<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EPA to fracking-polluted village: here&#039;s some clean water! 24 hours later: Oh hey,&#160;nevermind.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scav</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1319390</link>
		<dc:creator>scav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1319390</guid>
		<description>Lobster, are you subtly trolling me or what? Protons? I&#039;m going to guess you are, in which case: well played and have a nice day. ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lobster, are you subtly trolling me or what? Protons? I&#8217;m going to guess you are, in which case: well played and have a nice day. ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IronEdithKidd</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1318192</link>
		<dc:creator>IronEdithKidd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1318192</guid>
		<description>Technically, grey water is supposed to be water that&#039;s clean enough to release to surface waters, but not clean enough to be potable.  There shouldn&#039;t be any green cloud threats when you go to scrub the pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically, grey water is supposed to be water that&#8217;s clean enough to release to surface waters, but not clean enough to be potable.  There shouldn&#8217;t be any green cloud threats when you go to scrub the pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1318094</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1318094</guid>
		<description>And all this while, we have a gigantic coal mine, already built but going completely unused in Centralia, Pennsylvania.  

Who cares that it&#039;s on fire?  Advertise it as a feature!  Saves the customer a step.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And all this while, we have a gigantic coal mine, already built but going completely unused in Centralia, Pennsylvania.  </p>
<p>Who cares that it&#8217;s on fire?  Advertise it as a feature!  Saves the customer a step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1318091</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1318091</guid>
		<description>The fact that people sell tap water has nothing to do with having a dangerous surplus of tap water.  They sell it because other people buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that people sell tap water has nothing to do with having a dangerous surplus of tap water.  They sell it because other people buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1318087</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1318087</guid>
		<description>I guess the only problem with that is if someone uses a toilet cleaner that reacts with some other detergent already in the water.  Not insurmountable, as far as technical considerations go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the only problem with that is if someone uses a toilet cleaner that reacts with some other detergent already in the water.  Not insurmountable, as far as technical considerations go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1318085</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1318085</guid>
		<description>Your toilet spends 99% of its life doing absolutely nothing.  Do you really want a pool of standing toxic water in your home?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your toilet spends 99% of its life doing absolutely nothing.  Do you really want a pool of standing toxic water in your home?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1318082</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1318082</guid>
		<description>And what&#039;s to stop the fracking companies from buying the land NEXT to mine?

I drink your milkshake.  I DRINK IT UP!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what&#8217;s to stop the fracking companies from buying the land NEXT to mine?</p>
<p>I drink your milkshake.  I DRINK IT UP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1318080</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1318080</guid>
		<description>I think the &quot;point&quot; is that the market is not correcting this problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the &#8220;point&#8221; is that the market is not correcting this problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1318079</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1318079</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s so incriminating about doing something nice and not even a little bit court mandated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s so incriminating about doing something nice and not even a little bit court mandated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1318072</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1318072</guid>
		<description>Yes, you&#039;re right, and you can harvest uranium with your bare hands as long as you dodge the stray protons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you&#8217;re right, and you can harvest uranium with your bare hands as long as you dodge the stray protons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scav</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315862</link>
		<dc:creator>scav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315862</guid>
		<description>Oh FFS don&#039;t mention santorum under a photo of a foul and brownish cloudy liquid. Think of the google image search results! Eeew!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh FFS don&#8217;t mention santorum under a photo of a foul and brownish cloudy liquid. Think of the google image search results! Eeew!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scav</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315861</link>
		<dc:creator>scav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315861</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the water needs to be fresh water, and the chemicals doesn&#039;t need to be secret (although they probably aren&#039;t particularly terrifying, just protected as a trade secret). In any case, as I&#039;ve said: if those chemicals are getting out of the hydrocarbon reservoir in an uncontrolled way, then so are the hydrocarbons and you&#039;re doing it wrong.

There are all sorts of reasons why you might not want fracking to be used in a particular place (or by a particular company with a shitty safety record). I still draw the line before making it absolutely illegal in itself and under all circumstances.

