<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The academic linguistics of&#160;LOLspeak</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 01:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VeronicaGrow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1293409</link>
		<dc:creator>VeronicaGrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 11:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1293409</guid>
		<description>oh how silly, what cat speaks LOL? Don&#039;t you know that cats only speak french!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh how silly, what cat speaks LOL? Don&#8217;t you know that cats only speak french!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ignatz99</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1293348</link>
		<dc:creator>ignatz99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1293348</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really a cool talk, but one that on its face seems a bit lite on citation and research. For example, after only about 5 minutes in I noted:

&#039;l33t&#039; (cited ~4min in): It probably should have been mentioned this term specifically (and really the netspeak practice of substituting numeric for alpha characters and orthographic substitutions in general) originated squarely within the hacker/phreaker/pirate/BBS culture and is IMO still more indexical of that, than of the gaming or &#039;chat&#039; space. As an instance of the sort of cultural (word)play the author is interested in, the argot of hacker/phreaker world is the granddaddy of LOLspeak, not just a parallel instance of the same sort of thing, so it&#039;d be cool if she historicized her examples a tad better..

&#039;Huizinger&#039; (~6min in): I think she refers to Johann Huizinga &amp; his classic work Homo Ludens. Probably just a typo, but..  

still in the end these are minor considerations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really a cool talk, but one that on its face seems a bit lite on citation and research. For example, after only about 5 minutes in I noted:</p>
<p>&#8216;l33t&#8217; (cited ~4min in): It probably should have been mentioned this term specifically (and really the netspeak practice of substituting numeric for alpha characters and orthographic substitutions in general) originated squarely within the hacker/phreaker/pirate/BBS culture and is IMO still more indexical of that, than of the gaming or &#8216;chat&#8217; space. As an instance of the sort of cultural (word)play the author is interested in, the argot of hacker/phreaker world is the granddaddy of LOLspeak, not just a parallel instance of the same sort of thing, so it&#8217;d be cool if she historicized her examples a tad better..</p>
<p>&#8216;Huizinger&#8217; (~6min in): I think she refers to Johann Huizinga &amp; his classic work Homo Ludens. Probably just a typo, but..  </p>
<p>still in the end these are minor considerations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That_Anonymous_Coward</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1292646</link>
		<dc:creator>That_Anonymous_Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 09:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1292646</guid>
		<description>As a representative of Basement Cat LLC, we demand equal coverage.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a representative of Basement Cat LLC, we demand equal coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1292641</link>
		<dc:creator>akb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 09:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1292641</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re certainly following conventions that it would be interesting to hear analysed in the same way.  &quot;If you watch the video you get to hear me put on my best academic lecturer voice!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re certainly following conventions that it would be interesting to hear analysed in the same way.  &#8220;If you watch the video you get to hear me put on my best academic lecturer voice!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimmo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1292459</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 02:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1292459</guid>
		<description>Maybe you should watch some of the vid (I started to find it a bit dull with academic jargon and detail about 2/3 in).

It&#039;s actually a surprisingly interesting use of language; the fact that you can do it wrong means it&#039;s not just an execise in ananity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should watch some of the vid (I started to find it a bit dull with academic jargon and detail about 2/3 in).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s actually a surprisingly interesting use of language; the fact that you can do it wrong means it&#8217;s not just an execise in ananity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hornby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1292422</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hornby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 01:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1292422</guid>
		<description>I used to want to kill myself when I glanced at the comments on icanhascheeseburger.

I kind of find the whole thing a bit… pathetic?

I mean it&#039;s funny in the pictures, for sure; but taking it beyond that is a bit (to quote Alan Partridge) &#039;sa-a-aaaa-ad&#039;.

