;s cheaper and easier than real photos. PLUS it has the advantage of being professional. That&#039;s what stock photos are for; especially around navbars and on main pages. The real campaign photos are for twitter and the blog. 

And no, I&#039;m no Cain supporter. He&#039;s an a$$ clown. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non-story. Moving along&#8230;.</p>
<p>Nothing wrong with stock photography for this use case. It&#8217;s cheaper and easier than real photos. PLUS it has the advantage of being professional. That&#8217;s what stock photos are for; especially around navbars and on main pages. The real campaign photos are for twitter and the blog. </p>
<p>And no, I&#8217;m no Cain supporter. He&#8217;s an a$$ clown. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marionetta</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1285945</link>
		<dc:creator>Marionetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1285945</guid>
		<description>Delusional white religious women.

Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delusional white religious women.</p>
<p>Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sagodjur</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1285936</link>
		<dc:creator>sagodjur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1285936</guid>
		<description>The Lord led me to have my staff write fake testimonials in support of my candidacy and to actively deceive the voting populace because God supports my position that poor people are just lazy, exactly as Jesus said in the Bible! The loaves and the fishes were a catered lunch for hardworking business executives and the poor people just crashed the convention and stole the food instead of going out and getting a real job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lord led me to have my staff write fake testimonials in support of my candidacy and to actively deceive the voting populace because God supports my position that poor people are just lazy, exactly as Jesus said in the Bible! The loaves and the fishes were a catered lunch for hardworking business executives and the poor people just crashed the convention and stole the food instead of going out and getting a real job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1285918</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1285918</guid>
		<description>Given his reputation, I&#039;d be surprised if even his supporters would want to stand quite that close to him.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given his reputation, I&#8217;d be surprised if even his supporters would want to stand quite that close to him.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbo2112</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1285914</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbo2112</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1285914</guid>
		<description>Thumbs up for toucan stubs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thumbs up for toucan stubs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firedup</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1285911</link>
		<dc:creator>firedup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1285911</guid>
		<description>But why? I don&#039;t like Cain (well, as a satire he&#039;s kind of hilarious...) but this is standard practice. Why hold a real photo-op when you can just buy a stock photo for less money and it&#039;s just as good (probably much better.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But why? I don&#8217;t like Cain (well, as a satire he&#8217;s kind of hilarious&#8230;) but this is standard practice. Why hold a real photo-op when you can just buy a stock photo for less money and it&#8217;s just as good (probably much better.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug rogers</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1285894</link>
		<dc:creator>doug rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1285894</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re holding up the wrong finger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re holding up the wrong finger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grs</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1285857</link>
		<dc:creator>grs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1285857</guid>
		<description>I would seriously question some of those &quot;testimonials&quot;. Candidates plugging their own name is not uncommon. Those &quot;testimonials&quot; could very well all be from the same person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would seriously question some of those &#8220;testimonials&#8221;. Candidates plugging their own name is not uncommon. Those &#8220;testimonials&#8221; could very well all be from the same person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phor11</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/02/shutterstock-models-are-swell.html#comment-1285849</link>
		<dc:creator>phor11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=132684#comment-1285849</guid>
		<description>In a twist of irony, two of the women in the stock photo are now accusing Cain of sexual harassment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a twist of irony, two of the women in the stock photo are now accusing Cain of sexual harassment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