Or rather, since I don&#039;t get any say in it really, all I&#039;m saying is I am not outraged that it is still legal. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the water needs to be fresh water, and the chemicals doesn&#8217;t need to be secret (although they probably aren&#8217;t particularly terrifying, just protected as a trade secret). In any case, as I&#8217;ve said: if those chemicals are getting out of the hydrocarbon reservoir in an uncontrolled way, then so are the hydrocarbons and you&#8217;re doing it wrong.</p>
<p>There are all sorts of reasons why you might not want fracking to be used in a particular place (or by a particular company with a shitty safety record). I still draw the line before making it absolutely illegal in itself and under all circumstances.</p>
<p>Or rather, since I don&#8217;t get any say in it really, all I&#8217;m saying is I am not outraged that it is still legal. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315853</link>
		<dc:creator>noen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315853</guid>
		<description>&quot;the real life application has proven otherwise&quot; -- Actually it has not. The EPA has yet to document any confirmed groundwater contamination from fracking operations .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the real life application has proven otherwise&#8221; &#8212; Actually it has not. The EPA has yet to document any confirmed groundwater contamination from fracking operations .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary herman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315782</link>
		<dc:creator>gary herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315782</guid>
		<description>scav-while the theoretical practice might not be inherently dangerous, the real life application has proven otherwise. there are other factors including the exorbitant amount of fresh water required for each frack (4 million gallons plus) and also the anonymous nature of the chemistry being injected into the earth. estimates for the marcellus shale in delaware county, NY is 10 billion gallons of fresh water over the next 10 years. i wonder how you&#039;d feel (hypothetically) if i leased a parcel next to yours and gave the go ahead to drill horizontally underneath your property? at what point do we draw the line? another dimock?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>scav-while the theoretical practice might not be inherently dangerous, the real life application has proven otherwise. there are other factors including the exorbitant amount of fresh water required for each frack (4 million gallons plus) and also the anonymous nature of the chemistry being injected into the earth. estimates for the marcellus shale in delaware county, NY is 10 billion gallons of fresh water over the next 10 years. i wonder how you&#8217;d feel (hypothetically) if i leased a parcel next to yours and gave the go ahead to drill horizontally underneath your property? at what point do we draw the line? another dimock?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeargDoom</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315617</link>
		<dc:creator>DeargDoom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315617</guid>
		<description>I dont think Nathan was talking about the surplus energy when he said waste. He clearly meant the energy &lt;i&gt;used&lt;/i&gt; by the sewage treatment process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think Nathan was talking about the surplus energy when he said waste. He clearly meant the energy <i>used</i> by the sewage treatment process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retepslluerb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315503</link>
		<dc:creator>retepslluerb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315503</guid>
		<description>In these here parts are sewage treatment plant that   sell the energy they create - the surplus, that is.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In these here parts are sewage treatment plant that   sell the energy they create &#8211; the surplus, that is.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hornby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315480</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hornby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315480</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not that it&#039;s hard to do, it&#039;s that it wastes an incredible amount of energy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not that it&#8217;s hard to do, it&#8217;s that it wastes an incredible amount of energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hornby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315477</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hornby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315477</guid>
		<description>You can get water systems that feed shower waste water to your cistern - you don&#039;t need to piss up a tree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can get water systems that feed shower waste water to your cistern &#8211; you don&#8217;t need to piss up a tree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315452</link>
		<dc:creator>noen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315452</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why in the hell hasn&#039;t the practice been outlawed yet?&quot;

Because there is simply no evidence that drilling 3000 ft deep harms ground water wells.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why in the hell hasn&#8217;t the practice been outlawed yet?&#8221;</p>
<p>Because there is simply no evidence that drilling 3000 ft deep harms ground water wells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315439</link>
		<dc:creator>noen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315439</guid>
		<description>Brian Dunning&#039;s podcast Skeptiod #275 &lt;a href=&quot;http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4275&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;All About Fracking&lt;/a&gt; is very good.