I think a psychological or sociological study is in order, more than linguistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to want to kill myself when I glanced at the comments on icanhascheeseburger.</p>
<p>I kind of find the whole thing a bit… pathetic?</p>
<p>I mean it&#8217;s funny in the pictures, for sure; but taking it beyond that is a bit (to quote Alan Partridge) &#8216;sa-a-aaaa-ad&#8217;.</p>
<p>I think a psychological or sociological study is in order, more than linguistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gemma</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1292385</link>
		<dc:creator>Gemma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1292385</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s spelt &quot;Oh Hai&quot; in the LOLcat Bible (as per Amazon preview of first pages), which is what the video is mostly quoting. I suggest you edit the wiki.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s spelt &#8220;Oh Hai&#8221; in the LOLcat Bible (as per Amazon preview of first pages), which is what the video is mostly quoting. I suggest you edit the wiki.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Baruch</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1292185</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Baruch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1292185</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re conflating cat-identity with Internet-savvy-identity. As a meme-savvy Internet user, YOU know where all the phrases come from. But as a cat, Ceiling Cat is God, and FURST!!!1 is used when you are overexcited. Kthxbai.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re conflating cat-identity with Internet-savvy-identity. As a meme-savvy Internet user, YOU know where all the phrases come from. But as a cat, Ceiling Cat is God, and FURST!!!1 is used when you are overexcited. Kthxbai.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregS</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1292051</link>
		<dc:creator>GregS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1292051</guid>
		<description>I, 4 WAN, WELCOM R NEW LOLCAT-SPEAKIN OVERLORDZ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, 4 WAN, WELCOM R NEW LOLCAT-SPEAKIN OVERLORDZ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petzl</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1292020</link>
		<dc:creator>Petzl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1292020</guid>
		<description>What I think is funny is, these ppl are studying lolcats at teh graduate level and they&#039;re missing and/or getting stuff wrong.  eg, Ceiling Cat is first and foremost an explicit reference to that meme of the photo of a cat looking down through a ceiling trapdoor; FURST!!!1 isn&#039;t the &quot;overexcitability&quot; of the lolcat, but that of a videogame 1337-speaker glommed into lolspeak. I could go on, but my cheezburger is getting cold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I think is funny is, these ppl are studying lolcats at teh graduate level and they&#8217;re missing and/or getting stuff wrong.  eg, Ceiling Cat is first and foremost an explicit reference to that meme of the photo of a cat looking down through a ceiling trapdoor; FURST!!!1 isn&#8217;t the &#8220;overexcitability&#8221; of the lolcat, but that of a videogame 1337-speaker glommed into lolspeak. I could go on, but my cheezburger is getting cold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petzl</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1292007</link>
		<dc:creator>Petzl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1292007</guid>
		<description> Doctorate: WANT.  Aktually study hard subject is hard: DO NOT WANT. Solushun: LcD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Doctorate: WANT.  Aktually study hard subject is hard: DO NOT WANT. Solushun: LcD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EH</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1292000</link>
		<dc:creator>EH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1292000</guid>
		<description>I think they misspelled &quot;applied.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they misspelled &#8220;applied.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EH</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1291998</link>
		<dc:creator>EH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1291998</guid>
		<description>They are noise-reduction artifacts, probably introduced to get rid of the hum, by someone&#039;s child or friend who offered to encode the video for free (note also compression artifacts in the video itself).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are noise-reduction artifacts, probably introduced to get rid of the hum, by someone&#8217;s child or friend who offered to encode the video for free (note also compression artifacts in the video itself).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kbmcg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1291971</link>
		<dc:creator>kbmcg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1291971</guid>
		<description>As a linguistic anthropologist, I&#039;m curious why you called this &quot;academic linguistics.&quot;  Would you call research by a physicist &quot;academic physics&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a linguistic anthropologist, I&#8217;m curious why you called this &#8220;academic linguistics.&#8221;  Would you call research by a physicist &#8220;academic physics&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Byrne</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1291924</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Byrne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1291924</guid>
		<description>Not sure if speakers are trolling their convention...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if speakers are trolling their convention&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1291908</link>
		<dc:creator>boo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1291908</guid>
		<description>Kitty has become bored. Haz a mouse now?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kitty has become bored. Haz a mouse now?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhosPhorious</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1291891</link>
		<dc:creator>PhosPhorious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1291891</guid>
		<description>&quot;From everything we can gather, this is how cats speak at all times, and not just in contact with humans.&quot;

That made me spit out my tea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;From everything we can gather, this is how cats speak at all times, and not just in contact with humans.&#8221;</p>
<p>That made me spit out my tea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB44</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1291862</link>
		<dc:creator>MB44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1291862</guid>
		<description>We can haz overanaliizashun?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can haz overanaliizashun?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kartwaffles</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1291848</link>
		<dc:creator>kartwaffles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1291848</guid>
		<description>One nit from the vimeo thumbnail: it&#039;s &quot;O HAI&quot;, not &quot;Oh Hai&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One nit from the vimeo thumbnail: it&#8217;s &#8220;O HAI&#8221;, not &#8220;Oh Hai&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donncha-m</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html#comment-1291843</link>
		<dc:creator>donncha-m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=133633#comment-1291843</guid>
		<description>That warbly background sound is due to a hiss/hum-removal program the audio must&#039;ve been passed through.

Yes, that digital whispering does sound worse than the original hum surely did.

No, I don&#039;t understand it either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That warbly background sound is due to a hiss/hum-removal program the audio must&#8217;ve been passed through.</p>
<p>Yes, that digital whispering does sound worse than the original hum surely did.</p>
<p>No, I don&#8217;t understand it either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
