<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Raiders of the Lost Ark shot-for-shot tracing of the adventure movies it borrowed&#160;from</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark Sock</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1313119</link>
		<dc:creator>Dark Sock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 05:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1313119</guid>
		<description>I peed in a horse once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I peed in a horse once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Palomino</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308803</link>
		<dc:creator>Palomino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 05:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308803</guid>
		<description>Yakima Canutt.

I also read a great article years ago that even Yakima&#039;s stunt was first performed by a woman in cereal commercial ads during the silent film era. For the life of me, I can&#039;t remember where I read it nor can I find it, but I swear on George Lucas&#039;s life, I read it and saw the images too, She was dressed just like Indiana Jones, but the stunt was under a wagon/stage coach.  I&#039;m not going to stop until I find her name. 

The clip doesn&#039;t include Donald Duck comics either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yakima Canutt.</p>
<p>I also read a great article years ago that even Yakima&#8217;s stunt was first performed by a woman in cereal commercial ads during the silent film era. For the life of me, I can&#8217;t remember where I read it nor can I find it, but I swear on George Lucas&#8217;s life, I read it and saw the images too, She was dressed just like Indiana Jones, but the stunt was under a wagon/stage coach.  I&#8217;m not going to stop until I find her name. </p>
<p>The clip doesn&#8217;t include Donald Duck comics either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Baillie</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308772</link>
		<dc:creator>George Baillie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 04:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308772</guid>
		<description>Lobachevsky!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lobachevsky!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itsumishi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308691</link>
		<dc:creator>Itsumishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 02:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308691</guid>
		<description>Awesome, do you have a link to the re-done trailer? Sounds interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, do you have a link to the re-done trailer? Sounds interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KanedaJones</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308617</link>
		<dc:creator>KanedaJones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308617</guid>
		<description>welllllll...  I dunno.  Hunger Games is more Mad Max and Battle Royale was always alittle more North Korea lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>welllllll&#8230;  I dunno.  Hunger Games is more Mad Max and Battle Royale was always alittle more North Korea lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308567</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308567</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;this is a strange thing to be outraged about, given that the movie was intentionally made as an homage to early adventure movies and was marketed as such. &lt;/blockquote&gt;The outrage is that the people who did this are buying up the government so that they can make laws that make it impossible for other people to do this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>this is a strange thing to be outraged about, given that the movie was intentionally made as an homage to early adventure movies and was marketed as such. </p></blockquote>
<p>The outrage is that the people who did this are buying up the government so that they can make laws that make it impossible for other people to do this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Kukich</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308564</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Kukich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308564</guid>
		<description>I fail to see how this is a condemnation of Spielberg (not that I have any great affinity for him).

If I were to make,say, a western movie today, I would find it nearly impossible to avoid mimicking the numerous classic films that defined the genre.  Also, a lot of the shots seem to be fairly standard practices in regards to cinematography, composition, etc.

The Indiana Jones series was, in my opinion, a beautiful homage to the many adventure films that preceded it.  I had always assumed it was deliberate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fail to see how this is a condemnation of Spielberg (not that I have any great affinity for him).</p>
<p>If I were to make,say, a western movie today, I would find it nearly impossible to avoid mimicking the numerous classic films that defined the genre.  Also, a lot of the shots seem to be fairly standard practices in regards to cinematography, composition, etc.</p>
<p>The Indiana Jones series was, in my opinion, a beautiful homage to the many adventure films that preceded it.  I had always assumed it was deliberate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dahlia</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308557</link>
		<dc:creator>dahlia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308557</guid>
		<description>this is a strange thing to be outraged about, given that the movie was intentionally made as an homage to early adventure movies and was marketed as such.  i&#039;m pretty sure if you confronted spielberg with this smoking ah-ha, his response would be akin to &quot;well, duh.&quot;  

