<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poor Chris&#160;Dodd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Michael Ranapia</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326918</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Michael Ranapia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326918</guid>
		<description>Yup - and it&#039;s not as if the actual statement was the work of some cyber-anarchist scrawling REDRUM on the walls of his cubicle in his own poop.  In politics, as in life, you&#039;ve sometimes just got to accept you&#039;ve lost this round and try to move on with a modicum of good grace.  

It&#039;s also a no-brainer that you never, ever make threats you&#039;re not absolutely certain you can deliver on.  Dodd doesn&#039;t speak for &#039;Hollywood&#039;. He knows that; even worse, so does the White House.  Loser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup &#8211; and it&#8217;s not as if the actual statement was the work of some cyber-anarchist scrawling REDRUM on the walls of his cubicle in his own poop.  In politics, as in life, you&#8217;ve sometimes just got to accept you&#8217;ve lost this round and try to move on with a modicum of good grace.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also a no-brainer that you never, ever make threats you&#8217;re not absolutely certain you can deliver on.  Dodd doesn&#8217;t speak for &#8216;Hollywood&#8217;. He knows that; even worse, so does the White House.  Loser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326907</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326907</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;...that there are plenty of hard working people whose livelihoods might be on the line if the investors in Hollywood decides that the payout isn&#039;t worth the risk of funding entertainment because of piracy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;If those investors were capable of coming up with another way to make money, they would have updated Hollywood&#039;s business plan to accommodate current technology instead of whining about how they&#039;re being &#039;pirated&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;that there are plenty of hard working people whose livelihoods might be on the line if the investors in Hollywood decides that the payout isn&#8217;t worth the risk of funding entertainment because of piracy.</p></blockquote>
<p>If those investors were capable of coming up with another way to make money, they would have updated Hollywood&#8217;s business plan to accommodate current technology instead of whining about how they&#8217;re being &#8216;pirated&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That_Anonymous_Coward</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326660</link>
		<dc:creator>That_Anonymous_Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326660</guid>
		<description>No they interviews Zuzu and her petals around the holidays...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No they interviews Zuzu and her petals around the holidays&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phisrow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326656</link>
		<dc:creator>phisrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326656</guid>
		<description>I wonder if he believes what the hookers say about his unbelievable prowess, as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if he believes what the hookers say about his unbelievable prowess, as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnthonyW</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326629</link>
		<dc:creator>AnthonyW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326629</guid>
		<description>This is not about piracy, it&#039;s about greed.  There are already many anti-piracy law&#039;s in effect.  Just look back and see how sites like napster have been hit when crossing the line.  No this is about the media&#039;s ability to crush any form of competition or decenision.  To maintain control over anchient movie titles purely for greed.  We are talking about an industry that still charges $20.00 for a DVD of &quot;White Christmas&quot;, a 55 year old movie where everybody associated with the movie is dead.  All the royalties going to a select few and this DOES NOT include movie aides or gaffs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not about piracy, it&#8217;s about greed.  There are already many anti-piracy law&#8217;s in effect.  Just look back and see how sites like napster have been hit when crossing the line.  No this is about the media&#8217;s ability to crush any form of competition or decenision.  To maintain control over anchient movie titles purely for greed.  We are talking about an industry that still charges $20.00 for a DVD of &#8220;White Christmas&#8221;, a 55 year old movie where everybody associated with the movie is dead.  All the royalties going to a select few and this DOES NOT include movie aides or gaffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phisrow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326596</link>
		<dc:creator>phisrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326596</guid>
		<description>It does seem deeply foolish(I&#039;m assuming severe overconfidence caught them by surprise).

Tactically, the &#039;correct&#039;(if evil) move at this point would be to STFU about the issue and quietly kick it to some obscure trade tribunal with zero public input, an unpronounceable acronym that even policy wonks can&#039;t remember, and alarmingly broad powers. Once they&#039;ve quietly hammered out a &#039;framework&#039; that is based on &#039;consultations&#039; with the &#039;stakeholders&#039; it can be silently voted on somewhere, ratified by executive order under some sort of  &#039;fast track authority&#039; and then the domestic laws of various western nations and allies can be &#039;harmonized&#039; with the new treaty obligation.

