<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Map shows when solar will be cheaper than grid electricity in North American&#160;areas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2011/12/28/map-shows-when-solar-will-be-c.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/28/map-shows-when-solar-will-be-c.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. Kiernan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/28/map-shows-when-solar-will-be-c.html#comment-1308068</link>
		<dc:creator>W. Kiernan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136222#comment-1308068</guid>
		<description>In what way?  If solar panels were to achieve 100.0% efficiency and thus they could not get more efficient even in theory, the price of manufacturing them can still go down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what way?  If solar panels were to achieve 100.0% efficiency and thus they could not get more efficient even in theory, the price of manufacturing them can still go down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Maldia</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/28/map-shows-when-solar-will-be-c.html#comment-1306253</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Maldia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136222#comment-1306253</guid>
		<description>&quot;The cost of solar decreases by 7% per year.&quot;. 

Is this supported by at least historical data?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The cost of solar decreases by 7% per year.&#8221;. </p>
<p>Is this supported by at least historical data?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JorgeBurgos</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/28/map-shows-when-solar-will-be-c.html#comment-1306232</link>
		<dc:creator>JorgeBurgos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136222#comment-1306232</guid>
		<description>No, its highly likely that we have already passed the point where we can save ourselves from the proverbial dangerous 2 degrees of warming, unless we invent something to start sucking carbon out of the atmosphere in great quantities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, its highly likely that we have already passed the point where we can save ourselves from the proverbial dangerous 2 degrees of warming, unless we invent something to start sucking carbon out of the atmosphere in great quantities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhertzli</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/28/map-shows-when-solar-will-be-c.html#comment-1306171</link>
		<dc:creator>jhertzli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 06:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136222#comment-1306171</guid>
		<description>Does this mean we don&#039;t have to worry about global warming now? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean we don&#8217;t have to worry about global warming now? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjcamp</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/28/map-shows-when-solar-will-be-c.html#comment-1306137</link>
		<dc:creator>pjcamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136222#comment-1306137</guid>
		<description>2023? Dohhhh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2023? Dohhhh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cris Noble</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/28/map-shows-when-solar-will-be-c.html#comment-1305814</link>
		<dc:creator>Cris Noble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136222#comment-1305814</guid>
		<description>The map DOES take into account the differences in &#039;sunniness&#039; for different localities. Take a look at the following article from the same website to get an idea of how they figure grid parity: 
http://energyselfreliantstates.org/content/solar-grid-parity-101

As a side note it is very possible to run a pure solar house in Seattle, my grandfather has done it for at least the last 15 years. Granted it gets less sun so needs more panels / costs more to implement than San Diego, but that is why Seattle doesn&#039;t achieve parity until DEAD LAST at 2027.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The map DOES take into account the differences in &#8216;sunniness&#8217; for different localities. Take a look at the following article from the same website to get an idea of how they figure grid parity: <br />
<a href="http://energyselfreliantstates.org/content/solar-grid-parity-101" rel="nofollow">http://energyselfreliantstates.org/content/solar-grid-parity-101</a></p>
<p>As a side note it is very possible to run a pure solar house in Seattle, my grandfather has done it for at least the last 15 years. Granted it gets less sun so needs more panels / costs more to implement than San Diego, but that is why Seattle doesn&#8217;t achieve parity until DEAD LAST at 2027.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/28/map-shows-when-solar-will-be-c.html#comment-1305811</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136222#comment-1305811</guid>
		<description>According to the chart, it&#039;s not the subsidized price.  Cheaper solar is being driven by a lot of factors including:

• &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/local/environment/la-me-gs-breakthrough-double-solar-energy-output-20111216,0,3897047.story&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Increasing efficiency&lt;/a&gt; of solar cells
(ratio of electrical energy produced to sunshine energy)