this totally makes me want to see the movie again, it&#039;s been a while.  man, harrison ford was hot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a strange thing to be outraged about, given that the movie was intentionally made as an homage to early adventure movies and was marketed as such.  i&#8217;m pretty sure if you confronted spielberg with this smoking ah-ha, his response would be akin to &#8220;well, duh.&#8221;  </p>
<p>this totally makes me want to see the movie again, it&#8217;s been a while.  man, harrison ford was hot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Lamas</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308401</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Lamas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308401</guid>
		<description>See above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: originofcool</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308398</link>
		<dc:creator>originofcool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308398</guid>
		<description>Great video and bang on. StooTV should do a similar video highlighting Dennis Leary&#039;s &quot;borrowing&quot; of Bill Hicks&#039; comedy routines. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great video and bang on. StooTV should do a similar video highlighting Dennis Leary&#8217;s &#8220;borrowing&#8221; of Bill Hicks&#8217; comedy routines. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadreck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308367</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadreck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308367</guid>
		<description>I notice that, typically, nothing in this thread mentions the common thread through a lot of these movies: Lawrence Kasdan.  The writer, you know the guy who makes up the whole story, always seems to get less credit than the focus-puller on the cameras.  I remember that, even back when I was watching Saturday morning cartoons with DC superheros in them, that you could pretty much tell what was going to suck and what was not going to suck by checking if a writer like Kasdan wrote it.  Same thing with &quot;Pinky and the Brain&quot; episodes where I think that the majority of the great episodes were penned by Peter Hastings.

The same arguments play out in writing too though.  After all, when you right down to it, there are only three basic plots: a man leaves town, a man comes to town, and a swarm of nanobots turns the citizens into a horde of rampaging cyborgs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notice that, typically, nothing in this thread mentions the common thread through a lot of these movies: Lawrence Kasdan.  The writer, you know the guy who makes up the whole story, always seems to get less credit than the focus-puller on the cameras.  I remember that, even back when I was watching Saturday morning cartoons with DC superheros in them, that you could pretty much tell what was going to suck and what was not going to suck by checking if a writer like Kasdan wrote it.  Same thing with &#8220;Pinky and the Brain&#8221; episodes where I think that the majority of the great episodes were penned by Peter Hastings.</p>
<p>The same arguments play out in writing too though.  After all, when you right down to it, there are only three basic plots: a man leaves town, a man comes to town, and a swarm of nanobots turns the citizens into a horde of rampaging cyborgs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Orr</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308347</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Orr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308347</guid>
		<description>So, to summarize:

For a minute and a half we have people walking.  People have walked before, and people have walked on film before.  Then for about twenty seconds, we have explorers looking at ancient rock markers.  Clearly, this has never happened before nor has it ever been featured in any other kind of media.  Then we&#039;re back to people walking for about twenty more seconds before they stop, because they see something off-camera!

And at this point, I stopped the video(s?) because it was pretty clearly just &quot;Look! these classic functional scene-establishing shots that are tropes in their own right have been used before, albiet with slightly different camera angles and subject matter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, to summarize:</p>
<p>For a minute and a half we have people walking.  People have walked before, and people have walked on film before.  Then for about twenty seconds, we have explorers looking at ancient rock markers.  Clearly, this has never happened before nor has it ever been featured in any other kind of media.  Then we&#8217;re back to people walking for about twenty more seconds before they stop, because they see something off-camera!</p>
<p>And at this point, I stopped the video(s?) because it was pretty clearly just &#8220;Look! these classic functional scene-establishing shots that are tropes in their own right have been used before, albiet with slightly different camera angles and subject matter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citation</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308343</link>
		<dc:creator>Citation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308343</guid>
		<description>Art needs better provenance we should ask artists to cite sources, especially in publicly funded art. If sources were cited we could do quantitative studies and show how important references and copying are in art. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art needs better provenance we should ask artists to cite sources, especially in publicly funded art. If sources were cited we could do quantitative studies and show how important references and copying are in art. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BarBarSeven</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308338</link>
		<dc:creator>BarBarSeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308338</guid>
		<description>No, only you are. I had to look up the comment tree to see you bemoaning &lt;i&gt;Star Wars&lt;/i&gt; in a thread about &lt;i&gt;Raiders of the Lost Ark&lt;/i&gt; to see you are one of these spastic  fanboys who believes nothing is original, believes anything that is derived from something else is a rip-off and—on topic—believes in the case of this video that it’s being posted as “j&#039;accuse!!!” evidence of grand theft, when it’s really just a fannish bit of cinema archeology that connects the sources of an homage to the homage itself.

