<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roku Streaming Stick plugs directly into HDMI&#160;port</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ito Kagehisa</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html#comment-1312983</link>
		<dc:creator>Ito Kagehisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137194#comment-1312983</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the reality is that Hulu doesn&#039;t support Apple TV.  That&#039;s certainly the case with Google TV - Hulu picks up the flash player ID and blocks it on purpose.  Apple (and Google) don&#039;t want to play the Hulu Plus game so Hulu is locking them out. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the reality is that Hulu doesn&#8217;t support Apple TV.  That&#8217;s certainly the case with Google TV &#8211; Hulu picks up the flash player ID and blocks it on purpose.  Apple (and Google) don&#8217;t want to play the Hulu Plus game so Hulu is locking them out. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Goodwin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html#comment-1311040</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Goodwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137194#comment-1311040</guid>
		<description>But will it Blend?

I bet it will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But will it Blend?</p>
<p>I bet it will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Renault</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html#comment-1310999</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Renault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137194#comment-1310999</guid>
		<description>Er, so it&#039;s a Roku box, no?  A small Roku box, but just a Roku box.

Like, unless you&#039;re carrying the thing around all the time or you live in a capsule hotel, who cares?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, so it&#8217;s a Roku box, no?  A small Roku box, but just a Roku box.</p>
<p>Like, unless you&#8217;re carrying the thing around all the time or you live in a capsule hotel, who cares?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html#comment-1310966</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137194#comment-1310966</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think you are. Reading it right i mean. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you are. Reading it right i mean. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolfwitch</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html#comment-1310853</link>
		<dc:creator>wolfwitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 03:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137194#comment-1310853</guid>
		<description>So wait- if I&#039;m reading this right- it needs to stream data from my mobile phone? I thought this would be great for traveling on business- but a cheap HDMI adapter and a handful of free apps on my phone work just as well. I switched to AppleTV from Roku months ago- so I can wirelessly stream at home too. Plus- if you have rear-facing HDMI ports on a wall-mounted HDTV- good luck making this thing fit. I hope there will be more useful HDMI &quot;dongles&quot; down the road, but this seems like a gimmicky fail to me.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So wait- if I&#8217;m reading this right- it needs to stream data from my mobile phone? I thought this would be great for traveling on business- but a cheap HDMI adapter and a handful of free apps on my phone work just as well. I switched to AppleTV from Roku months ago- so I can wirelessly stream at home too. Plus- if you have rear-facing HDMI ports on a wall-mounted HDTV- good luck making this thing fit. I hope there will be more useful HDMI &#8220;dongles&#8221; down the road, but this seems like a gimmicky fail to me.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ito Kagehisa</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html#comment-1310581</link>
		<dc:creator>Ito Kagehisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137194#comment-1310581</guid>
		<description>I got a Roku XS at solstice and it&#039;s useful for playing Angry Birds on a big screen (after you add a decent micro-SD card, that is).

Other than that, it&#039;s just a gateway to advertisements and pay-for-content services - notably inferior to the Logitech Revue, which I also own. 

I don&#039;t have a cell phone, though, so I was feeling left out on the whole Angry Birds thing.  Damn those egg-stealing pigs!  Birds will make you pay!

Edit 2 days later:   OK,  the Roku XS actually does have a reasonably easy way to add more free channels, so my second comment is not entirely correct.  However, there&#039;s nothing freely available to it that you can&#039;t get on the Revue, and it has a wiimote instead of a combined keyboard/remote like the Revue so it&#039;s only marginally better than a  normal TV remote for attempting any interaction beyond the &quot;point and grunt&quot; caveman interface.