After the surprisingly swift and vicious public backlash, whining on national TV about how mean your enemies are just seems absurd...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does seem deeply foolish(I&#8217;m assuming severe overconfidence caught them by surprise).</p>
<p>Tactically, the &#8216;correct&#8217;(if evil) move at this point would be to STFU about the issue and quietly kick it to some obscure trade tribunal with zero public input, an unpronounceable acronym that even policy wonks can&#8217;t remember, and alarmingly broad powers. Once they&#8217;ve quietly hammered out a &#8216;framework&#8217; that is based on &#8216;consultations&#8217; with the &#8216;stakeholders&#8217; it can be silently voted on somewhere, ratified by executive order under some sort of  &#8217;fast track authority&#8217; and then the domestic laws of various western nations and allies can be &#8216;harmonized&#8217; with the new treaty obligation.</p>
<p>After the surprisingly swift and vicious public backlash, whining on national TV about how mean your enemies are just seems absurd&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jer_00</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326595</link>
		<dc:creator>Jer_00</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326595</guid>
		<description>But the overall point - which is actually a decent one - is that there are plenty of hard working people whose livelihoods might be on the line if the investors in Hollywood decides that the payout isn&#039;t worth the risk of funding entertainment because of piracy.

Now this argument is one that could be made with actual data, and it&#039;s telling that it ISN&#039;T being made that way.  Instead it&#039;s being supported by made up figures about piracy and imagined pie-in-the-sky scenarios about how much the studios &quot;could&quot; have made if only the evil pirates hadn&#039;t &quot;stolen&quot; so much material.