Which is all to say, grow up and get over it. The main thing I compared is your mentality to what it deserves to be compared to: Nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, only you are. I had to look up the comment tree to see you bemoaning <i>Star Wars</i> in a thread about <i>Raiders of the Lost Ark</i> to see you are one of these spastic  fanboys who believes nothing is original, believes anything that is derived from something else is a rip-off and—on topic—believes in the case of this video that it’s being posted as “j&#8217;accuse!!!” evidence of grand theft, when it’s really just a fannish bit of cinema archeology that connects the sources of an homage to the homage itself.</p>
<p>Which is all to say, grow up and get over it. The main thing I compared is your mentality to what it deserves to be compared to: Nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wizardru</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308335</link>
		<dc:creator>wizardru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308335</guid>
		<description>In a movie that was an intentional homage to previous movies, it&#039;s exactly the same thing.  People seem to be acting like Spielberg and Lucas pretended this film was cut from whole cloth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a movie that was an intentional homage to previous movies, it&#8217;s exactly the same thing.  People seem to be acting like Spielberg and Lucas pretended this film was cut from whole cloth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrett Eaton</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308329</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett Eaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308329</guid>
		<description>Was with you till you said &quot;impressive&quot; and &quot;Michael Bay&quot; in the same sentence..  Great points otherwise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was with you till you said &#8220;impressive&#8221; and &#8220;Michael Bay&#8221; in the same sentence..  Great points otherwise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madeline Ashby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308319</link>
		<dc:creator>Madeline Ashby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308319</guid>
		<description>This piece of re-mix isn&#039;t about whether Lucas, Spielberg, Kasdan, and company are talentless hacks. It&#039;s about recognizing that beloved media properties actually stem from a long lineage of earlier efforts. This is one of the ways that art is like science: repeated experimentation, even with minor differentiation, yields results that can be reproduced reliably. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This piece of re-mix isn&#8217;t about whether Lucas, Spielberg, Kasdan, and company are talentless hacks. It&#8217;s about recognizing that beloved media properties actually stem from a long lineage of earlier efforts. This is one of the ways that art is like science: repeated experimentation, even with minor differentiation, yields results that can be reproduced reliably. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madeline Ashby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308312</link>
		<dc:creator>Madeline Ashby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308312</guid>
		<description>This. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felton / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308290</link>
		<dc:creator>Felton / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308290</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I took the &quot;at least if we let it&quot; comment as meaning that you can create something great when laws don&#039;t prevent you from drawing on old ideas. Not at all negative in my opinion.&lt;/i&gt;

Thank you.  I think a lot of commenters are inferring something Cory isn&#039;t implying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I took the &#8220;at least if we let it&#8221; comment as meaning that you can create something great when laws don&#8217;t prevent you from drawing on old ideas. Not at all negative in my opinion.</i></p>
<p>Thank you.  I think a lot of commenters are inferring something Cory isn&#8217;t implying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guanto</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308282</link>
		<dc:creator>guanto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308282</guid>
		<description>I took the &quot;at least if we let it&quot; comment as meaning that you can create something great when laws don&#039;t prevent you from drawing on old ideas. Not at all negative in my opinion.

But I agree that many equivalences here are due to clever editing and probably coincidental. I mean, seriously, scenes of people walking on a trail will always look similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took the &#8220;at least if we let it&#8221; comment as meaning that you can create something great when laws don&#8217;t prevent you from drawing on old ideas. Not at all negative in my opinion.</p>
<p>But I agree that many equivalences here are due to clever editing and probably coincidental. I mean, seriously, scenes of people walking on a trail will always look similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hornby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308277</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hornby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308277</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s always been a controversial opinion of mine; but I&#039;ve never liked Spielberg.  I like some of his films, but I don&#039;t think he really brings much to them.  I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve watched one one of his films and thought, &#039;wow, you could really see Spielberg&#039;s influence in that&#039;.

He&#039;s just a name on a poster; one that attracts good cinematographers, actors, producers etc., etc.  I&#039;m confident that if you could (in an impossibly isolated way) remove him from the equation and replace him with someone just as generic his films would be exactly the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always been a controversial opinion of mine; but I&#8217;ve never liked Spielberg.  I like some of his films, but I don&#8217;t think he really brings much to them.  I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve watched one one of his films and thought, &#8216;wow, you could really see Spielberg&#8217;s influence in that&#8217;.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s just a name on a poster; one that attracts good cinematographers, actors, producers etc., etc.  I&#8217;m confident that if you could (in an impossibly isolated way) remove him from the equation and replace him with someone just as generic his films would be exactly the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobcorrigan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308274</link>
		<dc:creator>bobcorrigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308274</guid>
		<description>All this proves is that Spielberg, Lucas, and the directors of all those previous films were students of Wally Wood&#039;s 22 Panels http://joeljohnson.com/archives/2006/08/wally_woods_22.html .  And that the old adage of &quot;good directors make good movies; great directors steal great movies&quot; applies.

