<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TechCrunch not dead&#160;yet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/02/28/paid.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/02/28/paid.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 12:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhotogTech</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/02/28/paid.html#comment-1358123</link>
		<dc:creator>PhotogTech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=146235#comment-1358123</guid>
		<description>Funnily enough I just a few minutes ago unsubscribed from the TechCrunch RSS feed
They&#039;ve been posting even more shit than usual recently and posting far to many articles in total
My RSS rules are &quot;shit articles + too many articles = Unsubscribe&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funnily enough I just a few minutes ago unsubscribed from the TechCrunch RSS feed<br />
They&#8217;ve been posting even more shit than usual recently and posting far to many articles in total<br />
My RSS rules are &#8220;shit articles + too many articles = Unsubscribe&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sofong</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/02/28/paid.html#comment-1356469</link>
		<dc:creator>sofong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=146235#comment-1356469</guid>
		<description>http://technorati.com/blogs/top100/ Lists TechCrunch as #4 +1 for this week. That&#039;s all the blogs. Boingboing is #8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://technorati.com/blogs/top100/" rel="nofollow">http://technorati.com/blogs/top100/</a> Lists TechCrunch as #4 +1 for this week. That&#8217;s all the blogs. Boingboing is #8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/02/28/paid.html#comment-1356454</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=146235#comment-1356454</guid>
		<description>&quot;they tend to give lowball figures for sites who don&#039;t sign up for (or stop using) expensive direct measurement services&quot;

Load TechCrunch.com. View source. Search for &quot;scorecardresearch.com&quot; or &quot;COMSCORE.&quot; Beacon fires with the pageload. There could be sampling happening but direct measurement is available for the site.


 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;they tend to give lowball figures for sites who don&#8217;t sign up for (or stop using) expensive direct measurement services&#8221;</p>
<p>Load TechCrunch.com. View source. Search for &#8220;scorecardresearch.com&#8221; or &#8220;COMSCORE.&#8221; Beacon fires with the pageload. There could be sampling happening but direct measurement is available for the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliottw</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/02/28/paid.html#comment-1356388</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliottw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=146235#comment-1356388</guid>
		<description>Sounds like fairly ill-informed opinions about comScore. You could check with Nielsen Netratings for a second opinion. Or Alexa, which shows Techcrunch down 26% in just the past three months. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like fairly ill-informed opinions about comScore. You could check with Nielsen Netratings for a second opinion. Or Alexa, which shows Techcrunch down 26% in just the past three months. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ialreadyexist</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/02/28/paid.html#comment-1356347</link>
		<dc:creator>ialreadyexist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=146235#comment-1356347</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never read TechCrunch, but this doesn&#039;t surprise me.  It sounds very similar to what happened to Engadget.  Soon after Engadget was purchased by AOL, the suckage factor went way up, they seemed to encourage religious fanboy wars for the sake of clicks, and all their best writers left.

AOL - screwing up everything they touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never read TechCrunch, but this doesn&#8217;t surprise me.  It sounds very similar to what happened to Engadget.  Soon after Engadget was purchased by AOL, the suckage factor went way up, they seemed to encourage religious fanboy wars for the sake of clicks, and all their best writers left.</p>
<p>AOL &#8211; screwing up everything they touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haz 0</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/02/28/paid.html#comment-1356301</link>
		<dc:creator>Haz 0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=146235#comment-1356301</guid>
		<description>Probably has to do with Facebook-only commenting, and their fixation with flame wars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably has to do with Facebook-only commenting, and their fixation with flame wars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scatterfingers</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/02/28/paid.html#comment-1356272</link>
		<dc:creator>scatterfingers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=146235#comment-1356272</guid>
		<description>ComScore are a bunch of lying bastards whose continued existence is beyond a mystery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ComScore are a bunch of lying bastards whose continued existence is beyond a mystery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/02/28/paid.html#comment-1356159</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=146235#comment-1356159</guid>
		<description>Tech &#039;journalism&#039; actually is a lot of bullshit, at least according to 
http://www.realdanlyons.com/blog/2012/02/13/hit-men-click-whores-and-paid-apologists-welcome-to-the-silicon-cesspool/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tech &#8216;journalism&#8217; actually is a lot of bullshit, at least according to <br />
<a href="http://www.realdanlyons.com/blog/2012/02/13/hit-men-click-whores-and-paid-apologists-welcome-to-the-silicon-cesspool/" rel="nofollow">http://www.realdanlyons.com/blog/2012/02/13/hit-men-click-whores-and-paid-apologists-welcome-to-the-silicon-cesspool/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