But it is something that needs to be addressed.  Because the whole Hollywood machine right now works because investors dump massive amounts of capital into the system to keep it running on the promise that there will be massive, massive payouts in return.  If those massive, massive payouts become just masstive payouts, some average regular people are probably going to lose jobs.  (I&#039;d like to believe that the CEOs of the studios will be forced to take a paycut, but I&#039;ve lived more than 40 years on this planet now and I know that that idea is so laughably idealistic that I can only consider it in my occasional daydreams these days.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the overall point &#8211; which is actually a decent one &#8211; is that there are plenty of hard working people whose livelihoods might be on the line if the investors in Hollywood decides that the payout isn&#8217;t worth the risk of funding entertainment because of piracy.</p>
<p>Now this argument is one that could be made with actual data, and it&#8217;s telling that it ISN&#8217;T being made that way.  Instead it&#8217;s being supported by made up figures about piracy and imagined pie-in-the-sky scenarios about how much the studios &#8220;could&#8221; have made if only the evil pirates hadn&#8217;t &#8220;stolen&#8221; so much material.</p>
<p>But it is something that needs to be addressed.  Because the whole Hollywood machine right now works because investors dump massive amounts of capital into the system to keep it running on the promise that there will be massive, massive payouts in return.  If those massive, massive payouts become just masstive payouts, some average regular people are probably going to lose jobs.  (I&#8217;d like to believe that the CEOs of the studios will be forced to take a paycut, but I&#8217;ve lived more than 40 years on this planet now and I know that that idea is so laughably idealistic that I can only consider it in my occasional daydreams these days.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elix</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326571</link>
		<dc:creator>elix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326571</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m waiting for some movies actually worth going to see in theatres. I haven&#039;t paid out the nose for the luxury of being shown a ton of ads and being accused of being a pirate for paying to enter for the better part of a decade, and I&#039;m not missing it at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m waiting for some movies actually worth going to see in theatres. I haven&#8217;t paid out the nose for the luxury of being shown a ton of ads and being accused of being a pirate for paying to enter for the better part of a decade, and I&#8217;m not missing it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phisrow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326569</link>
		<dc:creator>phisrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326569</guid>
		<description>Why is it that the people who have least to pity themselves about are always &lt;i&gt;so damn good&lt;/i&gt; at nauseous self-pity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that the people who have least to pity themselves about are always <i>so damn good</i> at nauseous self-pity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That_Anonymous_Coward</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326564</link>
		<dc:creator>That_Anonymous_Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326564</guid>
		<description>One wonders if off camera we couldn&#039;t see his aide holding up a card showing how many zeros were on the new check they were writing to get him to stay bought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One wonders if off camera we couldn&#8217;t see his aide holding up a card showing how many zeros were on the new check they were writing to get him to stay bought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wreckrob8</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326545</link>
		<dc:creator>Wreckrob8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326545</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t he copy Shakespeare and Hollywood?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t he copy Shakespeare and Hollywood?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Bueche</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326496</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Bueche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326496</guid>
		<description>If piracy is allowed to continue exactly the way it has been, the movie industry will be... exactly as it is now. Entertainment continues to be doing very well thank you. I am not saying piracy is legitimate - it is not. But it is also not causing any perceivable harm to the movie industry. (Remember 2011 when no movies were released?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If piracy is allowed to continue exactly the way it has been, the movie industry will be&#8230; exactly as it is now. Entertainment continues to be doing very well thank you. I am not saying piracy is legitimate &#8211; it is not. But it is also not causing any perceivable harm to the movie industry. (Remember 2011 when no movies were released?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Chemist</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326493</link>
		<dc:creator>The Chemist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326493</guid>
		<description>I have no problem believing it. Gaffers and grips don&#039;t exactly earn royalties. But it doesn&#039;t help support his point- because it&#039;s not like they earn royalties. So they get paid the same whether or not the movie makes a profit, nevermind piracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no problem believing it. Gaffers and grips don&#8217;t exactly earn royalties. But it doesn&#8217;t help support his point- because it&#8217;s not like they earn royalties. So they get paid the same whether or not the movie makes a profit, nevermind piracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326478</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326478</guid>
		<description>Nope, but I am recommending that if Dodd is so terribly upset... he should consider stabbing himself in the stomach in shame repeatedly until he dies.  I figure he&#039;s pretty good at stabbing.  After all, he stabbed the back of the American public with no prob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, but I am recommending that if Dodd is so terribly upset&#8230; he should consider stabbing himself in the stomach in shame repeatedly until he dies.  I figure he&#8217;s pretty good at stabbing.  After all, he stabbed the back of the American public with no prob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sum One</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326454</link>
		<dc:creator>Sum One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326454</guid>
		<description>So we should just pirate Kurosawa films?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So we should just pirate Kurosawa films?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326425</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 02:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326425</guid>
		<description>Did it and spread it.  It&#039;s up to 12,473 sigs now.  Needs more, though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did it and spread it.  It&#8217;s up to 12,473 sigs now.  Needs more, though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326424</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326424</guid>
		<description>Maybe we should become less like modern China and more like old Japan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe we should become less like modern China and more like old Japan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aphid</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326422</link>
		<dc:creator>aphid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 02:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326422</guid>
		<description>As someone who watched the entirety Dodd&#039;s heroic filibuster of his own party against telecom immunity for warrantless wiretapping, I&#039;m saddened and disgusted to see what he&#039;s become.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who watched the entirety Dodd&#8217;s heroic filibuster of his own party against telecom immunity for warrantless wiretapping, I&#8217;m saddened and disgusted to see what he&#8217;s become.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimmerSD</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326411</link>
		<dc:creator>JimmerSD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 02:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326411</guid>
		<description>They have no justification for their position. They knew that the public would balk at it when the truth came out so that&#039;s why they tried to ram this crap through beneath the radar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have no justification for their position. They knew that the public would balk at it when the truth came out so that&#8217;s why they tried to ram this crap through beneath the radar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Michael Ranapia</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326386</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Michael Ranapia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326386</guid>
		<description>Leading the news: Numbers pulled out of lobbyist&#039;s arse smell funky.  No pictures at eleven, because we&#039;re both ultimately employed by the same people. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leading the news: Numbers pulled out of lobbyist&#8217;s arse smell funky.  No pictures at eleven, because we&#8217;re both ultimately employed by the same people. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Michael Ranapia</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326385</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Michael Ranapia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326385</guid>
		<description>If I was Chris Dodd, the only job I&#039;d be worried about is my own.  Even if I was a SOPA/PIPA fan (and I&#039;m not) this guy is the Uwe Boll of lobbyists.  Your legislative agenda is falling apart around you, and your best move is to go on Fox News and have a public tantrum at the President for the unspeakable sin of making a (pretty mild) statement you dislike?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I was Chris Dodd, the only job I&#8217;d be worried about is my own.  Even if I was a SOPA/PIPA fan (and I&#8217;m not) this guy is the Uwe Boll of lobbyists.  Your legislative agenda is falling apart around you, and your best move is to go on Fox News and have a public tantrum at the President for the unspeakable sin of making a (pretty mild) statement you dislike?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326366</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326366</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s bemoaning that he has to bribe &quot;fact-checkers&quot; and Congresscritters instead of hitting &quot;submit&quot; on bogus testimony and press releases.  It would be sooo much easier if he could just post as Anonymous Coward!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s bemoaning that he has to bribe &#8220;fact-checkers&#8221; and Congresscritters instead of hitting &#8220;submit&#8221; on bogus testimony and press releases.  It would be sooo much easier if he could just post as Anonymous Coward!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326354</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326354</guid>
		<description>Thank you for posting that link!