I could keep going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this proves is that Spielberg, Lucas, and the directors of all those previous films were students of Wally Wood&#8217;s 22 Panels <a href="http://joeljohnson.com/archives/2006/08/wally_woods_22.html" rel="nofollow">http://joeljohnson.com/archives/2006/08/wally_woods_22.html</a> .  And that the old adage of &#8220;good directors make good movies; great directors steal great movies&#8221; applies.</p>
<p>I could keep going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felton / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308272</link>
		<dc:creator>Felton / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308272</guid>
		<description>Storymark, I&#039;ve deleted two of your comments so far.  Insulting other commenters is against our &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2009/10/01/commenting.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Comment Policy&lt;/a&gt;.  Please stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Storymark, I&#8217;ve deleted two of your comments so far.  Insulting other commenters is against our <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/10/01/commenting.html" rel="nofollow">Comment Policy</a>.  Please stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Storymark</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308268</link>
		<dc:creator>Storymark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308268</guid>
		<description>Yeah, with enough time, you could do this for virtually any movie.  It&#039;s neat, but its not like it proves a damned thing about anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, with enough time, you could do this for virtually any movie.  It&#8217;s neat, but its not like it proves a damned thing about anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emo Pinata</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308261</link>
		<dc:creator>Emo Pinata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308261</guid>
		<description>Not exactly Hunger Games and Battle Royale...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not exactly Hunger Games and Battle Royale&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waetherman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308260</link>
		<dc:creator>waetherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308260</guid>
		<description>Well said. I would add that it also has a legal name; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sc%C3%A8nes_%C3%A0_faire&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;scenes a faire&lt;/a&gt;. That legal principle protects this language of films from spurious copyright claims that might try to silence it. It&#039;s an important concept in copyright law that I think everyone should understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. I would add that it also has a legal name; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sc%C3%A8nes_%C3%A0_faire" rel="nofollow">scenes a faire</a>. That legal principle protects this language of films from spurious copyright claims that might try to silence it. It&#8217;s an important concept in copyright law that I think everyone should understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathew</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308255</link>
		<dc:creator>mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308255</guid>
		<description>Lucas &#039;lost his hunger&#039; because THX-1138 was such a disaster that it almost destroyed American Zoetrope. He felt really guilty about the fact that his friends almost ended up unemployed and Coppola had to direct big studio projects to bail out the company, so he decided he would make feel-good Saturday morning popcorn movies in future. Hence, American Graffiti, Star Wars, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucas &#8216;lost his hunger&#8217; because THX-1138 was such a disaster that it almost destroyed American Zoetrope. He felt really guilty about the fact that his friends almost ended up unemployed and Coppola had to direct big studio projects to bail out the company, so he decided he would make feel-good Saturday morning popcorn movies in future. Hence, American Graffiti, Star Wars, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taras</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308256</link>
		<dc:creator>taras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308256</guid>
		<description>Absolutely disgusted that Spielberg and Lucas based their film on 0.5 second clips of older films, spliced together and faded in and out. I want my money back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely disgusted that Spielberg and Lucas based their film on 0.5 second clips of older films, spliced together and faded in and out. I want my money back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeGuyNamedMark</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308254</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeGuyNamedMark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308254</guid>
		<description>Spielberg went far using the idea of the obsessed hero and lots of slow close-ups of wide eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spielberg went far using the idea of the obsessed hero and lots of slow close-ups of wide eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeGuyNamedMark</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/01/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-shot-f.html#comment-1308252</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeGuyNamedMark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136673#comment-1308252</guid>
		<description>And the Uncle Scrooge stories have their roots in the search for El Dorado and the stories of Arthur Conan Doyle, etc.  There is no such thing as 100% original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the Uncle Scrooge stories have their roots in the search for El Dorado and the stories of Arthur Conan Doyle, etc.  There is no such thing as 100% original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