&quot;At this time, the EPA is in the midst of a major investigation into the safety of groundwater supplies that may be affected by fracking. Unfortunately it moves at government speeds; the investigation is due to last through 2012 with a report due in 2014. In the meantime, the good news is that the EPA has yet to document any confirmed groundwater contamination from fracking operations. Even the Duke University study found no evidence at all of any fracking fluid in any of the wells they sampled. However, there have been a number of cases of contamination from accidental surface spills, similar to what we see from virtually every industry that transports and pumps liquids.&quot;

The videos showing people lighting their tap water on fire are deliberately misleading as there have long been areas in the US where well water is naturally contaminated by underlying deposits. People in that area were able to light their well water on fire long before fracking. That&#039;s why the oil companies are interested in their land in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian Dunning&#8217;s podcast Skeptiod #275 <a href="http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4275" rel="nofollow">All About Fracking</a> is very good.</p>
<p>&#8220;At this time, the EPA is in the midst of a major investigation into the safety of groundwater supplies that may be affected by fracking. Unfortunately it moves at government speeds; the investigation is due to last through 2012 with a report due in 2014. In the meantime, the good news is that the EPA has yet to document any confirmed groundwater contamination from fracking operations. Even the Duke University study found no evidence at all of any fracking fluid in any of the wells they sampled. However, there have been a number of cases of contamination from accidental surface spills, similar to what we see from virtually every industry that transports and pumps liquids.&#8221;</p>
<p>The videos showing people lighting their tap water on fire are deliberately misleading as there have long been areas in the US where well water is naturally contaminated by underlying deposits. People in that area were able to light their well water on fire long before fracking. That&#8217;s why the oil companies are interested in their land in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navin_Johnson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315419</link>
		<dc:creator>Navin_Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315419</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;you may want to look at history before you implement a society on such a splendid scheme.&lt;/i&gt;

Exactly, this glorious disaster has already existed, and it took years and years of struggle and death to wrest some control from private business.  Of course, now we&#039;ve been slowly heading back toward that small government nightmare for decades.

Yes, things were wonderful when &quot;Big Government&quot; didn&#039;t get in the way of business.  Remember the awesome pollution free,  awesome labor conditions of the Gilded Age?  Robber barons, murderous private police , goon squads, child labor.....  

Ironically, if you want to see how business works almost completely unfettered, you only have to go to the manufacturing district in China.  

Libertarianism, much like a communism requires a convenient dismissal of human history, human nature, and the very function of capitalism.  When it all goes wrong we can just say that &#039;the conditions weren&#039;t right&#039;..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>you may want to look at history before you implement a society on such a splendid scheme.</i></p>
<p>Exactly, this glorious disaster has already existed, and it took years and years of struggle and death to wrest some control from private business.  Of course, now we&#8217;ve been slowly heading back toward that small government nightmare for decades.</p>
<p>Yes, things were wonderful when &#8220;Big Government&#8221; didn&#8217;t get in the way of business.  Remember the awesome pollution free,  awesome labor conditions of the Gilded Age?  Robber barons, murderous private police , goon squads, child labor&#8230;..  </p>
<p>Ironically, if you want to see how business works almost completely unfettered, you only have to go to the manufacturing district in China.  </p>
<p>Libertarianism, much like a communism requires a convenient dismissal of human history, human nature, and the very function of capitalism.  When it all goes wrong we can just say that &#8216;the conditions weren&#8217;t right&#8217;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wysinwyg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315417</link>
		<dc:creator>wysinwyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315417</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If you think that the private property rights of some peasant are as important as the private property rights of a multi-billion entity, you may want to look at history before you implement a society on such a splendid scheme.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Well, the &quot;peasant&quot; needs a place to live and needs clean water to drink and healthful food to eat whereas the &quot;multi-billion entity&quot; needs none of those things and is in fact a legal fiction.  So I completely disagree, the property rights of the &quot;peasant&quot; are much more important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If you think that the private property rights of some peasant are as important as the private property rights of a multi-billion entity, you may want to look at history before you implement a society on such a splendid scheme.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, the &#8220;peasant&#8221; needs a place to live and needs clean water to drink and healthful food to eat whereas the &#8220;multi-billion entity&#8221; needs none of those things and is in fact a legal fiction.  So I completely disagree, the property rights of the &#8220;peasant&#8221; are much more important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315410</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315410</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry, I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll keep it tied up in the courts until they&#039;re done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry, I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll keep it tied up in the courts until they&#8217;re done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donovan acree</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315385</link>
		<dc:creator>donovan acree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315385</guid>
		<description>Without the EPA, the homeowner would be free to sue the pants off the company causing them harm. As it is now, the EPA is protecting the company by approving their operations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without the EPA, the homeowner would be free to sue the pants off the company causing them harm. As it is now, the EPA is protecting the company by approving their operations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IronEdithKidd</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315362</link>
		<dc:creator>IronEdithKidd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315362</guid>
		<description>Are we really that stupid?

