Why hairy balls can't be combed to lie perfectly flat and what that has to do with wind currents on planet Earth. Surprisingly, this is all totally safe for work.

Via New Scientist and hectocotyli

Why hairy balls can't be combed to lie perfectly flat and what that has to do with wind currents on planet Earth. Surprisingly, this is all totally safe for work.

Via New Scientist and hectocotyli

In the late 1960s and 1970s, the mind-expanding modus operandi of the counterculture spread into the realm of science, and shit got wonderfully weird. Neurophysiologist John Lilly tried to talk with dolphins. Physicist Peter Phillips launched a parapsychology lab at Washington University. Princeton physicist Gerard O’Neill became an evangelist for space colonies. Groovy Science: Knowledge, […]

In a lead editorial in the current Nature, John Wilbanks (formerly head of Science Commons, now “Chief Commons Officer” for Sage Bionetworks) and Eric Topol (professor of genomics at the Scripps Institute) decry the mass privatization of health data by tech startups, who’re using a combination of side-deals with health authorities/insurers and technological lockups to […]

The Wall Street Journal reports that storytellers—people with a natural inclination to craft concise yet compelling narratives without rambling—were found to be hot by science. Feels good to be a writa. The results were the same across all three studies: Women rated men who were good storytellers as more attractive and desirable as potential long-term […]

Learning is a 24/7/365 proposition, and it never ends. And if you’re truly serious about leveling up your skill sets and career prospects, get a subscription to Stone River Academy’s massive course collection. This offer normally is worth over $1,400, but is now available for just $89 in the Boing Boing Store.A respected name in information technology […]

Home audio has taken some big leaps forward in recent years–not just in terms of sound quality, but also in the style department. The FRESHeBAR Leather Soundbar, now 56% off in the Boing Boing Store, is proof.The FRESHeBAR comes packing almost all the options you’d ever need for a home sound system, including Bluetooth streaming capabilities.The unit’s 90 […]

Much of what goes into creating an amazing photo happens in the digital darkroom. Here’s your chance to master all things photo editing: the Ultimate Adobe Photo Editing Bundle, now available in the Boing Boing Store for just $29.99.Across 8 courses and over 41 hours of intensive instruction, you’ll learn the fundamentals of Adobe’s suite of photo […]

Comments are closed.

This explains some of the problems I have with my cat. BTW, how big is this guaranteed area of no wind on the earth?

A single point minimum, but there may be more.

However, the guarantee is of no HORIZONTAL wind; there could still be an updraft or a downdraft. And one could argue that the movement of wind on the real world is not particularly well modeled by a continuous vector field in the first place; ultimately, the atmosphere is highly discontinuous, being made of various teeny molecules with big gaps of vacuum between them.

One could argue that, but it seems over-precise for this application. Granted that gases are discontinuous, it only matters for applications where that actually affects their behaviour. If you’re modelling diffusion, sure. If you’re modelling wind, a vector field still works pretty well.

Technically according to the theorem, the guaranteed area isn’t an area at all, it’s a point… in theory it could be infinitesimally small. (Although in practice in this example, it needn’t be.)

One of the joys of pure maths is that once you’ve proven something

exists, you mostly stop worrying about it.Yeah but… your cat is actually the donut.

boom.

Cat butts and hairy balls. Happy Monday, bOINGbOING!

That’s why I shave.

… I’m really sorry, but someone had to.

Look at that hairy banana.

Don’t comb it. Just look at it.

Technically, the theorem doesn’t apply to bananas, just spheres. But bananas are topologically equivalent, I suppose.

Yes, that’s described in the video. Balls are the same as banana-shaped objects, which are the same as rabbit-shaped objects. Unless you count the hole in the rabbit, in which case a rabbit is a donut, not a ball.

i don’t like the “it’s math. so don’t bother questioning it” assertion. but still, it’s a very nice (unnecessarily terse) explanation.

But that’s not what he said.

He said don’t go wasting your time

playing around with a hairy balltrying to prove the theorem wrong, because the ‘Hairy Ball Theorem’ is math (i.e., it’s not a prediction of the physical behavior of actual hairy balls, it’s about vector fields in algebraic topology) – and it’s a theorem that’s already been proven.So nothing you observe while playing around with an actual hairy ball is going to disprove it.

So you’d be wasting your time doing that. :-)

It’s a sad state of affairs for me when I can’t think of a joke to make about this post.

I was going to add ‘in my defence I am drunk’… but that makes my predicament even more shameful.

This may be the only time I’ve ever wished I had a hairy ball to play with.

“Most sets of values would give rise to universes that, although-” Shut the fuck up Stephen Hawkins and come my hairy balls!

Hairy balls need combing?

Other fun consequences of Brouwer’s Fixed Point Theorem and its related theorems:

Somewhere on the equator there are two antipodal points with exactly the same temperature. (Or barometric pressure, if you’d rather stick with air movement.)

Take two identical pieces of paper. Crumple one up and put it on the other. There is at least one point on the crumpled piece that is directly over the corresponding point on the flat one.

(You’d have to use transparent film with a numbered grid, or something, to see this for yourself.)

(Alternatively, take a map that includes your current location and drop it on the floor. At least one point on the map is directly over the point it represents.)

Edit edit: Nevermind, I was just being opinionated.

I really think these examples “naturally” illustrate other theorems.

Edit: (so as not to be obscure) i.e. I feel the first follows most naturally from Borsuk-Ulam or IMVT depending how you state it, and the second from Banach CMT. If you consider the map and use Brouwer, it’s really not as nice a result (no unique fixed point, no construction, …).

Everything you say is true – That’s why I said “and related theorems”.

The first is, obviously, Borsuk-Ulam. The second you can get at quite a few ways, but I agree that your approach is much more natural.

But seeing as we’re on BB not math.stackexchange, I felt like throwing in a few extra examples while we’re on this topic. They’re related. Fixed point theorems are just cool in general.

Full appreciation of the coolness of fixed point theorems may require several years study of analysis and topology.

And just look at that hairy banana. Just look at it.

Just make sure your v-field isn’t Lipschitz! Cause that would be gross.

Join us tomorrow when we discuss the Dat Ass Theorum, which deals with spherical curvatures and friction coefficients.

It would be even funnier if Pete Schweddy had proven this theorem…

It certainly took a while for this to start rolling downhill, but finally, here we go. Yay!

Male Pattern Baldness for the win!

I remember my high school geometry teacher mentioning this back in the dark ages. Although, I always remember him calling it the “hairy ape” theorem. (Maybe he just thought hairy balls were a little to giggle-provoking for his 10th grade audience.

Original source, better quality, no ads.