Here&#039;s the lead sentence (in the paragraph after the topic is introduced):

&quot;Three widely cited U.S. government estimates of economic losses resulting from counterfeiting cannot be substantiated due to the absence of underlying studies.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for posting that link!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the lead sentence (in the paragraph after the topic is introduced):</p>
<p>&#8220;Three widely cited U.S. government estimates of economic losses resulting from counterfeiting cannot be substantiated due to the absence of underlying studies.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucian Armasu</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326337</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucian Armasu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326337</guid>
		<description>How about we use the fact checkers to fact check MPAA&#039;s ultra bogus numbers about &quot;losses due to piracy&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about we use the fact checkers to fact check MPAA&#8217;s ultra bogus numbers about &#8220;losses due to piracy&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathan1234</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326328</link>
		<dc:creator>mathan1234</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326328</guid>
		<description>I wish everyone would go sign that petition about him at whitehouse.gov

https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions/!/petition/investigate-chris-dodd-and-mpaa-bribery-after-he-publicly-admited-bribing-politicans-pass/DffX0YQv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish everyone would go sign that petition about him at whitehouse.gov</p>
<p><a href="https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions/!/petition/investigate-chris-dodd-and-mpaa-bribery-after-he-publicly-admited-bribing-politicans-pass/DffX0YQv" rel="nofollow">https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions/!/petition/investigate-chris-dodd-and-mpaa-bribery-after-he-publicly-admited-bribing-politicans-pass/DffX0YQv</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finnagain</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326312</link>
		<dc:creator>Finnagain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326312</guid>
		<description>Pay per view!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pay per view!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LightningRose</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326308</link>
		<dc:creator>LightningRose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326308</guid>
		<description>He should do the honorable thing. I&#039;d consider it a privilege to be his second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He should do the honorable thing. I&#8217;d consider it a privilege to be his second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talon</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326306</link>
		<dc:creator>Talon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326306</guid>
		<description>And Chris Dodd makes his facts up.  Here is a Govt. Accountability Office investigation into the &quot;facts&quot; surrounding this legislation: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-423</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Chris Dodd makes his facts up.  Here is a Govt. Accountability Office investigation into the &#8220;facts&#8221; surrounding this legislation: <a href="http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-423" rel="nofollow">http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-423</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: travtastic</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326297</link>
		<dc:creator>travtastic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326297</guid>
		<description>Last I remember seeing: overall median ~$26k, useless &#039;average&#039; ~$46k, middle-aged dudes somewhere between those two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last I remember seeing: overall median ~$26k, useless &#8216;average&#8217; ~$46k, middle-aged dudes somewhere between those two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thunderhammer</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/01/22/poor-chris-dodd.html#comment-1326289</link>
		<dc:creator>thunderhammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=140069#comment-1326289</guid>
		<description>So let&#039;s say that 100,000 hypothetical college students pay for a copy of Avatar instead of pirating it.  How many $55,000/yr entertainment industry jobs will not be destroyed?  Or would all that extra profit just go to James Cameron and various distributors, investors, etc?

Asking for a friend.  100,000 of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So let&#8217;s say that 100,000 hypothetical college students pay for a copy of Avatar instead of pirating it.  How many $55,000/yr entertainment industry jobs will not be destroyed?  Or would all that extra profit just go to James Cameron and various distributors, investors, etc?</p>
<p>Asking for a friend.  100,000 of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