• Dramatic manufacturing technology improvements

• Economies of scale.
(The PV solar industry has been growing globally about 25% per year even during the recession)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the chart, it&#8217;s not the subsidized price.  Cheaper solar is being driven by a lot of factors including:</p>
<p>• <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/environment/la-me-gs-breakthrough-double-solar-energy-output-20111216,0,3897047.story" rel="nofollow">Increasing efficiency</a> of solar cells<br />
(ratio of electrical energy produced to sunshine energy)</p>
<p>• Dramatic manufacturing technology improvements</p>
<p>• Economies of scale.<br />
(The PV solar industry has been growing globally about 25% per year even during the recession)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E T</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/28/map-shows-when-solar-will-be-c.html#comment-1305739</link>
		<dc:creator>E T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136222#comment-1305739</guid>
		<description>Continental USA ≠ North America</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continental USA ≠ North America</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manooshi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/28/map-shows-when-solar-will-be-c.html#comment-1305677</link>
		<dc:creator>manooshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136222#comment-1305677</guid>
		<description>I guess I still don&#039;t understand why San Diego will be the first solar grid parity city  in 2013.  Is it because San Diego&#039;s demographics tend to be mostly the wealthy class [conservative/Republican/WASP&#039;s] who can afford to get off of the grid sooner than other less wealthy locales?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I still don&#8217;t understand why San Diego will be the first solar grid parity city  in 2013.  Is it because San Diego&#8217;s demographics tend to be mostly the wealthy class [conservative/Republican/WASP's] who can afford to get off of the grid sooner than other less wealthy locales?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaduncan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/28/map-shows-when-solar-will-be-c.html#comment-1305649</link>
		<dc:creator>jaduncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136222#comment-1305649</guid>
		<description>Let me preface this by saying that I like solar very much, and once solar panel production is entirely solar powered it comes close to free energy. Assuming that solar costs go down 7% a year assumes no physical limits on electron recovery, however, and that seems like something that at the very least demands reasoning to support this assumption over the next 5-10 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me preface this by saying that I like solar very much, and once solar panel production is entirely solar powered it comes close to free energy. Assuming that solar costs go down 7% a year assumes no physical limits on electron recovery, however, and that seems like something that at the very least demands reasoning to support this assumption over the next 5-10 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Pootel</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/28/map-shows-when-solar-will-be-c.html#comment-1305600</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Pootel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136222#comment-1305600</guid>
		<description>Ah Oregon - so green (thanks to the rain).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah Oregon &#8211; so green (thanks to the rain).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sachmo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/28/map-shows-when-solar-will-be-c.html#comment-1305590</link>
		<dc:creator>Sachmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 17:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136222#comment-1305590</guid>
		<description>A similar article comparing the cost of renewable vs. non-renewable energy in the UK was posted recently in the Guardian: 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/dec/28/uk-switch-low-carbon-energy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A similar article comparing the cost of renewable vs. non-renewable energy in the UK was posted recently in the Guardian: <br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/dec/28/uk-switch-low-carbon-energy" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/dec/28/uk-switch-low-carbon-energy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: subhan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/28/map-shows-when-solar-will-be-c.html#comment-1305585</link>
		<dc:creator>subhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136222#comment-1305585</guid>
		<description>While interesting in concept, this map is largely useless, as it appears to completely fail to take into account variation in efficiency due to climate factors as well as the effect of latitude.  I can guarantee you that you will get much less electricity out of your solar panels here in Portland than you will in San Diego, which is way further south &amp; gets a lot more sunshine!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While interesting in concept, this map is largely useless, as it appears to completely fail to take into account variation in efficiency due to climate factors as well as the effect of latitude.  I can guarantee you that you will get much less electricity out of your solar panels here in Portland than you will in San Diego, which is way further south &amp; gets a lot more sunshine!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matisse</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/28/map-shows-when-solar-will-be-c.html#comment-1305576</link>
		<dc:creator>matisse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136222#comment-1305576</guid>
		<description>$4/watt installed for unsubsidized solar seems low. That would mean a 2.5Kw system installed (unsubsidized) for $10,000 and I think the real numbers right now are roughly twice that, at least in major cities (where labor is more expensive.) The *subsidized* cost per installed watt is probably around $4/watt (that is, after tax incentives, etc.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$4/watt installed for unsubsidized solar seems low. That would mean a 2.5Kw system installed (unsubsidized) for $10,000 and I think the real numbers right now are roughly twice that, at least in major cities (where labor is more expensive.) The *subsidized* cost per installed watt is probably around $4/watt (that is, after tax incentives, etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Boone</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/28/map-shows-when-solar-will-be-c.html#comment-1305577</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Boone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136222#comment-1305577</guid>
		<description>Does the map account for climate variance?  I suspect there would likely be some significant differences, bang-for-the-buck-wise, between solar panels installed in, say, Phoenix and those installed in Seattle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the map account for climate variance?  I suspect there would likely be some significant differences, bang-for-the-buck-wise, between solar panels installed in, say, Phoenix and those installed in Seattle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techblog</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/28/map-shows-when-solar-will-be-c.html#comment-1305564</link>
		<dc:creator>techblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136222#comment-1305564</guid>
		<description>I would like to live in San Diego ! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to live in San Diego ! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
