<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meteorological paintings of the Tunguska&#160;Event</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/meteorological-paintings-of-th.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/meteorological-paintings-of-th.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Perriman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/meteorological-paintings-of-th.html#comment-1314619</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Perriman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137756#comment-1314619</guid>
		<description>I demand a cut of your profits ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I demand a cut of your profits ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AbdulAlhazred</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/meteorological-paintings-of-th.html#comment-1314591</link>
		<dc:creator>AbdulAlhazred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137756#comment-1314591</guid>
		<description>What do you mean? Are we to conclude there was no mystery simply because there has been research done and plausible or even proven explanations exist? What would the popsci channels and magazines do all day if we actually corrected misconceptions!?
You can&#039;t prove it didn&#039;t happen in a completely preposterous manner that is indistinguishable from it not happening that way!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean? Are we to conclude there was no mystery simply because there has been research done and plausible or even proven explanations exist? What would the popsci channels and magazines do all day if we actually corrected misconceptions!?<br />
You can&#8217;t prove it didn&#8217;t happen in a completely preposterous manner that is indistinguishable from it not happening that way!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marja Erwin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/meteorological-paintings-of-th.html#comment-1314583</link>
		<dc:creator>Marja Erwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137756#comment-1314583</guid>
		<description>According to Wikipedia, there&#039;s ongoing controversy over whether it was an asteroid or a comet. Apparently, nickel and iron anomalies in the soil and in tree resin suggest an asteroid, or perhaps a cometary nucleus, while the air-burst explosion and atmospheric effects suggest a comet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Wikipedia, there&#8217;s ongoing controversy over whether it was an asteroid or a comet. Apparently, nickel and iron anomalies in the soil and in tree resin suggest an asteroid, or perhaps a cometary nucleus, while the air-burst explosion and atmospheric effects suggest a comet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AbdulAlhazred</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/meteorological-paintings-of-th.html#comment-1314584</link>
		<dc:creator>AbdulAlhazred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137756#comment-1314584</guid>
		<description>Suddenly I just got a great idea for an alternate history short story! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suddenly I just got a great idea for an alternate history short story! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Breece</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/meteorological-paintings-of-th.html#comment-1314580</link>
		<dc:creator>David Breece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137756#comment-1314580</guid>
		<description>The Doctor likely had something to do with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Doctor likely had something to do with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noctilucent Studios</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/meteorological-paintings-of-th.html#comment-1314532</link>
		<dc:creator>Noctilucent Studios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137756#comment-1314532</guid>
		<description>I think I read once that if the alien starship, I mean,&quot;asteroid&quot; had arrived a few hours earlier it would&#039;ve wiped London off the map.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I read once that if the alien starship, I mean,&#8221;asteroid&#8221; had arrived a few hours earlier it would&#8217;ve wiped London off the map.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Perriman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/meteorological-paintings-of-th.html#comment-1314531</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Perriman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137756#comment-1314531</guid>
		<description>This got me to wondering: if the asteroid had been a few hours earlier or later, what could it have hit?
While most of the planet at around 60° is wilderness (Russia and northern Canada) or ocean, Oslo, Stockholm, Saint Petersburg and Anchorage are all within a degree or so of the impact site.
How would world history have been different if a major city had been wiped off the map in 1908? would the outcome of WWI or the Russian revolution have been different if they had been dealing with the destruction of St Petersburg just a few years previously?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This got me to wondering: if the asteroid had been a few hours earlier or later, what could it have hit?<br />
While most of the planet at around 60° is wilderness (Russia and northern Canada) or ocean, Oslo, Stockholm, Saint Petersburg and Anchorage are all within a degree or so of the impact site.<br />
How would world history have been different if a major city had been wiped off the map in 1908? would the outcome of WWI or the Russian revolution have been different if they had been dealing with the destruction of St Petersburg just a few years previously?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadreck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/meteorological-paintings-of-th.html#comment-1314520</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadreck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137756#comment-1314520</guid>
		<description>Of course it was an asteroid.  Prof. Moriarity laid a set of clues which posthumously lured Sherlock Holmes to the Tunguska region on the day of the impact in a failsafe assassination attempt.  The Prof had previous calculated the impact zone and date based on his classic paper &quot;The Dynamics of an Asteroid&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it was an asteroid.  Prof. Moriarity laid a set of clues which posthumously lured Sherlock Holmes to the Tunguska region on the day of the impact in a failsafe assassination attempt.  The Prof had previous calculated the impact zone and date based on his classic paper &#8220;The Dynamics of an Asteroid&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moriarty</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/meteorological-paintings-of-th.html#comment-1314505</link>
		<dc:creator>Moriarty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137756#comment-1314505</guid>
		<description>No! It was caused when NIKOLA TESLA created a BLACK HOLE with ALIEN TECHNOLOGY. Sheerson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No! It was caused when NIKOLA TESLA created a BLACK HOLE with ALIEN TECHNOLOGY. Sheerson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Shevett</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/09/meteorological-paintings-of-th.html#comment-1314491</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Shevett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=137756#comment-1314491</guid>
		<description>*sigh* - the mystery here has so long been solved... and I wish media wouldn&#039;t keep reporting this as some big scary puzzle that scientists still haven&#039;t solved.  Really, it&#039;s solved.  It was a few dozen meter diameter asteroid that exploded 6-10 miles off the ground.  This is backed up by fragments of meteorite found in the blast area, and the eye witnesses showing the re-entry track before the explosion.   These are even shown in the paintings above.  

It&#039;s not a mystery.  It&#039;s an asteroid.  Can we move on please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh* &#8211; the mystery here has so long been solved&#8230; and I wish media wouldn&#8217;t keep reporting this as some big scary puzzle that scientists still haven&#8217;t solved.  Really, it&#8217;s solved.  It was a few dozen meter diameter asteroid that exploded 6-10 miles off the ground.  This is backed up by fragments of meteorite found in the blast area, and the eye witnesses showing the re-entry track before the explosion.   These are even shown in the paintings above.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a mystery.  It&#8217;s an asteroid.  Can we move on please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