Still rocks for Angry Birds, but the XS is a little pricey for a single game, especially after you add the micro-SD card to make it run at a reasonable speed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a Roku XS at solstice and it&#8217;s useful for playing Angry Birds on a big screen (after you add a decent micro-SD card, that is).</p>
<p>Other than that, it&#8217;s just a gateway to advertisements and pay-for-content services &#8211; notably inferior to the Logitech Revue, which I also own. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a cell phone, though, so I was feeling left out on the whole Angry Birds thing.  Damn those egg-stealing pigs!  Birds will make you pay!</p>
<p>Edit 2 days later:   OK,  the Roku XS actually does have a reasonably easy way to add more free channels, so my second comment is not entirely correct.  However, there&#8217;s nothing freely available to it that you can&#8217;t get on the Revue, and it has a wiimote instead of a combined keyboard/remote like the Revue so it&#8217;s only marginally better than a  normal TV remote for attempting any interaction beyond the &#8220;point and grunt&#8221; caveman interface.</p>
<p>Still rocks for Angry Birds, but the XS is a little pricey for a single game, especially after you add the micro-SD card to make it run at a reasonable speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html#comment-1310308</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137194#comment-1310308</guid>
		<description>Have you met the iTouch? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you met the iTouch? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html#comment-1310311</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137194#comment-1310311</guid>
		<description>they&#039;re not that similar as devices. AppleTV plays YOUR content real well. Roku plays OTHERS content real well.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they&#8217;re not that similar as devices. AppleTV plays YOUR content real well. Roku plays OTHERS content real well.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Pootel</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html#comment-1310274</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Pootel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137194#comment-1310274</guid>
		<description>My own experience with the cheap version of the Roku and Hulu+ is fine.  Something funky about your setup maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My own experience with the cheap version of the Roku and Hulu+ is fine.  Something funky about your setup maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Pootel</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html#comment-1310272</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Pootel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137194#comment-1310272</guid>
		<description>I assume you mean native TV support for captions (the TV&#039;s own built in display system).  A lot of the shows I watch on HULU have captions, which are provided by the HULU app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume you mean native TV support for captions (the TV&#8217;s own built in display system).  A lot of the shows I watch on HULU have captions, which are provided by the HULU app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Easton</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html#comment-1310221</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Easton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137194#comment-1310221</guid>
		<description>Not all DVDs store caption data the same way. While some store it in the MPEG-2 stream, others use the subtitle format where that data is stored in a separate file. So they aren&#039;t just stripping out data they already have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all DVDs store caption data the same way. While some store it in the MPEG-2 stream, others use the subtitle format where that data is stored in a separate file. So they aren&#8217;t just stripping out data they already have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zdislaw</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html#comment-1310215</link>
		<dc:creator>zdislaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137194#comment-1310215</guid>
		<description>I shudder to think how slow the Hulu+ interface will run on this one.  It&#039;s already nearly unusable on the regular Roku.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shudder to think how slow the Hulu+ interface will run on this one.  It&#8217;s already nearly unusable on the regular Roku.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hadlockk</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html#comment-1310181</link>
		<dc:creator>hadlockk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137194#comment-1310181</guid>
		<description>The next generation of HDMI dongles are going to look like the current gen bluetooth dongles - a small plug with a lip to get it out with your fingernail, but otherwise sitting flush with the device.

Presumably they&#039;re just streaming h.264 with some custom encryption scheme to the dongle (h.264 chips are cheeeeeap these days, and small). With Microsoft&#039;s Silverlight going the way of the dodo, I presume Netflix (which only uses Silverlight for PCs) streams h.264 (or similar) to mobile devices. Putting a h.264 smartphone chip in a dongle seems like a smart idea.

This may replace my mom&#039;s Apple TV (Apple TV doesn&#039;t support Hulu) this coming christmas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next generation of HDMI dongles are going to look like the current gen bluetooth dongles &#8211; a small plug with a lip to get it out with your fingernail, but otherwise sitting flush with the device.</p>
<p>Presumably they&#8217;re just streaming h.264 with some custom encryption scheme to the dongle (h.264 chips are cheeeeeap these days, and small). With Microsoft&#8217;s Silverlight going the way of the dodo, I presume Netflix (which only uses Silverlight for PCs) streams h.264 (or similar) to mobile devices. Putting a h.264 smartphone chip in a dongle seems like a smart idea.</p>
<p>This may replace my mom&#8217;s Apple TV (Apple TV doesn&#8217;t support Hulu) this coming christmas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackbird</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html#comment-1310172</link>
		<dc:creator>jackbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137194#comment-1310172</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s been my one huge gripe with the Roku, although it&#039;s clearly a problem at the content providers&#039; end - the TED Talks channel is fully captioned, for instance, and Netflix is about 50/50.  

Still, I don&#039;t understand why they are stripping out data that they clearly already have (since just about everything under the sun since the late 1960s is captioned), that takes up a tiny fraction of the stream&#039;s bandwidth, and opening themselves up to ADA lawsuits in the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s been my one huge gripe with the Roku, although it&#8217;s clearly a problem at the content providers&#8217; end &#8211; the TED Talks channel is fully captioned, for instance, and Netflix is about 50/50.  </p>
<p>Still, I don&#8217;t understand why they are stripping out data that they clearly already have (since just about everything under the sun since the late 1960s is captioned), that takes up a tiny fraction of the stream&#8217;s bandwidth, and opening themselves up to ADA lawsuits in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Easton</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html#comment-1310162</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Easton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137194#comment-1310162</guid>
		<description>My thoughts exactly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts exactly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdmikev</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html#comment-1310123</link>
		<dc:creator>sdmikev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137194#comment-1310123</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great idea, but I&#039;d rather have one that plugs into my home stereo receiver.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great idea, but I&#8217;d rather have one that plugs into my home stereo receiver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capl</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/04/137194.html#comment-1310116</link>
		<dc:creator>capl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137194#comment-1310116</guid>
		<description>But will it support Closed Captions? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But will it support Closed Captions? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