Yes.  I present as evidence: ICBMs armed with 1.2 megaton nuclear warheads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we really that stupid?</p>
<p>Yes.  I present as evidence: ICBMs armed with 1.2 megaton nuclear warheads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bcsizemo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315354</link>
		<dc:creator>bcsizemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315354</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard if you detonate an atomic bomb at the right height above sand it&#039;ll turn it to glass.  Looks like an excellent high volume business to me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard if you detonate an atomic bomb at the right height above sand it&#8217;ll turn it to glass.  Looks like an excellent high volume business to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IronEdithKidd</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315346</link>
		<dc:creator>IronEdithKidd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315346</guid>
		<description>Duel systems are being installed/have been installed in SoCal.  Let&#039;s just pretend that&#039;s where Craig lives.  
 
I live in MI with bajillions of gallons of fresh water and I agree in principle that toilets should use grey water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duel systems are being installed/have been installed in SoCal.  Let&#8217;s just pretend that&#8217;s where Craig lives. <br />
 <br />
I live in MI with bajillions of gallons of fresh water and I agree in principle that toilets should use grey water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fluxivit y</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315281</link>
		<dc:creator>fluxivit y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315281</guid>
		<description>Its like Jesus said: &quot;Whatsoever you do to the least of my groundwater...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its like Jesus said: &#8220;Whatsoever you do to the least of my groundwater&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OtherMichael</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315270</link>
		<dc:creator>OtherMichael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315270</guid>
		<description>charmingly, most of the jobs are for out-of-staters, who while they do spend money on food and lodging and transportation, still spend and send the bulk of it out-of-state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>charmingly, most of the jobs are for out-of-staters, who while they do spend money on food and lodging and transportation, still spend and send the bulk of it out-of-state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scav</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/epa-to-fracking-polluted-villa.html#comment-1315255</link>
		<dc:creator>scav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=138006#comment-1315255</guid>
		<description>Because it isn&#039;t inherently dangerous. The point of fracking is to fracture the rocks in a hydrocarbon reservoir so the oil or gas can flow more easily to the well where it is being extracted.  There is no way the reservoir should be in contact with groundwater or porous water-bearing rock, otherwise all the hydrocarbons would have leaked out already. After all, they have had millions of years to escape if that were the case.

Usually the oil/gas is way, *way* below groundwater or aquifer level trapped under an impervious layer of rock.

If you fracture the impervious rock trapping the hydrocarbon deposits, or have a leak from your well into groundwater you&#039;re indisputably Doing It Wrong.

Which is not to say that when someone is doing it wrong they shouldn&#039;t be held responsible - of course they should. But you shouldn&#039;t flat-out outlaw everything that someone might do ineptly and thereby cause harm.  That would outlaw all the cool stuff like 3d printers and probably C compilers too :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it isn&#8217;t inherently dangerous. The point of fracking is to fracture the rocks in a hydrocarbon reservoir so the oil or gas can flow more easily to the well where it is being extracted.  There is no way the reservoir should be in contact with groundwater or porous water-bearing rock, otherwise all the hydrocarbons would have leaked out already. After all, they have had millions of years to escape if that were the case.</p>
<p>Usually the oil/gas is way, *way* below groundwater or aquifer level trapped under an impervious layer of rock.</p>
<p>If you fracture the impervious rock trapping the hydrocarbon deposits, or have a leak from your well into groundwater you&#8217;re indisputably Doing It Wrong.</p>
<p>Which is not to say that when someone is doing it wrong they shouldn&#8217;t be held responsible &#8211; of course they should. But you shouldn&#8217;t flat-out outlaw everything that someone might do ineptly and thereby cause harm.  That would outlaw all the cool stuff like 3d printers and probably C compilers too :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
